|
Anonymous #1
|
Are relationships “transactional”?
#28001108 - 10/15/22 09:40 PM (1 year, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I heard someone say that all relationships are transactional, which seems to me to be an unhealthy way of viewing ones relationship with others, but at the same time, you always receive a benefit from the people you hang out with, even if it’s as simple as enjoying your time with them. What do you guys think?
|
Anonymous #2
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: Anonymous #1]
#28001128 - 10/15/22 09:59 PM (1 year, 3 months ago) |
|
|
In my experience it's only assholes looking at relationships that way. There's so much more...
Edited by Anonymous (10/15/22 09:59 PM)
|
Lynnch
Strangerer



Registered: 04/29/09
Posts: 7,855
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: Anonymous #2] 2
#28001224 - 10/15/22 11:42 PM (1 year, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Transactional implies keeping score, keeping receipts, maybe even literally counting dollars. That's a pretty fucked up relationship. In a healthy relationship, you spend your time together without a calculator, ya know? That said, in an abusive situation, that balance gets so out of wack it's hard to ignore...
|
hummingbird

Registered: 06/29/14
Posts: 2,134
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: Lynnch] 1
#28001265 - 10/16/22 12:35 AM (1 year, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I think it's all in how you look at it, or how you define transaction. One of the definitions of transaction is an exchange or interaction between people...which is what all relationships of any type really are. Transaction does usually imply monetary/material exchange, but it doesn't have to.
|
cubezy
Floating Consciousness

Registered: 01/13/22
Posts: 33
Last seen: 5 months, 7 days
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: hummingbird] 1
#28001272 - 10/16/22 12:50 AM (1 year, 3 months ago) |
|
|
transactional means its based on desire, or what in this society is termed love, but what it really is is want. it comes from lack. happiness is based on the other person however if a relationship is based on unconditional love, where there is no want from the other person, just love, then it is not transactional. this comes from fulfillment and the role of the relationship is to share the happiness, rather than make it a source of it. it is easier to love everyone that way than only 1 person
|
hummingbird

Registered: 06/29/14
Posts: 2,134
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: cubezy]
#28001305 - 10/16/22 01:55 AM (1 year, 3 months ago) |
|
|
If any interaction or exchange between people is a transaction though, that would encompass it all. Sharing happiness or any other feeling or energy or thought with someone is an interaction/exchange, therefore could be considered a transaction/transactional. It's not hard to see how negative connation can be attached to the word transactional when being used to describe relationships, but even genuine unconditional love shared between people is still technically a transaction.
|
jack_straw2208
Doctor



Registered: 02/12/07
Posts: 3,115
Loc: Earth
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: hummingbird]
#28001317 - 10/16/22 02:28 AM (1 year, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Some are more transactional than you think but most are less
-------------------- If you can’t tell what you desperately need, it’s probably sleep.
|
LogicaL Chaos
Ascension Energy & Alien UFOs




Registered: 05/12/07
Posts: 69,325
Loc: The Inexpressible...
Last seen: 17 minutes, 53 seconds
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: hummingbird] 1
#28001363 - 10/16/22 04:46 AM (1 year, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
hummingbird said: I think it's all in how you look at it, or how you define transaction. One of the definitions of transaction is an exchange or interaction between people...which is what all relationships of any type really are. Transaction does usually imply monetary/material exchange, but it doesn't have to.
This. I see relationships as transactional as one person does something for the other and the other person can return the "transaction" in a myriad of different ways.
Its like the saying "You get out what you put in". A transferrence of energy and effort between two people.
-------------------- "What you must understand is that your physical dimension affects everyone in the higher dimensions as well. All things are interconnected. All things are One. Therefore, if one dimension is broken or out of balance, then all other dimensions will experience repercussions." - Pleiadian Prophecy 2020 The New Golden Age by James Carwin PROJECT BLUE BOOK ANALYSIS! (312 pages!) | Psychedelics & UFOs | Ready to Contact UFOs? | The Source on Mushrooms | Trippy Gematrix | Dj TeknoLogical | Fentanyl Test Kits R.I.P. Big Worm || The Start of the Ascension Process was 2020. Welcome to the Next Great Era of Earth 🌎🌍🌏
  Oregon Eclipse Festival 2017 :: Aug 19th - 21st :: Pure Paradise   Very Effective LSA Extraction Tek | 💧 Advanced Cold Water LSA Extraction Method 💧 |  Mescajuana - Mescaline with Marijuana | DMT Dab Bongs | UFO Technology! Shpongle
     
