Home | Community | Message Board


Out-Grow.com - Mushroom Growing Kits & Supplies
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Invisibleusefulidiot
It's notfascist, it's...Neoconservative!

Registered: 11/21/02
Posts: 732
Scary how fear is being used to keep us in line
    #3302179 - 10/31/04 09:06 PM (13 years, 1 month ago)

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/editorial/outlook/2875279

Scary how fear is being used to keep us in line
By COREY ROBIN

Since Sept. 11, many on the left have accused the Bush administration of manipulating the fear of terrorism for political gain. Democrats denounce Karl Rove for drawing from a slush fund of popular anxiety to bankroll the president's re-election. Liberals decry the USA Patriot Act, arguing that Attorney General John Ashcroft has exploited widespread feelings of vulnerability to reverse decades of progress in the realm of civil liberties. Progressives generally agree the White House has tried to turn national security into a mute button, muffling criticism with charges of insufficient patriotism and warnings about demoralizing the troops.

But fear in the United States is not a government-run monopoly. It's a joint venture between the public and private sector. Sometimes employers benefit from this collusion, cashing in on the fear of terrorism to restrain combative unions and dissident employees. Other times the government benefits, for employers can do what public officials cannot: punish men and women for their political views. Like so much else in the United States, fear has been outsourced, and the price is paid in freedom.
ADVERTISEMENT

While color-coded alerts have little effect on most

people's lives, fear can have a real impact when leveraged by an employer. In spring 2002, for example, shipping companies on the West Coast braced for a bitter showdown with their dockworkers' unions at the negotiating table. Hoping to blunt labor's ultimate weapon -- the strike -- the shipping companies joined forces with the Gap, Mattel and Home Depot, which rely on imports from East Asia, and met with officials from the Office of Homeland Security and the departments of Commerce, Labor and Transportation.

Sympathetic to their concerns, the Bush administration declared the impending strike a threat to security and threatened the unions with a declaration of national emergency and the use of federal troops. Though Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld failed to cite any evidence that stopping imports of children's toys from the Philippines would harm the nation's safety -- and the dockworkers' unions promised to load and unload military shipments even if the ports were closed -- the invocation of national security worked. Talk of a strike ceased, and the unions eventually capitulated.

While in that instance the government mustered the public's fears on behalf of private interests, it has also relied upon private fears -- in the workplaces of even the most high-minded employers -- to pursue its goals. In August, the New York Times reported that the American Civil Liberties Union had signed an agreement promising the government not to employ anyone appearing on official watch lists of suspected supporters of terrorism. Not convicted or even suspected terrorists, but terrorism's suspected supporters, whose only crime might have been to donate money to humanitarian groups alleged to support terrorism -- or to share a name with someone who had. (Both Sen. Edward Kennedy and Georgia congressman John Lewis found themselves on the list at one point. In one of those bizarre moments when Kafka becomes comedy, ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero discovered he was on the list, too.)

Why had the ACLU made this promise? It wanted to participate in a government program allowing federal employees to make charitable donations to nonprofit organizations through payroll deductions, and the Bush administration had made refusing to hire anyone on the watch lists a condition of the nonprofits' participation.

As soon as The Times exposed the agreement, the ACLU rescinded it. But that didn't end the matter. As Romero said later on National Public Radio, some 2,000 nonprofit organizations -- including NPR -- receive money through the same contribution program and were expected to sign the same agreement to police their employees.

Though some might take delight at seeing the nation's premier civil liberties organization hoist on its own petard, the ACLU's collusion with the government reveals the dark side of American freedom. For all the legal constraints the Constitution puts on the government, we rarely recognize the ironic byproduct of those constraints: the subcontracting of coercion to the private sector. In its search for those who might be conspiring to attack the United States, the government lacked the evidence required by the Bill of Rights to prosecute individuals with suspicious associations and beliefs. So what did the government do? It asked private employers to use their power of hiring and firing -- which is not subject to the Bill of Rights -- to punish these individuals instead.

It's not just the war on terrorism that drives coercion into the workplace. Employers punish their employees for all sorts of political opinions. Just ask Lynne Gobbell. Last month, Slate reported that Gobbell's boss, Phil Geddes, owner of an Alabama company that makes insulation, fired her for driving to work with a Kerry-Edwards bumper sticker on her car.

Gobbell never proselytized on the job, but Geddes was a Bush supporter who had distributed a flier to his employees explaining why they should re-elect the president. Geddes wasn't bothered by his double standard, which allowed him but not Gobbell to campaign. The work site, after all, was his private property. Nor was he legally in the wrong, although bad publicity apparently led him to offer, through an intermediary, to rehire her. (Gobbell declined.) Strange as it may sound in the land of free speech, employers are generally entitled by law to hire and fire people on the basis of their political views.

At the dawn of American democracy, Alexander Hamilton acknowledged that economic sanctions could be a powerful weapon for suppressing unpopular views. "A power over a man's subsistence amounts to a power over his will," he wrote in the Federalist Papers.

More than two centuries later, Hamilton's insight still applies. And all of us suffer: When we aren't allowed to voice their heterodox beliefs without fear of retribution in the workplace -- according to the latest polls, only 22 percent of Alabama's voters support John Kerry -- we are deprived of the information and diverse views that are critical to democratic deliberation.

