Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Bridgetown Botanicals CBD Concentrates   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Physics
    #28620557 - 01/14/24 06:18 AM (13 days, 16 hours ago)

So like if you take the hydrogen atom. One electron around one proton. I’ve been thinking about black holes, reverse stars. And I was wondering, is that a proton? The proton is reverse light?

Even then, just take the proton as a mini quantum system. The electron is another. The electrons spin being blue and the protons spin being yellow.

That got me thinking, something I never liked about the electron. Electricity and light. I’ve been wondering if the electron manages photonic energy. As the photonic energy increases, the gravitational pull is lessened. So the electron moves up in orbit.

I don’t think electricity is the flow of electrons. Rather photonic energy either flowing through the electron or the whole atom. And when too excited and bumped, it escapes as a plasma/wave. The Tesla ladder.

The color difference makes me think they aren’t the same, tho it doesn’t tell me if the whole atom stores photonic energy.


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: Nillion]
    #28620614 - 01/14/24 07:47 AM (13 days, 14 hours ago)

Quote:

Nillion said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadron

About the proton:

Quote:

Hadrons are categorized into two broad families: baryons, made of an odd number of quarks (usually three quarks) and mesons, made of an even number of quarks (usually two quarks: one quark and one antiquark).[1] Protons and neutrons (which make the majority of the mass of an atom) are examples of baryons; pions are an example of a meson.,.

Almost all "free" hadrons and antihadrons (meaning, in isolation and not bound within an atomic nucleus) are believed to be unstable and eventually decay into other particles. The only known possible exception is free protons, which appear to be stable, or at least, take immense amounts of time to decay (order of 1034+ years)...

According to the quark model, the properties of hadrons are primarily determined by their so-called valence quarks. For example, a proton is composed of two up quarks (each with electric charge +2⁄3, for a total of +4⁄3 together) and one down quark (with electric charge −1⁄3). Adding these together yields the proton charge of +1. Although quarks also carry color charge, hadrons must have zero total color charge because of a phenomenon called color confinement. That is, hadrons must be "colorless" or "white". The simplest ways for this to occur are with a quark of one color and an antiquark of the corresponding anticolor, or three quarks of different colors. Hadrons with the first arrangement are a type of meson, and those with the second arrangement are a type of baryon.





More about Baryons:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon


And then there are Leptons:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepton

One type of Lepton is called the electron:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron

Though when it comes to certain subjects Wikipedia is loaded with bad info it actually has a lot of quality info on physics and chemistry.


Technically a star made of antiprotons would be an reverse star, I believe.

The photon page is decent as well:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

This area of physics seems rather well studied and we appear to know quite a lot about these particles. Of course, I am presenting it from the perspective of quantum chromodynamics. Alternative theories exist but I don't pay a lot of attention to them because the quark material is incredibly well supported.

I'm into physics to some degree because understanding the building blocks it is made of helps me understand more about the Universe.




Well, it’s more the idea of making a proton a quantum system…….and this is where things get real fun.

We live near a yellow sun. What if the sun, its gravitational field influences something like the proton? The spin, which would affect its “color”. A yellow proton for a yellow sun, a it’s quantum harmonic is also its gravitational field harmonic.

Like, I’m talking real hard science. Taking Robert Penrose idea that consciousness is reality and reality is consciousness.

Or another way, quantum mechanics is particle physics. We just forgot the math. And polarity is spectral, based of the gravitational field.

So now we aren’t just in the influence of our sun, but then the gravity of the earth….. it becomes a thing.

Ideally then, you’d find the color of a hydrogen atom in a quantum vacuum. Which would give you a yellow proton and blue electron…….


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: Pscientist]
    #28620824 - 01/14/24 10:58 AM (13 days, 11 hours ago)

Quote:

Pscientist said:
Quote:

mushroomboy said:
Ideally then, you’d find the color of a hydrogen atom in a quantum vacuum. Which would give you a yellow proton and blue electron…….




Take the third toke.

:tmckenna:





Ugh  I forgot Enstein was colorblind and thought it was blue. It’s purple. My bad. That’s what the Azul physics quote Enstein was obsessed about meant. And the blue dot around the sun was to describe the wobble of an electron in orbit.

