|
Anonymous
|
2004 presidential election, PAL style.
#2914200 - 07/21/04 10:42 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
?
|
GernBlanston
unintended sideeffect


Registered: 05/28/03
Posts: 842
Loc: OR
Last seen: 2 years, 3 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2914210 - 07/21/04 10:47 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Kerry, of course - although allow me to add a caveat: If Bush were not in the white house today, and I didn't feel as strongly as I do about the need to get him out first and foremost, I would be voting for David Cobb.
I'm a big fan of the Green party. They have a long way to go to solidify their platform to really become a party of the people, but I love em.
-------------------- There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people. -- Howard Zinn
|
Anonymous
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2914213 - 07/21/04 10:49 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
i left out a few of course, and there can be write-ins...
there are some crazy political parties out there.
the vice presidential candidate for the personal choice party is porn actress marilyn taylor.
there's another political party called the peace and freedom party...
here's their economic agenda:
" * Double the minimum wage, and index it to the cost of living. * Guarantee the right of all workers to organize and to strike; forbid striker replacement. * Socially useful jobs for all at union pay levels. * Equal pay for equal work, and for work of comparable worth. * A 30-hour work week with no cut in weekly pay; longer paid vacations. * Guaranteed dignified income for those who cannot work. * A Universal Basic Income to alleviate poverty and homelessness. * Tax the income and assets of the rich to meet human needs. * International trade agreements must guarantee the protection of workers and the environment in all participating countries; abolish NAFTA, GATT and the World Trade Organization (WTO). * End homelessness; abolish vagrancy laws; provide decent affordable housing for all. * Social ownership and democratic control of industry, financial institutions, and natural resources"
hahaha. i love it. SIGN ME UP! 
should i have put that one on the ballot?
|
Ancalagon
AgnosticLibertarian

Registered: 07/30/02
Posts: 1,364
Last seen: 14 years, 11 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2914227 - 07/21/04 10:52 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Wow. What a party.
-------------------- ?When Alexander the Great visted the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: 'Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun.' It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.? -Henry Hazlitt in 'Economics in One Lesson'
|
GernBlanston
unintended sideeffect


Registered: 05/28/03
Posts: 842
Loc: OR
Last seen: 2 years, 3 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2914229 - 07/21/04 10:52 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Yah. Those are all horrible things to strive for. UnAmerican, I tell ya.
Equal wages for all. Useful jobs. Strength of unions. What are those assholes thinking???
-------------------- There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people. -- Howard Zinn
|
Redo
CTA

Registered: 04/13/04
Posts: 1,296
Last seen: 18 years, 5 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2914240 - 07/21/04 10:54 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Wow, they hit everything a poor person wants to hear.
|
Ancalagon
AgnosticLibertarian

Registered: 07/30/02
Posts: 1,364
Last seen: 14 years, 11 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: GernBlanston]
#2914253 - 07/21/04 10:59 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
GernBlanston said: Yah. Those are all horrible things to strive for. UnAmerican, I tell ya.
Equal wages for all. Useful jobs. Strength of unions. What are those assholes thinking???
Those things are ABSOLUTELY unamerican if worked towards through government force and coercion.
-------------------- ?When Alexander the Great visted the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: 'Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun.' It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.? -Henry Hazlitt in 'Economics in One Lesson'
|
DoctorJ


Registered: 06/30/03
Posts: 8,846
Loc: space
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2914372 - 07/21/04 11:34 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
jeez, what a bunch of crappy choices.
no thanks, I'm full
|
afoaf
CEO DBK?


Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2914537 - 07/22/04 12:23 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
anyone wantR toE guessD whoO voted for bush?
-------------------- All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.
|
Redo
CTA

Registered: 04/13/04
Posts: 1,296
Last seen: 18 years, 5 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: afoaf]
#2914542 - 07/22/04 12:25 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
afoaf said: anyone wantR toE guessD whoO voted for bush?
I already know
|
JesusChrist
Son Of God
Registered: 02/19/04
Posts: 1,459
Last seen: 11 years, 4 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2914648 - 07/22/04 01:03 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
I voted for Bush. I really wish that all the things on the "Peace and Freedom" platform were achievable if it was as simple as signing them into legislation. It isn't that simple. We have laws against murder, but people still murder. If you want to have a law against poverty, don't expect that to work either. In fact, we have tried that before.
Indeed, the "Great Society" programs and the "War against Poverty" were initiated in the 1960s. At the time, they predicted they would accomplish their goals in 4 years. Decades later, we are still feeling the ill effects of increase Government interfence with free choice. Does anyone here want to live in Government housing? Anyone want to argue that paying people not to work is a good incentive? Those programs blatently failed.
My favorite is "A Universal Basic Income to alleviate poverty and homelessness". No matter who you are or what you do, even if you achieve nothing and choose not to work, we will give you a home and an income. How many people would just love that? Why not just sit around surf the net and beat off all day? Might as well if it isn't your dime. WOO HOO! Sign me up to. I just became a liberal.
-------------------- Tastes just like chicken
|
silversoul7
Chill the FuckOut!