There's nothing really new or particularly Republican about this collaboration between the public and private sector. In the 1830s, as Alexis de Tocqueville traveled around the country, he asked a distinguished physician in Maryland why his colleagues publicly professed their belief in God when they so obviously had "numerous doubts on the subject of dogma." The man replied that if any doctor admitted he was an atheist, his "career would almost certainly be broken." Local ministers would warn parishioners that their doctor was an "unbeliever," and his practice would soon be finished.

In the early years of the Cold War, employers regularly used the fear of communism to stifle unions. Company supervisors kept track of the political beliefs of millions of employees (about 40 percent of the work force) and liberal groups swapped political information about their members with the FBI. So routine -- and bipartisan -- is this collusion between the public and private sector that we can give it a name: Fear, American Style.

Fear, American Style is neither part of a nefarious conspiracy nor a diabolical plot, but the result of people pursuing their interests. It's just business as usual, another day at the office, Adam Smith's Invisible Hand quietly -- and perversely -- at work.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblecarbonhoots
old hand

Registered: 09/11/01
Posts: 1,351
Loc: BC Canada
Re: Scary how fear is being used to keep us in line [Re: usefulidiot]
    #3302395 - 10/31/04 10:00 PM (13 years, 1 month ago)

Thank god in America YOU have the freedom to keep the lions share of wealth produced by the blood sweat and tears of many.

All that stands between these busted unions members and their American dream is a lack of self disipline.

Besides. The only real problem with the States is the left wing governments which rewards the losers and punishes the winners. That and the liberal media which lends the process legtimacy.


--------------------
  -I'd rather have a frontal lobotomy than a bottle in front of me

CANADIAN CENTER FOR POLICY ALTERNATIVES


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineDivided_Sky
Ten ThousandThings

Registered: 11/02/03
Posts: 3,171
Loc: The Shining Void
Last seen: 9 years, 6 months
Re: Scary how fear is being used to keep us in line [Re: carbonhoots]
    #3303017 - 11/01/04 12:51 AM (13 years, 1 month ago)

I found the title of the post to be very ironic.


--------------------
1. "After an hour I wasn't feeling anything so I decided to take another..."
2. "We were feeling pretty good so we decided to smoke a few bowls..."
3. "I had to be real quiet because my parents were asleep upstairs..."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineAaronEvil
The GuitarVillain
Male

Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 1,706
Loc: California
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
Re: Scary how fear is being used to keep us in line [Re: usefulidiot]
    #3303126 - 11/01/04 01:42 AM (13 years, 1 month ago)

My question to you, and put this article aside for a moment; how else would you keep someone in line? We use fear everyday to keep people in line. If you dont do your homework you are grounded. If you dont clean up you cant use the phone for a week. If you dont meet the deadline I will have to fire you. If you dont start showing up to work on time I will have to find someone else for the job. So, with that said how else do you keep people in line? I agree that this article is about an absurd use of fear to keep people in check with something they should not be in check about, but the topic of the thread suggests that you have a problem with all fear injected into people in hopes of keeping them in line with what they should be doing.


--------------------


There is not a lot of difference between a fox hole and a grave; but knowing that you dug your ditch and climbed in anyway.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineLearyfan
It's the psychedelic movement!
Male User Gallery

Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 30,382
Loc: High pride!
Last seen: 4 hours, 40 minutes
Re: Scary how fear is being used to keep us in line [Re: AaronEvil]
    #3303860 - 11/01/04 08:51 AM (13 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

AaronEvil said:
My question to you, and put this article aside for a moment; how else would you keep someone in line? We use fear everyday to keep people in line. If you dont do your homework you are grounded. If you dont clean up you cant use the phone for a week. If you dont meet the deadline I will have to fire you. If you dont start showing up to work on time I will have to find someone else for the job. So, with that said how else do you keep people in line? I agree that this article is about an absurd use of fear to keep people in check with something they should not be in check about, but the topic of the thread suggests that you have a problem with all fear injected into people in hopes of keeping them in line with what they should be doing.




I believe he means unnessessary fear.





--------------------
--------------------------------


Mp3 of the month: Brass Toads - In The Back Of My Mind



Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* REpublican FEAR MONGERING at its worst! KingOftheThing 1,725 18 01/04/08 08:14 PM
by kidaihuan
* some scary thoughts from the acceptance speech
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Simisu 2,623 63 11/10/08 10:01 AM
by johnm214
* Police chief's 'Orwellian' fears
( 1 2 all )
elbisivni 1,465 27 05/23/07 09:33 PM
by kotik
* US fears 'hell' of a response The_Red_Crayon 318 1 10/13/06 06:18 PM
by Fucknuckle
* The Politics Of Virus Fear... Anisotropic 668 16 11/04/05 02:07 PM
by Drink_Punk_Soda
* America lost because of fear.
( 1 2 3 all )
guri 2,039 54 11/04/04 05:17 AM
by AhronZombi
* Spineless Republicans fft2 605 12 07/27/04 01:02 PM
by Booger
* Series of documentaries about the use of fear for political gain discombobulate 340 1 07/10/07 01:50 AM
by Economist

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
562 topic views. 2 members, 0 guests and 5 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Crestline Sales - MycoPath
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2017 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.031 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 19 queries.