Home | Community | Message Board

Magic-Mushrooms-Shop.com
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >  [ show all ]
OfflineThe Ecstatic
Chilldog Extraordinaire


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 33,362
Loc: 'Merica Flag
Last seen: 7 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: Vahn421]
    #26826791 - 07/16/20 11:16 AM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

Vahn421 said:
A vote for Biden is a vote for Biden's VP.

This debate will change dramatically as soon as we know who the VP (A.K.A. the "actual" president.) will be.




I think that’s mostly right, except from the list of VP choices it’s clear the same people who own Biden own the VP, the ruling class just needs a solid continuation of the establishment agenda after Biden, and making practically anyone other than Bernie the VP does that, not only for 2020 but for 2024 as well, where the VP is the likely candidate.

People wondering why Biden doesn’t pick someone slightly to the left like Warren as VP and trying to get more of the Bernie vote, all but guaranteeing an election win in November, don’t understand that the VP is going to be someone they can use to steer people away from
The growing Bernie wing and back towards a socially liberal but fiscally conservative paradigm, that’s why Kamala Harris is a good pick for them.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineSirTripAlot
Semper Fidelis
Male User Gallery


Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 7,459
Loc: Harmless (Mostly)
Last seen: 5 hours, 7 minutes
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26826801 - 07/16/20 11:21 AM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Her or Duckworth.


--------------------
“I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26827820 - 07/16/20 08:59 PM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

The Ecstatic said:
Quote:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Even Bari Weiss just quit the NY Times, saying they force everyone to conform to their "predetermined narrative".



Bari Weiss is a racist scumbag fuck her opinions.



I hate Bari Weiss, and I even made fun of her here.

But do you disagree with her opinion that the NY Times forces its journalists to a predetermined narrative?


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: Psilynut2]
    #26827848 - 07/16/20 09:11 PM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

Psilynut2 said:
Quote:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Five or six companies now control over 90% of the media.  The media could EASILY have made Bernie President if they were neutral,



The voters could have easily made Bernie President , were they not able to hear the words coming  out of his mouth or something ?

Why couldn’t Bernie convince people to like him ?



As qman correctly pointed out, "most people don't have the time or ability to thoroughly study each candidate and the issues." "Every time I turned on CNN or MSNBC they were attacking Bernie with false narratives. They scared people away from Bernie".

90% of the news that people read/hear comes from the mainstream media.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBrian Jones
Club 27
Male User Gallery


Registered: 12/18/12
Posts: 12,340
Loc: attending Snake Church
Last seen: 3 hours, 6 minutes
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26828231 - 07/17/20 05:35 AM (3 years, 6 months ago)

True but the mainstream media is mostly FOX based on ratings.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

The worst thing about corruption is that it works so well,


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineqman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 1 day, 7 hours
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: Brian Jones] * 1
    #26828545 - 07/17/20 09:29 AM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

Brian Jones said:
True but the mainstream media is mostly FOX based on ratings.




Who also constantly attacked Bernie in a similar fashion, it was one of the few times CNN, MSNBC and FOX joined forces to attack a political candidate.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineVahn421
Awakening Moonlighter
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 4 months
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: qman]
    #26828713 - 07/17/20 11:01 AM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

qman said:
Quote:

Brian Jones said:
True but the mainstream media is mostly FOX based on ratings.




Who also constantly attacked Bernie in a similar fashion, it was one of the few times CNN, MSNBC and FOX joined forces to attack a political candidate.




FOX allowed Bernie to come on more than once to explain his positions. They actually gave him a fair shake and were definitely more critical of his ideas than him as a person.

There was a poll somewhere, I'll have to dig for it, that says that most people on the right get 60% of their news from republican sources and 40% from democrat sources (most conservatives I know DO watch the news on the other side to see what's up.) With most centrists it's like 70% democrat sources and 30% conservative sources, due to the slant of the mainstream media.

And then with democrats and leftists, 90+% of the news they absorb and listen to is democratic.


