|
meltdowner
Total Noob



Registered: 09/06/17
Posts: 1,457
Loc: New York City
Last seen: 7 months, 18 days
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: koods]
#26902937 - 08/27/20 06:59 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
hahahahahahahahhahahahaha "full stop" hahahahhahahahah
Wrong again, he lives 30min from Kenosha and it wasnt under curphew all day. Its also irrelevant to what happened. Kyle is going to free as the birds my America hating friend.
-------------------- I'm a Lightweight. I like to eat like two caps at a time.
|
Vahn421
Awakening Moonlighter



Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: koods] 1
#26902945 - 08/27/20 07:03 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Koods said: You’ve spent weeks defending the use of lethal and life altering force against both peaceful protesters
What the fuck kind of bullshit blatant lie is this? It makes anything else you said not even worth addressing, Koods. I've completely laid the fuck off your character from the beginning until you started with the personal jabs. It's like you can't help yourself. It's like the brain inside of your skull sees my posts and can't help but parrot to you, "Insult him. Insult him. Don't address the argument. Just go for personal jabs. You can't think of anything better to say anyway and you're ANGRY, so just let go, Koods!"
It's so fucking annoying. You're allowed to do it, but character slander is the fucking lowest of low and you're the king, Koods.
I'd block you, but you're just TOO good for the silent audience. The shit you post, especially about me, is just too valuable to not let rational people see.
Quote:
As much as I hate religion, I’m absolutely certain you were a much better person when you were still a Mormon.
And I'd say we'd all be better off without you here at all, but every forum needs at least one person to play the Machiavellian scumbag, so other people can see how they operate.
--------------------
Edited by Vahn421 (08/27/20 07:07 PM)
|
Vahn421
Awakening Moonlighter



Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421] 2
#26902966 - 08/27/20 07:13 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
A sensible man doesn’t go to a riot with a loaded weapon. Jesus Christ doesn’t anyone have any common sense?
(Ok... I have address this.) That's actually going to become the norm if the police keep standing down. People are going to start shooting others that want to fuck up their businesses. Lawlessness is not going to be tolerated, and those that get shot while participating in lawlessness are not victims.
--------------------
Edited by Vahn421 (08/27/20 07:15 PM)
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26902970 - 08/27/20 07:16 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Vahn421 said: It's like you can't help yourself. It's like the brain inside of your skull sees my posts and can't help but parrot to you, "Insult him. Insult him. Don't address the argument. Just go for personal jabs.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Kryptos
Stranger

Registered: 11/01/14
Posts: 12,330
Last seen: 1 hour, 15 minutes
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26902972 - 08/27/20 07:17 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Vahn brings up a good point.
If this leads to the legalization of lethal force to defend property, it becomes a lot easier to hunt MAGA hats.
|
Vahn421
Awakening Moonlighter



Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Kryptos] 3
#26902975 - 08/27/20 07:18 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
If this leads to the legalization of lethal force to defend property, it becomes a lot easier to hunt MAGA hats.
If this turned into a civil war, the political right would absolutely decimate the left. This is not even a debate.
--------------------
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421] 2
#26902977 - 08/27/20 07:19 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Vahn421 said: That's actually going to become the norm if the police keep standing down. People are going to start shooting others that want to fuck up their businesses.
Interesting point. I guess we'll see what happens.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
SirTripAlot
Semper Fidelis



Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 7,523
Loc: Harmless (Mostly)
Last seen: 2 hours, 25 minutes
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26902981 - 08/27/20 07:20 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
These are small scale riots that seem to manifest after most police shootings. There is no central coordination; sporadic WhackaMole it comes.
Are you up for a wager, regarding your doom views?
-------------------- “I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,333
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 43 minutes, 36 seconds
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26902983 - 08/27/20 07:22 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Kyle Rittenhouse was a minor who lived in another state. You can’t just drive to a city with a gun and start protecting anything... especially if there is a curfew. Every single person on the street that night was breaking the law. So fuck off about lawlessness. You only want to apply it to one side.
As for police standing down. Fire them. Fire the cops who shoot people for anything other than an imminent explicit threat. Fire the cops who don’t do their jobs and fire the cops who encouraged a gang of thugs to patrol the city illegally.
From what I’ve seen, the entire Kenosha police department should be disbanded.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
Edited by koods (08/27/20 07:23 PM)
|
Seriously_trippin
Cosmic Guru Ganesh



Registered: 07/12/13
Posts: 14,536
Last seen: 31 minutes, 55 seconds
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: koods]
#26903012 - 08/27/20 07:35 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
After he shot the first man in the head at point blank range which started the entire altercation this happened This video speaks volumes. You can hear people say get him he just shot someone and when they tried to wrestle him to the ground he shot 2 more times and then ended up firing many more rounds. As the police approaches you can see Kyle raise his hands and sling his rifle over his back while people yell that man just killed 2 people get him please. Even he knew he just committed murder and fully expected to be taken by police then and there hands up and everything. They didn't until the next day. Watch the video of the moments after he shot a man in the head point blank and tell me he is innocent. It's just justifying murder to turn a blind eye to this
-------------------- R.I.P Zombi3, Blue Helix Modest Mouse Zappa Slothie That Kid With The face ShLong Le Canard split_by_nine & Big Worm Forever Etched in the sands of time in the shroomery and ever so beloved and deeply missed by many
|
Kizzle
Misanthrope


