Home | Community | Message Board

Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1

Registered: 04/29/04
Posts: 354
Last seen: 11 years, 8 months
House Blocks Court on Pledge Case Rulings
    #3176128 - 09/24/04 07:29 PM (13 years, 3 months ago)


House Blocks Court on Pledge Case Rulings

By JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The House passed legislation Thursday that would prevent the Supreme Court from ruling on whether the words "under God" should be stricken from the Pledge of Allegiance.

In a politically and emotionally charged debate, Democrats said majority Republicans in the chamber were debasing the Constitution in order to force a vote that could hurt Democrats in the election.

Supporters insisted that Congress has always had authority to limit federal court jurisdiction, and the legislation is needed to protect an affirmation of religion that is part of the national heritage.

The bill, which was passed 247-173, would prohibit federal courts, including the Supreme Court, from hearing cases involving the pledge and its recitation and would prevent federal courts from striking the words "under God" from the pledge.

The legislation has little chance of advancing in the Senate this year, but it laid down another marker for politicians seeking to differentiate themselves from their election opponents on the volatile social issues of the day. Other "wedge" issues that have or could come up before the election include gay marriage and flag-burning.

The Supreme Court in June dismissed, on a technicality, a 2002 federal court decision that the religious reference made the pledge unconstitutional.

Rep. Todd Akin, R-Mo., the author of the amendment on legislation before the House Thursday, said the high court is likely to rule differently if it considers the substance of the case and "if we allow activist judges to start creating law and say that it is wrong to somehow allow schoolchildren to say 'under God' in the pledge."

In such a scenario, Akin said, Congress will have "emasculated the very heart of what America has always been about."

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Daisy Chain Eater

Registered: 12/04/03
Posts: 2,400
Loc: New York
Re: House Blocks Court on Pledge Case Rulings [Re: DigitalDuality]
    #3176157 - 09/24/04 07:38 PM (13 years, 3 months ago)

Can a conservative please define activist judge for me?
As far as i can tell, it means a justice who's actually doing his or her job and defending the Constitution against trends in Congress.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator

Registered: 04/29/04
Posts: 354
Last seen: 11 years, 8 months
Re: House Blocks Court on Pledge Case Rulings [Re: Gijith]
    #3176258 - 09/24/04 08:08 PM (13 years, 3 months ago)

"activist judge" is one who upholds the First Amendment and the intentions of Jefferson, Adams, Paine, the Treaty of Versailles, etc.. and acts on it.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Supreme Court to hear 'Pledge' Case
( 1 2 all )
afoaf 1,639 26 10/16/03 09:03 PM
by afoaf
* FISA Court Ruled Warrantless Wiretaps of Foreigners Illegal, prompting FISA Amendment johnm214 337 0 09/03/07 11:16 PM
by johnm214
* Supreme Court term packed with meaty cases lonestar2004 727 4 10/03/05 04:18 PM
by lonestar2004
* FORCED DRUGGING OK?D BY COURT Ellis Dee 411 2 06/27/02 06:54 AM
by Anonymous
* Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights
( 1 2 3 all )
Swami 2,655 48 12/25/03 04:31 PM
by Anonymous
* Bush: Miers' Religion Cited in Court Nod
( 1 2 all )
dblaney 1,584 32 10/14/05 10:55 PM
by gregorio
* Court rejects Seattle schools' racial tiebreaker luvdemshrooms 472 3 07/29/04 10:17 AM
by Seuss
* Galloway wins Saddam libel case Xlea321 407 2 12/03/04 01:49 AM
by Xlea321

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
348 topic views. 3 members, 2 guests and 10 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2018 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.029 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 19 queries.