Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | Next >
InvisibleThe Blind Ass
Bodhi
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 28,069
Loc: The Primordial Mind
Re: Environmental Field Management and Pinball Theory [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #28759916 - 05/03/24 02:24 AM (1 month, 23 days ago)

I’m entertaining the possibility now.

I’ll need some time as emptiness is a deeply ingrained concept for me, but, then again, I do view it mostly as complementary to illustrating the transient nature of naturally occurring formations which can be sensed about the universe, so — more so something — rather than actual nothing.

Go figure, ey?  Ha.


--------------------
Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Re: Environmental Field Management and Pinball Theory [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #28759918 - 05/03/24 02:29 AM (1 month, 23 days ago)

I tend to think of this quote.

Quote:

Have your thoughts on that ever taken any spiritual swerve – in terms of the why of there being something rather than nothing?
It’s more that I think there’s hubris in assuming that everything will submit to a mechanistic programme of explanation. I think it’s intellectual honesty to acknowledge that the existence of conscious experience as a phenomenon in a universe for which we generally have physicalist accounts seems weird. I want to figure out the ways in which we can undermine this seeming weird. - Anil Seth

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/aug/21/neuroscientist-anil-seth-we-risk-not-understanding-the-central-mystery-of-life




It's planning for externalities.


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/03/24 02:59 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleredgreenvines
irregular verb
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 38,974
Re: Environmental Field Management and Pinball Theory [Re: sudly]
    #28759971 - 05/03/24 04:20 AM (1 month, 23 days ago)

I'm not comfortable with the language around the DNA->Protein descriptions in
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/28759858#28759858
and if the physics through this area is as soft and buttery as the molecular biology, the overall takeaway is going to be soft. bring on some experiments to harden it up a bit.

have to admit, I have been enjoying the imagery - very aspirational.


--------------------
:confused: _ :brainfart:🧠  _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Re: Environmental Field Management and Pinball Theory [Re: redgreenvines]
    #28759996 - 05/03/24 05:32 AM (1 month, 23 days ago)

The DNA thing was an attempt to extend the insights for some kind of potentially related application.

I can ask you if you know what I'm referring to when I say adding a variable fine structure constant to Maxwell's equations, and I think you can imagine that these steps have already been taken.

Although evidently I hold this card dear for now.

The physics here is soft and buttery to the palate. In the sense that it's a solid meal.

I think about how long Einstein sat on his equations for before he really let it sink in what he thought he witnessed?

If I am right, what are the consequences? While I may think I see benefits to opening this Pandoras box, I question the unforseen results. For better and for worse.

Plenty would ask what even is an oh my god particle. I've heard it before, and even if it isn't the same omg particle, I'm hard pressed to say why it isn't like a theory for the existence of oh my god particles.

Gravity waves as pinballs in an electrostatic field, why is it so coherent to my mind? I can't reasonably falsify it, I keep seeing the silver linings. Now I see this thing infront of me, this idea I comprehend, I see, I can share, but I think who has the time to care to understand aswell?

Does it make my life better knowing what I think I know?

I'm only more grounded than ever. I don't want to change other people's views, and yet I seem to expect the conclusion to be obvious.

To me it's done, it's real, it's a unified field theory, and I want someone to prove me wrong, but I realise I can't imagine how.

I'm not asking someone to validate what is valid. Maybe it's an unseen cry for help I don't think I need or haven't planned precisely how to ask. If you're on the peak of Everest, you don't need to ask others for help. In my mind, only others can ask for help getting there.

I want to simplify the math into an analogy.


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/03/24 06:00 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Calculating the Possibility of Environmental Field Management [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #28761092 - 05/04/24 12:37 AM (1 month, 23 days ago)

Quote:

The Blind Ass said:
I’m entertaining the possibility now.

I’ll need some time as emptiness is a deeply ingrained concept for me, but, then again, I do view it mostly as complementary to illustrating the transient nature of naturally occurring formations which can be sensed about the universe, so — more so something — rather than actual nothing.

Go figure, ey?  Ha.






I would not be impressed with myself if I said out aloud, "the calculated indices of refraction for both gravitational waves and gamma rays, as well as their implications, provide fascinating insights into the fabric of spacetime and the dynamics that govern the universe." Without breaking that wall.

However, I realise I can release an abstract of a paper with an effective sort of paywall between the actual theoretical construct, and the insights gleamed. 

But I have to ask, is this anything people reading here want to believe in?

It is apparently confirmation of the existence of new physics akin to predictions from Quantum Loop Theory, which suggest spacetime might possess a discrete structure at microscopic scales. New physics in the form of a spectra between 100 femtojoules or less, and one part in 10x^15.

