|
Vvellum
Stranger
Registered: 05/24/04
Posts: 10,920
|
vote here - the OFFICIAL shroomery election
#3275915 - 10/25/04 03:54 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
.
Mr. Michael J. Badnarik - Libertarian
|
|
President George W. Bush - Republican
|
|
Mr. David Keith Cobb - Green
|
|
Senator John Forbes Kerry - Democrat
|
|
Mr. Ralph Nader - Indepedent
|
|
Other/Write-In
|
| |
Votes accepted from (10/25/04 03:53 PM) to (11/02/04 11:59 PM) You must vote before you can view the results of this poll.
Edited by bi0 (10/31/04 01:22 PM)
|
Rose
Devil's Advocate
Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 22,518
Loc: Mod not God
Last seen: 1 year, 7 months
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: Vvellum]
#3275971 - 10/25/04 04:10 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Wow, right now, only Nader's behind Bush.
-------------------- Fiddlesticks.
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole
Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 9 months
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: Rose]
#3276441 - 10/25/04 06:12 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I fixed that
--------------------
|
KingOftheThing
the cool fool
Registered: 11/17/02
Posts: 27,397
Loc: USA
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: Vvellum]
#3276495 - 10/25/04 06:28 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
umm the 5 people that voted for bush should please commit suicide thanks
|
EonTan
bird
Registered: 08/18/04
Posts: 468
Loc: very south
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: Vvellum]
#3276518 - 10/25/04 06:35 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Badnarik hurts bush more then nader hurts kerry.
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole
Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 9 months
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: KingOftheThing]
#3276773 - 10/25/04 07:48 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
KingOftheThing said: umm the 5 people that voted for bush should please commit suicide thanks
Wow, how do you have time to intimidate voters in Florida, vandalize campaign headquarters all over the country and still post on the Shroomery? What a modern day superhero.
--------------------
|
Krishna
कृष्ण,LOL
Registered: 05/08/03
Posts: 23,285
Loc: oakland
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: zappaisgod]
#3276792 - 10/25/04 07:52 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
more people at the shroomery are republicans than greens? wtf?!
--------------------
|
Anonymous
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: Vvellum]
#3276801 - 10/25/04 07:53 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
yo when you click on 'write in' you gotta write something in. come on now.
|
Vvellum
Stranger
Registered: 05/24/04
Posts: 10,920
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: ]
#3277140 - 10/25/04 09:01 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
dont be hating just cuz my poll is cooler than yers
|
AhronZombi
AhronZombi
Registered: 04/06/04
Posts: 1,265
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: Vvellum]
#3277243 - 10/25/04 09:27 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
this is the problem, you cant just choose noe. screw the system i choose no president
|
methikist
Mushroom Pirate.
Registered: 03/16/04
Posts: 138
Loc: PNW
Last seen: 18 years, 11 months
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: AhronZombi]
#3277895 - 10/26/04 01:06 AM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
If the badnariks, greens, and independents would set aside their issues for a moment and choose one to vote for strategically, they might just win in this trivial and meaningless poll.
-------------------- Oh cmon, I'm a fun guy.
|
Gijith
Daisy Chain Eater
Registered: 12/04/03
Posts: 2,400
Loc: New York
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: methikist]
#3277907 - 10/26/04 01:12 AM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
methikist said: If the badnariks, greens, and independents would set aside their issues for a moment and choose one to vote for strategically, they might just win in this trivial and meaningless poll.
Also, if the Cardinals and Sox set aside their bats, they might just win this World Series.
-------------------- what's with neocons and the word 'ilk'?
|
emprbasist
Stranger
Registered: 08/30/04
Posts: 7
Last seen: 19 years, 5 months
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: Gijith]
#3279160 - 10/26/04 11:34 AM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Bush has the balls to stand up for what he believes in. "Vote Kerry for a Stronger America"? What a load of shit. The guy can't even make decisions for himself, how can he make decisions for an entire country? How exactly does a weaker leader make a stronger country anyway. Whether you support bush or kerry, you have to admit that kerry is a pushover and will never stand up to anyone. I guarantee if, god forbid, kerry is elected, he will pull us out of iraq in a second and completely give up on the war on terrorism. But i guess if you think america, the most powerful country in the world, should act like little girls and run away from everything, vote kerry.
|
silversoul7
Chill the FuckOut!
Registered: 10/10/02
Posts: 27,301
Loc: mndfreeze's puppet army
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: emprbasist]
#3279173 - 10/26/04 11:37 AM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
emprbasist said: Bush has the balls to stand up for what he believes in.
Ya, I like how he had the balls to stand up against nation-building, which he said he was against in the election. Oh, and I also like how he stuck to his belief that medical marijuana is a state issue, not a federal one. Oh, and the part about small government. Ya, it's great having a small, non-intrusive government that would never pass something unconstitutional like the Patriot act. Ya, it sure is great to have someone who stand by his beliefs.
Quote:
I guarantee if, god forbid, kerry is elected, he will pull us out of iraq in a second and completely give up on the war on terrorism.
