|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,530
|
|
there is a lot of consistency to the works you are showing and generally they are flamingorgeous.
I did a few related to my brain theory stuff

They did not really express what I meant to express, but I did not spend that much time with it.
In any case just as photography provides art when a photographer is present and asks "what will it look like if I frame it like this and click NOW!?" the same what would it look like process is going on in the AI artist's creative process, although the tool is not bending light to film or sensors, he is bending ideas and pixels to a screen. It's still art.
As to whether it stands the test of time. well. NFT's are a rage right now. I like my hand drawn and painted paintings more than anything I have done with AI. But I think I am weirder than you and most people.


--------------------
_ 🧠_
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,530
|
|
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said:...
Your painting of the two musicians is quite extraordinary!
thanks, I was using Adobe InDesign which is a publishing layout software, I like it better than photoshop for polygon art, because I can move graphic shapes between layers and play with the transparency of layers. The polygons are really for outlining photos so that text can run around the edge of a figure, and the fill colors are really for backgrounds to photo elements, but I like to use them like colored translucent paper and lay them out while working you hear mouse clicks for each vertex I plop down, and I try not to place a lot of them.
In this one for reference I used a video frame from Hallelujah by Leonard Cohen in front and I guess Dino Soldo on saxophone.
It was a very loosely put together thing, which is what I like best. (falling apart..., or just about to, IYKWIM)
Several of my friends are wearing black T-Shirts with this printed on it. hahaha!
--------------------
_ 🧠_
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,530
|
Re: Is AI art truly creative? [Re: sudly]
#28628125 - 01/20/24 05:37 AM (8 days, 8 hours ago) |
|
|
It may not be moot that you wrote "publishing software" rather than writing software or finding a new software solution.
since ~2013, the standards governing software developers which encompasses tools, libraries, test schemes, source code control, collaboration methods etc. have become strict guardrails for all developers, and these are primarily the Apple Store, and Google Play App store.
From my point of view, while this may prevent some security problems it blocks a lot of creativity.
But guardrails are what AI works with very well. Very few areas will be worked on to develop, and the rest will be fully boiler plated. AI uses data awareness to create within a definition.
Me on the other hand - I take a task - get side tracked and find something astonishing that really works, and I go in the new direction in an unconstrained way, then come back to the guardrails and put the idea into acceptable form - which is very hard for me.
Usually after I show people what I came up with - they steal it. hahaha! you could say I am a self destructive developer. certainly an out of the box thinker. Oddly it was easy for me to work in banks, others made my schemes fit the mould.
--------------------
_ 🧠_
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,530
|
|
ace of hearts & jack of spades
--------------------
_ 🧠_
|
|