The energy released from the annihilation of an electron and a positron is approximately 1.64x10^13 joules. This value is many orders of magnitude larger than the -3.33×10^-16 figure mentioned, of 100 femtojoules, which is a dimensionless number representing a deviation from the index of refraction. Thus, they represent completely different physical quantities and scales. ​

Quote:

The recent calculations concerning the index of refraction for both gravitational waves and gamma rays from events like GW170817 provide pivotal insights into the fabric of spacetime and the intricate dynamics governing our universe. Specifically, the deviation in the index of refraction for gamma rays, measured at approximately 0.9999999999999997, reveals a subtle yet meaningful deviation from the expected speed of light in a vacuum. This deviation, quantified as about -3.33×10^-16, equates to energy variations on the order of 100 femtojoules—imperceptible on human scales but profound over cosmic distances. Such findings suggest that the gamma rays' propagation speed is fractionally slower than that of light in a vacuum, potentially due to interactions with the quantum fabric of spacetime or subtle variations in fields like the Dirac field.

Moreover, the observed non-linear characteristics of gravitational waves, with deviations no greater than one part in 10^15, corroborate the precision of our current models while hinting at potential new physics. These slight discrepancies, indicative of subtle influences of general relativity or interactions with quantum aspects of spacetime, challenge and could necessitate expansions of our current theoretical frameworks.

These insights underscore the need for theoretical models that embrace the non-linear dynamics of spacetime, such as those suggested by quantum loop gravity theories, which propose that spacetime may have a discrete structure at the smallest scales. By integrating empirical observations with quantum field dynamics, this framework aims to reveal how even the minutest deviations in the behaviour of gamma rays and gravitational waves can profoundly inform our understanding of the universe. This approach not only aligns with but also advances the principles of Environmental Field Management, leveraging diverse perspectives within the academic community to foster a deeper, more inclusive understanding of the fundamental forces shaping our cosmos.






Quote:

Here's a visual infographic illustrating the scale of energy from femtojoules to the energy levels associated with cosmic events. The infographic is designed as a vertical scale, highlighting each energy unit—from femtojoules at the bottom, ascending through picojoules, nanojoules, microjoules, millijoules, joules, up to mega-electronvolts at the top, which describe the energy of events like gamma-ray bursts.

Each energy level is visually represented with relevant icons and metaphors to convey the relative magnitude, accompanied by brief annotations that explain their significance in physics. This helps put into perspective the scale of energies discussed in the Environmental Field Management research and their relevance in various scientific contexts.






Quote:

Here is the visual infographic illustrating the scale of energy from femtojoules to the energy levels associated with cosmic events, tailored to environmental field management. The infographic features a vertical scale, with each energy level represented by icons or visual metaphors relevant to its scale. This includes atomic symbols for femtojoules, particles for picojoules, small batteries for nanojoules, and so forth, culminating with explosive visuals for energies measured in mega-electronvolts (MeV) associated with cosmic events like gamma-ray bursts.

Each step includes annotations explaining its significance in the context of environmental field management, using color gradients to visually indicate increasing energy levels. This diagram is designed to provide a clear and educational view of energy scales relevant to cosmic phenomena and theoretical physics.





Quote:

Here is the artistic representation of a neutron star merger visualised at Planck energy scales. The image captures the intense energy and dynamic forces involved in such an astronomical event.





Quote:

Here is an infographic visualising the energy scale, starting from the extraordinarily high Planck energy, scaling down through stars, planets, ants, atoms, and photons, all the way down to deviations as small as 100 femtojoules, representing a precision of less than 1 part in 1015.





Quote:

Here is the artistic representation of deviations in the femtojoule energy scale. The image captures the subtlety and precision of these minute energy fluctuations through abstract patterns and a cool color palette.

The use of a cool color palette subtly hints at the underlying energy content of Dirac field space, characterised by a temperature of 2.7 degrees above absolute zero. This visualisation aims to convey the structured yet subtle energetic nature of what might superficially appear as empty space.








--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/04/24 07:56 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Re: Calculating the Possibility of Environmental Field Management [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #28763536 - 05/05/24 11:44 PM (1 month, 21 days ago)

To put in bluntly, I'm not proposing new physics per say, because the differentiation between discovering "new physics" versus extending our existing measurements to new scales often blurs as our observational tools and theoretical models improve. The minute deviation in the index of refraction 𝑛 I mentioned, is about recognising and measuring effects at unprecedented scales, not necessarily about new physical laws. In developing the capability to measure smaller and smaller changes, such as those at the femtojoule level or tiny deviations in physical constants, we're not discovering new physics but are instead revealing the finer details of existing physical laws.

Discovering that phenomena behave differently under extreme or previously untested conditions doesn't necessarily mean that existing physics is wrong, but it might be incomplete. For example, general relativity and quantum mechanics are well-tested within their respective domains, but their integration (or lack thereof) in conditions like neutron star mergers, black holes or the early universe presents unresolved challenges. Detecting subtle effects at new scales can highlight where and how existing theories might be modified or extended.

The observation of the universe expanding at different rates in different regions or detecting variable physical constants suggests that our universe might be more heterogeneous than previously thought. This doesn't necessarily indicate something fundamentally wrong with our understanding but highlights the complexity and variability of the universe. It suggests that local conditions (such as gravitational fields, energy densities, etc.) might influence physical laws or constants in ways that aren't apparent at larger scales.