Registered: 10/10/02
Posts: 27,301
Loc: mndfreeze's puppet army
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2914854 - 07/22/04 03:23 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
A few days ago, I would've said Kerry. But at this point, I think I'd have to say Michael Badnarik.
--------------------
  "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."--Voltaire
|
Aldous
enthusiast


Registered: 10/19/99
Posts: 977
Loc: inside my skull
Last seen: 2 months, 8 hours
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: Ancalagon]
#2914870 - 07/22/04 03:34 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Ancalagon said: Those things are ABSOLUTELY unamerican if worked towards through government force and coercion.
... and truly American ways like corporate power have proved their efficiency at it anyway, so why bother?
|
Phred
Fred's son


Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 17 days
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: Aldous]
#2915177 - 07/22/04 08:15 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Interesting comment. Would you like to give us an example (start a new thread, please, so as not to derail this one) of the American government condoning corporate use of force and coercion? pinky
|
GazzBut
Refraction

Registered: 10/15/02
Posts: 4,773
Loc: London UK
Last seen: 25 days, 14 hours
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2915454 - 07/22/04 10:19 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Surely there should be an option: "I would not vote as voting simply reinforces an archaic and corrupt system. I am not willing to participate in this illusion of choice anymore!"
Just a thought!
-------------------- Always Smi2le
|
coralrives
Adventurer

Registered: 05/22/04
Posts: 174
Last seen: 8 years, 7 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2915470 - 07/22/04 10:22 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
mushmaster said: i left out a few of course, and there can be write-ins...
there are some crazy political parties out there.
the vice presidential candidate for the personal choice party is porn actress marilyn taylor.
there's another political party called the peace and freedom party...
here's their economic agenda:
" * Double the minimum wage, and index it to the cost of living. * Guarantee the right of all workers to organize and to strike; forbid striker replacement. * Socially useful jobs for all at union pay levels. * Equal pay for equal work, and for work of comparable worth. * A 30-hour work week with no cut in weekly pay; longer paid vacations. * Guaranteed dignified income for those who cannot work. * A Universal Basic Income to alleviate poverty and homelessness. * Tax the income and assets of the rich to meet human needs. * International trade agreements must guarantee the protection of workers and the environment in all participating countries; abolish NAFTA, GATT and the World Trade Organization (WTO). * End homelessness; abolish vagrancy laws; provide decent affordable housing for all. * Social ownership and democratic control of industry, financial institutions, and natural resources"
hahaha. i love it. SIGN ME UP! 
should i have put that one on the ballot?
Gosh, wonder why this didn't work in the SOVIET UNION????????
-------------------- "Be good and you will be lonesome." Mark Twain Grow Log
|
GernBlanston
unintended sideeffect


Registered: 05/28/03
Posts: 842
Loc: OR
Last seen: 2 years, 3 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: coralrives]
#2915503 - 07/22/04 10:32 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
You're joking, right?
-------------------- There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people. -- Howard Zinn
|
Seuss
Error: divide byzero


Registered: 04/27/01
Posts: 23,480
Loc: Caribbean
Last seen: 2 months, 19 days
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: coralrives]
#2915508 - 07/22/04 10:33 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
> Gosh, wonder why this didn't work in the SOVIET UNION????????
Because somebody has to pay for it... and eventually the people doing the paying part get sick of supporting the people doing the nothing part.
> Social ownership and democratic control of industry, financial institutions, and natural resources
Communism (which is an economical model, not a governmental model).
-------------------- Just another spore in the wind.
|
Redo
CTA

Registered: 04/13/04
Posts: 1,296
Last seen: 18 years, 5 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2915520 - 07/22/04 10:36 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
woo, 6 for Bush.
|
coralrives
Adventurer

Registered: 05/22/04
Posts: 174
Last seen: 8 years, 7 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: GernBlanston]
#2915583 - 07/22/04 10:48 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
GernBlanston said: You're joking, right?
Hey, I'm not interested in paying for you unemployeed lazy ass neighbor's Escalade. Are you? Or paying for someone who can work but wont because they can't get an "EMPOWERING" JOB BECAUSE THE FUCKED AROUND THROUGH THEIR WHOLE LIFE AND DIDNT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE OPPORTUNITIES GIVEN TO THEM. Wake the hell up. Friggin redistribution of wealth via taxes and the congress is all you're about.
-------------------- "Be good and you will be lonesome." Mark Twain Grow Log
|
Ancalagon
AgnosticLibertarian

