|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
When is it logical to love?
#26966963 - 10/03/20 04:55 AM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Precious, all my writings of poverty were worthless, yet here I come again, spitality as last of vitality.
I figured out that it must be a secret.
But I wish you luck in your legacy.
One Policy. Love, feast, pay with your Soul. Eternally.
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
nice, but what means "spitaly"?
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
The Phleg
Big Dick Chakra




Registered: 03/07/10
Posts: 14,473
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
Love always, but more importantly develope a keen sense when love is equally reciprocated. Tough love is also needed when encountering the particularly stubborn. Just avoid being naive, and don't give yourself up too easily.
-------------------- You wanna get high? Drink tap water. --------------------
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
I mean the universal geometry of going in square shaped loops, self-spite. People who worship the Black Crown as purity of Life would recognize the idea of it. It is like sticking only to one Ultimate truth, and not chosing another path, frequently because that path numbs pain. It is also like female/male having two paths and sometimes it happens that you refuse the other route, even if it means being left behind. Spite embraces fate of being misunderstood probably forever. Like a giant shelter you built to have a memorium of experiences you will never release into Darkness without adequate payment.
I can try to draw my big imago scetch, as I recently got computer and really..this thing has deep roots in my trip history where I tried to understand forgiveness, punishment, gender difference and national indifference. Someone hurt a pumpkin. Pumpkin lost trust in reason other than well known path in realms of Earth. Love signature, painful History, many supporters, including me. Myself has been trying to break a curse this thing progress into - loss of Self, painful dissolvation yielding more pain out of kinetic memory of Pumpkin distorting violently. Forces that I witness due to my interests being combined with electricity and other physics/chemistry fields seem so strong, that clearly only the same forces are each and one of us.
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
It is somewhat mathematical.. I must now be patient, Precious, and I will put this vivid vision into something real then.
To all of you out there, be excellent to each other.
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
OK, you got a lot of work to do there with your precious. post any progress. avoid red herrings.
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
Very well said. Logical to try, as in omni-benefitial. Love don't make you immortal. Your Soul knows tho. You have to break the barriers, only there's billiard and one. But this idea is good. Fool bridge rectifier approves it all. Be like tree. Bee in wholesomeness.
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
sounding mighty stoned now
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
Ferdinando


Registered: 11/15/09
Posts: 3,664
|
|
cool I´m sure that can help a lot of us with our drug problems
-------------------- with our love with our love we could save the world
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: Ferdinando]
#26967332 - 10/03/20 10:17 AM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I am in denial about that.
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
The only marijuanna I have possessed lately is CBD stuff, 12% they advertise. But haven't smoked any past few days. I believe marijuanna is a puzzle, yet all I can quote out of it is "..OTOH, it cannot be solved - with your's third eye feature one could say that symbiosis is out of question. Absolute meta-morph-o-sis happens simultaneously and there you are again with your hands..and fingers, crossed. Relax, holmes. Promises, it made, Precious. It will do it, it promised. It mediates what we cannot. Surely, if you chose to let it all go in sad manner, it damn strong mediates you towards deep existential crysis, past it and into the great Doubt. If you still feel like there is something simple and blissful just nearby, mayhaps it is just you Child, lost within lost Serpents.
|
Ferdinando


Registered: 11/15/09
Posts: 3,664
|
|
I meant to my precious
even cutting back 5 - 10 % can make a big difference
-------------------- with our love with our love we could save the world
|
thealienthatategod
retrovertigo


