|
MagicMush123
moon person



Registered: 01/22/15
Posts: 5,101
Loc: Chinada
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
#26877377 - 08/12/20 07:07 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
What was the us involved in the above?
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 57 minutes
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] 2
#26877395 - 08/12/20 07:20 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:
Rapjack said: Since we don't know exactly know what goes in the Uighur concentration camps we should all assume the CCP is actually helping them.
Uyghur Genocide just released a video of BBQ style torture going on inside the concentration camps:
https://twitter.com/auighur/status/1272360467479085056
The problem is the video isn't from China, and that’s not a Uyghur Muslim. It’s a BDSM fetish video from Taiwan.
https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/articles/379

More fake Uyghur news exposed here.
The US is on a mission to make China look worse than really they are.
Again for the record, I'm not saying China is a great country, I'm saying there's a lot of fake news against them right now.
It’s very telling that you always focus on the evidence that ends up defending governments that oppress and commit war crimes against civilians.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: koods]
#26877645 - 08/12/20 10:22 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: It’s very telling that you always focus on the evidence that ends up defending governments that oppress and commit war crimes against civilians.
It's even more telling when you defend fake news/make believe.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 57 minutes
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] 1
#26877689 - 08/12/20 11:16 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I didn’t defend that video.
There’s disinformation on every side in every issue. But you always seem to highlight the stuff that makes the underdog look bad. You’re doing it here with China. You did it obsessively with Syria, trying to discredit the victims of Assad’s war crimes. You did it with the guy in buffalo who was pushed by the cop.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 57 minutes
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: koods] 3
#26877699 - 08/12/20 11:27 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
You claim to care about make believe but you never say anything about trump’s bullshit. There’s so much material, yet not a peep from the self appointed sheriff of the make believe police.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: koods] 1
#26877703 - 08/12/20 11:31 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: You always seem to highlight the stuff that makes the underdog look bad. You’re doing it here with China. You did it obsessively with Syria, trying to discredit the victims of Assad’s war crimes. You did it with the guy in buffalo who was pushed by the cop.
To be clear, what I'm doing here with China is pointing out fake news about what people claim China did to the Uyghur. What I did with Syria was point out fake news about what people claim Assad did to the people of Syria. What I did with the guy who was pushed by a cop in Buffalo is point out that I don't think they tried to murder the guy (would you disagree?)
Quote:
koods said: You claim to care about make believe but you never say anything about trump’s bullshit. There’s so much material, yet not a peep from the self appointed sheriff of the make believe police.
I probably would, but you (and others) obsessively do it for me. Trump sucks dude.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] 1
#26877720 - 08/12/20 11:50 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:
shivas.wisdom said: You absolutely can preemptively attack someone in self-defence, assuming the fear is reasonable and the force proportional to the feared threat. If someone is threatening you with a gun, you don't need to wait until you are shot before fighting back. If someone is threatening you with a vehicle, you don't need to wait until you are run over before fighting back.
At this point I think we need to turn it over to an anonymous jury (the other members of this board) for their input.
Were the protesters justified enough in their fear of the truck to attack it? Yes 1 (17%) No 5 (83%) STAL 0 (0%)
Did attacking the stopped truck make the protesters safter, or did it put them in more danger? Attacking the truck made them safer 1 (17%) Attacking the truck put their safety at greater risk 5 (83%) STAL 0 (0%)
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:
qman said:
Quote:
christopera said: Loaded questions, dude.
The emotional state (fear) of the protesters was the argument used by members in this thread. So if you asked that question without that consideration, you would be assuming that the protesters were fearful and we don't know that as a fact.
You think I loaded the question in the protesters' favor.
Even with a loaded question in the protesters' favor, my guess that people thought the protesters overreacted was still better than I expected.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 57 minutes
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] 2
#26877731 - 08/12/20 11:57 PM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Who cares if the rest of us do it. You’re the one who is obsessed with identifying make believe.
Quote:
To be clear, what I'm doing here with China is pointing out fake news about what people claim China did to the Uyghur. What I did with Syria was point out fake news about what people claim Assad did to the people of Syria. What I did with the guy who was pushed by a cop in Buffalo is point out that I don't think they tried to murder the guy (would you disagree?)
Exactly. But what you don’t do is criticize what the Chinese are actually doing, or talk about all the times Assad unequivocally used chemical weapons against his own people. Your post is actively attempting to undermine the Uyghur’s cause by highlighting some sketchy tweets. You spent a year forcefully undermining the people of Syria who were trying to get the world to pay attention to what was happening. It just seems like a really fucked up thing to do. To be so obsessed with a little make believe on one side, while ignoring the full reality of the situation. You’re a propagandist.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: koods] 1
#26877737 - 08/13/20 12:09 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrno3 said: To be clear, what I'm doing here with China is pointing out fake news about what people claim China did to the Uyghur. What I did with Syria was point out fake news about what people claim Assad did to the people of Syria. What I did with the guy who was pushed by a cop in Buffalo is point out that I don't think they tried to murder the guy (would you disagree?)
Exactly. But what you don’t do is criticize what the Chinese are actually doing, or talk about all the times Assad unequivocally used chemical weapons against his own people. Your post is actively attempting to undermine the Uyghur’s cause by highlighting some sketchy tweets. You spent a year forcefully undermining the people of Syria who were trying to get the world to pay attention to what was happening. It just seems like a really fucked up thing to do. To be so obsessed with a little make believe on one side, while ignoring the full reality of the situation. You’re a propagandist.
Again, others here do that for me, and I won't disagree with real news. I just hate it when people make believe. Call it a flaw in my personality if you want, but I'm here for honest discussion.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 57 minutes
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] 1
#26877744 - 08/13/20 12:23 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I know you just hate make believe. You can’t let it stand. Except when trump engages in it.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
natedawgnow
Rocky mountain hood rat