Registered: 08/30/11
Posts: 9,865
Last seen: 1 day, 13 hours
|
|
They can charge people with a whatever they want but when he goes to trial it will only take one juror to decide he was defending himself and he will be acquitted of the homicide charges. I can't imagine that not happen given the video. It almost feels like they're charging him with homicide just to send a message and not because they think they'll get a conviction.
The guy that got shot the arm was also brandishing a gun while he was attacking this kid. No endangerment charge for him though and no one blaming him for trying to be a vigilante. He shouldn't have been there either, none of them should. Maybe defunding the police isn't such a bad idea if all they're getting paid for is to sit there and watch people commit crimes.
--------------------
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,333
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 43 minutes, 36 seconds
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Kizzle]
#26903037 - 08/27/20 07:48 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
He didn’t kill anyone
If you bring a weapon to willfully participate in riot and shoot someone you’re a criminal. Anyone with common sense should recognize the danger of bringing that weapon into a volatile situation. You’re not protecting anything. You’re an armed rioter.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Vahn421
Awakening Moonlighter



Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: koods] 2
#26903051 - 08/27/20 07:56 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
If you (insert anything that breaks the law and) participate in riot... you’re a criminal.
Is it still true, Koods? This is the first time I've ever heard you make this anti-rioting argument. All it took was one right winger, despite leftists rioting in cities and breaking the law for MONTHS.
--------------------
Edited by Vahn421 (08/27/20 07:57 PM)
|
Kizzle
Misanthrope


Registered: 08/30/11
Posts: 9,865
Last seen: 1 day, 13 hours
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: koods]
#26903068 - 08/27/20 08:04 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: He didn’t kill anyone
If you bring a weapon to willfully participate in riot and shoot someone you’re a criminal. Anyone with common sense should recognize the danger of bringing that weapon into a volatile situation. You’re not protecting anything. You’re an armed rioter.
He didn't kill anyone but he assaulted someone and it's part of the reason two more people got shot.
--------------------
|
Vahn421
Awakening Moonlighter



Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Kizzle]
#26903074 - 08/27/20 08:06 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Kizzle said:
Quote:
koods said: He didn’t kill anyone
If you bring a weapon to willfully participate in riot and shoot someone you’re a criminal. Anyone with common sense should recognize the danger of bringing that weapon into a volatile situation. You’re not protecting anything. You’re an armed rioter.
He didn't kill anyone but he assaulted someone and it's part of the reason two more people got shot.
He shot a man who was being clearly aggressive, yelled, "FUCK YOU!" and charged him.
What do you expect him to do instead? Keep running? Try to "talk" to the guy?
Let's not be naive. At that point, his options were to be harmed or to harm. This is the truth of it. No human being should ever be put in that position BUT IF THEY ARE, fire away sir. Fire away.
--------------------
|
Kwyjibo
Stranger

Registered: 07/31/18
Posts: 1,262
Loc: California
Last seen: 3 hours, 32 minutes
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26903095 - 08/27/20 08:17 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Vahn421 said:
What do you expect him to do instead?
Not be in a place he shouldn't have been with a gun he shouldn't have had in the first place.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,333
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 43 minutes, 36 seconds
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: koods]
#26903111 - 08/27/20 08:23 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
They can charge people with a whatever they want but when he goes to trial it will only take one juror to decide he was defending himself and he will be acquitted of the homicide charges.
You need 12 people to acquit not one.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
psi
TOAST N' JAM


Registered: 09/05/99
Posts: 31,458
Loc: 613
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: koods]
#26903125 - 08/27/20 08:30 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Yeah I believe the result of a single person holding out would be a mistrial due to a hung jury.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,333
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 43 minutes, 36 seconds
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421] 1
#26903127 - 08/27/20 08:31 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Vahn421 said:
Quote:
Kizzle said:
Quote:
koods said: He didn’t kill anyone
If you bring a weapon to willfully participate in riot and shoot someone you’re a criminal. Anyone with common sense should recognize the danger of bringing that weapon into a volatile situation. You’re not protecting anything. You’re an armed rioter.
He didn't kill anyone but he assaulted someone and it's part of the reason two more people got shot.
He shot a man who was being clearly aggressive, yelled, "FUCK YOU!" and charged him.
What do you expect him to do instead? Keep running? Try to "talk" to the guy?
Let's not be naive. At that point, his options were to be harmed or to harm. This is the truth of it. No human being should ever be put in that position BUT IF THEY ARE, fire away sir. Fire away.
You’ve been complaining about lefties participating in riots, but defend a right winger who participated in a riot and kills two people. Drove 30 miles and brought a gun to a riot and killed two people. And you defend it.
What I expect him to do is not drive to another state with a gun to participate in a riot. Get it?
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,333
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 43 minutes, 36 seconds
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26903138 - 08/27/20 08:36 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Vahn421 said:
Quote:
If you (insert anything that breaks the law and) participate in riot... you’re a criminal.
Is it still true, Koods? This is the first time I've ever heard you make this anti-rioting argument. All it took was one right winger, despite leftists rioting in cities and breaking the law for MONTHS.
I never said rioting was legal. I also don’t really care if people burn down a police station.
You on the other hand Have now not only endorsed rioting but endorsed killing people while rioting.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
|