Registered: 10/10/17
Posts: 2,642
Last seen: 4 months, 20 days
|
|
what did Precious promise?
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
Hmm, I can surely try to explain. That smoking herb is an option. Maybe it is not the most elegant way (also to explain what did it promise). Think of the process of combustion differently here though. Human can die from burning out and then leave traces in collective unconsciouss. Herb leaves a promise instead. It is just up to you to listen. I kind of get it. Only when hope is already broken in pieces, it makes sense and there is logic to hold onto. I am unsure if in my case it is eternal promise/hope thing or not, because I haven't stopped fighting for eternal prize, at my 27 I still feel childish enough for dreams of other realities. I must agree that this promised hard logic I spoke of cannot be really simplified. I could try to add subvalue of my own and make a nice inspirational and nurishing sentence, yet this Absolute Presence / Esence would diminish. To sum it up - there were ages before marijuana. Don't know how many years it took, or if it happened to have a gift of superconsciousness already ever since, but in September of 2020. I witnessed it's peak on my emotional peak. Let's say I am disappointed in quantum physics field, because all them anti-Enstein dudes try to build up is like zeroID bubble being bodyless shell of quantum tunneler. I have strong confidence that the standart model is flawed and makes little sense. Here I could simply say something classic: "basically weed promised that all of the deeds from past will (!) be remembered, as well as all of the circumstances will be taken note of. No longer a pestilence will come with doomsday, no, a strong LOGIC will prevail, and only when everyone will be happy with such turn, the Day will come. In reality it didn't seem so strong, no, my poor ents are weak these days as I wasted my juice trying hard when I was young. Still there are few nodes of perpetual motion that will keep on washing away the mistakes we make, which I value already within my Soul too much to give up. I really wish I could draw stronger picture for you, so you would recognize that one seismical feeling of something ancient hitting you, but I don't think I really can, because even if I can feel, I can't express anywere else but in my mind. Fractures are there. Dark warmth with strong wind blowing and then plants have the story unwrapped so that the last motion pictures are tiny tips of them leaves emphasizing their weakness like baby arms, so many layers of things morphed into itself. Strong, strong and rarely clear, zero-extralove experience.
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
that, seems to me a classic case of the human condition - for maybe 10000 years
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
You know that one "musical x magical ear", when you just feel like playing some sweet harmonies in a dream. The child is gone, the dream is gone. Still there was "the original One".
Saint Vitus - Born Too Late is just a checkpoint for this dream where Original had it's own origins that have clamped me strongly onto acheful surface, rendering me "appearently lazy".
I am not lazy, guys, I just cannot do it. My belief don't let me, Nuff said. Hold on, I also believe, that every second male predators look naughty at powerless little girls and it is a kaleidoscope of correlations. (Codename - Corel PaintShop Pro, 30 day free trial, 14 days left.) That program haz kaleidoscope and reflections/mirror effects. "Original" had maze of past/present faces meeting their eyes as a "mindspace scetch". Killing your future weakness in shells and escaping mass reality by recognizing presence as reflective surface of zero-ego, zero-narcistisstic, fully matured/logics preserving weakling. +9999 Death.Magic.Doom points.
If we gather correctly, I'll make that piece in 14 days, no matter how "rusty-lazy" I am with computers these days. Life is quite mathish. Some things are ugly on outside. And there is poo inside. And I get it. And we are under pressure. And I get it. Can you also get it? Thank you.
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: The Phleg]
#26994693 - 10/20/20 02:23 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
To The Phleg Today I perceived sense in your words. We are different. Purpose/less hierarchy is less of a stubborn obstacle for you, because you love differently. Different world, yet so similar. Can you cancel love easily, I would like to know? Say you were my doctor, and as we came from different worlds, and I were patient "on fire", really lit and psychotic. Could you try and cancel. Revert? // myself in opposite position - try and *give up*. Difference is subtle, in a way. Yet somehow we would still be wrong. Except you would be Out. Me, I spilled my drink, now I feel wrong, so I pour in another one. Yes, I drink with/for ones I don't dare to love again. And, to be honest, it was a pleasure. You were not my kind. I gained. I hope you understand, too. Even if I am not on right note about you, I hope you'll see what I mean. Cancel love - world is still there. Give up - all gone and shaking. Nightmare seekers home, paradise and bitter pleasure.
Edited by VeryStrangeMan (10/20/20 02:24 PM)
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
Paraplex paraconundrum.
Love let me see that we are different, yet due to lack of love we "cancel" or "give up".
Now what would president, king, queen say... They cannot appeal to human condition of being unloved, so no great sense for you, folks. They haz no right to. And I cannot teach them about it. So Karma is broken and I get weird trips of Queens being in love with me, flirting and kings being jealous. Putin also tries the best to be "debil-macho*
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
Too sacremented on Death is not tolerated. Yet just like with drugs, if you don't abuse it, yet Naturally face it, you may get out of judgement. Diabolical Nature teaches it's way of sensing truth. Truth and logics. No creation is perfect. Just diabolical dreams of purrfection occur. Duality, children on old Universe. It is heart(H)ful.
Everything is as it is. I have no morrr love for you if you don't scale with me Cards of Duality, let's play. Me, I don't like soul(less) machine elves being my housekeepers. I end up in messy places and still get drunk from three beers lmost daily. Soul tastes bloody...spicy. Everyone is large, love is spicy, I chose to take turn of sentiment, claim you all strangers and offer to scale. Wanna play Cards of Duality? I am lazy and borrred. You win. Machine elven energy. I won real elve of requiem. And insanity is not that dangerous to me. I know many 'Hi-Tach-I', so I predict your Death as very unexcellent and bogus event. Yes, yes. I depend on that Card. Just saying, save World of LazyDrunk or die.
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
Oh, I am having a birrthday again and wantrd to say - it is berry complicated to save this World, so you might (TRVE) Love..the Cancel option as free freedom pass with taste of respect. With taste of machine eeoeiil'v. (:
|
DividedQuantum
Outer Head


Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
|
|
Watch the spamming, please. Post within reason.
-------------------- Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
I had a meal, I felt sense of guilt. It will fade away. This might be memorium of yours and others. People keep things in order, bring fresh flowers. I live on the other side of fence. You may say it any way you wish, but I will claim my reason very, very sharp and global, in itself very personal too. I am like a brother of ego, easy to shatter, because seemingly "other side of a fence " may have it's own rules there. There where it belongs. Pardon my excentered explanation of core of an idea behind this all. My reason is simple. Let's exist above all borders legally. I seek something. Love may have many definitions. I don't seek love, I am bloody rich with it. I offer you not to steal it, not to ruin it, but something else. Yet where love begins to sprout, hate is reasonable for me. Thermodynamics. Above it all, brothers, sisters, and I cannot reach them. Because they have rules . I am opened up for a conflict of rules, be it debate, fight, energetical domino effect. Re-act, ion. I had yours, you had mine. You wants to cancel me, I gives up on you. Requiem has a definition.
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
probably on stimulants?
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
Thank you:?
Something possibly, yes, but not them illegal drugs induced stimulus. Just ageing all of a sudden.
|
RJ Tubs 202



