|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,313
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 13 minutes
|
Re: The gay agenda [Re: psi]
#27010954 - 10/29/20 06:32 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
psi said:
Quote:
OutsideOfMyMind said: I think what's actually causing a lot of people to go gay and trans these days is because practically the whole population has been eating GMO soy ever since the 90s. If you've noticed, women now have broader shoulders than men, men have tiny soyboy bodies, and women are usually fat huge and voluptuous. This is not how the make and female natural proportions should be. Men are supposed to have broader shoulders than women but now women have these huge broad shoulders. A man's shoulders are supposed to be wider than his hips. A woman's shoulders are supposed to be SMALLER than her hips.
Women are turning into men and men are turning into women. This is why more women are going crazy these days, because they have too much testosterone.
Soy contains estrogen like compounds naturally, it's not because of genetic modification.
Testosterone is an estrogen like compound. There is no evidence any of these natural soy compounds have any hormonal effect on people.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
nooneman


Registered: 04/24/09
Posts: 14,593
Loc: Utah
|
Re: The gay agenda [Re: koods]
#27010971 - 10/29/20 06:42 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: There is no evidence any of these natural soy compounds have any hormonal effect on people.
|
tyrannicalrex
Strange R



Registered: 04/24/03
Posts: 38,331
Loc: subtropics
|
Re: The gay agenda [Re: nooneman]
#27010996 - 10/29/20 06:57 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
psi said:
Quote:
OutsideOfMyMind said: I think what's actually causing a lot of people to go gay and trans these days is because practically the whole population has been eating GMO soy ever since the 90s. If you've noticed, women now have broader shoulders than men, men have tiny soyboy bodies, and women are usually fat huge and voluptuous. This is not how the make and female natural proportions should be. Men are supposed to have broader shoulders than women but now women have these huge broad shoulders. A man's shoulders are supposed to be wider than his hips. A woman's shoulders are supposed to be SMALLER than her hips.
Women are turning into men and men are turning into women. This is why more women are going crazy these days, because they have too much testosterone.
Soy contains estrogen like compounds naturally, it's not because of genetic modification.
Testosterone is an estrogen like compound. There is no evidence any of these natural soy compounds have any hormonal effect on people.
Quote:
nooneman said:
Quote:
koods said: There is no evidence any of these natural soy compounds have any hormonal effect on people.
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,458
Loc: 613
|
|
Claiming that's so must make it so I suppose. The presence of phytoestrogens in soy is not a myth.
|
tyrannicalrex
Strange R



Registered: 04/24/03
Posts: 38,331
Loc: subtropics
|
Re: The gay agenda [Re: psi]
#27011006 - 10/29/20 07:01 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
hmmmm....
|
schmutzen
King of the side-pins



Registered: 12/03/02
Posts: 15,390
Loc: Miss Kitty's Lounge
Last seen: 11 minutes, 11 seconds
|
|
Bragg's amino acids are far superior to soy sauce. Great for marinating steaks too.
--------------------
"Blow up your TV, throw away your paper. Go to the country, build you a home."
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,458
Loc: 613
|
|
Evidence that they do have hormonal effects on people: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270274/
The comparison to testosterone is disingenuous IMO. Soy isoflavones are considered phytoestrogens because of their interaction with estrogen receptors in particular.
Soy sauce has pretty minimal phytoestrogen content I think.
|
The Blind Ass
Bodhi



Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 26,731
Loc: The Primordial Mind
|
Re: The gay agenda [Re: psi]
#27011063 - 10/29/20 07:55 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
They are in lots of foods. Why the focus on soy. Got us a soy boy?
-------------------- Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,458
Loc: 613
|
|
In the intro to the article I posted it says that phytoestrogens are most abundant in soy out of common foods.
Maybe soy is harmless but there definitely is hormonal system interaction or it wouldn't work as an estrogen replacement therapy for menopausal women. I don't feel like I'm missing out on much by not making it a regular part of my diet.
|
OutsideOfMyMind
LSD Self Administrative Director



Registered: 10/05/20
Posts: 5,439
Last seen: 9 hours, 35 minutes
|
Re: The gay agenda [Re: psi]
#27011148 - 10/29/20 09:21 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
This thread belongs in the conspiracy sub. This is turning a little bit too much into a circle jerk for me. I don't know how much more research some of you guys need to read to understand why soy plays a part in disrupting the hormonal system of both men and women, contributing to depopulation. According to research men nowadays have less testosterone than they did 10 to 20 years ago. Also, according to the research females nowadays have higher testosterone than they did 10 to 20 years ago.
There is no gay agenda. The agenda at hand is depopulation which has been the agenda for the last 10-15 years if not longer.. Obama legalized gay marriage during his term several years ago. There was also a transgender revolution a few years ago also which also goes hand in hand with depopulation. You can't have kids once you've had a sex change operation.
So these factors play into depopulation: 1. Soy masculinizing women and feminizing men. 2. Gay marriage 3. Transsexualism
Some of you want to keep your head in the sand.
Edited by OutsideOfMyMind (10/29/20 09:24 PM)
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,458
Loc: 613
|
|
If those are major factors in "depopulation" then prove it. I'd guess availability of the birth control pill is far more significant.
|
Amanita86
OTD Keymaster


