|
The Ecstatic
Chilldog Extraordinaire


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 34,046
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 2 hours, 5 minutes
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: ballsalsa]
#27886886 - 08/02/22 12:33 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ballsalsa said: If you can get one then you could get any of them. I doubt we'll break tradition by holding anyone at those levels accountable any time soon. Maybe they'll find a way to give Trumpy a slap on the wrist of some kind that would prevent him from holding office without doing any time or forfeiting any significant assets.
Maybe they could use this one somehow. He'll be too old to run again 5 years after conviction
They won’t do this for the same reason they won’t pack the court: they’re terrified of setting a precedent for the party with an actual ideological goal.
--------------------
|
lifeiswhatyoumake


Registered: 09/30/11
Posts: 17,363
Last seen: 4 hours, 42 minutes
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: The Ecstatic] 1
#27895643 - 08/09/22 09:45 AM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
The FBI raided Mar-a-lago yesterday. It is clear that "they" aren't afraid of setting new precedents. Trump will be indicted on crimes that bar him from office pretty soon. About damn time!
|
Psilynut2
Stranger

Registered: 04/28/17
Posts: 5,356
Last seen: 48 minutes, 46 seconds
|
|
Oh man the irony of this being about classified documents he wasn't supposed to be keeping his house ... it's so much irony .... lock him up !!!
|
mushboy
modboy



Registered: 04/24/05
Posts: 33,062
Loc: where?
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: Psilynut2]
#27895745 - 08/09/22 11:17 AM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
his going to use hillarys imaginary fake crime to justify his real crime.
its like something my older brother use to try and do to me
|
Heady
Booby Trap
Registered: 08/08/22
Posts: 14
Loc: Questionable
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: mushboy] 1
#27895813 - 08/09/22 12:21 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
The raid will accomplish nothing besides inflaming the rightwing’s hatred of federal law enforcement. The fact that nothing will be found actually does discredit the FBI and lends credence to the perception—held by the majority of the right—that any investigation of Trump is calculated malice and part of a political hit-job. Plays right into their concept of “deep state” paranoia.
If Trump is concealing any physical evidence, it’s held within a safe at his legal counsel’s office. The raid was a publicity stunt that will backfire spectacularly.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 107,128
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 56 seconds
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: mushboy]
#27895814 - 08/09/22 12:24 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Hillary tweeted a picture of a “but her emails” hat and Ted Cruz said “of course Hillary makes it about herself.”
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Heady
Booby Trap
Registered: 08/08/22
Posts: 14
Loc: Questionable
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: koods]
#27895817 - 08/09/22 12:26 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Liberals love political theater
|
lifeiswhatyoumake


Registered: 09/30/11
Posts: 17,363
Last seen: 4 hours, 42 minutes
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: Heady]
#27895820 - 08/09/22 12:29 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Heady said:The fact that nothing will be found
haha, how can you possibly say "The fact that nothing will be found"???? Unless you're literally in the FBI and have insider knowledge, then you have NO FUCKING IDEA what you're talking about. The FBI doesn't conduct raids unless it has very strong evidence already of a crime.
|
Heady
Booby Trap
Registered: 08/08/22
Posts: 14
Loc: Questionable
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
|
Shall we place a wager? Haha!
|
Psilynut2
Stranger

Registered: 04/28/17
Posts: 5,356
Last seen: 48 minutes, 46 seconds
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: Heady] 2
#27895829 - 08/09/22 12:37 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
If Trump is concealing any physical evidence, it’s held within a safe at his legal counsel’s office. The raid was a publicity stunt that will backfire spectacularly.
They managed to convince a judge who probably thought of everything you just said and more that they would in fact find something and it wouldn't just look like a political stunt . Even if they find something his supporters will just say the law doesn't matter , the news is fake and the election was stolen , I couldn't give less of a fuck what they think . They are going to have to find someone else to lose to Biden .
|
lifeiswhatyoumake