Registered: 09/20/08
Posts: 6,016
Loc: USA
Last seen: 1 hour, 29 minutes
|
|
I believe love is something beyond logic or the need for reciprocation.
That's my pithy thought at the moment
|
DividedQuantum
Outer Head


Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: RJ Tubs 202] 1
#26998562 - 10/22/20 07:29 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I agree. First of all, when we are young and in love, we are at our least logical, and can see no fault in the other. Also, unconditional love seems to place empathy and compassion far above logic, although to what degree unconditional love can exist is a separate and difficult topic.
In the end, I don't think love nor logic have anything to do with one another.
-------------------- Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
true, but it is always logical to love rather than the opposite
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
DividedQuantum
Outer Head


Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
|
|
I agree. When faced with the option to love or hate, according to my personal logic, love is virtually always the better option.
-------------------- Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici
|
Pinkerton
Ultrasentient

Registered: 02/26/19
Posts: 3,127
|
|
Love feels good. Hate feels bad. Most people love to do what makes them feel good. Most people hate to do what makes them feel bad.
But the question is: is it most people or every single one of us?
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: Pinkerton]
#27000766 - 10/24/20 02:49 AM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I prefer to say that "disarmonia mundi" is very dominative aspect, and "pureness" of love is like cast alloys, you need to master hate to have stronger love. The "root of evil" is in us too.
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: Pinkerton]
#27000833 - 10/24/20 06:11 AM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Pinkerton said: Love feels good. Hate feels bad. Most people love to do what makes them feel good. Most people hate to do what makes them feel bad.
But the question is: is it most people or every single one of us?
interesting insight
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
Quote:
VeryStrangeMan said: I prefer to say that "disarmonia mundi" is very dominative aspect, and "pureness" of love is like cast alloys, you need to master hate to have stronger love. The "root of evil" is in us too.
this is wildly strange - would fit in a comic book where the hero is an assassin.
i.e. rules for some secret ninja society.
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
Pinkerton
Ultrasentient

Registered: 02/26/19
Posts: 3,127
|
|
Quote:
redgreenvines said:
Quote:
Pinkerton said: Love feels good. Hate feels bad. Most people love to do what makes them feel good. Most people hate to do what makes them feel bad.
But the question is: is it most people or every single one of us?
interesting insight
Icelander the bodhisattva himself said I'm all about love and when you RödaGrönaVs +1 my post my love increase. This is good stuff and calls for some Bukem.

|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
You just made my day. Many of ninjas lived in solitude and never showed their hero in light of love, daily and common love. Bread. They never made it to bread. Their hero never made it into bread. Because fame is an obstacle. Fame pays. Love and hate being twisted tighter than DNA doesn't accept many forms of payment. Sex without love is just fucking. Love without sex is just "baking cookies" every day. Hard to be a hero - you have to love, to kill, to bake bread, share it, give birth to even more heroic children and,, yes. Nevermind. It is nice. To love. To dream. To dream love. To love dream. But logical, yes, ninja style, samurai..
|
teknix
𓂀⟁𓅢𓍝𓅃𓊰𓉡 𓁼𓆗⨻



Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
|
Hello everyone, long time no chat!
I used to be of the view of loving everyone, as taught in metta, as the best course for humanity in general. Over the years my perspective has shifted to loving those deserving of love. The reason for this shift is because some people are evil, and I don't love evil, and pretending to love an evil person is disillusioned. You might think that it is their actions that are evil and not the person, separating a person from their actions, but what really determines the nature of a person more than their actions and intentions?
-------------------- .6th and 7th sense theory .Now is forever. .ﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞTheﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ ﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞUnseenﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ is seenﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ by the blindﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ eye.ﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ ﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ ﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ ﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ ﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ ﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ.When the inevitable time comes, go with your head held high,without regret or remorse, in your subconscious mind. ﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ ﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞﱞ
|
skOsH
Functionally dysfunctional