--------------------


Edited by Vahn421 (07/17/20 11:02 AM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: Vahn421]
    #26828788 - 07/17/20 11:39 AM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

Vahn421 said:
FOX allowed Bernie to come on more than once to explain his positions. They actually gave him a fair shake and were definitely more critical of his ideas than him as a person.



Ya, I actually gained a little respect for Fox because of this.

Fox is still bad just like the other mainstream sources.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineVahn421
Awakening Moonlighter
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 4 months
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26828806 - 07/17/20 11:50 AM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:

Vahn421 said:
FOX allowed Bernie to come on more than once to explain his positions. They actually gave him a fair shake and were definitely more critical of his ideas than him as a person.



Ya, I actually gained a little respect for Fox because of this.

Fox is still bad just like the other mainstream sources.




It's the least worst mainstream media source out there right now. My 2008 self would be flipping out at my 2020 self for saying that, but times change.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBrian Jones
Club 27
Male User Gallery


Registered: 12/18/12
Posts: 12,340
Loc: attending Snake Church
Last seen: 3 hours, 6 minutes
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: Vahn421]
    #26829603 - 07/17/20 06:53 PM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

Vahn421 said:
Quote:

qman said:
Quote:

Brian Jones said:
True but the mainstream media is mostly FOX based on ratings.




Who also constantly attacked Bernie in a similar fashion, it was one of the few times CNN, MSNBC and FOX joined forces to attack a political candidate.




FOX allowed Bernie to come on more than once to explain his positions. They actually gave him a fair shake and were definitely more critical of his ideas than him as a person.

There was a poll somewhere, I'll have to dig for it, that says that most people on the right get 60% of their news from republican sources and 40% from democrat sources (most conservatives I know DO watch the news on the other side to see what's up.) With most centrists it's like 70% democrat sources and 30% conservative sources, due to the slant of the mainstream media.

And then with democrats and leftists, 90+% of the news they absorb and listen to is democratic.




What I'm saying is that since FOX is the highest rated news show of the mainstream media. it nonsensical to talk about "the slant of the mainstream media" implying that it's a liberal slant.

It reminds me of when my friend in grad school went home to Austria for the summer. When she returned I mentioned that our media was doing daily stories on Austrian President Kurt Waldheim being exposed as a former Nazi. She said she never heard that, and their press was focusing on American corporations selling baby organs in the 3rd world.

I seldom stray from streaming channels, but when I do turn on broadcast TV I watch MSNBC and Fox. I realize that MSNBC is biased, but I wouldn't say I'm getting any information from FOX because I think it's a joke.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

The worst thing about corruption is that it works so well,


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineKryptos
Stranger
 User Gallery
Registered: 11/01/14
Posts: 12,262
Last seen: 57 minutes, 20 seconds
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: The Ecstatic] * 1
    #26829616 - 07/17/20 07:02 PM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

The Ecstatic said:
Quote:

Kryptos said:
First off, I fundamentally disagree with your initial axiom that Biden won't move left. Based on everything that I've seen, Biden has been veering sharply left for a while now. He's a party man, and he knows that he needs to follow the party.

That kinda fundamentally destroys both of the OP options, but I'll still give it a shot:

Biden elected, doesn't govern much, mostly leaves it to the experts and younger party members while occasionally pulling back on the leash.

I'd expect another one of the GOP's post mortems like in 2012 in which they talk about how they need to be less racist and less sexist, which they then promptly ignore. 2022 midterms become a litmus test on whether they can double down on the racism or not. Assuming they lose those, I could see the GOP fracturing into a far right nationalist/white supremacists branch, and a piece that joins the Democrats. I could see the left wing element of the Democrats also splitting off around this time.

If Biden plays his cards right, I could see 2024 and 2028 both going democrat, likely whoever Biden picks as VP this year. I think Biden's VP will be groomed as the next candidate.




