Home | Community | Message Board

Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1

Registered: 07/30/02
Posts: 1,364
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
John Kerry's War Vote: Profiles in Political Calculation?
    #3031802 - 08/21/04 09:32 AM (12 years, 2 months ago)

John Kerry's War Vote: Profiles in Political Calculation?

When John Kerry recently admitted that, even knowing what he knows now, he'd still have voted to give the president the authority to invade Iraq, the Bush campaign team was elated. President Bush immediately assailed Kerry as a flip-flopper.

But that's not quite right: Kerry hasn't changed his position on Iraq. In October 2002, when the congressional vote was held, Kerry, like most members of Congress, was in favor of punting the question of war or peace to the president and avoiding accountability for the decision. And Kerry remains firmly in favor of avoiding accountability for Iraq today. That tells us something about John Kerry as a candidate. More importantly, it tells us a lot about the health of Congress as a political institution, and about the erosion of Congress' power to declare war.

As James Madison put it, "In no part of the Constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." But Kerry, and a majority of senators and House members, ignored that wisdom and voted for a use-of-force resolution that Sen. Robert Byrd (D.-W.Va.) rightly denounced as a "blank check" to the president. The language of that resolution was clear: "The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq." Thus, Congress left it up to the president ("he determines") to decide whether and when to initiate the war.

Kerry has since complained about how the president exercised that authority. Bush, he says, violated Congress' trust by not building a large enough coalition and getting the U.N. on board, "...and that's why I was upset about it."

But if Kerry was upset, he has only himself to blame. Complaining about the president using the authority you've granted him is rather like locking the barn door after you've deliberately let the cows out.

Kerry still hasn't said whether he was in favor of invading and occupying Iraq. But he's firmly against botching the job (who isn't?). Such evasiveness is all too common in Congress. The imperial presidency continues to grow largely because many legislators want to duck their responsibility to decide the question of war and peace; delegate that responsibility to the president; and reserve their right to criticize him, should military action go badly.

Congressional scholar Louis Fisher compares the Iraq vote to the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution that empowered Lyndon Johnson to expand the Vietnam war. As with the Iraq war resolution, the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was broadly worded to allow the president to make the final decision about war all by himself. Lyndon Johnson compared the resolution to "grandma's nightshirt" because it "covered everything." And, as with Iraq, the president did not immediately use the authority granted him. It would be six months later, after Johnson defeated Goldwater in the November election, before the war escalated with a sustained bombing campaign in North Vietnam. In Iraq, President Bush waited five months before launching Operation Iraqi Freedom. As Fisher put it, "In each case [Vietnam and Iraq], instead of acting as the people's representatives and preserving the republican form of government, [Congress] gave the president unchecked power." In each case, it was easier to dodge the issue than to take responsibility.

When that kind of cynical calculus reigns, it's little wonder our representatives want to rush past their most solemn responsibility and get back to spending money to reward favored constituencies. That's how Senator Kerry and Senator John Edwards, the man who would later become his running mate, both saw it at the time. In the run-up to the vote, Edwards said, "In a short time Congress will have dealt with Iraq and then we'll be on to other issues." Kerry echoed: "We will have done our vote.... you're not going to see anything happen in Iraq until December, January, February, sometime later.... And we will go back to the real issues."

But the question of war is a "real issue," if anything is. It's the gravest issue the Constitution requires Congress to decide. That prominent senators -- and presidential candidates -- squirm to avoid responsibility for it does not bode well for the future health of either branch.

?When Alexander the Great visted the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: 'Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun.' It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.?
-Henry Hazlitt in 'Economics in One Lesson'

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
 User Gallery

Registered: 09/26/03
Posts: 10,378
Last seen: 2 years, 1 month
Re: John Kerry's War Vote: Profiles in Political Calculation? [Re: Ancalagon]
    #3035302 - 08/22/04 04:59 AM (12 years, 2 months ago)

need more posts like this

i don't think anyone would argue that bush is a bit of a bonehead, but far too many people don't realize that kerry's a slimy turd.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Son Of God
Registered: 02/19/04
Posts: 1,459
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: John Kerry's War Vote: Profiles in Political Calculation [Re: Ancalagon]
    #3036533 - 08/22/04 04:41 PM (12 years, 2 months ago)

I think that we should go back to declaring war. I supported the war, and many people did not. We had a national debate about it, and Congress voted for it. Once we go to war, I think we are better off if we concentrate on winning it rather than bitching about it. The politics of it all would be made easier if we made Congress go back to declaring war.

Many of the people who supported the military effort in Vietnam wound up against it when things got sticky. I hate to see us repeating those mistakes. Kerry had been to war. He is not a moron. He is a Vietnam Veteran and he was an anti war activist. He had to know what he was voting for when Congress passed the resolution. He had to know that young men were going to die. They do in all wars.

Tastes just like chicken

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 4 months, 25 days
Re: John Kerry's War Vote: Profiles in Political Calculation [Re: JesusChrist]
    #3037334 - 08/22/04 09:18 PM (12 years, 2 months ago)

I do not think kerry is a moron. I think he is an utterly craven opportunist who believes in nothing except john kerry and who will stop at nothing to further his own resume. I think that he is mentally ill from having been rejected as a child


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* John Kerry -- war criminal
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Phred 4,910 94 04/10/04 06:49 AM
by EchoVortex
* stick a fork in john kerry
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Anonymous 2,860 65 11/03/04 01:05 AM
by Gijith
* John Kerry's Speech
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Zahid 3,354 61 07/31/04 06:53 PM
by Ancalagon
* John Kerry question SpecialEd 272 0 08/14/04 06:32 AM
by SpecialEd
* john kerry's voting record on drugs KingOftheThing 985 7 03/16/04 09:25 PM
by The_Red_Crayon
* Why Americans Must Vote for John Kerry
( 1 2 3 all )
Zahid 2,758 40 08/29/04 04:08 PM
by Zahid
* John Kerry: Clueless and a glutton for punishment
495 11 01/03/06 12:46 PM
by Silversoul
* republicans support john kerry?? KingOftheThing 672 6 08/01/04 01:57 AM
by JesusChrist

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Prisoner#1, Enlil
542 topic views. 1 members, 2 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.058 seconds spending 0.003 seconds on 14 queries.