You guarantee it, huh? Are you fucking serious? That has to be one of the most deluded things I've heard someone say. Shit, I wish Kerry would pull us out of Iraq. Instead, he plans on sending more troops there. The only candidate who favors immediate withdrawal from Iraq is Michael Badnarik, who has my vote.
-------------------- "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."--Voltaire
|
DirtMcgirt
in a pinch
Registered: 10/20/04
Posts: 2,213
Loc: city of angels
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: emprbasist]
#3281558 - 10/26/04 08:30 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
ditto silversoul...excpet immediate withdrawal part. We are there right now thanks to Bush and an immediate withdrawal will be just as damaging to the region, American reputation, and saftey as the war was in the first place. How about choppin the fucking country up? It illogically put people together that didn't belong together in the first place. Damn colonialism!
ditto Soul
Quote:
emprbasist said: Whether you support bush or kerry, you have to admit that kerry is a pushover and will never stand up to anyone. I guarantee if, god forbid, kerry is elected, he will pull us out of iraq in a second and completely give up on the war on terrorism.
sounds like you OD'ed on Fox News. Kerry IS a pushover. But wait...so is your canindate. Who's got there hand up Bush's ass making that meek little mouth talk? Its Dick Cheney and Karl Rove. He has no self relience, thats why he can't go to the U.N to push for his own war or hold news conferences without preassigned questions or excel in a debate while reciting his "own" beliefs. He just make vauge statements ("stay the course") and repeats. But I guess if you are for a leader that can't support himself against criticism without stomping his feet like a little girl than vote Bush.
The best chance of a terrorist attack comes from Bush blowing up more civillians in his war. The more fundamentalist the US seems to the rest of the world will result in the more people who hate it. The idea that that your going to go kill all the terrorists in the world is an oversight on the elementary level.
-------------------- "And we, inhabitants of the great coral of the Cosmos, believe the atom (which still we cannot see) to be full matter, whereas, it too, like everything else, is but an embroidery of voids in the Void, and we give the name of being, dense and even eternal, to that dance of inconsistencies, that infinite extension that is identified with absolute Nothingness and that spins from its own non-being the illusion of everything."
|
Gijith
Daisy Chain Eater
Registered: 12/04/03
Posts: 2,400
Loc: New York
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: Vvellum]
#3281611 - 10/26/04 08:39 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
someone sticky this bitch
-------------------- what's with neocons and the word 'ilk'?
|
Evolving
Resident Cynic
Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: DirtMcgirt]
#3281615 - 10/26/04 08:39 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
DirtMcgirt said: How about choppin the fucking country up? It illogically put people together that didn't belong together in the first place. Damn colonialism!
That would be preferable to forcing different tribes with historical animosity towards each other to stay in an unwanted union. Another alternative would be to have something along the lines of the Swiss Canton system, with more autonomous regions within a loose confederation.
Quote:
Kerry IS a pushover. But wait...so is your canindate. Who's got there hand up Bush's ass making that meek little mouth talk? Its Dick Cheney and Karl Rove. He has no self relience...
Quote:
The best chance of a terrorist attack comes from Bush blowing up more civillians in his war. The more fundamentalist the US seems to the rest of the world will result in the more people who hate it. The idea that that your going to go kill all the terrorists in the world is an oversight on the elementary level.
-------------------- To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.' Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence. Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains. Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.
|
DirtMcgirt
in a pinch
Registered: 10/20/04
Posts: 2,213
Loc: city of angels
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: Evolving]
#3281661 - 10/26/04 08:47 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Evolving said:
Quote:
DirtMcgirt said: How about choppin the fucking country up? It illogically put people together that didn't belong together in the first place. Damn colonialism!
That would be preferable to forcing different tribes with historical animosity towards each other to stay in an unwanted union. Another alternative would be to have something along the lines of the Swiss Canton system, with more autonomous regions within a loose confederation.
I dig, wouldn't that be in the image of what America was before the federal government got so damn big in the first place?
-------------------- "And we, inhabitants of the great coral of the Cosmos, believe the atom (which still we cannot see) to be full matter, whereas, it too, like everything else, is but an embroidery of voids in the Void, and we give the name of being, dense and even eternal, to that dance of inconsistencies, that infinite extension that is identified with absolute Nothingness and that spins from its own non-being the illusion of everything."
|
Vvellum
Stranger
Registered: 05/24/04
Posts: 10,920
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: Gijith]
#3282052 - 10/26/04 10:25 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
damn right. sticky the bitch where are the non-existent moderators when you need them?
|
Evolving
Resident Cynic
Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
|
Re: vote here - the [unofficial] shroomery election [Re: DirtMcgirt]
#3282129 - 10/26/04 10:43 PM (19 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
DirtMcgirt said:
Quote:
Evolving said: Another alternative would be to have something along the lines of the Swiss Canton system, with more autonomous regions within a loose confederation.
I dig, wouldn't that be in the image of what America was before the federal government got so damn big in the first place?
Similar, except it's my understanding that the people have an explicit right and mechanism for secession from a canton to form a new canton or join up with a different canton. I believe that they also have an explicit right of secession from the Swiss federation (don't quote me though, as I may be wrong about this).
-------------------- To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.' Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence. Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains. Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.
|
|