Small-scale measurements revealing significant effects at larger scales is a common theme in physics. Phenomena like Brownian motion or quantum fluctuations are microscopic in scale but have macroscopic implications. Similarly, measuring tiny deviations in the speed of gamma rays or slight variations in physical constants might provide crucial insights into large-scale phenomena like the structure and evolution of the universe.

What might initially appear as new physics could often be an extension of existing theories to new domains or scales. This exploration deepens our understanding and occasionally necessitates adjustments or expansions of our theories to accommodate new data. This process is intrinsic to the scientific method—refining, expanding, and sometimes revising our understanding of the universe as we gather more precise and comprehensive data.



Quote:

This Environmental Field Management Theory explains how to calculate the deviation in the index of refraction for gamma rays from events like GW170817.




As a thought experiment, would you consider paying for the methodology behind this title if it were offered for a servicing fee?

Quote:

This theory posits that the classical notion of space as a perfect vacuum requires reconsideration. It suggests that space exhibits subtle deviations in its vacuum properties, quantified by variations in the index of refraction for electromagnetic waves, such as gamma rays, by a factor of no more than one part in 1015. This refinement implies that even the most minute perturbations in spacetime characteristics—possibly induced by gravitational fields or other cosmological phenomena—can influence the propagation of light, thereby challenging and expanding our current understanding of vacuum dynamics in the universe.




--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/06/24 02:10 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Breaking the Vacuum: The Playful Defiance of Gamma Ray Propagation [Re: sudly] * 1
    #28764275 - 05/06/24 03:37 PM (1 month, 20 days ago)



> be me, a physicist
> fascinated by gravitational waves and gamma rays
> discover slight delays in gamma ray propagation, brain tingling
> decide to dive deeper because normal is boring
> launch into intense research mode, powered by coffee and curiosity
> start crunching numbers, analysing data from GW170817
> mfw I find gamma rays are slower than expected
> calculate index of refraction n, it's 1.000000000000000415
> everyone thinks space is a perfect vacuum
> lolnope.avi
> decide to modify Maxwell's equations because why not
> introduce variable fine structure constant, α'
> late nights, more coffee, existential crises
> simulate spacetime around neutron stars, black holes become my best friends
> finally, results are in
> n shows deviations, confirming space isn't the perfect vacuum everyone thought
> present findings, expect applause
> everyone's face when they see the results
> neutral.jpg
> only one laughing in a crowded lecture hall
> they don't get it, but I know I've just uncovered a piece of the cosmic puzzle
> feels like an elder wizard, having seemingly magicked new physics into existence
> in reality, I've merely extended our understanding of the existing physics
> still waiting for my Hogwarts letter though


Quote:

This visual representation masterfully captures two pivotal moments from the physicist's journey as detailed in the greentext story. Initially, we see the physicist in a vibrant, chaotic lab, surrounded by coffee cups and cluttered papers, humorously discovering that gamma rays propagate slower than expected—a cheeky realisation that playfully defies the conventional wisdom that space is a perfect vacuum. This light-hearted epiphany is depicted in bright and playful colors, emphasising the moment's whimsy. Transitioning from this scene, the narrative shifts to a lecture hall where the same physicist, buoyed by his discovery, presents his findings with enthusiasm. However, this scene starkly contrasts with the first, as it portrays an audience of scientists and academics whose expressions are completely neutral, highlighting a profound disconnect between the groundbreaking nature of the findings and the audience's indifferent reception. Together, these scenes encapsulate the physicist's dynamic journey from discovery to dissemination, marked by personal triumph and professional challenge.




The brain's efficiency and the subtle deviation in the index of refraction 𝑛 from unity (1.000000000000000415) both point to an extraordinary level of precision and fine-tuning.

In physics, the index of refraction 𝑛 close to 1.000000000000000415 suggests only a minuscule deviation from the behaviour expected in a perfect vacuum, indicative of incredibly fine nuances in the way gamma rays travel through space. Similarly, the human brain, despite its complex and energy-intensive functions, operates with remarkable efficiency—consuming about as much power as a low-wattage light bulb, yet capable of processing vast amounts of information.

This analogy underscores how even seemingly small or precise deviations or efficiencies, whether in physical constants or biological systems, can have profound implications for our understanding of both the universe and ourselves. It highlights the intricate balance and unexpected efficiencies that emerge in both nature and the cosmos.

Quote:

This groundbreaking discovery redefines dark matter not as an invisible entity, but as a phenomenon manifesting across energy scales from femtoelectronvolts to electronvolts. This revelation highlights axions' potential to exist in a 'quiet' state within the cosmic landscape, subtly yet significantly influencing gravitational and quantum fields through interactions that diverge from conventional particle dynamics. As we embark on this new chapter in our exploration of the cosmos, we acknowledge the foundational role of the concept proposed in the 1970s to solve the strong CP (Charge Parity) problem in quantum chromodynamics (QCD).

