Home | Community | Message Board


Shroom Supply
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom

Jump to first unread post. Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next >  [ show all ]
InvisibleEnlilM
OTD God-King
 User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 53,012
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: yeah]
    #27049055 - 11/20/20 04:42 PM (12 days, 13 hours ago)

I do.  Clearly, you don't.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.

Ask an Attorney

Fuck the Amish


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OnlineSulfurshelfsean
Defender of Cubes
 User Gallery

Registered: 07/29/10
Posts: 2,502
Last seen: 4 minutes, 59 seconds
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: yeah]
    #27049058 - 11/20/20 04:44 PM (12 days, 13 hours ago)

Uh....i made the comment. So yeah I understand it was sarcasm. You understand that this is the same type of framing for trumps retarded arguments right now, correct? That even one instance of voter fraud should force recounts and revotes?


--------------------


Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleEnlilM
OTD God-King
 User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 53,012
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
    #27049061 - 11/20/20 04:46 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)

I think you're exaggerating.  Trump has two people who were denied the right to cure their votes.  That is literally TWICE as many as the "one instance" you seem to be implying is in play.  If you can't debate honestly, you shouldn't even try.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.

Ask an Attorney

Fuck the Amish


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineyeah
Male User Gallery

Registered: 02/08/09
Posts: 3,416
Last seen: 2 hours, 19 minutes
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean] * 1
    #27049062 - 11/20/20 04:47 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)

Quote:

Sulfurshelfsean said:
Quote:

yeah said:
Quote:

christopera said:
You don't have to watch the news to see how stupid the right wing, or at least those dying on the cross for Trump's 2020 election, sound when they act like he will still win. Many of the posts on this site alone are good enough.




But the guy I quoted was implying anyone who questions the election as being stupid. That's a lot different than "dying on the cross" for Trump.



Yeah i never said that...Anyone towing trumps stupid line right now sounds stupid as fuck. It has to be embarrassing. I mostly get my news through the shroomery these days. I follow the links everyone posts to try and get a better understanding of where everyones heads are at. This website is an actually awesome resource to gauge the political discourse in the country.




So is someone who thinks there's enough things that add up to warrant examining it all through the legal process what you would call stupid?


--------------------
[


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineyeah
Male User Gallery

Registered: 02/08/09
Posts: 3,416
Last seen: 2 hours, 19 minutes
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Enlil] * 1
    #27049068 - 11/20/20 04:49 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)

Quote:

Enlil said:
I do.  Clearly, you don't.



lmao man you're a lawyer you can do better than "no you"
I'm just some guy without any degree at all come on man you look bad

So if someone says "I have proof that Hilary was the real winner of the 2016 election. This woman voted twice for trump in 2016. Hilary never got a revote or recount"
then saying "this is how stupid they look"
He isn't implying that there is very little evidence of fraud and anyone who thinks otherwise is stupid?
How?


--------------------
[


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineyeah
Male User Gallery

Registered: 02/08/09
Posts: 3,416
Last seen: 2 hours, 19 minutes
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Enlil] * 2
    #27049072 - 11/20/20 04:50 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)

Quote:

Enlil said:
I think you're exaggerating.  Trump has two people who were denied the right to cure their votes.  That is literally TWICE as many as the "one instance" you seem to be implying is in play.  If you can't debate honestly, you shouldn't even try.



You need to get news from sources besides CNN and Reddit.
If you're not aware of the anomalies present then you're hardly doing any due diligence to be informed.


--------------------
[


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleEnlilM
OTD God-King
 User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 53,012
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: yeah]
    #27049073 - 11/20/20 04:52 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)

Quote:

yeah said:
Quote:

Enlil said:
I do.  Clearly, you don't.



lmao man you're a lawyer you can do better than "no you"
I'm just some guy without any degree at all come on man you look bad

So if someone says "I have proof that Hilary was the real winner of the 2016 election. This woman voted twice for trump in 2016. Hilary never got a revote or recount"
then saying "this is how stupid they look"
He isn't implying that there is very little evidence of fraud and anyone who thinks otherwise is stupid?
How?