Registered: 09/26/12
Posts: 89,464
Loc: hades
|
Re: The gay agenda [Re: psi]
#27011183 - 10/29/20 09:48 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
That and abortion.
--------------------
Orange clock, pencil "They threw me off the hay truck about noon..."
*Mark 15:34  Gam zeh ya’avor...
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,313
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 13 minutes
|
|
At most, abortion is a wash
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,458
Loc: 613
|
|
Definitely a contributor too to some degree. Then you have economic factors. Have kids in your prime fertility years and you will probably struggle financially. Wait until you are financially secure, and the woman is probably nearing the end of her childbearing years.
|
SonicTitan


Registered: 05/17/16
Posts: 24,118
Last seen: 5 hours, 14 seconds
|
|
Life has been been gay since the base level instincts to mate and attraction were instilled in life. Throughout history there have been men who clearly have adopted more feminine lifestyles at least back then with how they dressed and presented themselves. The fact that this could be considered a conspiracy is stupid. There are certain animals that have been studied and naturally have gay partners. I think swans predominantly have same sex partners.
-------------------- "We are a way for the cosmos to know itself."
 
|
tyrannicalrex
Strange R



Registered: 04/24/03
Posts: 38,331
Loc: subtropics
|
|
There's over 100 species that do it.
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,458
Loc: 613
|
|
Yeah I doubt there's any major shift in ingrained inclinations. It's just that there is more social acceptance of being gay or trans.
|
OutsideOfMyMind
LSD Self Administrative Director



Registered: 10/05/20
Posts: 5,439
Last seen: 9 hours, 35 minutes
|
Re: The gay agenda [Re: psi]
#27011256 - 10/29/20 10:47 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Social acceptance of gays and transgenders is important for the total depopulation agenda. With more gays comfortable about being themselves that means less gays are dating women pretending to be heterosexual and then having babies with them.
I can't prove any of this because conspiracy theories cannot be proven or disproven with the scientific methods and instruments that are available to me and every average Joe schmo right now.
|
nooneman


Registered: 04/24/09
Posts: 14,593
Loc: Utah
|
|
Accepting gay and trans people is more just about not being an asshole and not hating people who are different than you. Who cares what people do in their own homes? It has nothing to do with "depopulation" and everything to do with just accepting people and being a good person.
Let people love and fuck whoever they want to (within reason). Just because some people are different doesn't mean they're bad. They just like different things than you. If you choose to hate them, don't hide behind some crazy conspiracy theory, be honest about what you're doing. But you shouldn't hate them because there's no reason to. They don't affect your life at all. Why not just accept them? Is hating other people really so important to you?
Everyone is different. There's nothing wrong with that. Not everyone has to be like you or me or anyone else. Hating good people just because they're different says more about you than it does about them.
Edit; Also, the article psi posted about soy has a single author from "The People's University of Russia Moscow" which casts some doubt on it to begin with given Russia's stance on this kind of stuff. The article isn't even a scientific study, it's just a meta analysis that talks about previous studies related to the subject.
The same article also says that Phytoestrogens in a multitude of studies don't appear to be effective as a hormone replacement in menopause which indicates that they don't have any biological effect. If they did, you'd expect the same results from estrogen, but your own article shows that Phytoestrogens don't have the effects of estrogen. It even says that there's absolutely no data showing any impact on the biology or sexuality of men and women from Phytoestrogens. So your own article says they have no biological effect.
To quote your own article: "no data on modification of gender-related characteristics or feminization in humans in consequence of soy consumption have been found." And further that: "a recent metaanalysis and subsequently published studies show that neither isoflavone supplements nor isoflavone-rich soy products affect serum testosterone or estrogen levels in men, which according to the context was meant as a proof for the absence of feminizing effects"
Edited by nooneman (10/29/20 11:42 PM)
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,458
Loc: 613
|
|
Biggest problem with it is that most people by far say they are not gay or trans, and yet births are way down anyway. Meanwhile an awful lot of women are on birth control pills. The birth rate in the US took a nosedive over the 60s and 70s. It has gone down further since then but nothing compared to the drop over the 15 or so years after the pill was introduced in 1960.

The real depopulation agenda is trying to convince people outside the first world to do the same thing.
|
|