So yah, that’s pretty much it. A neutron is an almost 0 frequency vibration. A proton is near 0, so instead of qbits having states. Give them spectrums.

Then make the complexity of an electron purple to represent the complexity of a purple star.

And gravity being the base component for the proton and the neutron with the electron being more electromagnetic. Or the amount of light it has, photonic energy, representing how light the particle is.


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: Nillion]
    #28620920 - 01/14/24 11:58 AM (13 days, 10 hours ago)

Quote:

Nillion said:
I know I said I was out, but:

Color is a function of wavelength for light.
It literally doesn't exist on an atomic scale.
The color in quantum chromodynamics is not actually color either.

Quote:

And gravity being the base component for the proton and the neutron




This really doesn't belong in the Science and Technology section.




The color is a metaphor for the frequency in which it vibrates. The spectrum of function of the electron itself. That’s why Enstein used variables and talked like that.

So we don’t exactly know what light is. We know it’s emitted, and when it hits a surface. It bounces back at the frequency matching the color of the surface.

So in this sense, pure light hits the color blue and reflects as a blue wavelength. With some energy diffusing out, scattering. That’s the flair around a candle so to speak.

And depending on the color source, the reflection is a combined harmonic pattern. So you’d see an off blue if the light was more yellowish than “white”.

It’s still just a construct representation of what we believe light to be. So then, is there both a light matrix that we always see, and another matrix in which a larger function appears as photon? We know there is a medium, tho what that medium is, is heavily debated.

Edit: e=mc^2 if you redefined e as a color and made it blue. The you’d understand what I’m saying, the definition of e is wrong, it should equal purple. Metaphorically. That’s what the blue dot that circles the sun was about in the famous Enstein quote. Find out what e = frequency as blue, and change that to purple. Then e=mc^2


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Edited by mushroomboy (01/14/24 12:13 PM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: koraks]
    #28620956 - 01/14/24 12:29 PM (13 days, 9 hours ago)

Quote:

koraks said:
Quote:

mushroomboy said:
It bounces back at the frequency matching the color of the surface.



No, it bounces back at the frequency it already is before it hits anything. The act of bouncing doesn't change the frequency / wavelength.

There are similar problems in the remainder of your argumentation. It's a house of cards, with the exception that yours doesn't actually stand.




It’s an opposite response, think like reverse polarity. Just like you see upside down, and cross compose both eyes to make a singular image that’s preprocessed in the brain. To cover imperfections and hide the holes, or two known blind spots in the brain.

To be honest, we actually have no clue exactly how that happens. Because the rods and cones don’t absorb light. They vibrate at a frequency to send a signal. Or they resonate to the liquid in the eye. It’s weird.

So you see an inverted light pattern, that hits the eye and lense, refracts, flips, then hits the back of the eye. Making the rods and cones resonate, or vibrate sending a signal down the ocular nerve of each eye. Both eyes are cross composed and translated into something you “see” in your head.

So yah, I have an idea of how this process works.


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: Nillion]
    #28620993 - 01/14/24 12:48 PM (13 days, 9 hours ago)

Well if you follow Robert Penrose. And Stuart, the neuroscientist. The nanotubes argument, that cells might be able to communicate via other methods. Or, some process of thought itself aren’t a representation of the neural pathway in the brain.

That’s where quantum physics and things get spooky, though what if consciousness is quantum. A product of complex quantum interactions. Where at one time, we were a simple consciousness of just interaction. Monkey see monkey do, we couldn’t have abstract thought.

This work is especially important when you get into things people have to do. Mathematics that are done at the instinctual level. This would make the possibility of nanotubes and stuff being made to alter the quantum state of the brain.

What is consciousness, especially if you look at reaction times compared to neural activity or speed. Or are our machines slower than the neural activity itself making it appear slower?

That’s a good question. So it depends on your perspective. As relativity in this stance, would be the overall quantum field as a projection of the self. The overall vibrational harmonic the whole body resonates at.

Then you could say, the quantum space you exist in, is a localized field. That is also within a larger localized field and so on.