He is saying that.  There is very little evidence of fraud.  Anyone who thinks otherwise IS stupid. 

That's not what you said, though.  You said that he's implying anyone who questions the election is stupid.

There's a big difference between the two. 

And yes, I can do better.  No, your posts aren't worth the effort of doing so.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.

Ask an Attorney

Fuck the Amish


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineyeah
Male User Gallery

Registered: 02/08/09
Posts: 3,416
Last seen: 2 hours, 19 minutes
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: yeah] * 1
    #27049075 - 11/20/20 04:52 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)



--------------------
[


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleEnlilM
OTD God-King
 User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 53,012
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: yeah]
    #27049078 - 11/20/20 04:53 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)

Quote:

yeah said:

You need to get news from sources besides CNN and Reddit.
If you're not aware of the anomalies present then you're hardly doing any due diligence to be informed.



I don't view either.  My source is actual court filings.  So far, that's what is in question...two votes.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.

Ask an Attorney

Fuck the Amish


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OnlineSulfurshelfsean
Defender of Cubes
 User Gallery

Registered: 07/29/10
Posts: 2,502
Last seen: 4 minutes, 59 seconds
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: yeah] * 1
    #27049082 - 11/20/20 04:54 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)

Its not warranted, because judges have determined there is not enough evidence for any of this bullshit. In states where the margin of error is enough for a recount, sure have at it. But trumps line of bullshit is just that at this point. Bullshit with no concrete evidence as to its validity. At this point trump and his cult are make believing that the election was rigged. Big ole nothing burger. Worse than Russia gate.


--------------------


Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleEnlilM
OTD God-King
 User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 53,012
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: yeah]
    #27049107 - 11/20/20 05:13 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)

Quote:

yeah said:
https://hereistheevidence.com/?fbclid=IwAR1347xMNTaQyG4rHWiFNyicoQ5mmJbGb2rPxcjHlbrqiCZPVkTlkg6OAyc



That site is incredibly slow, but I'm working my way down it.  So far, I haven't found any evidence of fraud on it.  Any hints about which entries are actually about fraud?


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.

Ask an Attorney

Fuck the Amish


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineyeah
Male User Gallery

Registered: 02/08/09
Posts: 3,416
Last seen: 2 hours, 19 minutes
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Enlil]
    #27049135 - 11/20/20 05:27 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)

-_-


--------------------
[


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleEnlilM
OTD God-King
 User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 53,012
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: yeah]
    #27049138 - 11/20/20 05:28 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)

I take that to mean that you couldn't find any on that site either?  Okay then.  Unless/until some evidence of fraud surfaces, I guess we have to assume it's all bullshit.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.

Ask an Attorney

Fuck the Amish


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineyeah
Male User Gallery

Registered: 02/08/09
Posts: 3,416
Last seen: 2 hours, 19 minutes
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Enlil]
    #27049169 - 11/20/20 05:42 PM (12 days, 12 hours ago)

lol


--------------------
[


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinechristopera
Stranger
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/13/17
Posts: 5,567
Last seen: 5 hours, 17 minutes
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: yeah]
    #27049231 - 11/20/20 06:19 PM (12 days, 11 hours ago)

My father said, “wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which ones fills up the fastest.”

This is the strategy of the election fraud folk currently.


--------------------
A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

Bank and Union with The Shroomery at the Zuul on The internet - now with %'s and things

I’m sorry it had to be me.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OnlineSulfurshelfsean
Defender of Cubes
 User Gallery

Registered: 07/29/10
Posts: 2,502
Last seen: 4 minutes, 59 seconds
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Enlil]
    #27049247 - 11/20/20 06:30 PM (12 days, 11 hours ago)

I followed one of the sources for a claim titled:"Dominion manual states high risk vulnerabilities, remedy is invalidate election". It just states that the machines have vulnerabilities. No evidence that those vulnerabilities were exploited.

https://mobile.twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1327368214238597123

The next one says "computer scientist proves that voting machines can be hacked". Again no evidence that this happened. Just saying it can be done.

