|
CHeifM4sterDiezL
Chief Globerts


Registered: 07/28/10
Posts: 22,535
Loc: United States
Last seen: 43 minutes, 27 seconds
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26904972 - 08/28/20 08:53 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Vahn421 said:
Quote:
CHeifM4sterDiezL said: its important to not be petty and mean but stand by the truth and the rule of law. Its about integrity and trust.
Don't take my shadow side on an online forum seriously, I revel in dark comedy when I know it's going to freak someone else out. 
Who tf are u seriously i dont need some other angle of some nutter coming at me rn for whatever reason
|
shivas.wisdom
בּ



Registered: 02/19/09
Posts: 13,428
Loc: Turtle Island
Last seen: 1 hour, 29 minutes
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26904983 - 08/28/20 09:04 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Vahn421 said: He was assaulted first by a charging man, then a man hit him with a skateboard and smacked him with it, then another man had a handgun. These are the people that attacked Kyle and these are the people Kyle shot.
When a man is charging you, you don't have time to analyze and ask, "is there any other way I can get out of this?"
No. You fuckin' shoot.
Even if Kyle was justified in self-defense against assault, was he justified in using lethal force in self-defense?
Furthermore, when a man shoots someone dead in front of you and then starts fleeing, you don't have time to analyze and ask, "is this a legitimate case of self-defence?"
No. You fuckin' respond to the threat. If you grant Kyle the privilege of self-defense, you need to give every person who tried to stop a fleeing murderer the same privilege. The fact that despite knowing this kid just shot someone, that even the dude with a gun in hand still refrained from using lethal force shows the restraint of these people.
Despite all your fear porn, these protesters aren't killers. They responded to a firearm murderer with minimal force in an attempt to get the gun. The coward responded to an unarmed running person with 4 shots point blank.
Fuck that murderous coward, and fuck the cowards hiding in the shadow who radicalized him and set him up that night
--------------------
|
Vahn421
Awakening Moonlighter



Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 4 months
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: shivas.wisdom]
#26904989 - 08/28/20 09:08 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Despite all your fear porn, these protesters aren't killers.
I've never condemned the second set of protesters that rushed Kyle, not once. It is unfortunate they got shot, but they rushed a man holding a semi-automatic, thinking it was a good idea.
It seems in every case we've deal with so for, it's always the people lacking intelligence that get shot. They aren't guilty of being killers, but they are guilty of being idiots.
--------------------
|
meltdowner
Total Noob



Registered: 09/06/17
Posts: 1,457
Loc: New York City
Last seen: 7 months, 3 minutes
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26904994 - 08/28/20 09:10 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Vahn421 said:
Quote:
Koods said: You’ve spent weeks defending the use of lethal and life altering force against both peaceful protesters
What the fuck kind of bullshit blatant lie is this? It makes anything else you said not even worth addressing, Koods. I've completely laid the fuck off your character from the beginning until you started with the personal jabs. It's like you can't help yourself. It's like the brain inside of your skull sees my posts and can't help but parrot to you, "Insult him. Insult him. Don't address the argument. Just go for personal jabs. You can't think of anything better to say anyway and you're ANGRY, so just let go, Koods!"
It's so fucking annoying. You're allowed to do it, but character slander is the fucking lowest of low and you're the king, Koods.
I'd block you, but you're just TOO good for the silent audience. The shit you post, especially about me, is just too valuable to not let rational people see.
Quote:
As much as I hate religion, I’m absolutely certain you were a much better person when you were still a Mormon.
And I'd say we'd all be better off without you here at all, but every forum needs at least one person to play the Machiavellian scumbag, so other people can see how they operate.