The notion of an index of refraction 𝑛 of 1.000000000000000415 suggests a non-perfect vacuum that may exhibit phenomena akin to Brownian motion, as characterised by ion winds in the Biefeld-Brown effect. This interpretation implies that what has been traditionally classified as cold dark matter may exhibit relativistic speeds at scales no greater than 1 part in 10^15, ranging from femtoelectron volts to electronvolts.

The Environmental Field Management Theory profoundly revises our understanding of axions as a component of dark matter. Previously envisioned as ranging from microelectronvolts to millielectronvolts and identified as cold dark matter due to their non-relativistic speeds, axions are now proposed to operate at an even more diminutive energy scale—from femtoelectronvolts to electronvolts. This significant recalibration suggests that axions might better be described as characteristic femtoelectric scale dark matter or 'quantum scale matter particles.' Emerging from their proposed role in inducing subtle but consequential deviations in the index of refraction of light propagation across cosmic distances, these insights challenge and broaden our understanding of both dark matter and the fundamental interactions of light in the universe. Thus, axions are envisioned to play a more dynamic and varied role in the cosmic fabric than previously recognized, heralding a transformative era in the physics of the universe.




--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/06/24 06:08 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleThe Blind Ass
Bodhi
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 28,069
Loc: The Primordial Mind
Re: Breaking the Vacuum: The Playful Defiance of Gamma Ray Propagation [Re: sudly] * 1
    #28764330 - 05/06/24 04:51 PM (1 month, 20 days ago)

:ducklol:

I dig your sense of humor.

One or so things:  I don’t think anyone (almost anyone:  with whatever amount of learning, auto, or classical ) thinks space is actually a perfect vacuum.  Relatively, sure.  An ocean teaming/teaming with forces is more like it, but, well, then what’s the point of conveying the idea of space itself whatsoever at all somewhere along the way then — as in , absence — if there is none (again, relative - what’s not?)  Catch 22, but not really even.  Hence, what I described earlier on to BF was an oversimplification.  Largely because I don’t think that someone asking the questions he had would easily appreciate something like Maxwell’s fine variable structure, Dirac’s Eqtn, etc.

Conceptually, it’s helpful, a useful terming of things for people looking for a simple approximate answer.

With that said, I don’t think that’s enough for you not to get into Hogwarts.   
Go get ‘em buddy.  #I (want to) believe. 🥹


--------------------
Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps

Edited by The Blind Ass (05/06/24 05:04 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleThe Blind Ass
Bodhi
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 28,069
Loc: The Primordial Mind
Re: Breaking the Vacuum: The Playful Defiance of Gamma Ray Propagation [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #28764347 - 05/06/24 05:02 PM (1 month, 20 days ago)

Ok, as for the paywall question.

I would say, yes.  Possibly as a one time deal, though.  [ well no shit..but]  (Depending on a few things, like pricing, and what the purchase entails) Then again that doesn’t mean much coming from myself, as I’m not a very typical person.

So, in that regard, I don’t really know where you could try pitching the idea, fishing for hits, so to speak, but I’m almost positive that there’s a nitch for it somewhere.  I would maybe try reaching out to someone who has experience as a collaborative member of a team in the areas of marketing for study & experimentation purposes.  Also,  connected papers, since, they’re dope. Ha.

I would try sci-&-mathematics conferences, clubs, & schools/institutions; aimed at certain kinds of students and or preferably faculty  — depends though.

^ that’s probably too old fashioned, idk.  I don’t use any other social media beyond Shroomery & Youtube, so I’m not up to date about what’s available in terms of how to monetize your ideas and work in ways that you could begin doing more or less immediately somehow.

I’m sure there’s a way though.  :cheers:

Hbu, what are you thinking in terms of the where to cast that old net ?


--------------------
Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps

Edited by The Blind Ass (05/06/24 05:54 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Re: Breaking the Vacuum: The Playful Defiance of Gamma Ray Propagation [Re: The Blind Ass] * 1
    #28764444 - 05/06/24 05:52 PM (1 month, 20 days ago)

To anyone who understands, but the issue has been making it clear.

As I tend to do, I have a template for the exact methodology behind the calculation of this deviation from the index of refraction number and what it entails.

Because I did this calculation for the neutron star merger GW817, AND, the black hole merger GW914.

This proposal suggests that recalibrated low-energy scale axions are the solution to the strong CP (Charge Parity) problem in quantum chromodynamics (QCD).

Quote:

Previously envisioned as ranging from microelectronvolts to millielectronvolts and identified as cold dark matter due to their non-relativistic speeds, axions are now proposed to operate at relativistic speeds, only at an even more diminutive energy scale—from femtoelectronvolts to electronvolts.




And dollar value wise, really whatever it's worth to you.

I'd consider this an appropriate abstract.