I agree with most of this, especially the part about the direction of the next GOP pivot affecting the future of the Democrats, and the left, as well. But I don’t see Biden making any genuine moves to the left. He won’t even come out in support of legalization, something that 2/3rds of Americans support AND a policy position that will excite younger voters (the demo he’s worst with in enthusiasm). He’s shunned M4A and proposed choosing a Republican VP. He’s attacking Trump from the right on foreign policy by saying trump is being too nice to Russia China Venezuela and North Korea. He’s pro fracking, despite pushing out some weak sauce climate plan a few days ago. Like I said, he’ll make a couple small incremental improvements, just enough to duct tape the party back together for another 4 years, but I’m not sure if it will be enough long term. The Sanders wing of the party is growing, even in defeat, which means a lot during a time when its super easy for the establishment to say “look our hands are tied the gop control everything.” If/when Biden gets in there that excuse goes away, and the reluctance of the Democratic leadership to govern the way their base wants them to will be laid bare. And they won’t have a charismatic black guy to dress it up this time, they’ll have a bumbling old racist sexual harasser who’s basically a caricature of what’s wrong with US politics.




I see your point, yes, but I still think it is somewhat disingenuous. Here we have to get into party politics as well as personal politics, and distinguish between the two. The difference here is one of ideological consistency, from a party perspective.

In essence: Hillary Clinton and Obama had fundamentally the same policy positions, and I see those same policy positions in Biden. Bush Jr, Mitt Romney, and Donald Trump have almost identical policy positions as well.

But that statement doesn't really feel right, does it? After reading it, you probably feel the urge to find evidence to the contrary. I will admit there is some. Not much, but yes, there are some minor surface level differences in their politics. Overall, though, they are ideologically congruent.

Now, here's the kicker: if you were to ask Plumber's Crack Joe, College Kid Chad, and Professional Bob a series of political questions, then ask those same political questions of Biden, Obama, Clinton, Bush Jr, Romney, and President Tweety, you'll find that the democratic candidates are universally farther left than the regular schmoes, and the republican candidates are universally farther right. From a party perspective.

That's the theoretical academic level answer. What does it mean in real life?

Well, first, you have to account for the average person. Here on the politics subforum, we are not the "average person". Not even close. We can pretend we are, but we have deeply held political beliefs which we argue to the exclusion of other distractions, like family, friends, netflix, TV, video games, weed, hiking, [insert hobby here]. Most people aren;t like that. Most people have other shit going on, and politics is simply not a priority. Do I agree with the mindset of "I'm not really into politics"? No. It's a stupid mindset akin to burying your head in the sand. Do I recognize the inherent value of that mindset? Yes. So does Biden.

Thing is, that mindset allows someone to hold fairly incongruent political beliefs. For example, a white non-college-educated worker is very likely opposed to immigration of any sort, but at the same time very economically liberal, and supportive of things like UBI and M4A. On the other hand, a highly educated professional doesn't give a rat's ass about immigration, and likely supports it, but would prefer lower taxes and other fiscal conservative policies, and definitely doesn't care about UBI or M4A. This should make pretty logical sense: uneducated laborers are economically threatened by immigrants, and simultaneously are at the bottom of the economic totem pole, which means they want more "leftist" support. Educated professionals are not even remotely threatened by immigrants, and UBI/M4A is just a drop in the bucket for them, while taxes are a real factor.

Now, how do we reconcile these two realities: the political reality and the, well, average idiot reality?

I will split this into two parts: messaging and ideology.

First, the importance of messaging/electability, is that you need to have a message that resonates with a majority of voters. This largely relies on stereotypes. We all know that "Republicans are fiscally responsible" is a bad joke, but Plumber's Crack Joe doesn't. Republicans are seen as the stern father figure that smacks your hand away from the cookie jar. That image excels on the "law and order" front, it excels on the anti-immigration front, and it looks like sober fiscal austerity. At the same time, democrats are the party of empathy, trust, and helping out the fellow man no matter the cost. So, based on these stereotypes, the election hinges on the national zeitgeist. Do we need more stern father figures slapping our hands, or do we need more empathy? Trump, in 2016, ran a campaign on racism and anti-immigration sentiment, and managed to control the narrative in a way that those were the primary considerations of the zeitgeist. The economic message didn't matter, empathy for the fellow man didn't matter, it was all about immigrants stealing yer jerbs. Of course, being that a strong anti-immigration stance is associated with republicans, he won.