BTW if you hate cops and white people, you'll never be banned from here.
-------------------- I'm a Lightweight. I like to eat like two caps at a time.
|
CHeifM4sterDiezL
Chief Globerts


Registered: 07/28/10
Posts: 22,535
Loc: United States
Last seen: 43 minutes, 27 seconds
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: shivas.wisdom]
#26904999 - 08/28/20 09:11 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
shivas.wisdom said:
Quote:
Vahn421 said: He was assaulted first by a charging man, then a man hit him with a skateboard and smacked him with it, then another man had a handgun. These are the people that attacked Kyle and these are the people Kyle shot.
When a man is charging you, you don't have time to analyze and ask, "is there any other way I can get out of this?"
No. You fuckin' shoot.
Even if Kyle was justified in self-defense against assault, was he justified in using lethal force in self-defense?
Furthermore, when a man shoots someone dead in front of you and then starts fleeing, you don't have time to analyze and ask, "is this a legitimate case of self-defence?"
No. You fuckin' respond to the threat. If you grant Kyle the privilege of self-defense, you need to give every person who tried to stop a fleeing murderer the same privilege. The fact that despite knowing this kid just shot someone, that even the dude with a gun in hand still refrained from using lethal force shows the restraint of these people.
Despite all your fear porn, these protesters aren't killers. They responded to a firearm murderer with minimal force in an attempt to get the gun. The coward responded to an unarmed running person with 4 shots point blank.
Fuck that murderous coward, and fuck the cowards hiding in the shadow who radicalized him and set him up that night
Ignorance of the law isn't a defense
|
meltdowner
Total Noob



Registered: 09/06/17
Posts: 1,457
Loc: New York City
Last seen: 7 months, 3 minutes
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: shivas.wisdom]
#26905003 - 08/28/20 09:12 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
shivas.wisdom said:
Quote:
Vahn421 said: He was assaulted first by a charging man, then a man hit him with a skateboard and smacked him with it, then another man had a handgun. These are the people that attacked Kyle and these are the people Kyle shot.
When a man is charging you, you don't have time to analyze and ask, "is there any other way I can get out of this?"
No. You fuckin' shoot.
Even if Kyle was justified in self-defense against assault, was he justified in using lethal force in self-defense?
Furthermore, when a man shoots someone dead in front of you and then starts fleeing, you don't have time to analyze and ask, "is this a legitimate case of self-defence?"
No. You fuckin' respond to the threat. If you grant Kyle the privilege of self-defense, you need to give every person who tried to stop a fleeing murderer the same privilege. The fact that despite knowing this kid just shot someone, that even the dude with a gun in hand still refrained from using lethal force shows the restraint of these people.
Despite all your fear porn, these protesters aren't killers. They responded to a firearm murderer with minimal force in an attempt to get the gun. The coward responded to an unarmed running person with 4 shots point blank.
Fuck that murderous coward, and fuck the cowards hiding in the shadow who radicalized him and set him up that night
You are always justified to use lethal force in self defense. Kyle isnt a radical. His behavior looked pretty normal to me. Defend property and himself from rioters. Any man should do the same.
-------------------- I'm a Lightweight. I like to eat like two caps at a time.
|
CHeifM4sterDiezL
Chief Globerts


Registered: 07/28/10
Posts: 22,535
Loc: United States
Last seen: 43 minutes, 27 seconds
|
|
|
Seriously_trippin
Cosmic Guru Ganesh



Registered: 07/12/13
Posts: 14,471
Last seen: 2 hours, 48 minutes
|
|
Quote:
CHeifM4sterDiezL said: OK so do people not get that cops can't just come out and confirm this that and the third on twidder 90 seconds after it happens? Its all legal af shit. Have u ever thought hey maybe it takes more time than that to conduct and polish and confirm 1000% wtf is going on v4 innocent ppl go to jail? Not only that but im mean hello have u ever heard of tryimg to not influence a jury? In this political climate? Do u want the guy to walk? Do u want justice? Or do u want the world to fit ur own view distpite maybe what actually happened?
That's a ramble if I've ever heard one but he's not some innocent kid sitting in jail for no reason. Dozens and dozens of eye witnesses and every video I've seen starting with the videos he made saying "he's ready to defend the businesses from the rioters"
He's listening to people like diesel that tell him he was in the right to go there where there wasn't any guns just protesters and rioters and took it upon itself to kill them to "defend the area" wasn't his community he saw protestors that fox news demonized the shit out of, drove there shot 3 murdered 2 injured 1 he put his hands up with his gun on his back and people screaming to get him because he just killed people 3 police officers drove right passed him and asked him if anyone was injured When they found his carnage and evidence they arrested him and charged him the next day .
-------------------- R.I.P Zombi3, Blue Helix Modest Mouse Zappa Slothie That Kid With The face ShLong Le Canard split_by_nine & Big Worm Forever Etched in the sands of time in the shroomery and ever so beloved and deeply missed by many
|
CHeifM4sterDiezL
Chief Globerts