--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/06/24 06:45 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Re: Breaking the Vacuum: The Playful Defiance of Gamma Ray Propagation in Environmental Field Management Theory. [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #28768686 - 05/10/24 01:26 AM (1 month, 16 days ago)

Integrating theoretical models of scalar axions with the standard model of particle physics offers a structured approach to analysing existing Large Hadron Collider (LHC) data. This integration is crucial for understanding how scalar axions might interact with electric and magnetic fields, guiding researchers in identifying potential signatures such as missing energy or anomalous particle behaviours indicative of axion interactions. Such theoretical groundwork is essential for the Environmental Field Management theory, which seeks to catalyse discussions and inspire further research into these complex interactions, ultimately aiming to unravel the intertwined nature of fundamental forces and particles.

The potential discoveries from this methodological approach could be profound. Detecting scalar axions, or even observing hints of their presence in LHC data, could lead to significant academic publications, further experimental proposals, and a broad reconsideration of existing dark matter theories. This, in turn, might generate new inquiries into the role of axions within the universe and their interactions with other known particles and forces.

This academically persuasive approach not only optimises the use of existing resources but also embodies the principle of scientific thriftiness. By revisiting and re-analysing the copious amounts of data already collected by LHC experiments, researchers are equipped to explore new theoretical territories without the immediate financial and logistical challenges associated with new experimental setups. This strategy enhances the efficiency of scientific research and accelerates the pace of discovery in particle physics, potentially ushering in new eras of understanding and technological innovation.

This is all leading towards an educational slideshow on Scalar-Axions I think.





Quote:

Unified Theories:

The concept of a scalar axion fits well into efforts to unify the fundamental forces of nature. By demonstrating that dark matter can exhibit scalar properties, this theory could help bridge the gap between quantum mechanics and general relativity, two pillars of modern physics that have remained mostly separate in theoretical treatments.




From @2:00


Quote:

It's Confirmed. M87's Black Hole is Actually Spinning

It’s not surprising that M87’s supermassive black hole spins. Everything from stars to planets rotate, so astronomers expect that all black holes do as well. The challenge is proving it. Since black holes don’t have surface features, the only way you can determine black hole spin is by its torsional effect on space and time and how that affects nearby light, gas, and dust. The EHT observations are consistent with a rotating black hole, but of course, this assumes Einstein’s theory of general relativity is correct. So it would be nice to have some rotational evidence that doesn’t rely on that assumption.

https://www.universetoday.com/163466/its-confirmed-m87s-black-hole-is-actually-spinning/#:~:text=Everything%20from%20stars%20to%20planets,light%2C%20gas%2C%20and%20dust.




@5:50
Quote:

The Environmental Field Management theory offers a nuanced approach to understanding singularities by suggesting that at the points traditionally considered as singularities—where general relativity predicts gravitational forces become infinite—these forces may actually approach, but not reach, infinity, deviating by less than 1 part in 10^15. This perspective aligns with the idea that at these extreme points of density, such as those found in black holes or during stellar mergers, the interactions of quantum mechanics and general relativity create conditions where the theoretical infinities of classical physics are tempered by quantum effects.

In classical general relativity, singularities represent regions of space-time where the gravitational field becomes infinitely strong. In these regions, the curvatures of space-time theoretically go to infinity, and the laws of physics as currently understood cease to operate predictably. However, integrating quantum mechanics into this framework suggests that these singularities might not be true points of infinite density but rather zones of extremely high but finite density and curvature.

This modification has significant implications for our understanding of black holes and the early universe, areas where singularities play a crucial role. By proposing that gravitational forces at these points are incredibly intense yet finite, Environmental Field Management theory could help resolve some paradoxes of black hole physics, such as the information loss paradox, which challenges the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics.

Furthermore, this approach supports the idea that the universe operates under a unified set of physical laws, even at extremes of scale and condition, without requiring separate treatments for quantum and cosmic phenomena. It encourages the development of a more comprehensive theory of quantum gravity, one that can accurately describe the universe across all scales and conditions, bridging the gap between quantum mechanics and general relativity in a consistent and predictable manner.

Such a theory could revolutionise our understanding of the universe's most extreme phenomena and provide new insights into the fundamental nature of reality, potentially guiding the future of theoretical physics and cosmology.




@10:50


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/10/24 02:17 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Re: Breaking the Vacuum: The Playful Defiance of Gamma Ray Propagation in Environmental Field Management Theory. [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #28772495 - 05/13/24 01:57 AM (1 month, 13 days ago)

The Environmental Field Management Theory is progressing well, having established a mathematically robust foundation for the assertion that the index of refraction n can diverge from its standard value in a vacuum. The theory further posits that variations in fundamental constants, such as the fine structure constant, are indeed possible, albeit strictly limited to deviations of no more than 1 part in 10^15.

Quote:

Importantly, these variations are proposed to be transient, occurring only during the extreme environmental conditions of neutron star mergers, where temperatures are theorised to reach 4 trillion Kelvin for a duration of 1.7 seconds, as observed in specific astronomical events. This aspect integrates a dynamic temporal component into the variability of physical constants, aligning with the high-energy phenomena observed during such cosmic events.