Registered: 07/30/02
Posts: 1,364
Last seen: 14 years, 11 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: coralrives]
#2915617 - 07/22/04 11:00 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Hey, I'm not interested in paying for you unemployeed lazy ass neighbor's Escalade. Are you? Or paying for someone who can work but wont because they can't get an "EMPOWERING" JOB BECAUSE THE FUCKED AROUND THROUGH THEIR WHOLE LIFE AND DIDNT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE OPPORTUNITIES GIVEN TO THEM. Wake the hell up. Friggin redistribution of wealth via taxes and the congress is all you're about.
Still no clue how you can support republicans if you believe even part of what you just said. They've had near a decade in control of congress now and near half a decade in control of both congress and the white house. Social Security has not been privitized, government is encroaching more and more upon healthcare in this country, welfare is alive and well. If a minor tax cut is all that's needed for you to declare the republican party to stand for what they say, then you are truly deceiving yourself.
-------------------- ?When Alexander the Great visted the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: 'Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun.' It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.? -Henry Hazlitt in 'Economics in One Lesson'
|
coralrives
Adventurer

Registered: 05/22/04
Posts: 174
Last seen: 8 years, 7 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: Ancalagon]
#2915702 - 07/22/04 11:25 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Ancalagon said:
Quote:
Hey, I'm not interested in paying for you unemployeed lazy ass neighbor's Escalade. Are you? Or paying for someone who can work but wont because they can't get an "EMPOWERING" JOB BECAUSE THE FUCKED AROUND THROUGH THEIR WHOLE LIFE AND DIDNT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE OPPORTUNITIES GIVEN TO THEM. Wake the hell up. Friggin redistribution of wealth via taxes and the congress is all you're about.
Still no clue how you can support republicans if you believe even part of what you just said. They've had near a decade in control of congress now and near half a decade in control of both congress and the white house. Social Security has not been privitized, government is encroaching more and more upon healthcare in this country, welfare is alive and well. If a minor tax cut is all that's needed for you to declare the republican party to stand for what they say, then you are truly deceiving yourself.
LOL, I see what you mean in a way. My views are fiscally conservative and socially more liberal. . Im not happy with the Patriot Act, but dont want nukes going off in my backyard, and that is a very REAL scenerio. Bush has tried to get S.S> reform, but reform takes a while and upsets many folks on both sides. Conserv's want to let you keep more of your money in your pocket, so you will spen it and invest it. Dems want to tax it and spend it the way they see fit. All GWB wants to do to healthcare is form a bill to stop frivilous medical malpractice lawsuites, and thats good. He does NOT want to have socialized medicine, you know that. I dont like all I see with Bush by far, believe me, I like my environment and want to protect it. Hell I even belong to PETA!!! YTou believe that?? LOL, But I tell you this, Kerry scares the shit out of me in more ways than one. He can't even make up his mind on where he stands, his views change with the group he is addressing, he is extreemly scarry to me. I dont know too much about your guy, but would be glad to entertain discussions on him and how he would help.
Thanks for being civil and I have enjoyed your posts in these forumns.
-------------------- "Be good and you will be lonesome." Mark Twain Grow Log
|
Evolving
Resident Cynic

Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: coralrives]
#2915957 - 07/22/04 12:35 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
coralrives said: All GWB wants to do to healthcare is form a bill to stop frivilous medical malpractice lawsuites, and thats good. He does NOT want to have socialized medicine,
I guess you missed his massive medicare spending increase. Better start paying attention. BTW, how many spending bills has GWB vetoed?
-------------------- To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.' Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence. Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains. Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.
|
Xlea321
Stranger
Registered: 02/25/01
Posts: 9,134
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: Ancalagon]
#2916012 - 07/22/04 12:47 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
welfare is alive and well.
For the corporations and Bush's rich buddies it is, for the poor it's been under relentless attack for the last 20 odd years.
-------------------- Don't worry, B. Caapi
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?



Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: GernBlanston]
#2916477 - 07/22/04 02:50 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Equal wages for all.
Not all deserve equal wages.
Quote:
Useful jobs.
All jobs have some use or they wouldn't exist.
Quote:
Strength of unions.
Unions should have died out years ago. They promote mediocrity.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Anonymous
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: GernBlanston]
#2916599 - 07/22/04 03:25 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Those are all horrible things to strive for.
they are fine things to strive for, but using the government to do it has serious consequences which leftists such as these guys overlook. maybe we could start another thread about this?
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2916621 - 07/22/04 03:30 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
I'm all for the Free Beer party
--------------------
|
DoctorJ


Registered: 06/30/03
Posts: 8,846
Loc: space
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: luvdemshrooms]
#2916803 - 07/22/04 04:13 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
luvdemshrooms said: All jobs have some use or they wouldn't exist.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?



Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: DoctorJ]
#2916809 - 07/22/04 04:14 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Care to tell us which jobs don't? Not which jobs YOU have no use for, since we know you're too smart for some jobs (I know because you told us so), but those that no-one would have no use for.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
Edited by luvdemshrooms (07/22/04 04:15 PM)
|
Anonymous
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: luvdemshrooms]
#2916813 - 07/22/04 04:15 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
All jobs have some use or they wouldn't exist.
you forgot about government jobs?
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?



Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: ]
#2916819 - 07/22/04 04:16 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
mushmaster said: All jobs have some use or they wouldn't exist.
you forgot about government jobs?
Please see the post just above yours.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: luvdemshrooms]
#2916822 - 07/22/04 04:17 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
The jobs he (Doctor J)can't get or keep.
--------------------
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?



Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: zappaisgod]
#2916829 - 07/22/04 04:19 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
zappaisgod said: The jobs he (Doctor J)can't get or keep.
Ah.... so that would be ALL jobs then.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
coralrives
Adventurer

Registered: 05/22/04
Posts: 174
Last seen: 8 years, 7 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: Evolving]
#2917012 - 07/22/04 05:22 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Evolving said:
Quote:
coralrives said: All GWB wants to do to healthcare is form a bill to stop frivilous medical malpractice lawsuites, and thats good. He does NOT want to have socialized medicine,
I guess you missed his massive medicare spending increase. Better start paying attention. BTW, how many spending bills has GWB vetoed?
Sometimes the threat of veto power tends to change policy BEFORE it gets that far. Bush veto threat on highway bill poses dilemma for GOP WASHINGTON (AP) ? President Bush has chosen a giant, jobs-rich highway bill to show his election-year toughness against congressional spending, to the chagrin of many Republican lawmakers, governors and business allies. Weeks of talks have yet to reach a middle ground between the Bush administration, which has threatened to veto any bill that goes much beyond Bush's $256 billion limit, and GOP lawmakers who say the nation's crumbling infrastructure demands far more. House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., set the target at $275 billion. The greatest power of the veto is not in its use but in its threat. [Bush] has threatened it many times, and it has modified the legislation," said Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia?s Center for Politics
-------------------- "Be good and you will be lonesome." Mark Twain Grow Log
|
Evolving
Resident Cynic

Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: coralrives]
#2917028 - 07/22/04 05:29 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
How many spending bills has GWB vetoed? Did you know that spending has increased more under his administration than Clinton's? The man is no conservative, he's a big government crony capitalism Republican.
-------------------- To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.' Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence. Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains. Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.
|
coralrives
Adventurer

Registered: 05/22/04
Posts: 174
Last seen: 8 years, 7 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: Evolving]
#2917037 - 07/22/04 05:33 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Evolving said: How many spending bills has GWB vetoed? Did you know that spending has increased more under his administration than Clinton's? The man is no conservative, he's a big government crony capitalism Republican.
We kinda had a little incident called 9/11 and a little war to fight and a whole new branch of the government to create....
-------------------- "Be good and you will be lonesome." Mark Twain Grow Log
|
Evolving
Resident Cynic

Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: coralrives]
#2917212 - 07/22/04 06:31 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quit dodging the question, it's not that hard. How many spending bills has the jackass vetoed?
-------------------- To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.' Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence. Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains. Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.
|
Dragonaut

Registered: 06/24/04
Posts: 6,190
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. *DELETED* [Re: coralrives]
#2917272 - 07/22/04 06:53 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by DragonautReason for deletion: .
|
Divided_Sky
Ten ThousandThings

Registered: 11/02/03
Posts: 3,171
Loc: The Shining Void
Last seen: 15 years, 7 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: Evolving]
#2917777 - 07/22/04 09:02 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Evolving said: How many spending bills has GWB vetoed? Did you know that spending has increased more under his administration than Clinton's? The man is no conservative, he's a big government crony capitalism Republican.
No, he who wants to please everyone and nievly thinks compromise will win him points. Didn't work with his buddy Ted Kennedy. He needs to stop trying to win over liberals who hate him anyways.
|
coralrives
Adventurer

Registered: 05/22/04
Posts: 174
Last seen: 8 years, 7 months
|
Re: 2004 presidential election, PAL style. [Re: Dragonaut]
#2919539 - 07/23/04 06:28 AM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
WI_Shroomer_Skater said:
Quote:
We kinda had a little incident called 9/11 and a little war to fight and a whole new branch of the government to create....
Well, if the Bush administration and the CIA hadn't dropped the ball in the first place...
Hmm.. Bush dropped the ball, 8 months in office vs 8 YEARS in office by Bubba??????
-------------------- "Be good and you will be lonesome." Mark Twain Grow Log
|
|