Registered: 07/03/19
Posts: 1,372
Loc: the PNW
Last seen: 1 day, 18 hours
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: teknix]
#27002774 - 10/25/20 01:38 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
It's a lot more difficult to actively hate someone, than to love someone. It is taxing, probably emotionally draining and toxic
I don't hate anyone. Although I have yet to meet someone I love, partner wise...which is fine. Oftentimes I know that I don't even love myself, so it would be quite difficult for me to really love someone else. I gotta learn to love myself first I think....maybe?
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: teknix]
#27002843 - 10/25/20 02:17 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Hello, teknix.
Could you share an insight of so called "absolute perspective" of your own. For an example - VOID contains premordial roots, since birth of Universe until today many flaws can be forgiven, due to LIFE being BORN as not perfect creation. Then again someone, someone among the brightest ones sold themselves to repeated sin/crime, banishing us all from evolution (let's say Trump instead of Putin this time. Now their excuse is - but God /oj, Bog/ made us such temper boys, we have no hope of being loved, yes, we are corrupted, oh my, oh my, we are also part of One and we just cannot be better...
Now herecomes the perspective. You are now in charge of charges of your own HQ. You know Trump is corrupted by excuse, godworthy perspective - there is us, at computer ATM, being completely "dislocated muscles" for him. From My perspective it IS logical to aim hate from such viewpoint. That is how I work my hate. I also work out in Love, albeit it is a lot more freeflowing than hate, I often get stuck within perspectives of global evolution. So then I switch to plans of hateful spider.
If you also contribute to such lifestyle, even semiconsciously, it means you have witnessed our common unconsciouss already long time ago, and therefore you are enabled at address {knows.ratios.luck:global}.
If you know such underground community, do not hestitate to admit it, all we ever wanted was OUR+SELVES, but the truth shall never set us free (as in - I love (******) and perspectives..
But we must administer this pain to become stronger, I myself am very light and not a muscle packer, yet I surely know that muscles * perspective -> forces*/LOGIC. With strong MIND you may conquer BODY.
Thank you for share. Peace.
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: skOsH]
#27002863 - 10/25/20 02:27 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Do whatever you do, you are doing right. When you claim you have issues with love, perhaps you have already forgotten that you love in ROOM 1, suffer in ROOM2, do Public Relations through make up ROOM 3. As a sum of all things appears you are a "bad lover". Tell me who is not?
That is how I spoke when I was younger (and perhaps less tainted with experience). Found it hard to deny love, when all I had was a brokenheartedness. Anyway, I loved to talk about it with people I did not know back then. They kind of supported me between the lines. We all know a lot more than we pretend to others. Hell, I'll (BEER x ALL SHALL PERISH x FISTBUMPO OVER MILES) for you to support people who say they not good with love+ing. Because what is this ING? Succeeding? What is success? A pill to isolate? Perhaps I am wrong but there must be a reason why wires have "insulation". Insult. Perfect lovers and perfect relationships are insult for the rest of world being different. I am not mad. I am just opened. I don't mind people being capable of delivering drugs to themselves, to medi(c)ate their lives. But, please, don't become "gravital" over the top. It is not nice to step on snail. Admit it. It just is not. Nothing else will suit as an answer. It is not unescapable and remarkable as *rainbows pooed*.
Thanks. Stay cool.
|
DividedQuantum
Outer Head


Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: teknix]
#27002968 - 10/25/20 03:13 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Hope you are well, teknix. 
-------------------- Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici
|
teknix
𓂀⟁𓅢𓍝𓅃𓊰𓉡 𓁼𓆗⨻



Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
|
Quote:
VeryStrangeMan said: Hello, teknix.
Could you share an insight of so called "absolute perspective" of your own. For an example - VOID contains premordial roots, since birth of Universe until today many flaws can be forgiven, due to LIFE being BORN as not perfect creation. Then again someone, someone among the brightest ones sold themselves to repeated sin/crime, banishing us all from evolution (let's say Trump instead of Putin this time. Now their excuse is - but God /oj, Bog/ made us such temper boys, we have no hope of being loved, yes, we are corrupted, oh my, oh my, we are also part of One and we just cannot be better...
Now herecomes the perspective. You are now in charge of charges of your own HQ. You know Trump is corrupted by excuse, godworthy perspective - there is us, at computer ATM, being completely "dislocated muscles" for him. From My perspective it IS logical to aim hate from such viewpoint. That is how I work my hate. I also work out in Love, albeit it is a lot more freeflowing than hate, I often get stuck within perspectives of global evolution. So then I switch to plans of hateful spider.
If you also contribute to such lifestyle, even semiconsciously, it means you have witnessed our common unconsciouss already long time ago, and therefore you are enabled at address {knows.ratios.luck:global}.
If you know such underground community, do not hestitate to admit it, all we ever wanted was OUR+SELVES, but the truth shall never set us free (as in - I love (******) and perspectives..
But we must administer this pain to become stronger, I myself am very light and not a muscle packer, yet I surely know that muscles * perspective -> forces*/LOGIC. With strong MIND you may conquer BODY.
Thank you for share. Peace.
Hi!
I don't adhere to an absolute perspective, and Hate is not an aspect of me. If I ever feel gassed with hate I meditate and replace it with love, purging the undesireable feeling from the body. My view on feelings whether it be hate or love, is that it is a choice to feel that way, either consciously or subconsciously, but generally it is a subconscious choice. Bring the choice to consciousness and it becomes relatively easy to choose what to feel. The more feelings you master, the more energies you master, the more powerful of a wizard you become. I just don't see the utility in hate so I don't care to master it 
I do see how hate could have utility in pushing oneself to do things that would ordinarily be unjustifiable to a rational conscious, but I have little desire for such things.
|
Rahz
Alive Again



Registered: 11/10/05
Posts: 9,230
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: teknix]
#27003184 - 10/25/20 05:23 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Well, first of all, what is love?
-------------------- rahz comfort pleasure power love truth awareness peace "You’re not looking close enough if you can only see yourself in people who look like you." —Ayishat Akanbi
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: Rahz]
#27003820 - 10/25/20 10:57 PM (3 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Love is equal to subset of rules that claim immortality of every single memory and the rules that enable hope of better Universe.
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
no kidding?
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
You better check yourself before you turn to wreck, yourSelf.
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
I'm wrecked now, if you are interested
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
RJ Tubs 202