So what is the exact size of the field of relativity per conscious agent? That is a good question.


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: Nillion]
    #28621021 - 01/14/24 01:11 PM (13 days, 9 hours ago)

Quote:

Nillion said:
Quote:

mushroomboy said:
To be honest, we actually have no clue exactly how that happens. Because the rods and cones don’t absorb light. They vibrate at a frequency to send a signal. Or they resonate to the liquid in the eye. It’s weird.




You are mistaken.

We know exactly how this works.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photopigment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoreceptor_protein
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodopsin
There is even classified light based cryogenic computer tech that we developed in the US for our military aircraft. The data medium, being cryogenic involves proteins that denature when they reach warm temps, thus preventing our enemies from being able to obtain the data from a crashed jet or drone.

I saw some lectures, given by research scientists working on this material in 2001-2003.

I'm a person who can be considered at least slightly intelligent by several standards. I think I am dumb but that is besides the point. My point is that over the course of my life I have been mistaken about several things. Including recently. The way I correct this is through self education. One needs to be open to the idea that they have more to learn and then start learning it.

I don't know if you are the type of person who believes that taking psychedelics and thinking about the Universe can provide detailed knowledge about things like particle physics, but it can't. What it can do is make delusional assertions seem true in a very powerful way. Nearly all psychonauts learn this at some point.

The path to knowledge is paved with effort, there are no shortcuts.




That’s the organic response to light stimulation. So it essentially vibrates the retina, which can detach. It’s its own sense organ that uses vibration you could say.

And while this is all fine and dandy, how do you actually visualize. You’re missing my point entirely. When you see something, you aren’t seeing the images or even signals your eyes actually see. It’s a sense, a frequency no matter how you spin it.

So this gets translated in various centers of the brain, there are many queues  that senses use to define what you understand as reality.

In fact every sense, once you get to the neurological sense is frequency or pulse. I two studied psychology, sociology, neural linguistic programming. Calculus, I’ve studied theology, history. War, sung tzu, I studied mental illness. The concept of autism, identic memory, I’ve read up on the worry of CWD in deer as a prion disorder that’s slowly becoming more human in nature, what mad cow is…..

So what I’m talking about, isn’t just the physical representation of light or the neural network. How do you actually compose the image, it’s a lot more complex than your leading on.

The language center of the brain translates language, it’s found to be almost universal. So the word love, lights up the language center of the brain almost universally identical. No matter what language love is said in.

When we got FMRI, feral magnetic resonance imaging for medical. It blew the field up.

So I’m well versed in the brain.

Edit: all I’m saying is, Enstein got the wrong spin on the e=mc^2


Edited by mushroomboy (01/14/24 01:25 PM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: Nillion]
    #28621054 - 01/14/24 01:33 PM (13 days, 8 hours ago)

Quote:

Nillion said:
Good luck with that.
:smile:




Yah, I know. That’s the problem. I’m gonna have to learn physics now to understand what I figured out. Like the actual math. :frown: or somebody who’s better than me.

Cause if you look at the atom like that, a static quantum agent, of smaller agents like Penrose looks at consciousness. Then you could see a much more complex system in particle physics. Where polarity isn’t a 1, -1, 2, or 0….. it would be a much more complex variable like e, or quantum spin.

So now the spin, as a vibration representation. Where white is 0 or something, yellow is like > or <, a range for the proton right?

Where the spin the electron math is currently done with is e=blue as a frequency range. What I’m saying is that range of spin is wrong and it should be closer to something representing purple metaphorically.

What that is? Not sure. But why does a hydrogen based sun look yellow? Why is a black hole black? A white star white?

What frequencies of energy do those colors represent?


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: koraks]
    #28621795 - 01/15/24 06:57 AM (12 days, 15 hours ago)

No I’m not, the color gets absorbed by the pigment. The reflection is the wave without the color it reflected from.

You then detect this as color. Yup, look it up. It’s the reverse wave form of the pigment you reflect the light on.

Edit: so dark colors absorb light, hence they absorb heat. That’s the spectrum they absorb, what’s reflected is what doesn’t absorb. And you perceive that as color. Easy.