Now, from an ideology perspective, we need to look at how national ideology and national ethos changes. This is where I think Bernie lost, why I think Bernie should have lost (strategically, not personally), and fundamentally why I think Bernie's loss was incredibly important. As an example, let's look at gay marriage. Now, gay marriage was politically unthinkable until roughly the 1980s. Around the 1980s, public support slightly increased, to the point where some people thought it might be okay. Then it steadily continued to increase, until it became a mainstream political topic in the mid-late 2000s. At that point, support actually began to drop, as it was a politically divisive topic. Few years later, it continued a steady increase until it was legalized not that long ago, around the time it had overwhelming majority support. Before that, it didn't have much support, even from the politicians that were instrumental in legalizing gay marriage.

So what does this mean in terms of modern politics? Well, messaging and ideology combine into a balancing act: You can go towards the ideological end, where the 10% of the population of people like us resides, and get instant support by going far left/far right. This has two effects: it amplifies and popularizes your message, while simultaneously making yourself unelectable. This is why Bernie and Yang were so important. They were the fresh meat going into the meat grinder. They were the charge of the light brigade. They were the men you send on a one way mission, knowing they won't come back, so they can buy time for the main force. Between Bernie, Yang, and Covid-19, UBI is now a political player, instead of being such a fringe movement that it was considered a joke. They got it from 2% support to 30% support. Not electable by any means, but within the common discourse. Overton Window.

Biden is the opposite of that. Biden is the electable candidate that takes middle-of-the-road positions, and uses the zeitgeist to maneuver politics in his favor. He's the electable candidate, not the activist candidate. The activist candidate wins the battle but loses the war. The electable candidate may lose the battle to win the war.

However, the electable candidate is often politically savvy enough to pivot with the times. Obama never openly supported gay marriage when he got elected, but he presided over the legalization of gay marriage. Do I know his personal opinions? No. You don't either. I suspect, however, that he personally didn;t give much of a fuck either way since it didn;t really affect him personally. He just played the political game and worked within the zeitgeist of the times. I expect Biden will do the same. Depending on how Covid shakes out, Biden might well preside over the implementation of both UBI and M4A, all due to the sacrifices of Bernie and Yang.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineshivas.wisdom
בּ
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/19/09
Posts: 13,428
Loc: Turtle Island
Last seen: 10 hours, 28 minutes
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26833270 - 07/19/20 09:22 PM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

The Ecstatic said:
So here’s my question:

Is it better for the future of the left if:

A) The left turns out for Biden to win, govern like a typical right wing Democrat, further alienating the base, and awakening/expanding the Bernie wing of the party

Or

B) The left stays home, Trump wins re-election, and the Democratic base is forced to stare itself in the mirror for another 4 years.





I'm usually an accelerationist - but to a point. Looking at the rate of decay for democracy in the USA throughout Trump’s first-term, I don't think the nation could recover from a second one. You've already reached the point of secret state police kidnapping citizens off the street and intentionally cruel concentration camps built to hold undesirables - four more years to solidify their grasp on these authoritarian powers?

Especially when so many people seem to still think Trump is just an aberration to the system. Over and over again I've seen people put their faith in what amounts to human-representatives of the state and it's supposed check-and-balances. It's this insidious idea that 'the system works' and will self-correct from abuse of authority and corruption - when the reality is that our system of ruthless capitalism, built on a foundation of white supremacy, is working exactly as intended. Putting our hope in pseudo-heroes like Mueller (as if the FBI has ever been our ally...) or Fauci only allows us to be placated while we wait for things to be fixed on their own - until it's too late for us to fix these things ourselves. Hope like this is poison.

How do we kill that hope? I think Biden getting elected, and people finding that nothing significantly changes, will go further towards killing off this paralyzing hope than Trump getting reelected; because Trump is just creeping fascism that likely won't instigate a proper revolutionary response until its too late to avoid significant violence, whereas Biden might just be disappointing enough to cause a fundamental shift away from the 2-party system or the electoral process entirely.

