Home | Community | Message Board

NorthSpore.com BOOMR Bag!
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Bridgetown Botanicals CBD Concentrates   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   PhytoExtractum Kratom Powder for Sale   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >  [ show all ]
Offlineteebeekid
Stranger
 User Gallery

Registered: 07/09/14
Posts: 133
Last seen: 55 minutes, 59 seconds
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Sporespreder]
    #26917030 - 09/04/20 09:09 AM (3 years, 4 months ago)

Quote:

Sporespreder said:
On Tilia Americana near creeks... in washout areas...have you found caerulipes? Nice find!!




No luck finding caerulipes :mad: Perfect habitat for them though: (Hemlock/Beech/Birch) near a brook..so many LBM that look like caerulipes coming out the leaf litter/downed logs..they ought to be there somewhere, just have to look harder :cool:


--------------------


Edited by teebeekid (09/04/20 09:12 AM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineSporespreder
Stranger
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/30/20
Posts: 71
Last seen: 2 months, 14 days
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Doc9151]
    #26917197 - 09/04/20 10:33 AM (3 years, 4 months ago)

Good info on caerulipes ... I’ve been looking in those areas just too damn dry here in central ny... I messaged Allen I’m gonna send him a non active type I found, the active one is luteus, the non active or extremely weakly active is unknown... I called it spectabilis but the new write up there gives the name to the European non active variety...I’m excited to help🙂thanks for the opportunity!!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAlan RockefellerM
Mycologist
Male User Gallery
Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,274
Last seen: 3 hours, 30 minutes
Trusted Identifier
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Doc9151]
    #26922397 - 09/07/20 04:32 AM (3 years, 4 months ago)

I am also looking for collections of verified inactive ones so I know which species not to include in the lists.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekarri0n
Mind Traveller
Male User Gallery


Registered: 08/29/20
Posts: 698
Last seen: 15 days, 5 hours
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Alan Rockefeller]
    #26932630 - 09/12/20 10:30 PM (3 years, 4 months ago)

I picked a bunch of Gyms - Many Gymnopilus Luteus and Quite a few which I would call Spectabilis.

northeast U.S. on hardwood.



I do not see any blue bruising, whether I manually bruised it or otherwise.

I am pretty confident these are Id'd properly but I am not confident with eating wild mushrooms in general.

If you are really looking for samples and this can help with researching and identifying actives in this area, I am more than willing to get them to you.


Edited by karri0n (09/12/20 10:48 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAlan RockefellerM
Mycologist
Male User Gallery
Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,274
Last seen: 3 hours, 30 minutes
Trusted Identifier
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: karri0n]
    #26932803 - 09/13/20 02:59 AM (3 years, 4 months ago)

The red ones are Cortinarius in the C. marylandensis group.

The others I am not sure about, more clear photos would help.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineDoc9151M
Mycologist
Male User Gallery


Registered: 02/23/17
Posts: 13,753
Loc: Gulf Coast USA Flag
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
Trusted Identifier
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Alan Rockefeller]
    #26933189 - 09/13/20 10:55 AM (3 years, 4 months ago)

Alan, I have several collections being sent to me, once I get a sample from them I will forward the collections to you. It would be nice to be able to verify my findings with yours.


--------------------


Psilocybe cubensis data collection thread. please help with this project if you hunt wild cubensis.
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=26513593&page=0&vc=1#26513593


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekarri0n
Mind Traveller
Male User Gallery


Registered: 08/29/20
Posts: 698
Last seen: 15 days, 5 hours
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Alan Rockefeller]
    #26933799 - 09/13/20 05:04 PM (3 years, 4 months ago)

Quote:

Alan Rockefeller said:
The red ones are Cortinarius in the C. marylandensis group.

The others I am not sure about, more clear photos would help.




Sorry...

The others must also be cortinarius. They were growing together on similar woods and have the same shape, density, and texture. When comparing the two its is pretty apparent they are the same genus.

Cortinarius lewisii look like them. But this is all very unrelated to this thread and I apologize for that.


--------------------

Panaeolus Bisporus


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAlan RockefellerM
Mycologist
Male User Gallery
Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,274
Last seen: 3 hours, 30 minutes
Trusted Identifier
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: karri0n]
    #26941346 - 09/17/20 08:53 PM (3 years, 4 months ago)

Check the microscopic features, Gymnopilus gills are covered in capitate cystidia and Cortinarius gills never have anything that looks like this.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineSporespreder
Stranger
 User Gallery


Registered: 08/30/20
Posts: 71
Last seen: 2 months, 14 days
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: karri0n]
    #26947208 - 09/21/20 05:11 AM (3 years, 4 months ago)

The pinners bruise green, the mushroom is yellow-orange


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMalachite
Novice?
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/05/18
Posts: 201
Loc: Florida
Last seen: 11 days, 20 minutes
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Sporespreder]
    #26957996 - 09/27/20 08:42 PM (3 years, 3 months ago)

This makes sense. I had been wondering what the gyms in my yard were, since I had found a remarkably pin-happy colony growing on some unknown hardwood plank in my yard that are extremely purple (even turning blue/violet through maturation!) compared to all the others I've been finding. Once they pop up again I will post them, because they really don't match what I usually find for G. lepidotus or cyanopalmicola. For reference, I've been finding them in Florida. I actually have some tissue samples attempting to colonize some pine chips in a jar right now. I would not be surprised if they were a totally different species.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleCHUCK.HNTR
feral urbanite
Male


Registered: 09/30/19
Posts: 2,255
Loc: SF, CA, USA
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Malachite]
    #26958475 - 09/28/20 08:47 AM (3 years, 3 months ago)

Good read thanks for the synopsis Alan!