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Edited by mushroomboy (01/15/24 07:10 AM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: koraks]
    #28622077 - 01/15/24 11:42 AM (12 days, 10 hours ago)

Quote:

koraks said:
Alright then, since you understand it so well, please explain a couple of things to me.

Quote:

mushroomboy said:
the color gets absorbed by the pigment.



Define 'the color'. What is it, according to you?

Quote:

The reflection is the wave without the color it reflected from.



Define 'the wave'. It sounds like you're talking about it in the singular. Explain how a single wave would have 'a color' substracted from it.

Quote:

You then detect this as color. Yup, look it up. It’s the reverse wave form of the pigment you reflect the light on.



Explain how the wave form relates to color. Explain how inverting this supposed waveform would alter color.




It’s the physics of pigment. Light hits a color, that color absorbs the frequency that it isnt. This is what causes things to “warm up” by the sun. The reflected light is that colors wavelength. Which your eyes interpret. They see color by sensing it.

That’s seriously how light works on the eye. The actual physics of it.

Edit: I had it right the first time. Damn it, it reflects the wave of the color absorbing everything else.

https://sciencing.com/colors-reflect-light-8398645.html

That’s a basic idea. What is light?


Edited by mushroomboy (01/15/24 11:46 AM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: koraks]
    #28622232 - 01/15/24 02:06 PM (12 days, 8 hours ago)

The color, it’s just a representation of a frequency range. Or? An energy state, with certain colors more excited than others.

If you think about that, then frequency is the speed in which the light vibrates. What is spin? So could you equate a certain energy range of light to the spin of an electron?

So then yellow, that’s the base spin around a yellow sun. As it’s effected by the gravity, which could also become a quantum harmonic.

I actually did answer this, you just weren’t really paying attention.

So the neutron is represented as? Green, but wasn’t that blue and yellow? So now what would be yellow and purple? That’s the energy range if you converted light frequency into an energy spectrum.

That’s somewhat what Enstein did, people just didn’t know it. Then the proton starts within the yellow spectrum, that’s the energy state where it’s spin starts well say.

Now what Enstein did was make the electron blue, however he was colorblind. It should have been purple. So then the energy range, frequency, of the color purple is where the electron resides.

So you need to know the color spectrum properly, the right order. The hint to this is the yellow sun. A hydrogen based fusion reaction. Which creates yellow light.

So the neutron is essentially the least to want change, the most indifferent. And changes based on the states of the total system of protons and electrons.

You then get to the proton, this will be less indifferent to change. So it will be willing to change more than a neutron. As it’s also effected by the total system.

Then you get the electron, this is the most unstable. It likes change, and will do this often to retain its natural color or state. It’s spin.

Does that make more sense?


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Edited by mushroomboy (01/15/24 02:09 PM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: Nillion]
    #28622617 - 01/15/24 07:50 PM (12 days, 2 hours ago)

Ugh impossible. When we first did atomic physics. We thought the color of the sun was yellow. That’s what they based the hydrogen spin off. A yellow sun, so to make the other math work. They needed to know the color or spectrum of light the electron resided in. They thought the blue spectrum.

Turns out, that was wrong. But what IS the right spectrum? If the electron is purple, you need to look at it in the ultraviolet spectrum. Like a reverse star, a black hole……

Cause it would be the opposite of a normal star, a hydrogen based star.


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: Nillion]
    #28622633 - 01/15/24 07:59 PM (12 days, 2 hours ago)

Just as a neutron based star is a brown dwarf. It’s in the astrophysics itself. That’s why it’s funny. The quote Enstein made:

Azul, the blue little dot that circles the sun. To protect the sun, to protect the galaxy.

You don’t really need much else to understand what that meant. He was talking about the sun and the quotes describing what Enstein saw the hydrogen atom “looking” like if spectral energy was described as color. That’s why in chemistry it’s a yellow proton, green neutron, and blue electron. Enstein thought about it as a color. But he had the spectrums of energy wrong. The electron is ultraviolet. And you can use the different stars and there base materials that burn to figure it out.