Registered: 09/20/08
Posts: 6,016
Loc: USA
Last seen: 1 hour, 29 minutes
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: Pinkerton]
#27014920 - 11/01/20 12:18 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Pinkerton said:
Love feels good. Hate feels bad. Most people love to do what makes them feel good. Most people hate to do what makes them feel bad.
People often choose to engage in self-harming behaviors. Understanding why people frequently choose to do what makes them feel bad is the holy grail of psychology. Hate must provide a type of joy or satisfaction, or else so many people wouldn't invest (sometimes years) engaging in it. Hate can feel orgasmic. People invest in what they think may bring desirable rewards.
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
Thanks. Surely your pulse is intact still, perhaps carrying you away, but the Clock is really primitive - it simply evaluates us all and doesn't offer anything impossible. It is not me offering empathy for your wreckage. It is above me. One more word and I will be robbing us all.
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
when you make a promise, you extend yourself into time.
it adds a dimension to life.
love is in that zone.
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
Jewstress
Momma


Registered: 03/21/19
Posts: 5,402
Loc: everywhere.
Last seen: 2 days, 5 hours
|
|
Never
--------------------
😇
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: Jewstress]
#27015711 - 11/01/20 12:54 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Perhaps you can het faster towards plateau eternal with 'never'. Still doesn't count as most logical way. Keen, resistively persisting logics above love. Dangerous too. Uneasy to speak about. But not the ant I am looking for. There are other ent-ants that are based on that fuel. It is supranatural, not particulary logical.
|
Rahz
Alive Again



Registered: 11/10/05
Posts: 9,230
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: RJ Tubs 202]
#27016166 - 11/01/20 06:11 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
RJ Tubs 202 said:
Quote:
Pinkerton said:
Love feels good. Hate feels bad. Most people love to do what makes them feel good. Most people hate to do what makes them feel bad.
People often choose to engage in self-harming behaviors. Understanding why people frequently choose to do what makes them feel bad is the holy grail of psychology. Hate must provide a type of joy or satisfaction, or else so many people wouldn't invest (sometimes years) engaging in it. Hate can feel orgasmic. People invest in what they think may bring desirable rewards.
One could say people often love to hate. There's also the not fun hate where people lash out after their patience runs dry.
In both cases it's a matter of unmet needs(desires). Does love need anything at all? It seems when needs become involved the motives become questionable.
-------------------- rahz comfort pleasure power love truth awareness peace "You’re not looking close enough if you can only see yourself in people who look like you." —Ayishat Akanbi
|
MarkostheGnostic
Elder



Registered: 12/09/99
Posts: 14,279
Loc: South Florida
Last seen: 3 years, 2 days
|
|
Love is not about logic or reason, it is a moral imperative if one assumes Christian, Jewish, or Buddhist frameworks for example. 1 John 4:8 asserts that "God IS Love while every sura in the Qu'ran is prefaced by "Allah the Merciful, the Compassionate." One has to fine tune the meaning of love in any of these contexts. Love in the New Testament is agapé which is is a very specific form of love, a dispassionate warm, universal specie unlike some of the other forms designated in classic Greek thought like Philia (friendship), Storge (familial), Ludens (playful), Pragma (dutiful), Philautia (self-love) or Eros (sexual or spiritual in the sense of yearning for the transcendental). In Judaism, specifically Kabbalah, Chesed/Gedulah) is the sphere of loving-kindness. Its opposite divine attribute is Din (or Geburah, Judgment). Geburah and Chesed are mediated by the sphere Tiphereth (Beauty) also called Rachamim, Compassion. There is Metta in Buddhism, also loving kindness and there is Karuna, Compassion. The differences are subtle within each system or comparatively. In Christianity Love is not an attribute of God as it seems in the Qu'ran, somehow lesser than the essence as 1 John 4:8 asserts as the metaphysical Ground of Being.
In Buddhism the descriptions I read that differentiate Metta (loving kindness) from Karuna (Compassion) in Buddhism seem artificial and just as difficult to separate Chesed (loving kindness) from Rachamim (Compassion) in Kabbalah. Compassion seems to partake of both loving kindness and judgment, especially as they are graphically symbolized on the glyph of the tree of Life in Kabbalah along with the understanding that in Kabbalah the notion of Coincidentia Oppositorum and the union of opposites runs through the entire philosophy. Chesed/Gedulah is sometimes called Loving Kindness and other times it is called Mercy to balance Judgment of Geburah. In this idiom the opposite of love is not hate but rather Judgment, like the wrath of God versus the Son of God. Nowhere are there teachings to either hate or to judge others. One is bid to 'turn the other cheek,' but not continuously. I noticed how in his movies Chuck Norris always turned the other cheek after the first blow. But then his Mercy was balanced by Judgment as to how to retaliate in the violent exchange.
Also, this is not to equate violence with judgment or wrath. Slapping someone to keep them from lapsing into a drug-induced coma, for example, would be an act of compassion. Intentionality is the single invariant feature in consciousness according to Phenomenology.
-------------------- γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
|
Sorry, but if you are not mentally slapping politicians 24/7 for being inadequate, you are not eligible to speak about wholesome love within humankind yet. It surely requires hefty dose of logics to afford one. Deus est mortus, logica obtinet.
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
Quote:
MarkostheGnostic said: Love is not about logic or reason, it is a moral imperative if one assumes Christian, Jewish, or Buddhist frameworks for example. ...
like I said, commitment.
Quote:
MarkostheGnostic said:... One is bid to 'turn the other cheek,' but not continuously. I noticed how in his movies Chuck Norris always turned the other cheek after the first blow. But then his Mercy was balanced by Judgment as to how to retaliate in the violent exchange.
new appreciation for Chucky!
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
MarkostheGnostic
Elder