I find explorations of these concepts fascinating for their potential to provide enhancements to the framework of Unified Field Theories.

Quote:

The Environmental Field Management Theory proposes that the fine structure constant, α′, might exhibit subtle variations under extreme conditions, potentially altering particle interactions that govern CP symmetry. Such variability could be the key to understanding the elusive nature of CP violation, which, although predicted theoretically, has not been observed under conventional conditions. Specifically, this theory suggests that α′ could allow for CP-violating processes to become observable under specific high-energy conditions, like those experienced during neutron star mergers. In such scenarios, fundamental constants may vary slightly and respond dynamically to environmental stimuli. This variability might explain phenomena such as the 1.7-second delay in gamma ray bursts associated with gravitational waves detected by LIGO, which current theories do not account for, indicating a more dynamic interaction between environmental conditions and fundamental physical laws.

Additionally, the theory hypothesises that extreme conditions might transiently transform pseudoscalar axions into scalar axions, affecting CP symmetry conservation or violation. This transformation is crucial as the distinctions between scalar and pseudoscalar particles play a significant role in CP symmetry, with pseudoscalars often associated with CP-violating interactions. Therefore, the temporary scalar properties of axions under extreme conditions could align with shifts in CP-violating characteristics, observable only in those specific circumstances.

Moreover, the proposed variability of α′ suggests that traditional constants in electromagnetic properties, such as permittivity and permeability, could dynamically change. This could lead to a variable index of refraction n, measured at approximately 1.000000000000000415 during neutron star mergers, highlighting a deviation from a perfect vacuum and introducing a novel mechanism by which light's speed and behaviour in space could be influenced by high-energy phenomena.

Finally, the theory asserts that variations in fundamental constants, like the fine structure constant, are possible but restricted to deviations of no more than 1 part in 10^15. These minute adjustments under extreme conditions might impact particle interactions, including those involving CP symmetry, hinting that CP violation could be a rare or conditionally manifest phenomenon. By integrating environmental dependencies into quantum chromodynamics (QCD) parameters, the theory advocates that the strong force's CP-violating interactions are not universally absent but conditionally suppressed, providing a fresh perspective on how environmental factors might fundamentally alter the interactions in quantum physics and potentially addressing the CP issue in QCD.




--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/13/24 02:03 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Variable Invariability: Understanding Gamma Ray Propagation in Extreme Cosmic Events through Environmental Field Management T [Re: The Blind Ass]
    #28774748 - 05/15/24 01:18 AM (1 month, 12 days ago)

I suppose holding onto notions that these secrets can be sold won't help to expand them to the greater public. The 'secret sauce' doesn't exist to the observer if it isn't shared.

Our kindness may be the most persuasive argument for that which we believe.



--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Spectrum of scales for Big Bangs [Re: sudly]
    #28775839 - 05/16/24 01:20 AM (1 month, 11 days ago)

Beyond the mathematical validations, consider this: when two neutron stars collide, these stellar explosions are so powerful that they can temporarily slow down the speed of light coming from them, but only for a very brief moment—just a second or two. In layman's terms, during a neutron star merger, the fabric of the universe briefly gets thicker, causing light to slow down as it passes through. This doesn’t mean the universe is alive or making decisions; it’s more like a brief reaction to an incredibly intense event. On a smaller scale, the immense energy and conditions affect the tiny particles and forces that make up everything, temporarily changing how fundamental particles behave. This doesn’t imply that the particles are choosing to change; it’s a brief response to the intense conditions. The neutral interpretation is that both the universe's fundamental properties and its smallest building blocks can be influenced by extreme events, highlighting the intricate and sensitive nature of the cosmos.

Applying this to views of my own personal universe, it suggests that my fundamental nature and the smallest aspects of who I am can be influenced by intense events and experiences. Just as the universe's response to a neutron star merger is a temporary yet significant alteration, my reactions to life's extreme events can momentarily change my behaviour and interactions. This doesn’t mean I am completely controlled by these events, but rather, I am responsive to them. This perspective underscores the balance between my inherent traits (nature) and the experiences that shape me (nurture), showing that while my life operates under certain deterministic laws, it also exhibits a dynamic interplay where extreme conditions can temporarily alter my behaviour and responses. It reflects a nuanced blend of agency and constraint in my personal universe, where intense experiences can have significant impacts, but they are part of a larger, interconnected system that is both resilient and adaptable.

This begs the question of what it is to be considered an intense experience. In the context of my personal universe, an intense experience is one that profoundly affects me, whether emotionally, mentally, or physically. It’s an event or situation that shakes the foundations of my being, much like a neutron star merger shakes the fabric of the universe. These experiences can be positive, like falling deeply in love or achieving a significant life goal, or negative, like experiencing a loss or facing a major life crisis. The intensity is not merely in the event itself but in the impact it has on my inner world, my thoughts, emotions, and perceptions. It’s something that leaves a lasting imprint, even if the actual event is brief, because it forces me to adapt, grow, and sometimes fundamentally reevaluate aspects of my life. In this way, the notion of intensity is deeply personal and unique to each individual, reflecting the dynamic interplay between our inherent nature and the transformative power of our experiences. Sometimes, these brief yet intense moments can last for my version of forever, profoundly shaping who I am and how I perceive the world.