Registered: 07/28/10
Posts: 22,535
Loc: United States
Last seen: 43 minutes, 27 seconds
|
|
I'm always willing to kill kids
|
Kryptos
Stranger

Registered: 11/01/14
Posts: 12,263
Last seen: 9 seconds
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: mycosis]
#26905031 - 08/28/20 09:21 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
mycosis said:
Quote:
Kryptos said: Eh, it's illegal to give a 'tard a gun, and it's illegal for a 'tard to have a gun.
Might be worth mentioning at trial.

It's illegal for mentally retarded people to own guns. It is also illegal to give a mentally retarded person a gun.
|
CHeifM4sterDiezL
Chief Globerts


Registered: 07/28/10
Posts: 22,535
Loc: United States
Last seen: 43 minutes, 27 seconds
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Kryptos] 2
#26905038 - 08/28/20 09:25 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Good theyll take yalls guns then
|
SporeJunkie
Pöåšt Šhïttēr



Registered: 11/30/18
Posts: 2,106
Loc: TheOnlyTenISee
Last seen: 2 months, 12 days
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26905041 - 08/28/20 09:26 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Not guilty.
-------------------- Royale with cheese
|
meltdowner
Total Noob



Registered: 09/06/17
Posts: 1,457
Loc: New York City
Last seen: 7 months, 3 minutes
|
|
Quote:
CHeifM4sterDiezL said: Good theyll take yalls guns then
Lol
-------------------- I'm a Lightweight. I like to eat like two caps at a time.
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
|
Quote:
CHeifM4sterDiezL said: Good theyll take yalls guns then
Says the guy who cant put together a single coherent post over 2 sentences long
--------------------
|
meltdowner
Total Noob



Registered: 09/06/17
Posts: 1,457
Loc: New York City
Last seen: 7 months, 3 minutes
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26905072 - 08/28/20 09:38 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
You understood that one smart guy.
-------------------- I'm a Lightweight. I like to eat like two caps at a time.
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: meltdowner]
#26905079 - 08/28/20 09:40 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Apparently you arent the smart guy.
I specifically said he cant make a coherent post OVER 2 SENTENCES LONG.
The post i replied to was barely 1 sentence.
You failed at your insult and now you should hang your head in shame.
--------------------
|
Vahn421
Awakening Moonlighter



Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 4 months
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26905082 - 08/28/20 09:41 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
natedawgnow said: Apparently you arent the smart guy.
I specifically said he cant make a coherent post OVER 2 SENTENCES LONG.
The post i replied to was barely 1 sentence.
You failed at your insult and now you should hang your head in shame.
You ever wonder if you're insulting someone who speaks 4 languages with English being their fourth?
--------------------
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26905086 - 08/28/20 09:43 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I was insulted first. Not sure how that went over your head.
--------------------
|
christopera
Stranger


Registered: 10/13/17
Posts: 14,201
Last seen: 1 hour, 13 minutes
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26905088 - 08/28/20 09:44 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Vahn421 said:
Quote:
natedawgnow said: Apparently you arent the smart guy.
I specifically said he cant make a coherent post OVER 2 SENTENCES LONG.
The post i replied to was barely 1 sentence.
You failed at your insult and now you should hang your head in shame.
You ever wonder if you're insulting someone who speaks 4 languages with English being their fourth?
I've always wondered if some of the poster's here are actually dogs. It's hard to tell on the internet...
-------------------- Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result. A Dorito is pizza, change my mind. Bank and Union with The Shroomery at the Zuul on The internet - now with %'s and things I’m sorry it had to be me.
|
CHeifM4sterDiezL
Chief Globerts


Registered: 07/28/10
Posts: 22,535
Loc: United States
Last seen: 43 minutes, 27 seconds
|
Re: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty or not guilty? [Re: Vahn421]
#26905090 - 08/28/20 09:44 PM (3 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Here it goes arguing semantics. Grow the fuck up lil kids.
|
|