Registered: 12/09/99
Posts: 14,279
Loc: South Florida
Last seen: 3 years, 2 days
|
|
It's the Utilitarian ethic. Perhaps you are more familiar with its fictional version from Spock on Star Trek instead of the philosophers Jeremy Bentham or John Stuart Mill. Namely, 'the good of the many over the good of the few or the one.' It becomes a very interesting exercise to consider the ethics in eliminating a murderer before [s]he murders again. Or as I saw it posed once, 'not to kill the baby-killer is to kill the baby.' I am in agreement with Hitler's assassination even though all attempts failed. But what about the killing of baby Hitler before he was even a corporal in WW I where presumably he killed British, French, or American soldiers in combat? Is there any ethical justification for killing an innocent IF certainty of a future existed? The question is hypothetical because prescience, precognition, and prophesy are only made certain after-the-fact, in time following the preternatural knowledge of the future.
I despise Trump and his ilk and my disgust extends to political supporters of him. Yet I am guided by professional ethics and so when admitted Trump supporters have requested hypnotherapy for conditions tormenting them OR tormenting their young child, my professional ethics operate over my personal bias. My professional ethics are in turn informed by my subjective factors including the value of agapé (dispassionate willing of the good). Apparently you do not grok the apparent contradictions or else you would not have made the half-baked judgment of me that you have. I have no philial love for Trumpsters, neither do I like them for their callousness and related personal flaws. But the absence of a love grounded in the more visceral aspects of my psyche does not preclude me acting according to a higher, more universal ethical principle. I remember reading a postcard given to me to mail by an acquaintance on a camping trip. He had written insulting things about me on the postcard because I was responsible for my father's car and did not acquiesce to his reckless 16 year old desires. I was 17 but even then I was capable of being trustworthy despite my personal bias (i.e., tossing away the insulting postcard its recipient would read back home). In my former career I was often faced with conducting therapy with individuals who offended every decent value I can think of. Perhaps you should reflect on a moment in your own life story when you chose to act above the bias of your own self-interest. It would seem that you need to expand your own capacity to handle contradictions that can only be resolved on a level transcending the personal-emotional.
Kabbalistically speaking, Judgment (Geburah) and Mercy (Chesed) are balanced by Rahamim (Compassion) which draws from both Judgment and Mercy but which aims to 'restore' the greatest degree of 'brokenness,' not only those selected by personal bias. I have on more than one occasion transcended a personal bias in order to act honestly and hence ethically. Your need to judge me is just attempting to put someone else down in the interest of feigning a higher moral stance. Morally depraved individuals who command political power over multitudes need to be shown for the monsters they are. Compassion for the many partakes of a certain amount of judgment against an enemy of the many who rules exclusively in his own self-interest. Trump and his cronies are guilty of many offenses against the American people and are directly responsible for deaths whether from lies about Hydrochloroquine thereby killing a few intentionally misinformed people or by refusal to act according to correct medical protocols resulting in potentially thousands of deaths. Trump and the GOP are guilty of crimes against humanity but it is unlikely any will receive the consequences they deserve. Ill-gotten monies would be appropriated and distributed to victims in a just world. This is not a just world.
-------------------- γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself
|
laughingdog
Stranger

Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 4,828
|
|
Surprised biology and hormones get ignored in this thread, Guess folks are in love with concepts, which seems a little dry ... if you know, what I mean?
Of course science is also a little dry and quickly leads to all sorts of technicalities, outside of anyone's expertise here ... I mean the biochemistry of hormones and the variation between species ... is complex beyond belief.
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: laughingdog]
#27019618 - 11/03/20 02:41 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Hi.
I can add something to this, even though I am okay with scientific materials, I often don't take them as cores of things, no, more like data that can be "core+related" to absolute juice of truth (which I won't attempt to prove with my own words).
The thing about hormones, if we consider analogy to flux density in magnetism and permeability tells that it is normal that two opposites attract. So far - check, according to widespread "truths". But to be more specifical, in my million hour trip the highest refinement I have concluded is that hormone, a singular aspect (and singularity most often in an endless ending of something). Victor-err-y. {strongest}, (not most appealing) biologically most bio-logical dominator's descriptor function within it's hormone system is to have a strong message brought out. And mind now that if you are "average" (to make it lovely - pretty good) at things, as long as you are biologically classical, your hormones will be number one proclaimers of your strengths. It is also true within dual system of Universe, it gives self-confidence and self-appeal for an individual, but!!! on a high high level (spiritually) it all ends where only a single (again!!!) hormone bearer will have the very high strength given to his/her mind, to love all worthy ones, yet witness their chaotical confusions of life.
Oh, I am bad at this writing thingy, yes. I have a huge advance to meditate with purpose and well balanced hormone therapy. I am ugly and bad situated. I tend to spend more than I can, on extra beer and smokes, yet to compensate, I am being critical about prejudices, my Voice and many other things. I have witnessed how hormones bring inner peace and acceptance of myself, strongly following bio-daizy-chain. You love to love. And to have more love. Theoretically we all are given IKEA or, hmm, "cheap Chinese" equivalent of material. It works. Now we get funky with it. Yet to overengineer it with parts out of "lying around parts bin" is not impossible. You add a tweak here, there, purposefully improve the thing, adapting things you learn on your way, being critical about usefulness of it. (If you are a douche, most likely you don't, if ypou are spoiled, you create a stress cage and change your bio to work in ugly way). Now go further and further, you will reach a phase where yoursuperhormones keep you calm around everyone. Be it most attractive (in any way) people or quite opposite, idiots you consider worth killing. You cannot kill them, due to laws and consequences. You change your triggers to signalize all of them people you flirt with to recognize your strengths again. And so do you reduce the daizy chain's length of duration by elaminating all unneccesary information, yet leaving biological essence. In the end of events you will be singular wh(a)ormonium - ability to overcome anything and anyone at cost of clasifying them. And that hurts, believe me, because you will notice "pretty nice" people with kids, that deeply inside have witnessed a lot, maybe even this, and they know that they will die too once, yet they don't attempt to become stronger, better, faster. And you cannot blame them. Just that the kids.. and so you reduce and induce the hormon cycle searching a single stray of hope in this void. Somewhere, where you become worthy to be entitled a human being you realize it is the same LOVE again, within us all, that we split and multiply like them bread crumbs. Now probably you have learnt to apply hormone bursts like an animal to disarm dangerous faggets by showing your animal to them. But come closer to this race towards Victory and it will stand there. That somewhere there is stronger whormone. So strong that it is beyond ugly, just like baby poo, sometimes too. If you accept it and learn to love it, perhaps it is worth it. I am tired now. I don't want to fight, but that is all we ever do. Split hair, because guns aare already in wrong hands and we have nothing but love. Split. Love. You. Too. Not youse, douches. Youses, loveworthy.
|
laughingdog
Stranger

Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 4,828
|
|
Quote:
VeryStrangeMan said: ....
The thing about hormones, if we consider analogy to flux density in magnetism ...
. Like RGV said way back, it all sounds way too stoned to make sense. Even you may not know what it was supposed to mean in a few days.
. Then again the whole question is vague and much of the thread sort of continues the flux density in magnetism, except reversed in the space time, of orbiting string theories that haven't tied the knot yet. However with a little K-Y Jelly it may be possible to slip the knots into yeses that reaffirm the reincarnation of Jesus as pure love, which is what we all need to hold these shifting sands...
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: laughingdog]
#27020403 - 11/03/20 10:00 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Oh, I am deathmetaller, I will surely remember this and all of the slipknots and milestones will circulate in my minds eye until they are embedded in my path. Also I am sober a lot, just feel lile being needled 24/7. Not a native English speaker, but, hey, I talk little in my native too, can't expect me to be perfect writer with so little practice. Take care now. I will. Remember.
|
laughingdog
Stranger

Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 4,828
|
|
Quote:
VeryStrangeMan said: .... I will. Remember.
actually the perhaps most relevant quote goes:
"And this too shall pass."
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: laughingdog]
#27021123 - 11/04/20 10:06 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Everyone is different (-ly deficite) for love (for love) and a tad inadequate therefore (not purrfect). Our common goal should be to satisfy this deficite which is caused by our differentness. I would love to fight, with (for) my inadequacies. Before they teach AI how to feel different and in deficite for something else than love.
|
MarkostheGnostic
Elder



Registered: 12/09/99
Posts: 14,279
Loc: South Florida
Last seen: 3 years, 2 days
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: laughingdog]
#27024087 - 11/05/20 09:56 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I am NOT a reductionist. I recognize All Quadrants All Levels as I learned from human developmentalist Ken Wilber. All vectors contribute to any phenomenon in the human condition.
-------------------- γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself
|
kneesocks
Divineress



Registered: 12/25/11
Posts: 870
Loc: Puget Sound/PNW
Last seen: 1 year, 10 months
|
|
Love is reason in its purest form. One should love at all times.
-------------------- "An ignorant man is lost, faithless, and filled with self-doubt; A soul that harbors doubt has no joy, not in this world or the next." -Bhagavad-gita 4:40
|
MarkostheGnostic
Elder



