Home | Community | Message Board

Please support our sponsors.

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics >> Mushroom Cultivation

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1

Registered: 12/27/03
Posts: 348
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
So casing depth determines size?
    #2672372 - 05/13/04 07:20 AM (12 years, 9 months ago)

I read this somewhere in another post and just wanted to confirm. Is it safe to say, that having all the other variables right, that the mushroom height will be aproximatly the size of the substrate layer? So 4 inch sub = 4 inch shrooms(maximum height give or take?)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Registered: 12/11/03
Posts: 28,021
Re: So casing depth determines size? [Re: Scolecite]
    #2672406 - 05/13/04 07:45 AM (12 years, 9 months ago)

Ive never read that the substrate level = shroom height....nor have i found that to be the case....

Did you read that on the FAQs?

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Twisted brainwrong of a oneoff man mental

Registered: 08/08/03
Posts: 812
Loc: Airstrip One
Re: So casing depth determines size? [Re: Scolecite]
    #2672884 - 05/13/04 11:29 AM (12 years, 9 months ago)

Substrate depth is a big factor in yield. To produce the fruit there needs to be a large enough support structure in the substrate. Deeper means more the square inch on the surface.

I would think that if the substrate was too thin it will make ickle shrooms, but once its deep enough I don't think they will grow much bigger than their genetics determine.

If you want large try this strain....

Try http://www.thehawkseye.com/india/india.html

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/14/01
Posts: 1,253
Loc: Currently Earth...
Trusted Cultivator
Re: So casing depth determines size? [Re: Scolecite]
    #2673186 - 05/13/04 01:05 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

IDE, several factors seem to be related.

The ratio of substrate volume to surface area seems to be most important. Casing depth is important because it helps to support larger fruits (helps to reach the potential).

I believe that the mycelium eats up the substrate, and somehow stores the energy from it. The total energy available at any time relates to the fruiting potential.

Pinset is important also. While you may have an amazing pinset, the stored energy within the mycelium IS the potential, and you may still end up with small fruits.

Or, I may be entirely wrong...

Study the past...
See the future...

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics >> Mushroom Cultivation

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Casing Depth VS. Casing Width Teknion 1,323 5 01/31/04 06:03 AM
by Rose
* casing depth
shirley knott
806 6 12/14/02 11:04 PM
by TeKn0
* casing depth? Anonymous 1,217 2 01/28/04 12:29 PM
by Bi0TeK
* Casing Depth TrippingBillies 1,650 6 07/07/05 01:46 PM
by hyphae
* casing depth onthefly 749 6 03/23/04 01:12 AM
by wicish1
* Substrate Depth Determines Shroom Height? Mighty Bop 693 4 06/04/05 09:47 PM
by 5meopsyco
* Measuring Casing Depth? kungpow 779 7 02/02/06 11:45 PM
by Jaeger
* Casing depth problem quigezz 778 8 05/01/09 01:32 PM
by ev0ldave

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Magash, Shroomism, george castanza, Prisoner#1, RogerRabbit, Citric, total, FooMan, 13shrooms, stonesun, EvilMushroom666, cronicr, PussyFart, Tmethyl
900 topic views. 27 members, 111 guests and 25 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2017 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.027 seconds spending 0.003 seconds on 14 queries.