So a proton based star, hydrogen, is yellow. A neutron star is brown, a brown dwarf. Almost a star and almost a planet. And an electron is like a black hole, that’s what I’m getting at.

So look for the electron atomically in the ultraviolet spectrum.

Edit: and a proton heavy star burns, a neutron heavy star doesn’t, and an electron heavy star becomes a black hole


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Edited by mushroomboy (01/15/24 08:16 PM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: Nillion]
    #28622766 - 01/15/24 10:07 PM (12 days, 19 minutes ago)

Quote:

Nillion said:
Is there any chance that you could be mistaken about any of this?




What do you mean?

Literally stars burn fuel. Right? Fuel is?

So then, we can already extrapolate how a star burns. So they know the general particles present and their percents. Then just figure out the difference of a burning star and a brown dwarf. You’ll probably get more protons than neutrons……. Mass , all that they can extrapolate.

Then what’s a black hole? A star that doesn’t burn. So what’s the difference between a live star and a brown dwarf? Take the opposite of that. You now know what a black hole is…..

Next just check to see if the electron leaks ultraviolet. Hawking radiation. What is it? Photons? What leaks out of electrons? Photons? Weird right?


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: Nillion]
    #28622811 - 01/15/24 11:00 PM (11 days, 23 hours ago)

Hawking
Quote:

Nillion said:
I mean, is there any chance, in your mind, that you could be mistaken about any of this?

Do you believe it might be possible for any of the details you are sharing to be incorrect?




So the electron gets excited and emits photons….. what is hawking radiation?

Like no. That’s why I posted the Enstein quote as I’ve never taken physics. Ever, I just added a bit.

Azul the little blue man, the little blue dot that circles the sun. The little blue man to protect the earth, to protect the sun, to protect the galaxy. For if we blew up mars, we could blow up the earth. If we blew up the earth, we lose Father Time. If we lose Father Time, we lose all hope. Without hope there would be no bomb. For without the bomb there would be no explosion. Without the explosion there would be no space and all time would be lost in the galaxy.

And I realized what he was trying to say. And all you have to do is use the technology we have today.

Enstein said the atomic bomb wasn’t right. And I’ve always had an issue with the electron. It doesn’t make sense the way you describe it. And this, this makes much more sense. Especially if you take into account what hawking radiation is.

So yah, I’m basically saying that you got the wrong spin on the electron. Use ultraviolet to find it. It’s there, trust me.

Edit:

Time is the illusion the self tells the mind as it passes through space

Space is the illusion the mind tells the self to exist

Space time is the illusion the self tells the mind as a story

Story is the illusion the mind tells the self as it passes through space and time


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Edited by mushroomboy (01/15/24 11:14 PM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: koraks]
    #28622924 - 01/16/24 04:33 AM (11 days, 17 hours ago)

Quote:

koraks said:
Your story about blue, green and yellow shows you're clutching at straws. It's interesting subject matter, but you'll have to investigate further. Moreover, you'll have to get rid of the apparent feeling of "I've got this" that currently stops you from learning.

I didn't ask because I wanted you to explain it to me. I asked because I hoped that you'd be stimulated to do some very basic reading on the subject. Whether you want to do this, is up to you. Good luck and have fun with physics. Or metaphysics, if you prefer. Don't ever mix them up, again.




No, it’s seriously how fusion works. When you burn fuel, you’re actually burning something? So you figure this out by going from hotter stars to cooler stars. The color of a star is the representation of the energy and amount of fuel.

https://www.space.com/22437-main-sequence-star.html

They primarily burn? And the difference between a star and a theoretical brown dwarf? Is? It’s considered neutron star.

https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/objects/neutron_stars1.html

So a star with fuel is a proton based star. And the amount of fuel is the color. So find the weakest star….

Then you already know a neutron star, they can find them.

The only fucking thing left, is an electron based star. Which is what we never had tech to find. A black hole. Aka the reverse star


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Edited by mushroomboy (01/16/24 04:34 AM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: mushroomboy]
    #28622928 - 01/16/24 04:42 AM (11 days, 17 hours ago)

When light hits something like a pigment, color…. Or a metal…. It gets warm right? But it reflects a color right? The heat is a representation of the atom being? Excited? With the most excited thing the? Electron? When then reflects, leaks the spectrum of light that it is……


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: mushroomboy]
    #28622936 - 01/16/24 04:55 AM (11 days, 17 hours ago)

Oh, and I’m coming from Robert Penrose and the perspective that consciousness isn’t what it appears. So then, what is light? As we assume that something hits the eye? Right? But we know rods and cones don’t detect photons.

