Home | Community | Message Board

SoulSpeciosa Kratom
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1

Registered: 07/30/02
Posts: 1,364
Last seen: 9 years, 4 months
Wise Words
    #2852733 - 07/03/04 12:22 AM (13 years, 11 months ago)

For those who think the words 'general welfare' in the constitution give congress a blank check and for those who don't see a problem with breaking from a strict interpretation of the constitution 'just a little':

Proper Role of Government

"Here is the text of a letter that was written by James Madison in 1817. In it he discusses the proper role of the federal government and the limits placed on it by the Constitution.


Veto of federal public works bill

March 3, 1817

To the House of Representatives of the United States: Having considered the bill this day presented to me entitled "An act to set apart and pledge certain funds for internal improvements," and which sets apart and pledges funds "for constructing roads and canals, and improving the navigation of water courses, in order to facilitate, promote, and give security to internal commerce among the several States, and to render more easy and less expensive the means and provisions for the common defense," I am constrained by the insuperable difficulty I feel in reconciling the bill with the Constitution of the United States to return it with that objection to the House of Representatives, in which it originated.

The legislative powers vested in Congress are specified and enumerated in the eighth section of the first article of the Constitution, and it does not appear that the power proposed to be exercised by the bill is among the enumerated powers, or that it falls by any just interpretation with the power to make laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution those or other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States.

"The power to regulate commerce among the several States" can not include a power to construct roads and canals, and to improve the navigation of water courses in order to facilitate, promote, and secure such commerce with a latitude of construction departing from the ordinary import of the terms strengthened by the known inconveniences which doubtless led to the grant of this remedial power to Congress.

To refer the power in question to the clause "to provide for common defense and general welfare" would be contrary to the established and consistent rules of interpretation, as rendering the special and careful enumeration of powers which follow the clause nugatory and improper. Such a view of the Constitution would have the effect of giving to Congress a general power of legislation instead of the defined and limited one hitherto understood to belong to them, the terms "common defense and general welfare" embracing every object and act within the purview of a legislative trust. It would have the effect of subjecting both the Constitution and laws of the several States in all cases not specifically exempted to be superseded by laws of Congress, it being expressly declared "that the Constitution of the United States and laws made in pursuance thereof shall be the supreme law of the land, and the judges of every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." Such a view of the Constitution, finally, would have the effect of excluding the judicial authority of the United States from its participation in guarding the boundary between the legislative powers of the General and the State Governments, inasmuch as questions relating to the general welfare, being questions of policy and expediency, are unsusceptible of judicial cognizance and decision.

A restriction of the power "to provide for the common defense and general welfare" to cases which are to be provided for by the expenditure of money would still leave within the legislative power of Congress all the great and most important measures of Government, money being the ordinary and necessary means of carrying them into execution.

If a general power to construct roads and canals, and to improve the navigation of water courses, with the train of powers incident thereto, be not possessed by Congress, the assent of the States in the mode provided in the bill can not confer the power. The only cases in which the consent and cession of particular States can extend the power of Congress are those specified and provided for in the Constitution.

I am not unaware of the great importance of roads and canals and the improved navigation of water courses, and that a power in the National Legislature to provide for them might be exercised with signal advantage to the general prosperity. But seeing that such a power is not expressly given by the Constitution, and believing that it can not be deduced from any part of it without an inadmissible latitude of construction and reliance on insufficient precedents; believing also that the permanent success of the Constitution depends on a definite partition of powers between the General and the State Governments, and that no adequate landmarks would be left by the constructive extension of the powers of Congress as proposed in the bill, I have no option but to withhold my signature from it, and to cherishing the hope that its beneficial objects may be attained by a resort for the necessary powers to the same wisdom and virtue in the nation which established the Constitution in its actual form and providently marked out in the instrument itself a safe and practicable mode of improving it as experience might suggest.

Madison in this letter attempts to warn congress away from the pragmatic point of view that would later be employed to tremendously ill-effect by FDR. He conveys the sense that if the constitution is not strictly adhered to, the proverbial flood-gates will be open. Needless to say, he was very unfortunately correct. What started out as slight breaks from the document that made this country great has led to a full-blown disregard for it. I leave you with another Madison quote:


"With respect to the words general welfare, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers (enumerated in the Constitution) connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators."
James Madison, 1751 ? 1836
4th President of the United States
?Father? of the Constitution

?When Alexander the Great visted the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: 'Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun.' It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.?
-Henry Hazlitt in 'Economics in One Lesson'

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Two inch dick..but it spins!?

Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,239
Loc: Lost In Space
Re: Wise Words [Re: Ancalagon]
    #2853367 - 07/03/04 06:41 AM (13 years, 11 months ago)

It's a shame this country veered so far from it's proper course.

The funny thing is that those who so wish for government to be all things to all people, are some of those who whine so loudly and often about where we are today.

They got just what they wished for and now we all must suffer right alongside them.

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Iraqi Constitution ratification halts terrorism?
( 1 2 3 all )
Swami 3,909 44 10/17/05 09:10 PM
by Prosgeopax
* Transcript of Allawi's speech to Congress Phred 600 4 09/24/04 03:50 PM
by Zahid
* Constitution Restoration Act of 2004 biblical law in america mabus 1,115 13 03/15/04 09:25 PM
by Phred
* A Material Breach of the Constitution Ellis Dee 821 7 02/19/03 07:44 PM
by BowlKiller
* Congress & Bush's interferance in the Terri Schiavo situation.
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Dark_Star 4,448 90 03/27/05 07:30 PM
by unbeliever
* Congress to repeal presidential term limits to allow Bush to seek third term..
( 1 2 3 all )
Smallworlds 3,053 52 08/02/05 12:23 AM
by LeftyBurnz
* The Constitution and the Right to Privacy silversoul7 374 0 10/19/04 09:12 PM
by silversoul7
* Bush on the Constitution: "It's just a goddamned piece of paper"
( 1 2 3 all )
Solutarch 2,021 44 12/15/05 02:25 AM
by rickpsfuckyou

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
250 topic views. 0 members, 0 guests and 4 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
High Mountain Compost
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2018 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.022 seconds spending 0.003 seconds on 19 queries.