Quote:

---

filthyknees said:
Wow I'm sorry people bother you about mobile layout. They must really have hard lives.

Switched back to old layout, I've never heard any real complaints about mobile.  I bet if you did it's from a few whiny people.

I'll be disappointed if we're forced to use this 'responsive layout',  sad to see you'll 'support as long as you can', when it's worked fine for decades.

I get the need to 'upgrade' but seems like an entirely make work sinario, the idea that because people have to scroll means users so just leave the shroomery is not sound at all. Can you list any real number of linkable examples of user complaints saying they had to scroll to use the website on mobile and that it's so hard they're leaving? Or it just a made up idea you think people have or some person told you that's true?

Making it a 'modern managed platform'?,  it's a forum where people post mushroom pics and make phallic jokes, it doesn't need to be modernized. Having been a mobile user all along and having made 6,000 posts I can tell you it's fine and you would likely find better use of your time on other things.

All love to the shroomery, love the site, just being honest. At the very least support the old layout indefinitely, all I see that the formatting and zooming has changed. I do not see how this is nessecary or effectively changes the relivence on the shroomery comparable to if you'd used your time in other directions to promote the site.

No need to be 'smart' . It's not broken don't fix it ect. But if you're gonna make it a 'smart layout's at least don't force us to use it, cause like you said in your post outlining it, I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking what the fuck? Only because I have high hopes for the shroomery and think we could be doing way more things to stay relivent than auto zoom on mobile browsing feature which to me is worse than a nothing burger it's like a nothing burger with glitter on it. Best analogy I could think of while on the toilet.

Tl;dr: cool, I guess? but don't make us use it.

---

 

Quote:

---

1234go said:
I went back to the old one until I can't anymore. I don't care for the new, but I'm sure it'll just take some getting used to.

As others have mentioned, the "threads" link is a little small compared to others that I never use. Not a fan of how threads are listed/laid out either, all blocky looking.

---

Quote:

---

Smartattack said:

Quote:

---

Big_Dub said:

Quote:

---

Big_Dub said:
Try using the find in page/  find feature to "scroll" to top, not ideal, but significantly better.

---

But a go to top button would be so nice Ythan
Maybe after edit, quick reply, reply....

---

There is one...

---

Quote:

---

koods said:
The new format would be fine if I could make the letters smaller.

---

.....touche'

Quote:

---

The Ecstatic said:

Quote:

---

1234go said:
I went back to the old one until I can't anymore. I don't care for the new, but I'm sure it'll just take some getting used to.

As others have mentioned, the "threads" link is a little small compared to others that I never use. Not a fan of how threads are listed/laid out either, all blocky looking.

---

This is my main gripe as well.

Being formatted to fit my screen is great because it saves me having to zoom in and out, but the downside is now I have to scroll down 5x as far because only a handful of threads can fit on my screen.

Finding where the buttons are on the page is annoying too but I’m sure my fingers will figure it out.

---

Quote:

---

The Ecstatic said:
Being formatted to fit my screen is great because it saves me having to zoom in and out, but the downside is now I have to scroll down 5x as far because only a handful of threads can fit on my screen.

---

Quote:

---

Drboomer said:
My only gripe as well they need enlarged and the others under it shrank I keep missing threads and hitting search kinda frustrating.

---

This should be improved now, in line with your suggestions.


Thanks so much everyone for the continued feedback!