Let the electoral'left' get what they were told to want, realize it's empty of all substance, and then maybe we'll all start dreaming about what we want togethe and how to get it no matter how many Trumps or Biden try to stand in the way.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineVahn421
Awakening Moonlighter
Male User Gallery


Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 2,162
Loc: Portland
Last seen: 3 years, 4 months
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: shivas.wisdom]
    #26833320 - 07/19/20 09:52 PM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

because Trump is just creeping fascism




HA.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineqman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 1 day, 7 hours
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: shivas.wisdom]
    #26833361 - 07/19/20 10:25 PM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

shivas.wisdom said:
Quote:

The Ecstatic said:
So here’s my question:

Is it better for the future of the left if:

A) The left turns out for Biden to win, govern like a typical right wing Democrat, further alienating the base, and awakening/expanding the Bernie wing of the party

Or

B) The left stays home, Trump wins re-election, and the Democratic base is forced to stare itself in the mirror for another 4 years.





I'm usually an accelerationist - but to a point. Looking at the rate of decay for democracy in the USA throughout Trump’s first-term, I don't think the nation could recover from a second one. You've already reached the point of secret state police kidnapping citizens off the street and intentionally cruel concentration camps built to hold undesirables - four more years to solidify their grasp on these authoritarian powers?

Especially when so many people seem to still think Trump is just an aberration to the system. Over and over again I've seen people put their faith in what amounts to human-representatives of the state and it's supposed check-and-balances. It's this insidious idea that 'the system works' and will self-correct from abuse of authority and corruption - when the reality is that our system of ruthless capitalism, built on a foundation of white supremacy, is working exactly as intended. Putting our hope in pseudo-heroes like Mueller (as if the FBI has ever been our ally...) or Fauci only allows us to be placated while we wait for things to be fixed on their own - until it's too late for us to fix these things ourselves. Hope like this is poison.

How do we kill that hope? I think Biden getting elected, and people finding that nothing significantly changes, will go further towards killing off this paralyzing hope than Trump getting reelected; because Trump is just creeping fascism that likely won't instigate a proper revolutionary response until its too late to avoid significant violence, whereas Biden might just be disappointing enough to cause a fundamental shift away from the 2-party system or the electoral process entirely.

Let the electoral'left' get what they were told to want, realize it's empty of all substance, and then maybe we'll all start dreaming about what we want togethe and how to get it no matter how many Trumps or Biden try to stand in the way.




I agree that frustration with Biden in office would likely produce the ingredients for real change more so than Trump at this point.

Obama got lots of cover from progressives for almost his whole term, but I don't think Biden will be given that luxury.

Honestly, I don't think Trump wants anymore of this shit storm and Biden isn't very thrilled about being US President either, who would want it today?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: qman]
    #26833381 - 07/19/20 10:36 PM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Hillary.  :smirk:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThe Ecstatic
Chilldog Extraordinaire


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 33,362
Loc: 'Merica Flag
Last seen: 7 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26834186 - 07/20/20 12:36 PM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:

The Ecstatic said:
Quote:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Even Bari Weiss just quit the NY Times, saying they force everyone to conform to their "predetermined narrative".



Bari Weiss is a racist scumbag fuck her opinions.



I hate Bari Weiss, and I even made fun of her here.

But do you disagree with her opinion that the NY Times forces its journalists to a predetermined narrative?




That’s not really her complaint though. It’s that she got bullied out of the NYT for having too radical of an opinion on certain things. She’s a rich Zionist with dogshit opinions on practically everything, including culture. She fit in perfectly at the NYT, she voluntarily left to (likely) go start a new publication with Andrew Sullivan and Ben Shapiro, this “the ultra woke left ruined my life” shtick is just an excuse.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26835172 - 07/20/20 10:05 PM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

The Ecstatic said:
That’s not really her complaint though.