Any election can be stolen. So none of them have been valid lol.


--------------------


Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleEnlilM
OTD God-King
 User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 53,012
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
    #27049254 - 11/20/20 06:32 PM (12 days, 11 hours ago)

A bunch of them were links to fox or breitbart articles.  The weird thing about that site is that it says they only want "admissible" evidence, but then it's all a bunch of online articles and nothing that would ever be admissible.  Also, a lot of the articles actually undercut the claim that the site is using them to prove.

I was hoping that yeah had one or two of them that he found particularly damning, but he doesn't seem to have any clue either.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.

Ask an Attorney

Fuck the Amish


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OnlineSulfurshelfsean
Defender of Cubes
 User Gallery

Registered: 07/29/10
Posts: 2,502
Last seen: 4 minutes, 59 seconds
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Enlil]
    #27049258 - 11/20/20 06:36 PM (12 days, 11 hours ago)

People just believe everything the internet and their news source of* choice, and the baby in the white house tell them. When did people start trusting their government like lemmings?


--------------------


Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!


Edited by Sulfurshelfsean (11/20/20 06:37 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblepsi
TOAST N' JAM
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/06/99
Posts: 26,764
Loc: 905 Flag
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean] * 1
    #27049280 - 11/20/20 07:02 PM (12 days, 10 hours ago)

Personally I don't find comparisons to the "cult of personality" phenomenon too unreasonable.

Quote:

A cult of personality, or cult of the leader, arises when a country's regime – or, more rarely, an individual – uses the techniques of mass media, propaganda, the big lie, spectacle, the arts, patriotism, and government-organized demonstrations and rallies to create an idealized, heroic, and worshipful image of a leader, often through unquestioning flattery and praise. A cult of personality is similar to apotheosis, except that it is established by modern social engineering techniques, usually by the state or the party in one-party states and dominant-party states. It is often seen in totalitarian or authoritarian countries.




Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 25,254
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 1 hour, 14 minutes
Re: Hilary Should Have Won 2016 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
    #27049399 - 11/20/20 08:43 PM (12 days, 9 hours ago)

Quote:

Sulfurshelfsean said:
When did people start trusting their government like lemmings?



Russia-Gate?
Iraq WMDs?


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* TRUMP 2020
( 1 2 3 4 ... 634 635 )
XUL 123,474 12,692 12/03/20 02:10 AM
by Falcon91Wolvrn03
* Fox Viewers Most Misinformed
( 1 2 3 4 all )
EchoVortex 11,612 70 10/28/03 04:51 PM
by SquattingMarmot
* Trump Again Disavows White Supremacists while Biden Wont Disavow Antifa
( 1 2 3 4 ... 20 21 )
BANANA.MAN
4,885 415 12/02/20 10:04 AM
by Enlil
* Bush Suggests War on Terror Can't be Won
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
KingOftheThing 8,488 125 09/04/04 12:22 PM
by Phred
* The Questions That Won?t Be Asked
( 1 2 all )
Ancalagon 2,725 31 10/04/04 07:50 AM
by Learyfan
* Israel Suspends Contact With Pat Robertson
RandalFlagg
796 10 01/15/06 09:06 AM
by Baby_Hitler
* Teachers won't walk with graduates.
( 1 2 all )
lonestar2004 2,279 34 06/09/05 02:42 PM
by trendal
* Kerry Won - Here are the Facts.
( 1 2 3 all )
ekomstop 2,475 44 11/06/04 12:55 PM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
973 topic views. 1 members, 1 guests and 4 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Print Topic ]
Search this thread:
Sporeworks
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2020 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.058 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 14 queries.