|
K-dubs
Rookie


Registered: 06/23/20
Posts: 174
Last seen: 24 days, 14 hours
|
|
Agreed. I used Hillary as an example of a classy loser and of course the person's head exploded and that was the end of that discussion.
|
twighead
mͯó



Registered: 08/27/08
Posts: 29,686
Loc: Glenn Gould's Fuck Windmill
Last seen: 3 hours, 48 minutes
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: K-dubs]
#27076167 - 12/06/20 09:09 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I don't know if she was the classiest loser, she seemed like an entitled, fitful, lashing loser that expected all of the cards to line up in her favor due to all of the grease in the machine and was astounded when it didn't work out.

John McCain was a classy loser... but why even use the term? We win when we lose and can accept it and move forward with commonality in mind.
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 8 days
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: K-dubs] 1
#27076232 - 12/06/20 10:02 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
K-dubs said: I used Hillary as an example of a classy loser...
Are you joking? She started the whole Russia-Gate scandal as a result of losing.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
christopera
Stranger


Registered: 10/13/17
Posts: 14,270
Last seen: 34 seconds
|
|
I only skimmed that but I didn’t see Hilary on that document.
-------------------- Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result. A Dorito is pizza, change my mind. Bank and Union with The Shroomery at the Zuul on The internet - now with %'s and things I’m sorry it had to be me.
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,800
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: christopera] 1
#27076279 - 12/06/20 10:36 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
More importantly, everything in that document occurred prior to the election, so that pretty much disproves FW's theory that she did it as a result of losing.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 8 days
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Enlil]
#27076321 - 12/06/20 11:29 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Ah, you're right. She did it to deflect from her email scandal, as I pointed out back in July 2016 and to cheat in the upcoming election.
Even less classy.
Thanks for refreshing my memory!
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Sulfurshelfsean
Defender of Cubes


Registered: 07/29/10
Posts: 3,956
Last seen: 11 hours, 34 minutes
|
|
So what youre saying is that you lile to spin these things however it suites you at the time/ depending on the argument youre trying to make? To the point where you forget what youve said about these things in past poats?
--------------------
   Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!
|
RJ Tubs 202



Registered: 09/20/08
Posts: 6,029
Loc: USA
Last seen: 5 days, 20 hours
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Kryptos]
#27076400 - 12/07/20 12:53 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Kryptos said:
Watch Ben Shapiro's brain melt down when he realizes that even his wife's dry-ass pussy can't keep him glued to the computer screen for long enough to attack everything.
You're speculating about the moisture level of Ben's wife's vagina?
I think we can all agree that's degrading the discussion.
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 8 days
|
|
Quote:
Sulfurshelfsean said: So what youre saying is that you lile to spin these things however it suites you at the time/ depending on the argument youre trying to make? To the point where you forget what youve said about these things in past poats?
No. Hillary DID in fact make blame Russia on her loss, and that still supports my point that she wasn't a classy loser.
Admittedly, I forgot that she had already made up the Russia-Gate story in order to deflect from her email scandal before she blamed Russia for her election loss, and I happily corrected myself once Enlil pointed out the timing error, but this doesn't take away at all from the point that Hillary did make up the Russia-Gate scandal.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,800
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: Ah, you're right. She did it to deflect from her email scandal
I don't see how that's cheating. She reported a russian hack on her server. Donald Trump literally asked hackers to get those emails. I don't see how her making inferences from the two is cheating in any way.
Besides, if saying false/bad things about a political opponent is cheating, then Trump, the man you voted for, has been cheating this whole time.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
K-dubs
Rookie


Registered: 06/23/20
Posts: 174
Last seen: 24 days, 14 hours
|
|
Russia did interfere with the election- it is well documented. She was the target of the misinformation campaign. I mean, if she blamed them for her loss, she was not wrong. But she was classy in that she conceded and did not file 5 million lawsuits and claim everyone is cheating with zero proof. J/s.
|
chopstick
nobody



Registered: 07/26/08
Posts: 5,134
Loc: Chin's Wok
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: K-dubs] 2
#27076845 - 12/07/20 09:56 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
K-dubs said: Agreed. I used Hillary as an example of a classy loser and of course the person's head exploded and that was the end of that discussion.
Hillary, after her loss literally launched a massive campaign, co-ordinated with the intelligence community to blame Trump's victory on "Russian interference", which not only was a complete Lie, but which they knew was a Lie.
So Trump, rather than being able to re-establish ties with Russia was held back politically by "Russiagate" which was nothing more than a cold-blooded attempt by the Hillary gang to prevent Trump from being able to do the things he wanted to do while in office, and prevent his presidency from seeming "legitimate" in the eyes of the american people. It didn't work, of course, as many million of people see through this evil and fallacious lie.
By keeping ties between the US and Russia from being healed it puts the entire world directly at risk of WW3 and potentially even nuclear annihilation.
That is how despicable Hillary and her cronies are, that they'd rather risk the planet than let Trump have his 4 years unmolested by the deep state.
So yeah, Hillary is anything but a "classy" loser. She is a power hungry and obsessed psychopath who has done things far worse than Trump could ever possibly dream of, and she definitely doesn't give a damn about the American people or doing what's best for the planet.
|
The Ecstatic
Chilldog Extraordinaire