|
Anonymous #3
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: LogicaL Chaos] 1
#28001466 - 10/16/22 07:45 AM (1 year, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Every interaction is transactional. People rarely give eachother the benefit of the doubt and true compassion is limited to those closest to us. Even in altruism there's atleast an expectation that the one on the receiving end at least appreciates it. Communication is a constant transaction. Think about why people hate small talk. Is it hard or does it have little to offer? What is it to have an "intelligent" conversation?
|
TrancedOutBrah
Stranger


Registered: 08/17/21
Posts: 1,303
Last seen: 1 day, 52 minutes
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: Anonymous #3]
#28001936 - 10/16/22 03:21 PM (1 year, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous #3 said: Every interaction is transactional.
Lmao that's a giant stretch.
No relationship or friendship that's worth a damn is transactional
-------------------- Lead by example, words mean little when your actions don't reflect what you say. Spread kindness, love, empathy, compassion. Learn from mistakes. Try and do better. Each day is a new day, try to make it a better one. Coconut and Avocado is awesome for the skin. MIND OVER MATTER

|
Anonymous #3
|
|
More micro. Less macro. Why communicate if there isn't some need? We all need eachother. Is there not something, however miniscule, which you can gain by simply making your comment? Why am I responding? Do you think your SO has expectations of you?
|
Darwin23
INFJ



Registered: 10/08/10
Posts: 3,277
Loc: United States
Last seen: 1 day, 13 hours
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: Anonymous #1]
#28023768 - 10/29/22 10:25 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
On the most relevant level, I disagree. In an ideal relationship, you'll try to bring the best out of your partner and your partner will do the same for you. At the same time, we're human. 30% of female calorie-intake goes to her reproductive system. On a biological level, there is some degree of transaction programmed into us.
--------------------
Take a look at my journal
|
RJ Tubs 202



Registered: 09/20/08
Posts: 6,014
Loc: USA
Last seen: 3 hours, 14 minutes
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: Anonymous #1]
#28026999 - 10/31/22 09:17 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Courtship can feel transactional, especially regarding the Mr. Nice Guy Syndrome. For many men who want to have sex with a woman, (maybe a relationship also) they conclude they must stack the scale in their favor by promoting various impressions that support the conclusion they're a great catch. It's a trade. If this show works, the guy gets sex and the gal gets a fantastic partner who is kind, brave, supportive, polite, good listener, etc. (insert alpha male stereotypes here) "The Game" as some call it. It's a lot like a job interview - a trade based on an interview (performance) evaluation. The company gets a great team member (maybe), and the candidate gets a paycheck every two weeks.
Of course, the facade eventually fades . . . and there's the inevitable reveal 
Jerks are attractive to many women because they don't play this game. What you see is what you get.
|
Gray Hound
Trash



Registered: 05/24/21
Posts: 161
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: Anonymous #1]
#28027109 - 10/31/22 10:31 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
oh god. through hardships an trials. I dont know if ill ever view relationships as transactional, though i never did, but i was certainly picky about who i kept around and i was definitely selfish.
I think theres more to find in the world and deeper in people than a "transaction" maybe it was not a great word choice but "transactional" relationship sounds as cheap as a reciept for a trophy.... or something idk.
ive taken a lot of relationships for granted as a kid.. and now as an adult i can say that i wish to never take another person for granted... cuz there is so much more to life than "me" and "what i want"
fuck what i want, and fuck me. its not what i want in life. its what is given back to me.
all in all. what is life worth to you. You on a journey? or not too sure an just on it for a ride.... The ticket is yours.
Edited by Gray Hound (10/31/22 10:34 PM)
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 1 minute
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: Gray Hound]
#28030549 - 11/03/22 01:38 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
kind, brave, supportive, polite, good listener, etc. (insert alpha male stereotypes here)
Lol those aren’t alpha male stereotypes
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
theRealrollforever
I DID-DENT



