|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Vahn421] 1
#26873238 - 08/10/20 12:34 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Vahn421 said: Honestly, I really do get a kick out of it when protesters act genuinely shocked that these things happen to them when they stand in the road.
Those that choose to "disrupt" society need to be adequately prepared to deal with the consequences. Especially if their goal is to dismantle at least some of, if not all of the law. When they're done, who do they expect to protect them anyway?
Here is vahn saying protestors want to dismantle laws. Follow the convo fal for christ sake
--------------------
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26873246 - 08/10/20 12:38 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
natedawgnow said: Thats vahns FIRST post in the are they all terrorists thread.
Holy fuck see this is why I don't bother going back to quote shit over and over. You purposefully skim over it and deny its existence
Instead of refuting the points he makes with opposing logic, you again resort to your preferred emotional attack "Dude you seriously suck at this"
The mods seem to be VERY generous to those attacking Vahn.
PS - to use your own logic "You're a big fat poo poo head!!!"
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] 1
#26873249 - 08/10/20 12:39 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Instead of acknowledging that you were wrong and vahn indeed did say what I claimed he said, you divert the conversation to me being a meanie
--------------------
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow] 1
#26873250 - 08/10/20 12:40 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
If you actually followed the thread you wouldnt need people to constantly go back and quote other peoples posts. You just love playing DA so much you stick up for truly reprehensible positions
--------------------
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26873251 - 08/10/20 12:41 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Acknowledge that I was wrong about what?
You need to learn how to move from generic attacks based on emotion to specific attacks based on logic.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26873253 - 08/10/20 12:43 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
natedawgnow said: If you actually followed the thread you wouldnt need people to constantly go back and quote other peoples posts. You just love playing DA so much you stick up for truly reprehensible positions
Oh, I follow the thread and link to posts proving you wrong. When I ask for sources proving yourself right, you complain.
You're not going to win too many arguments that way.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] 1
#26873254 - 08/10/20 12:43 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
You were wrong and you know it, dude.
You said vahn never claimed white people will be executed in the streets, I provide proof that he did, and here you are denying its existence.
--------------------
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26873255 - 08/10/20 12:44 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
I'm pretty sure you're a bot dude. Your account got hacked for sure
--------------------
|
Vahn421
Awakening Moonlighter



Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26873262 - 08/10/20 12:46 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
natedawgnow said: Dude you seriously suck at this
Quote:
Vahn421 said: "Terrorism (Noun):
1. The use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes. 2. The state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization. 3. Terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government."
Let's focus on #1 and #3.
We essentially have two opposing forces and MOST of America is going to agree that at least one of these two organizations, (if not both), are terrorists: Antifa/Rioters and Police/Government.
So, who are the real terrorists? Or are they ALL terrorists?
I lean toward all of them, but I'll take the boys in blue over any other group.
Hypothetically, the result of Antifa having all the power right now would mean an immediate return to a caste system with black people at the very top and white people at the very bottom. The sins of the fathers would be heaped on the heads of the sons and we'd likely see executions in the street. We'd look like Venezuela in 6 months. That power is unbridled, unchecked, and ironically completely fascist and racist. (All the things they claim to hate.)
This is, hypothetically of course, assuming China doesn't nut so hard over far leftists after they finish sucking its dick that it claims us as their own.
Cops and government fuck up, but no cops just means drug lords rise as the terrorist/boss of any given territory anyway, and I promise you they aint as civil as cops.
Thats vahns FIRST post in the are they all terrorists thread.
Holy fuck see this is why I don't bother going back to quote shit over and over. You purposefully skim over it and deny its existence
I realized most people can't see that far ahead yet, but the "executions in the street" part is starting already. I didn't mean public mock trials, I just meant mob justice.
What did I just post about an hour ago? Mob Justice. Or at least their attempt at it.
The rest will come slowly if we don't change course. Grab your popcorn, enjoy the show.
--------------------
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Vahn421]
#26873265 - 08/10/20 12:46 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Whatever you say dude
--------------------
|
Vahn421
Awakening Moonlighter



Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26873267 - 08/10/20 12:47 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
natedawgnow said:
Quote:
Vahn421 said: Honestly, I really do get a kick out of it when protesters act genuinely shocked that these things happen to them when they stand in the road.
Those that choose to "disrupt" society need to be adequately prepared to deal with the consequences. Especially if their goal is to dismantle at least some of, if not all of the law. When they're done, who do they expect to protect them anyway?
Here is vahn saying protestors want to dismantle laws. Follow the convo fal for christ sake
"some, if not all" means some people want to dismantle some of the laws, and others like many members of Antifa are more interested in a collapse of the entire system.
--------------------
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Vahn421]
#26873276 - 08/10/20 12:52 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Wanting police to not kill people is not dismantling any laws 
Drug laws deserve to be dismantled
--------------------
|
MightyWhite