Registered: 09/30/11
Posts: 17,363
Last seen: 4 hours, 42 minutes
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: Heady]
#27895830 - 08/09/22 12:37 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
I'm not going to make a bet with some noobie who has 7 posts. You're probably a Falcon puppet.
|
Heady
Booby Trap
Registered: 08/08/22
Posts: 14
Loc: Questionable
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
|
How I do wish you people were more intelligent. It’s honestly depressing af.
Liberals, make sure you don’t run Buttigieg, Kamala, or (lol) Hilary against Trump or DeSantis. They will lose.
Edited by Heady (08/09/22 12:41 PM)
|
lifeiswhatyoumake


Registered: 09/30/11
Posts: 17,363
Last seen: 4 hours, 42 minutes
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: Heady]
#27895835 - 08/09/22 12:41 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
In what way do you want "you people" to become more intelligent? Please be clear in your explanation so we understand exactly where you're coming from.
|
Heady
Booby Trap
Registered: 08/08/22
Posts: 14
Loc: Questionable
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
|
You’re sickeningly naive. The way you mindlessly engross yourselves in the spectacle.
You’re almost as bad as the most backward and belligerent trump supporters. Just slightly more educated and philosophically inclined. Just barely though
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 107,128
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 56 seconds
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: Heady]
#27895844 - 08/09/22 12:48 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Heady said: The raid will accomplish nothing besides inflaming the rightwing’s hatred of federal law enforcement. The fact that nothing will be found actually does discredit the FBI and lends credence to the perception—held by the majority of the right—that any investigation of Trump is calculated malice and part of a political hit-job. Plays right into their concept of “deep state” paranoia.
If Trump is concealing any physical evidence, it’s held within a safe at his legal counsel’s office. The raid was a publicity stunt that will backfire spectacularly.
My prediction: FBI discovered that Trump was removing documents and putting them in his personal safe.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Heady
Booby Trap
Registered: 08/08/22
Posts: 14
Loc: Questionable
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: koods]
#27895848 - 08/09/22 12:52 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
if he’s done so, which certainly is not outside the realm of possibility, the documents won’t be in his personal safe. He has an army of hirelings to insulate himself from situations such as these.
|
lifeiswhatyoumake


Registered: 09/30/11
Posts: 17,363
Last seen: 4 hours, 42 minutes
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: Heady]
#27895850 - 08/09/22 12:54 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Heady said: You’re sickeningly naive. The way you mindlessly engross yourselves in the spectacle.
You’re almost as bad as the most backward and belligerent trump supporters. Just slightly more educated and philosophically inclined. Just barely though
so you make a claim about how we need to be more intelligent. I then ask you to clearly explain what you mean. You then reply without explaining yourself at all.... I'm quite disappointed in your lack of determination to make your point clear. I would ask you to explain how I am being naive, but you obviously won't explain yourself for that, either, a wise person would assume.
Therefore, I am declaring myself done talking with you because you just aren't able to explain your points at all. Welcome to the Shroomery!
|
Heady
Booby Trap
Registered: 08/08/22
Posts: 14
Loc: Questionable
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
|
I didn’t read that
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 107,128
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 56 seconds
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: Heady]
#27895862 - 08/09/22 01:05 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Trump should show us the warrant.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 8 months, 8 days
|
Re: Why isn’t there a thread for the Jan 6 hearings? [Re: Heady]
#27895863 - 08/09/22 01:06 PM (1 year, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Heady said: The raid will accomplish nothing besides inflaming the rightwing’s hatred of federal law enforcement. The fact that nothing will be found actually does discredit the FBI and lends credence to the perception—held by the majority of the right—that any investigation of Trump is calculated malice and part of a political hit-job. Plays right into their concept of “deep state” paranoia.
If Trump is concealing any physical evidence, it’s held within a safe at his legal counsel’s office. The raid was a publicity stunt that will backfire spectacularly.
This happened with the Mueller investigation. The Special Counsel was authorized to investigate:
(i) any links and/or coordination bet ween the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and (ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and (iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
They found no criminal connection between Trump campaign and Russia for (i), but (ii) and (iii) are interesting. They used the investigation as a free pass to investigate everyone around him for pretty much anything.
Now they're trying again to find anything bad on Trump to prevent him from running for office again. We're in a Banana Republic.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
Edited by Falcon91Wolvrn03 (08/09/22 01:15 PM)
|
|