Registered: 02/09/15
Posts: 8,939
Loc: ation
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: koods] 1
#26877766 - 08/13/20 12:50 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Please supply evidence that anybody ever claimed that the cop WANTED to murder guigino.
Seriously dude you are the worst hypocrite
--------------------
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 57 minutes
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26877772 - 08/13/20 01:06 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
If I recall correctly, Falcon spent a lot of time pondering the fake news that Guigino was trying to jam the cops communications with his cell phone. You know, “just asking questions.”
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
MagicMush123
moon person



Registered: 01/22/15
Posts: 5,101
Loc: Chinada
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow] 1
#26877805 - 08/13/20 01:54 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
natedawgnow said: Please supply evidence that anybody ever claimed that the cop WANTED to murder guigino.
Seriously dude you are the worst hypocrite
Because murder would imply it was intentional
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: natedawgnow]
#26877810 - 08/13/20 02:03 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
natedawgnow said: Please supply evidence that anybody ever claimed that the cop WANTED to murder guigino.
Here you said "I can get murder charges for punching you in the face if you go down and crack your dome and die."
Wikipedia says "All three crimes above (First-degree murder, Second-degree murder, and Voluntary manslaughter feature an intent to kill, whereas involuntary manslaughter is unintentional".
Quote:
natedawgnow said: Seriously dude you are the worst hypocrite
Seriously dude, you're the worst make believer.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: MagicMush123] 1
#26877812 - 08/13/20 02:04 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
MagicMush123 said: Because murder would imply it was intentional
You beat me to it. 
Edit: But I included links to prove the point.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 57 minutes
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
#26877877 - 08/13/20 04:43 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:
natedawgnow said: Please supply evidence that anybody ever claimed that the cop WANTED to murder guigino.
Here you said "I can get murder charges for punching you in the face if you go down and crack your dome and die."
Wikipedia says "All three crimes above (First-degree murder, Second-degree murder, and Voluntary manslaughter feature an intent to kill, whereas involuntary manslaughter is unintentional".
Quote:
natedawgnow said: Seriously dude you are the worst hypocrite
Seriously dude, you're the worst make believer.
You still haven’t shown evidence that someone claimed the cop tried to murder him, as you suggested. Are you going to show us evidence or was this just make believe?
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Asante
Mage


Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 86,795
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: koods] 1
#26877882 - 08/13/20 04:55 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic?
Ask a crossing guard.
No, not i mean that seriously.
When to block traffic? When there are people in the road.
When are there people in the road? In instances such as kids crossing to go to school or protests in the road.
In the latter case there are ideological opponents of the protesters who want to deliberately run over protestors, not just people who don't grasp the effects of speed and distance.
I'll leave it to the experts of TAC in Australia to explain:
-------------------- Omnicyclion.org higher knowledge starts here
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 57 minutes
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: Asante] 2
#26877884 - 08/13/20 05:00 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsoctv.com/news/trending/self-described-kkk-leader-who-plowed-truck-through-blm-protesters-sentenced-6-years-prison/Q7N4MDYJ2JGZBHBZKXP6UYGSSI/%3foutputType=amp
Quote:
RICHMOND, Va. — A Virginia man and self-described Ku Klux Klan leader was convicted Tuesday on multiple misdemeanor charges brought after he drove his truck into a crowd of peaceful Black Lives Matter protesters in Richmond on June 7. Harry H. Rogers, 36, of Hanover, Virginia, was not found guilty of hate crimes, but the judge did impose the maximum sentence allowed on each misdemeanor charge, including four counts of assault, a hit-and-run and destruction of property, The Washington Post reported
Rogers was sentenced to a total of six years in prison, or one year for each count, and still faces three felony charges of attempted malicious wounding — one count for each of the three people struck — in connection with the same incident, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reported.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: koods]
#26878065 - 08/13/20 08:40 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:
natedawgnow said: Please supply evidence that anybody ever claimed that the cop WANTED to murder guigino.
Here you said "I can get murder charges for punching you in the face if you go down and crack your dome and die."
Wikipedia says "All three crimes above (First-degree murder, Second-degree murder, and Voluntary manslaughter feature an intent to kill, whereas involuntary manslaughter is unintentional".
You still haven’t shown evidence that someone claimed the cop tried to murder him, as you suggested. Are you going to show us evidence or was this just make believe?
So natedawgnow just brought up murder for no reason? It had nothing to do with the discussion the rest of us were having?
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
|
Re: Is there ANY good argument for blocking traffic? [Re: koods]
#26878070 - 08/13/20 08:42 AM (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
|