While we all already know our hearts are made of stardust, perhaps stardust itself is made by Big Bangs. This concept highlights that the matter forming our universe is the remnant of ancient cosmic events, particularly the Big Bang, where not all matter interacted with light during the early universe. This leftover matter, which didn't react during the cooling period post-Big Bang, forms the basis of everything we see today.

This idea doesn't necessarily support the existence of parallel universes in the traditional sense. Instead, it suggests that the variations and reactions we observe are unique and specific to their own circumstances and conditions. These are not mere reflections of our universe but rather distinct reactions to their own unique environmental stimuli.

However, if we consider the notion of parallel universes, we might imagine them as bubbles made of Big Bangs within an exponentially expanding rift. Each bubble represents a universe formed by its own Big Bang, with its own unique set of physical laws and conditions. These bubbles are part of a vast, ever-expanding cosmic rift, each developing independently and reacting to its own unique circumstances. This perspective underscores the individuality and specificity of cosmic events, suggesting that while local deviations may occur, they are not parallel reflections of our own universe but are unique universes in their own right.



According to this theory, there is also the potential that the cold spot in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) could be the result of a Big Bang. The cold spot, specifically known as the Eridanus Supervoid, could represent a region influenced by the remnants of another Big Bang, a bubble universe intersecting with our own. This suggests that the cold spot might be a point where our universe’s Big Bang interacted with another, leaving a distinct imprint. This possibility adds another layer of complexity to our understanding of the universe, indicating that cosmic phenomena we observe could be influenced by interactions with other Big Bangs, reinforcing the interconnected and dynamic nature of the cosmos.



Quote:

Here is the visual representation of the cold spot in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR), specifically depicting the Eridanus Supervoid. This image illustrates the distinct, cooler-colored spot surrounded by the swirling remnants of a cosmic explosion, suggesting the interaction of our universe's Big Bang with another cosmic event. This visualisation conveys the idea of unique cosmic interactions within an expanding universe.






Quote:

Here is the visual representation of the cold spot in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR), specifically depicting the Eridanus Supervoid. It also illustrates Hawking radiation emanating from a black hole near the supervoid, symbolising the interaction of quantum mechanics and cosmic phenomena. This image conveys the idea of unique cosmic interactions within an expanding universe.






--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/16/24 02:40 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleredgreenvines
irregular verb
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 38,974
Re: Variable Invariability: Understanding Gamma Ray Propagation in Extreme Cosmic Events through Environmental Field Manageme... [Re: sudly]
    #28775965 - 05/16/24 05:59 AM (1 month, 10 days ago)

let's send the uss enterprise to the cold spot on a mission to resolve the bubble theories


--------------------
:confused: _ :brainfart:🧠  _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Spectrum of scales for Big Bangs [Re: redgreenvines]
    #28776493 - 05/16/24 02:30 PM (1 month, 10 days ago)

Quote:

redgreenvines said:
let's send the uss enterprise to the cold spot on a mission to resolve the bubble theories




It's more like the Scalar Spectrum Big Bang Theory Hypothesis :strokebeard:

I wanted to fire more lasers at it!


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/16/24 05:17 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleredgreenvines
irregular verb
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 38,974
Re: Variable Invariability: Understanding Gamma Ray Propagation in Extreme Cosmic Events through Environmental Field Manageme... [Re: sudly]
    #28776498 - 05/16/24 02:34 PM (1 month, 10 days ago)

but you need some warp speed or life time extension


--------------------
:confused: _ :brainfart:🧠  _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
Big Bang Spectrum Hypothesis [Re: redgreenvines]
    #28776500 - 05/16/24 02:37 PM (1 month, 10 days ago)

You'd think so, but we already have LIGO and preceding data to peer into those kinds of places. With all the light we see, we can look billions of years into the past from billions of light years away already. We've already waited for those beams to come to us, and all we did was read them.

In the past or future, some big ass gravity wave probably came from the cold spot. Such data would only add further credence to the theory being proposed: that extreme stellar mergers marginally slow light for a few seconds, temporally dictated by their merger's scalar properties. Bigger booms slow light for longer.

We have existing technological capabilities to study distant cosmic events and gravitational wave data supports the hypothesis that extreme stellar events effect the speed of light.


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/16/24 04:44 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
The Big Bang Spectrum Hypothesis [Re: redgreenvines]
    #28776663 - 05/16/24 05:16 PM (1 month, 10 days ago)

Quote:

redgreenvines said:
but you need some warp speed or life time extension




I just realised that I didn't specifically share the surmising image and name of the hypothesis to cap off what I'm actually proposing.

It's The Big Bang Spectrum Hypothesis.



