Home | Community | Message Board


Original Seeds Store - Cannabis Seeds
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Invisibleretread
-=HasH=-
Registered: 07/14/04
Posts: 851
Truths behind Halliburton
    #3229254 - 10/07/04 07:12 PM (12 years, 2 months ago)

Despite the liberal's campaign against Cheney for his awarding a no-bid contract to halliburton, they don't seem to mention the fact that clinton did the same thing...
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/richlowry/rl20030918.shtml




The Democrats have discovered the enemy in the ongoing Iraq war. And it is Halliburton.

Nothing quite so angers Democrats about the current situation in Iraq than that Halliburton is making money there. Dennis Kucinich, the out-to-lunch leftist who sounds ever more mainstream given the leftward drift of the rest of the Democratic field, wants the United Nations in Iraq so there will be "no more Halliburton sweetheart deals." Bob Graham huffs, "I will not support a dime to protect the profits of Halliburton in Iraq." John Edwards vows "to stop this president from giving billions of dollars in American taxpayer money to companies like Halliburton in unbid contracts."

The Texas oil-services giant formerly headed by Dick Cheney, who still gets deferred compensation from the firm, has achieved iconic status. Halliburton is the equivalent of Dow, the maker of a key ingredient to napalm, during the Vietnam War -- the focus of supposed corporate evil during wartime. It is the equivalent of Mena Airport, the Arkansas site that obsessed anti-Clinton conspiracy theorists during the 1990s -- the focus of dark speculation about the mercenary scheming of a U.S. president.

Behind the Democratic outrage is the implicit, and sometimes explicit, charge that Bush waged war in Iraq to fatten the bottom line of one corporation. As The New York Times has put it, Halliburton's Iraq contract "undermines the Bush administration's portrayal of the war as a campaign for disarmament and democracy, not lucre." But to have risked his presidency -- not mention American lives -- on the war in order to benefit Halliburton, Bush would have to be a psychopath. That the Halliburton charge has become a chief Democratic critique of the war is another sign of the party's descent into unhinged ravings.

As journalist Byron York has reported, it's not really true that the company got its work without competitive bidding. In the 1990s, the military looked for ways to get outside help handling the logistics associated with foreign interventions. It came up with the U.S. Army Logistics Civil Augmentation Program, or LOGCAP. The program is a multiyear contract for a corporation to be on call to provide whatever services might be needed quickly.

Halliburton won a competitive bidding process for LOGCAP in 2001. So it was natural to turn to it (actually, to its wholly owned subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root) for prewar planning about handling oil fires in Iraq. "To invite other contractors to compete to perform a highly classified requirement that Kellogg Brown & Root was already under a competitively awarded contract to perform would have been a wasteful duplication of effort," the Army Corps of Engineers commander has written.

Then, in February 2003, the Corps of Engineers gave Halliburton a temporary no-bid contract to implement its classified oil-fire plan. The thinking was it would be absurd to undertake the drawn-out contracting process on the verge of war. If the administration had done that and there had been catastrophic fires, it would now be considered evidence of insufficient postwar planning. And Halliburton was an obvious choice, since it put out 350 oil-well fires in Kuwait after the first Gulf War.

The Clinton administration made the same calculation in its own dealings with Halliburton. The company had won the LOGCAP in 1992, then lost it in 1997. The Clinton administration nonetheless awarded a no-bid contract to Halliburton to continue its work in the Balkans supporting the U.S. peacekeeping mission there because it made little sense to change midstream. According to Byron York, Al Gore's reinventing-government panel even singled out Halliburton for praise for its military logistics work.

So, did Clinton and Gore involve the United States in the Balkans to benefit Halliburton? That charge makes as much sense as the one that Democrats are hurling at Bush now. Would that they directed more of their outrage at the people in Iraq who want to sabotage the country's oil infrastructure, rather than at the U.S. corporation charged with helping repair it.






Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineunbeliever
Yo Daddy!
 User Gallery
Registered: 05/22/04
Posts: 5,158
Loc: Gallifrey
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
Re: Truths behind Halliburton [Re: retread]
    #3229266 - 10/07/04 07:15 PM (12 years, 2 months ago)

Did you even read your article? They won a bidding war for the contract, but then lost it. Rather than create chaos in the middle of the whole thing, Clinton basically extended their contract. Oh and neither clinton nor gore were ex-employees of the company with shares of stock and interest in the company like Cheney is. Plus this time around, there wasn't even an initial bid contest.


--------------------
Happiness is a warm gun...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineallmakescombined
Boss Man

Registered: 10/03/04
Posts: 384
Loc: My Office
Last seen: 12 years, 1 month
Re: Truths behind Halliburton [Re: retread]
    #3229285 - 10/07/04 07:20 PM (12 years, 2 months ago)

The problem lies in the fact that Halliburton is not after honey oil.


--------------------
Get back to work.



Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleafoaf
CEO DBK?
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
Re: Truths behind Halliburton [Re: retread]
    #3229356 - 10/07/04 07:38 PM (12 years, 2 months ago)

did clinton or gore sit on the board of halliburton?


--------------------
All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleretread
-=HasH=-
Registered: 07/14/04
Posts: 851
Re: Truths behind Halliburton [Re: afoaf]
    #3229405 - 10/07/04 07:49 PM (12 years, 2 months ago)

No, thats entirely the point. Neither of them did, yet both of them realized that the only company that had the ability to do the rebuilding was Halliburton.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibletrendalM
point of inflection
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 04/17/01
Posts: 19,380
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: Truths behind Halliburton [Re: retread]
    #3229418 - 10/07/04 07:53 PM (12 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

unbeliever said:
Did you even read your article? They won a bidding war for the contract, but then lost it.




Bidding for a contract doesn't mean the company who wins is the "only company" that has "the ability to do the rebuilding". It means they said they could do it for a lot less $$$ :smirk:

That's besides the point though, since there was no bidding this time around...


--------------------
You're here because you know something.
What you know you can't explain,
But you feel it;
You've felt it your entire life.
That there's something wrong with the world.
You don't know what it is, but it's there....
Like a splinter in your mind...
Driving you mad.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Halliburton scores big off Iraq RonoS 566 4 08/28/03 10:35 PM
by afoaf
* Halliburton acquiring asian poor for labor at slave wages
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
kilgore_trout 5,257 125 10/16/05 09:52 PM
by kilgore_trout
* The Halliburton Smear Phred 433 1 09/20/03 08:25 PM
by shakta
* Halliburton Ignores Sanctions Zahid 280 0 07/23/04 07:11 AM
by Zahid
* Michael Moore Owned Halliburton, Defense Stocks Luddite 1,044 11 07/28/06 11:47 AM
by Phred
* Another halliburton conspiracy theory. FrankieJustTrypt 540 2 02/10/05 12:57 PM
by FrankieJustTrypt
* Halliburton Charged with Selling Nuclear Technology to Iran.....Sorry if this was already posted Grizz 432 0 11/08/06 06:30 PM
by Grizz
* THIS is what's wrong the the Halliburton deals. GernBlanston 751 8 11/06/03 11:07 PM
by GernBlanston

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Prisoner#1, Enlil
597 topic views. 0 members, 1 guests and 4 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Avalon Magic Plants
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.06 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 14 queries.