So, what is light? Like, hawking radiation? Electrons emit light when excited, we already know this. It’s in physics.

So I’m saying that is a total system harmonic. So light is absorbed by the system as a hole, we’ll say for now. Then it’s somehow internalized and reflected back at another wavelength.

That’s an interesting process if you think about it. So light what, messages the atom? Then the atom produces new light?

So how exactly does light reflect off a surface? That’s a good question isn’t it? If it’s a particle then it bounces. If it’s a wave, does it reflect? Still bounces, tho how does it dump its energy as heat then? Like?

So there has to be a mechanic you can use, that allows for atoms to absorb the energy of light and output that energy. And the proper angle of physics.

I did a lot of programming. So look at 3D modeling of light, especially ocular occlusion and modeling. It’s very difficult alone to create a model to reflect light. Then we have to layer a thermal dynamic system into light as well? Where is this data going? How are you going to explain that?


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: Nillion]
    #28623020 - 01/16/24 07:01 AM (11 days, 15 hours ago)

Yah it’s metaphors. I know, and I’m telling you buried in some theology. Like Hinduism and the stories bRAma taught sheva….. there is another story.

How do I know this? Because, it’s about me and my spirituality….. and I’m telling you, that the electron represents the ultraviolet spectrum.

I’m well aware how light works. The Enstein quote is also code, passed down as Enstein said to keep it secret. And only when he returned would its meaning be revealed.

I came to the community that the quote was meant for. I delivered the message it was meant to say. Enstein had the wrong spin.

I’ve even explained where to look and how. Like, the whole concept of how the energies were thought about.

And on top of that, Enstein wasn’t good at math. He stood on the shoulders of giants. The main thing he had was relativity. And it’s becoming very obvious that your figuring out consciousness isn’t all that it appears.


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinemushroomboy
Mushroom King
Other User Gallery
Registered: 09/21/11
Posts: 155
Last seen: 2 days, 9 hours
Re: Physics [Re: mushroomboy]
    #28623023 - 01/16/24 07:07 AM (11 days, 15 hours ago)

Reverse star, how do I know that? That hawking radiation is the only thing to escape the event horizon of a black hole. And you can only see it in the ultraviolet spectrum.

That’s why it’s a reverse star, it absorbs light.

And consciousness, the actuation speed of thought is a very interesting physics phenomenon. As you can’t actually create a plausible explanation for how neurology acts and advanced thought patterns. Is like the brain is too simple for the complexity of consciousness.


--------------------
int getRandomNumber()
{
return 4; // Chosen by random dice roll
}; // guaranteed to be random. <3 GeoHot


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Bridgetown Botanicals CBD Concentrates   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Destroy nukes with neutrino ray. Baby_Hitler 1,168 9 03/03/06 05:54 AM
by koppie
* The response to the modern aburdities of Einsteinian Physics
( 1 2 3 all )
cleeen 3,395 44 07/26/07 11:07 AM
by Diploid
* The properties of Neutron Asante 1,339 16 07/26/06 04:50 PM
by Diploid
* Quantum Physics - The double slit experiment
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
MDMC 16,933 139 08/03/23 10:09 AM
by imachavel
* Superluminal Neutrinos? DiploidM 740 1 09/23/11 05:25 AM
by Diploid
* Neutrinos trendalM 422 6 06/01/11 01:40 PM
by trendal
* Superluminal Neutrino Experimenter Resigns DiploidM 655 6 04/01/12 07:42 AM
by koraks
* "Possible" new force/particle and new class of neutrino OddEye 314 1 04/06/11 03:49 PM
by cortex

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: trendal, automan, Northerner
536 topic views. 0 members, 0 guests and 2 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.048 seconds spending 0.004 seconds on 16 queries.