Registered: 08/31/13
Posts: 12,736
Loc: Bada-Bing!
Last seen: 2 days, 53 minutes
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: koods]
#28031382 - 11/03/22 03:49 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
kind, brave, supportive, polite, good listener, etc. (insert alpha male stereotypes here)
Lol those aren’t alpha male stereotypes
Believe it or not some people are so far behind in the race they actually think they are leading
--------------------
sunshine said: The order has to be secret and no one is sure.
|
Cranial Feature
Familiar

Registered: 07/05/15
Posts: 77
Loc: Between
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: koods]
#28031495 - 11/03/22 05:02 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
SHHH!
|
Pastywhyte
Say hello to my little friend



Registered: 09/15/12
Posts: 37,808
Loc: Canada
|
|
Until people can reproduce asexually and/or own realistic synthetic companions, all relationships will be to some extent transactional. The question at that point is: can transactional relationships be mutually fulfilling? I believe that they can but that it’s less common today as it was in previous times. Humans don’t need to worry as much about grim realities of existence these days, we have different values now. That may change but for the moment people have different concerns than they once did. Until the social morays and drives catch up to modern technological existence, people will always to some extent see a partner in a relationship as someone who can augment their own life in some way. That is I believe the essence of a transaction between people.
So if relationships are in essence going to always have some elements of transaction what does this say about said relationship and the people within it? That will depend entirely on what exactly has been transacted and what kind of social morays we have instilled around those things in relation to said transaction. Two people just spending time together feels very egalitarian but what if one person has a communication issue, ie mute or deaf? Suddenly that mutual transaction becomes a little more one sided. But what if the deaf person is super interesting and can teach a lot? Now it’s going the other way. As soon as resource sharing becomes a factor it gets even more complex. Is there a difference between a pretty woman getting lots of dates where she benefits from her date paying for her and a sex worker? Is there a difference between a guy who spends $600 on 5 dates where he eventually gets lucky and sleeps with a woman (or doesn’t) and him paying $600 to go smash an escort for 2 hours? I would say there is but that the essence of the transactions taking place are still quite similar. It’s the expectation of potential outcomes or paths to the outcome that are different.
One thing to consider is what is the point of a relationship? Within most species in the animal kingdom relationships between animals is designed to further the survival of that species. Wolf packs hunt together to provide food for survival, many birds mate for life, etc. These relationships while not all the same are meant to allow for the survival of the species; both on an individual level and the subsequent generations to ensure survival of the species. Humans seem less concerned with raw survival now and our relationships that we form today tend to reflect this. I feel that the exact nature of transactional human relationships have a lot more “personal choice” built into them today as they are seen as an augmentation of human existence rather than the mechanism by which humans can exist. This is likely due to technology and as technology advances the need for specific relationship structures changes as well. As the conditions upon which we survive changes over the years, so to can the exact facets of our relationships and what kinds of relationships become successful or not.
|
Asante
Mage


Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 86,795
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: Pastywhyte]
#28065390 - 11/22/22 11:21 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
in a relationship you invest yourselves into each others wellbeing. If you let yourself be given the vip treatment like that, but dont give them the vip treatment back, the love will die, not because they are "transactional" but because you mooch of them.
So yes, love is transactional in the sense that each gives what they can. This is even so in most bdsm relationships.
Not in the sense of "wanting to receive" but in he sense of mutual giving, which of couirse doesbnt have to be money related.
-------------------- Omnicyclion.org higher knowledge starts here
|
Anonymous #4
|
Re: Are relationships “transactional”? [Re: Anonymous #1]
#28080735 - 12/03/22 04:33 AM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous #1 said: I heard someone say that all relationships are transactional, which seems to me to be an unhealthy way of viewing ones relationship with others, but at the same time, you always receive a benefit from the people you hang out with, even if it’s as simple as enjoying your time with them. What do you guys think?
"Transactional" gets a bad rep. People say you're an incel/cynic/psychopath (depending on your sex and relationship status) when you say that you consider (the concept of) relationships transactional, but say "I think relationships are a give and take spiritually, mentally, physically and sexually where both parties should invest themselves equally" and suddenly everyone gives you standing ovations or at worst calls you something of an over-idealistic hippy despite both of these statements saying the E-X-A-C-T same fucking thing.
So yes. They're transactional. A non-transactional relationship is at best dishonest if not downright exploitative if not abusive.
|
|