Quote:
Holybullshit said: In my experience, for adult men, how often they think about sex itself is directly proportional to how much they objectify women.
Correct, as a sex object. 
Quote:
Holybullshit said: I've remained physically active, I work out but never bulked up(6'1", 185lbs), and that hasn't been true for me. Maybe some of these "ogreish" looking men who stay as horny as teenagers are using a little chemical assistance to remain "hormonal"?
Firstly, it grosses out about 50% of women.
The other half kind-of like to be grossed-out. Very young women. All different hair colors, around town.

I don't look pretty. I have all the secondary sex characteristics, in abundance.
If you've followed me, for long, you already knew that I eat on the permissive side and shy away from chemicals, though.
Nobody else put me up to this. There was no pressure or body image issue.
I liked the idea of putting on as much weights as I can stand, before I knew it was a thing.
When I did labor, I took the same approach, as well as when I ate, afterwards, to regain my strength.
I was your size in about the 6th grade.
Genetics are an issue. I have many unusually tall people and centenarians in my family.
I have friends with different builds who also look like their fathers and male relatives. 
imho, the effect of steroids is cosmetic, to change the balance of water in different tissues. When I saw guys in their 100's taking this stuff, it improved their looks and self confidence. Not genetics.
HGH and testosterone are subject to a negative feedback loop, that will atrophy your organs, over time. I have never literally seen the rumored way, in which someone is supposed to work them off, so have never touched the stuff, even once. Don't mind if you do, but can't recommend it.
|

Quote:
Holybullshit said: In my experience, for adult men, how often they think about sex itself is directly proportional to how much they objectify women.

Marriage is an arrangement of ownership, in which your property, or that of another man, can be treated roughly or with careful stewardship.
It does not imply that I ruin a resource, useful for primogeniture (but, usually for my enjoyment.)
It does not imply that I am a homewrecker, because I might offend the chivalry of a strongman (but, usually a simp.)
|