|
Kaeden123

Registered: 12/15/20
Posts: 121
Loc: Oregon
Last seen: 1 year, 8 months
|
Gymnopilus Luteofolius ID
#27102539 - 12/22/20 01:16 PM (3 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Habitat: Growing out of a wood chip pile in Willamette valley OR Gills: Yellow, turning more rusty with age, attached
Stem: Wide, 3-6 cm tall. Reddish. Brushing blue green especially at base. Hollow
Cap: Reddish purple with scales, scales becoming yellower with maturity. some bluish bruising. Pinkish veil.
Spore print color: In progress
Bruising: Blue green
Other information: Growing in clumps
|
ApostleofAzathoth
lunatic wielding pressure cooker



Registered: 11/16/17
Posts: 699
Loc: Somewhere in the PNW
|
Re: Gymnopilus Luteofolius ID [Re: Kaeden123] 1
#27102571 - 12/22/20 01:38 PM (3 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
I've only found em twice so I can't give you a positive ID, but it appears to be Gymnopilus near luteofolius! I was told that the ones in our area are generally Gymnopilus thiersii rather than luteofolius.
|
Kaeden123

Registered: 12/15/20
Posts: 121
Loc: Oregon
Last seen: 1 year, 8 months
|
|
Quote:
ApostleofAzathoth said: I've only found em twice so I can't give you a positive ID, but it appears to be Gymnopilus near luteofolius! I was told that the ones in our area are generally Gymnopilus thiersii rather than luteofolius.
Thanks for the input! Yeah I was puzzled not seeing either on the mushrooms by state document! Looked up Thiersii and it definitely could be that! Coloration just looks more like the pictures I’ve seen of Luteofolius. Hopefully we can get some more input!
Edited by Kaeden123 (12/22/20 04:19 PM)
|
ChasingBoomers86
Fungus Finder



Registered: 07/03/19
Posts: 330
Loc: North Carolina
Last seen: 8 days, 20 hours
|
Re: Gymnopilus Luteofolius ID [Re: Kaeden123]
#27103202 - 12/22/20 10:03 PM (3 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Def Gymnopilus
|
Moria841



Registered: 07/02/18
Posts: 4,935
Loc: NJ
Last seen: 23 minutes, 55 seconds
|
|
G. thiersii is likely
|
Kaeden123

Registered: 12/15/20
Posts: 121
Loc: Oregon
Last seen: 1 year, 8 months
|
Re: Gymnopilus Luteofolius ID [Re: Moria841]
#27103503 - 12/23/20 04:11 AM (3 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ChasingBoomers86 said: Def Gymnopilus
Quote:
Moria841 said: G. thiersii is likely
Definitely active then? Though potentially pretty weak? Thanks for your guys’s time!
|
Doc9151
Mycologist



Registered: 02/23/17
Posts: 13,753
Loc: Gulf Coast USA
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
|
Re: Gymnopilus Luteofolius ID [Re: Moria841]
#27104041 - 12/23/20 11:44 AM (3 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Moria841 said: G. thiersii is likely
I agree
--------------------
  Psilocybe cubensis data collection thread. please help with this project if you hunt wild cubensis. https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=26513593&page=0&vc=1#26513593
|
Alan Rockefeller
Mycologist

Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,311
Last seen: 1 day, 14 hours
|
|
Quote:
ApostleofAzathoth said: I've only found em twice so I can't give you a positive ID, but it appears to be Gymnopilus near luteofolius! I was told that the ones in our area are generally Gymnopilus thiersii rather than luteofolius.
I'm not sure if G. thiersii is different than G. luteofolius - I find G. thiersii all the time, but I don't know exactly what G. luteofolius is. G. thiersii was described from conifer just a few miles from my house, while G. luteofolius was described from birch in New York.
Perhaps one day I'll be able to get a sample that I am confident is G. luteofolius and see how it compares.
On the west coast I know of two active red Gymnopilus - G. thiersii with subcapitate cheilocystidia and G. dilepis with ventricose cheilocystidia.
I am also not sure what G. aeruginosus is.
|
Doc9151
Mycologist



Registered: 02/23/17
Posts: 13,753
Loc: Gulf Coast USA
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
|
|
Quote:
Alan Rockefeller said:
Quote:
ApostleofAzathoth said: I've only found em twice so I can't give you a positive ID, but it appears to be Gymnopilus near luteofolius! I was told that the ones in our area are generally Gymnopilus thiersii rather than luteofolius.
I'm not sure if G. thiersii is different than G. luteofolius - I find G. thiersii all the time, but I don't know exactly what G. luteofolius is. G. thiersii was described from conifer just a few miles from my house, while G. luteofolius was described from birch in New York.
Perhaps one day I'll be able to get a sample that I am confident is G. luteofolius and see how it compares.
On the west coast I know of two active red Gymnopilus - G. thiersii with subcapitate cheilocystidia and G. dilepis with ventricose cheilocystidia.
I am also not sure what G. aeruginosus is.
Do you know of any nonactive look alikes?
Edit: on the West Coast!
--------------------
  Psilocybe cubensis data collection thread. please help with this project if you hunt wild cubensis. https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=26513593&page=0&vc=1#26513593
Edited by Doc9151 (01/14/21 07:24 PM)
|
Alan Rockefeller
Mycologist

Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,311
Last seen: 1 day, 14 hours
|
Re: Gymnopilus Luteofolius ID [Re: Doc9151]
#27148473 - 01/14/21 07:24 PM (3 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Doc9151 said: Do you know of any nonactive look alikes?
The inactive ones tend to look a lot more boring, like G. sapineus.
Tricholomopsis rutilans can look a lot like G. thiersii, but it doesn't have gills that are as orange and a slightly different cap texture.
|
Kaeden123

Registered: 12/15/20
Posts: 121
Loc: Oregon
Last seen: 1 year, 8 months
|
|
Quote:
Alan Rockefeller said:
Quote:
ApostleofAzathoth said: I've only found em twice so I can't give you a positive ID, but it appears to be Gymnopilus near luteofolius! I was told that the ones in our area are generally Gymnopilus thiersii rather than luteofolius.
I'm not sure if G. thiersii is different than G. luteofolius - I find G. thiersii all the time, but I don't know exactly what G. luteofolius is. G. thiersii was described from conifer just a few miles from my house, while G. luteofolius was described from birch in New York.
Perhaps one day I'll be able to get a sample that I am confident is G. luteofolius and see how it compares.
On the west coast I know of two active red Gymnopilus - G. thiersii with subcapitate cheilocystidia and G. dilepis with ventricose cheilocystidia.
I am also not sure what G. aeruginosus is.
Seems like most people seem to think Dilepis is not active, this is not the case?
|
Alan Rockefeller
Mycologist

Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,311
Last seen: 1 day, 14 hours
|
Re: Gymnopilus Luteofolius ID [Re: Kaeden123]
#27155997 - 01/18/21 05:38 PM (3 years, 28 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Kaeden123 said: Seems like most people seem to think Dilepis is not active, this is not the case?
Hard to be sure but I have heard recently that it is active.
|
|