--------------------
"What is the practical application of a million universes?" -Alan Watts
:mushroom2::mushroom2::mushroom2::mushroom2::mushroom2:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMalachite
Novice?
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/05/18
Posts: 201
Loc: Florida
Last seen: 11 days, 20 minutes
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: CHUCK.HNTR]
    #26960021 - 09/29/20 09:44 AM (3 years, 3 months ago)



Now, unless these aren't gymns (and they have extremely thick orange spore prints), I'm not really sure what species they could be. Doesn't seem like a match for anything I've found down here before. They stay pretty small, perhaps just a weak patch though.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineskinnylittleblonde
Stranger
 User Gallery
Registered: 08/30/20
Posts: 83
Last seen: 2 years, 5 months
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Malachite]
    #26961266 - 09/30/20 12:01 AM (3 years, 3 months ago)

Thank You, informative & interesting!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineShroomhunts
Hunter Gatherer
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/07/18
Posts: 2,928
Loc: PA
Last seen: 26 minutes, 47 seconds
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Malachite]
    #26961439 - 09/30/20 04:27 AM (3 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Malachite said:


Now, unless these aren't gymns (and they have extremely thick orange spore prints), I'm not really sure what species they could be. Doesn't seem like a match for anything I've found down here before. They stay pretty small, perhaps just a weak patch though.



I've found those same little gyms before, never ate them because they were so small didn't seem worth it.


--------------------

You never kno


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMalachite
Novice?
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/05/18
Posts: 201
Loc: Florida
Last seen: 11 days, 20 minutes
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Shroomhunts]
    #26962043 - 09/30/20 01:12 PM (3 years, 3 months ago)

Same. I just think they're pretty.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinemycot
Crazy as fuck
 User Gallery

Registered: 05/31/06
Posts: 1,112
Loc: Australia
Last seen: 1 month, 5 days
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Malachite]
    #26981356 - 10/12/20 11:33 AM (3 years, 3 months ago)

I came across this paper in addition to related papers just some days ago and its been driving me crazy ever since.For several reasons.
The biggest is an answer to the question of whether psychoactivity (presence of psilocybin) correlates to phylogeny or not.
In other words can we expect certain clades within gymnopilus to be active and other clades not. In recent years I would have answered yes to this question and this would highly likely lead to gymnopilus being split into two genuses as happened some years ago to the psilocybe genus. This is opposed to some species within a clade being active and others not within the same clade. Which doesn't make sense to me??

Right now the only gyms that I feel confidant are active are those that are in that red capped active clade that Alan mentions in the opening post. I wish to add something positive here before becoming totally confused with the Junonius clade.
It was mentioned earlier in the thread that Alan was collecting names of active gyms species.

There is this paper that I came across recently.
Gymnopilus dunensis, a new species from Punjab province, Pakistan
HIRA BASHIR et al
Phytotaxa 428 (1): 051–059
Within the paper G.dunensis sits firmly within the active clade.
Another species of interest is G.igniculus whose phylogeny would indicate that it too is active.


Edited by mycot (10/12/20 11:46 AM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMalachite
Novice?
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/05/18
Posts: 201
Loc: Florida
Last seen: 11 days, 20 minutes
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: mycot]
    #26981445 - 10/12/20 12:21 PM (3 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

mycot said:
There is this paper that I came across recently.
Gymnopilus dunensis, a new species from Punjab province, Pakistan
HIRA BASHIR et al
Phytotaxa 428 (1): 051–059
Within the paper G.dunensis sits firmly within the active clade.
Another species of interest is G.igniculus whose phylogeny would indicate that it too is active.




Now that's pretty interesting. I'm glad I get to live through the restructuring of the Gymnopilus taxonomy lol. I hope I'm able to contribute in some fashion.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinemycot
Crazy as fuck
 User Gallery

Registered: 05/31/06
Posts: 1,112
Loc: Australia
Last seen: 1 month, 5 days
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: mycot]
    #26981591 - 10/12/20 01:54 PM (3 years, 3 months ago)

Here is where I plunge deep down the rabbit hole.
Within the first few sentences of the paper G.junonius, G.spectabilis and G.pampeanus are regarded as synonymous with the prefered name being g.junonius.
With the implication of psychoactivity within the clade, and additional reasons you can imagine my suprise when I came across.
Cultivation  requirements  and  substrate  degradation  of  the  edible
mushroom  Gymnopilus  pampeanus—A  novel  species  for  mushroom
cultivation
María  Belén  Colavolpe,  Edgardo  Albertó
Scientia  Horticulturae  180  (2014)  161–166
My first thought was - Geez I hope these guys know what they are doing, otherwise they'll have the whole town tripping out.:eek::tongue:
On the other hand this seems like a really good paper. In it he mentions G.pampeanus being consumed  in  Argentina  and  Uruguay.
Unfortunately no phylogenetic sequence in this paper.:frown:

Before getting too comfortable and decides to tuck into a nice plate of the shrooms just mentioned,(especially those who have written off activity for the taxon as most analysis show)they might want to consider this.-
Determining  the  pharmacokinetics  of  psilocin  in  rat  plasma  using ultra-performance  liquid  chromatography  coupled  with  a  photodiode  array detector  after  orally  administering  an  extract  of  Gymnopilus  spectabilis
Jianbo Chen et al
Journal  of  Chromatography  B, 879 (2011) 2669–2672
My own opinion is a mis-identification on the part of the authors. They don't say much about where they sourced their G.spectabilis from.
Again no phylogentic sequence here either.:frown:

To further confuse the issue of synonymy we have this paper.-
Species of Gymnopilus P. Karst: New to India
Kaur H et al
Mycosphere 6(1): 165–173(2015)
In it the authors Have G.pampeanus and G.spectabilis as distinct species complete with detailed descriptions, line drawings and photographs of two quite different looking shrooms.
The photography in this paper is extraordinary and worth getting for that alone.
A real pity there wasn't sequencing to go along with paper.:frown:
One could almost go :mad:

Any light shed down the rabbit hole most welcome!!!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinemycot
Crazy as fuck
 User Gallery

Registered: 05/31/06
Posts: 1,112
Loc: Australia
Last seen: 1 month, 5 days
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: Malachite]
    #26981763 - 10/12/20 03:20 PM (3 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Malachite said:
Now that's pretty interesting. I'm glad I get to live through the restructuring of the Gymnopilus taxonomy lol. I hope I'm able to contribute in some fashion.



I've been looking at this for some years and waiting for some years for genbank to get a sequence for G.luteus (with its reputed activity) to shed more light on phylogenetic relationships and psychoactivety.
Well genbank got that acquisition recently with this paper and it hasn't clarified much at all.
Rather the implication is left that G.luteus is actually inactive.

Within the paper bluing is only mentioned with G.speciosissimus and that only in connection with the annulus.
Most peculiar. One would expect bluing to be more widespread as in caps and stems or the base of stems.
The photo might be seen to have very slight bluing in the annulus region, can't say for sure from same.

P.S. Some years ago due to a number of factors I argued that G.sapineus was an active species.
I've more recently believed that species to be inactive due its sequence being very different to the active clades and obviously more closely related to inactive clades.

Lots of ways to contribute. You're probably already doing it. Cheers.:grin:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMalachite
Novice?
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/05/18
Posts: 201
Loc: Florida
Last seen: 11 days, 20 minutes
Re: New paper on the Gymnopilus junonius group [Re: mycot]
    #26982410 - 10/12/20 08:51 PM (3 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

mycot said:
Within the paper bluing is only mentioned with G.speciosissimus and that only in connection with the annulus.
Most peculiar. One would expect bluing to be more widespread as in caps and stems or the base of stems.





Woah, are they implying that it only bruises in the annulus? can't really have a confirmation from a lack of information, but that is very odd, and a very specific region to note bluing. But if  that happens to be true, I'd be very interested to see if Gymnopilus somehow focuses all Psilocybin synthesis/storage on the annulus. Doesn't really make much sense, but is fascinating. And the Gymns around me will bruise just by existing too long and the elements doing their thing, so if that field sample bruised they had to have seen it in more places than just the annulus. That's so wild.


Edited by Malachite (10/12/20 08:52 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: Bridgetown Botanicals CBD Concentrates   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   PhytoExtractum Kratom Powder for Sale   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Fungal Spores and Hyphae Microscopic Workshop for beginners mjshroomer 2,726 3 08/01/06 03:54 PM
by georgeM
* DFW, TX area mycology group
( 1 2 all )
ChrisHippyLoser 9,901 21 01/31/08 01:03 PM
by GGreatOne234
* Large grouping of immature G.Spectabilis/G.Junonius found nofind_um 4,771 14 09/23/03 10:29 AM
by Anonymous
* Little guys found in big groups ID? amatuer5352 972 10 07/01/07 02:44 PM
by nofind_um
* Another group of photos zuropak 1,659 9 11/10/06 02:13 PM
by psilocyboid
* Interesting Group of Mushrooms ninsega 959 8 09/15/04 06:10 AM
by ninsega
* Nice Group Peaceful_Nomad 1,135 6 06/29/02 02:02 PM
by Sporz
* Panaeolus campanulatus/sphinctrinus group/complex: Basidiocarp & Basidiospores (Photographs) GGreatOne234 3,295 1 02/09/08 03:43 PM
by notapillow

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout
3,200 topic views. 1 members, 15 guests and 11 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.032 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 15 queries.