Registered: 08/27/08
Posts: 3,610
Last seen: 6 hours, 47 minutes
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: ballsalsa]
#26873303 - 08/10/20 01:01 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
I think you forgot the part that says as long as Quote:
ballsalsa said:
Quote:
MightyWhite said:
Quote:
ballsalsa said: You absolutely do. There is no express right to drive a vehicle in the road, though.
No you don't
Better educate yourself before you get run over https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/protesters-rights/
Quote:
Your rights are strongest in what are known as “traditional public forums,” such as streets, sidewalks, and parks. You also likely have the right to speak out on other public property, like plazas in front of government buildings, as long as you are not blocking access to the government building or interfering with other purposes the property was designed for.
Quote:
You don’t need a permit to march in the streets or on sidewalks, as long as marchers don’t obstruct car or pedestrian traffic. If you don’t have a permit, police officers can ask you to move to the side of a street or sidewalk to let others pass or for safety reasons.
But where does it say that it's your right to obstruct traffic?
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26873322 - 08/10/20 01:09 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
natedawgnow said: You said vahn never claimed white people will be executed in the streets
Source, or make believe? I said:
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: I remember Vahn disagreeing about this, but maybe I missed the post you're referring to?
Notice I included a link proving my point.
Quote:
natedawgnow said: I provide proof that he did, and here you are denying its existence.
Source, or make believe?
Quote:
natedawgnow said: I'm pretty sure you're a bot dude. Your account got hacked for sure 
Any evidence/logic to back this up, or is "I think you're a big fat poo poo head" type of attack all you have?
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Vahn421
Awakening Moonlighter



Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
#26873324 - 08/10/20 01:11 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Drug laws deserve to be dismantled
Most of them, yes. Agree.
--------------------
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] 1
#26873325 - 08/10/20 01:11 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Dude I quoted where vahn said what I claimed he said. If you refuse to read the evidence I posted the we're done here
--------------------
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26873380 - 08/10/20 01:41 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
natedawgnow said:
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:
natedawgnow said: You said vahn never claimed white people will be executed in the streets
Source, or make believe? I said:
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: I remember Vahn disagreeing about this, but maybe I missed the post you're referring to?
Notice I included a link proving my point.
Dude I quoted where vahn said what I claimed he said. If you refuse to read the evidence I posted the we're done here
I can't read it if you don't link to it. I did a search for "execute" and "executed" under Vahn's name and I only thing I found is that he DOESN'T want people executed. That's why I'm asking for help.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] 1
#26873545 - 08/10/20 03:12 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Dude its the 2nd to last comment on the last page. For real you are being horrible obtuse right now and you're doing it on purpose cause you know youre wrong.
I quoted it right after your obligatory "source or make believe" to my original assertion that he said it. So this just proves to me that you dont give 2 shits about evidence. You just like to argue even when proven wrong.
Vahn even requoted it on this exact page 8 or 9 comments up.
The amount of hypocrisy you are displaying right now is gross.
--------------------
Edited by natedawgnow (08/10/20 03:13 PM)
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,333
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 27 minutes
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow] 1
#26873571 - 08/10/20 03:30 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
natedawgnow said: Dude its the 2nd to last comment on the last page. For real you are being horrible obtuse right now and you're doing it on purpose cause you know youre wrong.
I quoted it right after your obligatory "source or make believe" to my original assertion that he said it. So this just proves to me that you dont give 2 shits about evidence. You just like to argue even when proven wrong.
Vahn even requoted it on this exact page 8 or 9 comments up.
The amount of hypocrisy you are displaying right now is gross.
This is the way he operates. The king of bad faith debating.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: koods] 1
#26873579 - 08/10/20 03:37 PM (3 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Where did I say vahn wants people executed fal? Source or make believe?
This was my original comment
Quote:
He literally said this is a race war that will end with whites being executed in the street 
To which you said
Quote:
source or make believe
And after supplying you with the quote on the last page 2nd to last comment, you claim i never provided it and now say this
Quote:
I can't read it if you don't link to it. I did a search for "execute" and "executed" under Vahn's name and I only thing I found is that he DOESN'T want people executed. That's why I'm asking for help
Seriously bad faith tactics there which everyone can see
--------------------
|
|