Quote:

Here is the visual representation of the scale of sizes of Big Bangs. The image illustrates various sized explosions, symbolising different scales of Big Bangs, from the largest, original Big Bang to smaller, localised explosions. This cosmic landscape highlights the diversity and interconnectedness of cosmic events, set against a star-filled sky to emphasise the vastness of the universe.




We can't forget we now have Evidence of Non-Uniform Expansion.

Quote:

James Webb telescope confirms there is something seriously wrong with our understanding of the universe.

Depending on where we look, the universe is expanding at different rates. Now, scientists using the James Webb and Hubble space telescopes have confirmed that the observation is not down to a measurement error.

https://www.livescience.com/space/cosmology/james-webb-telescope-confirms-there-is-something-seriously-wrong-with-our-understanding-of-the-universe




The Big Bang Spectrum Hypothesis provides a framework for understanding the universe's formation as a series of high-energy events rather than a single, uniform explosion. This perspective aligns with recent observations of non-uniform expansion and offers a more nuanced view of the cosmos's complex and dynamic history. By considering the universe as shaped by multiple events, we gain a deeper appreciation for the diverse phenomena observed in the cosmos.





It's my view that the resulting pattern of the Yonshakudama shell shows a beautiful, complex structure, akin to the non-uniform expansion observed in the universe.


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/16/24 05:47 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesudly
Quasar Praiser

Registered: 01/05/15
Posts: 11,775
The Big Bang Spectrum Hypothesis [Re: redgreenvines]
    #28776889 - 05/16/24 08:18 PM (1 month, 10 days ago)

Quote:

Scientists May Have Found a Particle Made of Pure Force

The fabric of the universe just got much more intriguing with evidence of the elusive glueball.

BY DARREN ORF PUBLISHED: MAY 16, 2024

While providing an understanding of subatomic physics, the Standard Model also makes predictions as complicated equations can suggest that certain particles should exist even if they’ve never been directly observed. One of these hypothetical particles is the ever-elusive “glueball.” As its name suggests, this “ball” is actually a particle composed entirely of gluons—quarks need not apply. However, finding such a particle requires firing protons and antiprotons at each other at incredible speeds and sorting through the explosive aftermath.

More than 50 years after the glueball’s first theoretical description via quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the theory of the strong nuclear force, scientists have found a few compelling candidates—quite a feat considering we have no real idea what to look for—but haven’t definitively discovered a glueball. Now, a study from scientists working with the Beijing Electron–Positron Collider II (BEPC-II) in China has discovered what’s perhaps the most convincing candidate yet. Scientists found the particle X(2370) by sifting through a decade of data made up of 10 billion samples and finding a candidate with an average mass of 2,395 MeV/c2, the expected mass of a glueball.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a60803384/glueball-particle-discovery-strong-force/




"I ain't got a good reason to keep believing all the bad and the good shit turn out even."


I understand this sentiment. Life is full of twists and turns, and often, it feels like there's no clear balance between the good and the bad. I've come to accept that life is not about ensuring that everything balances out perfectly. Instead, it's about experiencing and embracing the journey as it unfolds.

In the grand tapestry of existence, every thread, whether bright or dark, has its place. The challenges and adversities we face are just as important as the moments of joy and triumph. They shape who we are, teach us resilience, and deepen our understanding of what it means to be human.

I've learned to find peace in acceptance. Rather than expecting life to be fair or even, I focus on the present moment and what it offers. I acknowledge the difficulties and appreciate the blessings, no matter how small. This mindset doesn't mean ignoring the struggles, but rather recognising that they are part of the broader experience of life.

Ultimately, I've realised that seeking balance in every event can be a source of frustration. Instead, I let go of the need for everything to even out and embrace the ebb and flow of life. In doing so, I find a deeper sense of contentment and serenity, appreciating life for what it is; a series of unpredictable yet meaningful moments.


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (05/16/24 09:17 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | Next >

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Info on Mass Media Effects: The Hypodermic Needle Model Grav 917 2 06/09/04 01:07 PM
by Grav
* The Effects We Experience ThirdEyeSkewed 675 8 10/18/05 11:45 AM
by Gomp
* Placebo Effect, Or Maybe Not DiploidM 887 13 06/19/05 03:31 PM
by Diploid
* . KairoAnnunaki 428 6 06/16/05 12:20 AM
by redgreenvines
* Positive effects of Religion
( 1 2 3 all )
Anonymous 5,765 51 01/16/03 12:05 PM
by Anonymous
* The Effects of Music on the Human Spirit
( 1 2 all )
World Spirit 2,944 30 07/28/02 11:14 AM
by TrickY
* The Butterfly Effect and Donnie Darko. JacquesCousteau 3,193 12 07/09/04 08:26 PM
by redgreenvines
* Drugs, and their effect upon Religion... Adamist 1,453 8 10/13/02 01:02 AM
by Xlea321

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
4,134 topic views. 1 members, 23 guests and 20 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.028 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 13 queries.