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 33,472
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 17 hours, 13 minutes
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: chopstick]
#27076860 - 12/07/20 10:10 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Yeah I mean Hillary blamed everyone but herself for losing.
Her own campaign elevated trump, and then lost to him. Then blamed Bernie, Jill stein, Russia, progressives blah blah blah
--------------------
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 6 hours, 3 minutes
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: K-dubs]
#27076945 - 12/07/20 11:02 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
K-dubs said: Russia did interfere with the election- it is well documented. She was the target of the misinformation campaign. I mean, if she blamed them for her loss, she was not wrong. But she was classy in that she conceded and did not file 5 million lawsuits and claim everyone is cheating with zero proof. J/s.
I also 'interfered' in the election and that's well documented. Every election is about spewing misinformation, so there's nothing new on that front.
|
The Ecstatic
Chilldog Extraordinaire


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 33,472
Loc: 'Merica
Last seen: 17 hours, 13 minutes
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: qman] 1
#27076961 - 12/07/20 11:12 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
By “interfere” in the election, he means people connected to the Russian government shared information that made the Democrats look bad.
No wonder these same people think anyone that criticizes Democrats is a Russian agent.
--------------------
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 8 days
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: The Ecstatic] 1
#27076976 - 12/07/20 11:21 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
The Ecstatic said: By “interfere” in the election, he means people connected to the Russian government shared information that made the Democrats look bad.
No wonder these same people think anyone that criticizes Democrats is a Russian agent.
Learning truthful information about the DNC is bad. Spewing make believe information about Trump-Russia collusion is good.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Psilynut2
Stranger

Registered: 04/28/17
Posts: 5,187
Last seen: 10 hours, 3 minutes
|
|
Quote:
Yeah I mean Hillary blamed everyone but herself for losing.
Her own campaign elevated trump, and then lost to him. Then blamed Bernie, Jill stein, Russia, progressives blah blah blah
--------------------
And then Trump blamed her popular vote victory on illegal Mexicans !!! But omg Hillary though.... nothing worse than her .
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 8 days
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: K-dubs]
#27076996 - 12/07/20 11:36 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
K-dubs said: Russia did interfere with the election- it is well documented.
Can you link to that documentation? I keep asking, and all I get is the troll farm, for which the charges were dropped, and the WikiLeaks DNC leak which Wikileaks insists wasn't provided by the Russians.
Quote:
K-dubs said: She was the target of the misinformation campaign.
What mininformation campaign? Did you mean Trump was the target of a misinformation campaign?
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 8 days
|
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Psilynut2]
#27077002 - 12/07/20 11:38 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Psilynut2 said: And then Trump blamed her popular vote victory on illegal Mexicans !!! But omg Hillary though.... nothing worse than her .
What's worse? Spreading a fake story before people vote, or after?
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
skOsH
Functionally dysfunctional



Registered: 07/03/19
Posts: 1,377
Loc: the PNW
Last seen: 5 days, 15 hours
|
|
People got desperate after they got fucked over during the recession, and gambled on someone that made their money basically conning everyone. That's how desperate the people became
That's how far the overton window was shifted with Obama. People thought he was far left. Maybe on about three issues
It will take liberals (fake leftists that are actually centrists but don't realize it) to realize that Obama wasn't a good president, Hillary was a terrible choice, Biden too, same with Bush v2 and Clinton. Garbage in, garbage out.
I'll be waiting for 2024 when everyone will say...again, that we have to choose between the lesser of two evils and that this is the most important election ever. Just like they always do.
I probably won't vote. Again. Every four years, Americans do this stupid shit and life doesn't get better, it gets worse...for the vast majority of people, it gets worse.
Obama kicked millions of people out of their homes due to being given terrible loans
Congress just argues with each other. They gave the richest 100 people another $5 Trillion, shut down the economy except for major corporations and have given everyone maybe $2400, individuals $1200. Once.
The people need more
The politicians literally don't care. The media whines about covid parties but then politicians are throwing and attending parties. All of them still getting paid...whilst tens of millions of Americans are struggling to stay afloat
You think the VP of the guy that kicked millions out of their homes is going to let you have a home?
Biden's gonna kick people out of their homes...because he serves the banks and corporations.
|
|