It's not all of her complaint, I agree.  But it was definitely part of it.  From the resignation letter I linked to:
Quote:

I was always taught that journalists were charged with writing the first rough draft of history. Now, history itself is one more ephemeral thing molded to fit the needs of a predetermined narrative.




--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThe Ecstatic
Chilldog Extraordinaire


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 33,362
Loc: 'Merica Flag
Last seen: 7 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26835835 - 07/21/20 10:46 AM (3 years, 6 months ago)

shes lying


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThe Ecstatic
Chilldog Extraordinaire


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 33,362
Loc: 'Merica Flag
Last seen: 7 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: The Ecstatic] * 2
    #26835859 - 07/21/20 10:54 AM (3 years, 6 months ago)

These establishment shitheads glom on to institutional power and then, when they see an opportunity, they leave that power structure and make themselves a bunch of money complaining about how unfair and bad it was.

It’s no different than the ex cabinet members all writing a book about the dangers of Trump (that they incidentally promoted and accelerated until that was no longer profitable for them), and then taking a CNN gig.


Y’all need to stop taking these assholes at their word simply because their new shtick reinforces your beliefs. Do I think the NYT is biased and bad? Yes. Am I gonna go to bat for fucking Bari Weiss because they didn’t advocate the ethnic cleansing of Palestine vigorously enough? No.


This will happen again in a few months when John Kasich speaks at the DNC against the dangers of Trump. And all the liberals will cheer on this guy who obliterated Planned Parenthood in Ohio and devastated unions, simply for saying orange man bad. And the bigger point here is that KASICH DOESNT EVEN HATE TRUMP. Kasich is just playing his best hand, which is at this point doing the “sane moderate never trumper.” It’s no different than what Bari is doing. She doesn’t honestly believe the NYT is some ultra left rag hellbent on silencing conservatives, they have multiple columnists to her right. She’s just doing it because this excuse gets her clout with the “liberal media is fake news” contingent.

So please don’t defend this fucking maniac or give her an ounce of credibility simply because she said orange man NYT bad.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
Re: Regarding the Left’s Moral Conundrum of Voting Biden [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26835963 - 07/21/20 11:58 AM (3 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

The Ecstatic said:
Do I think the NYT is biased and bad? Yes.



That's really what I was trying to show.

Quote:

The Ecstatic said:
Am I gonna go to bat for fucking Bari Weiss because they didn’t advocate the ethnic cleansing of Palestine vigorously enough? No.



I wouldn't "go to bat" for that cunt either.  You totally misinterpreted my post. 

Quote:

The Ecstatic said:
So please don’t defend this fucking maniac or give her an ounce of credibility simply because she said orange man NYT bad.



Dude, I'm not defending HER.  I'm defending ONE thing she said.


People need to read my signature.  To me, just because I hate Bari Weiss (and Tucker Carlson, and Donald Trump), that doesn't mean I won't defend them on any good points they have.  I realize that puts me in a small minority here.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Arbitary Moral Values TheOneYouKnow 2,006 18 03/03/04 04:35 PM
by FrankieJustTrypt
* morality and the law
( 1 2 all )
hongomon 2,257 33 11/20/02 02:08 PM
by BleaK
* No Gods (pt. 1) Abudiwa 1,059 7 04/11/02 06:58 PM
by Buddha
* Moral flaw? Uncle Sam, look in the mirror grib 428 1 05/30/04 07:36 PM
by Evolving
* Joe Biden the liar
( 1 2 all )
Chemy 4,094 24 08/30/08 12:13 AM
by Prisoner#1
* Why Americans Must Vote for John Kerry
( 1 2 3 all )
Zahid 4,710 40 08/29/04 02:08 PM
by Zahid
* vote here - the OFFICIAL shroomery election
( 1 2 3 all )
Vvellum 2,863 41 11/02/04 07:34 PM
by Great_Satan
* Voting: Thoughts, Questions & Quotes... Autonomous 720 9 09/08/03 12:44 AM
by SquattingMarmot

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
1,098 topic views. 6 members, 1 guests and 8 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.035 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 15 queries.