Registered: 12/09/99
Posts: 14,279
Loc: South Florida
Last seen: 3 years, 2 days
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: kneesocks] 1
#27024287 - 11/06/20 02:09 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
kneesocks said: Love is reason in its purest form. One should love at all times.
Loving at all times is a moral imperative and does not constitute the function of mind we call reason. It may be considered reasonable to love if and only if one assumes the gravitas of a religious commandment to love or if one prioritizes the ontological state of love as fundamental to one's life, as in the Buddhist prerequisite to contemplate metta before engaging in meditation. Reason is a logical process which is evaluative. Reason in turn may depend on certain prerequisite assumptions such as the law of parsimony, or Occum's Razor which is often explained as "the simplest explanation is most likely the right one." Love is attributed to will, theologically speaking, which is prior to intellection including reason. Love is therefore not merely a matter of emotion, affect. While emotions are non-rational, the decision to love as an act or to be in a state of love may be considered by transpersonal psychologists or by those with a spiritual or religious stance as being trans-rational, that is, a decision drawing on transpersonal or transcendental influences.
Just how committed or convinced one is of the ontological value of love determines a great deal of behaviors. I witnessed my parents sacrifice their own pleasures for their children for example. My undergrad education was paid for but my mom never did get a trip to Hawaii, for example. I am certain that I never met their expectations so I have some unresolved guilt which needs to be resolved right now. My decision cost me any inheritance I would've received. Manipulating our parents, my only sibling struck a deal to pay their mortgage if they signed their condo over to him. He could've sold the property and reclaimed his payments along with half the profit but he chose to keep it all for himself thereby cheating me out of much needed funds the year my mom died, I had just survived cancer and I bought my first house. Philias, brotherly love, is entirely absent between my sibling and myself but this extends back decades.
My folks would've much preferred a couple of grandchildren from me than my choice to work on myself to become more compassionate and go into a low-paying helping profession to aid other people's children as a crisis counselor. I had to be true to myself rather than live my life in an emotionally obligatory way. My only sibling tried to guilt me into becoming a father because that was the path he chose. My commitment to storge, familial love between children and parents was less than my commitment to the agapé my faith informed me of. Since I never had a desire of my own for parenthood my choice was ethically superior than becoming a parent out of socio-biological and psychological influences. Being disinherited and cheated by one's only sibling causes one to re-evaluate just how one continues to love. While Philautia, self-love sounds selfish it does not have to be so. It is not unhealthy to treat oneself compassionately when others have failed to do so. My sibling had already rejected me years before the inheritance event and so I have no intention of having anything to do with him again out of care for my own well-being. Subjecting oneself to a chronically contemptuous and toxic being regardless of biological connections is pathologically masochistic. I have been, by his own admission, generous when gifting his children, my niece and nephew instead of subjecting myself to further abuse by contact with him. One needs to practice some Philautia in order to maintain healthy self-esteem. It would be great to have a sibling who was also my brother, but that ship sailed long ago when he showed his true colors and rejected me the first and only time I ever reached out to him for some emotional support at my divorce. "I don't want to get involved in your personal problems" he said.
Now forgiveness is important for healing, but when a perpetrator of a 'sin' does not admit he is wrong or think he needs forgiveness an impasse is reached. I was shown more love my my BFF and by compassionate strangers at that time than from my biological sibling and so I learned more about the teachings of Jesus through that regarding 'who IS my brother?'
I used to hang with a former colleague who wore a Christian cross around his neck but he was fairly paranoid and never left home without 2-3 guns on his person. He was known to brandish a weapon in public and he'd tell me about these incidents over time. When I pointed out the inconsistency or hypocrisy, it was obviously not well-received. How committed is one to loving people in a Christian sense if one is 2-3 times more likely to shoot them? I once 'love-bombed' a threatening street person when I was tripping my face off following a Jefferson Starship concert in NYC's Central Park. The greasy, unwashed derelict with the threatening pipe wrench in hand looked like he'd seen the Devil when I asked him to stop touching my lady friend's long blond hair but to just hang around with us for a while. He stammered something out about something he had to do and ran away from us. I was being sincere or he never would've been staggered by it. I saw the power of love that day come through me to my own surprise and relief of all of us.
It is difficult for many people to understand that they are no less deserving of love than anyone else. Certainly not more so, but decidedly not less. This has nothing to do with narcissism let alone malignant narcissism the likes of which I have never seen exceeded than in the person of Donald Trump. This is self-love expanded at the expense of everyone the man has ever deceived and/or ripped off. Malignant narcissism means the co-morbid condition of Narcissistic Personality Disorder as well as Antisocial Personality Disorder. Trump is therefore a narcissist as well as a sociopath. He is incapable of love in any of these forms save perhaps Eros, but only in a sexual sense not its spiritual sense of yearning for a transcendental object. I mention this only in diametrical opposition to any sense of the word love.
-------------------- γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself
|
kneesocks
Divineress



Registered: 12/25/11
Posts: 870
Loc: Puget Sound/PNW
Last seen: 1 year, 10 months
|
|
In a way, pure reason will always express itself in right action and right relations, and that manifests as what love is in our world. That's why I treat pure love as a quality or effect of pure reason. I agree love goes beyond emotions, its origin is in the divine.
-------------------- "An ignorant man is lost, faithless, and filled with self-doubt; A soul that harbors doubt has no joy, not in this world or the next." -Bhagavad-gita 4:40
|
VeryStrangeMan
Weirdo

Registered: 10/25/13
Posts: 230
Loc: Somewhere I belong.
Last seen: 19 days, 14 hours
|
Re: When is it logical to love? [Re: kneesocks]
#27024407 - 11/06/20 05:15 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I asked for permission to comment my spiritual session within galaxies, here, on shroomery instance. Do you "remember" this session of reduction? IMHO correct reduction is very great way to perform legal chemistry adventure with your world. No harm was done, I hope. I am deathmetaler. I play harmonic distortion. I am part of putridness. I wish not to fight pointlessly. So I demonstrate my knowledge to spirits I meet. I never know if they are dwelling or awake, on a purpose. To maintain relationships with duality. To perform better. I work hard, I get no results. But them results speak, when they come. You wish to see me? I bet so not. To love better I chose to fight corruption. I am not an angel of bliss. Cause ignorance is a bliss.
|
Pinkerton
Ultrasentient

Registered: 02/26/19
Posts: 3,127
|
|
Jesus Christ your insight and academic knowledge is mesmerizing. I don't really understand most of that but I'm foreign, still I know you're on point in these regards.
Big up, Markos!
|
|