|
SirTripAlot
Semper Fidelis



Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 7,459
Loc: Harmless (Mostly)
Last seen: 18 minutes, 1 second
|
Re: Coronavirus Chat [Re: Ran-D]
#27145470 - 01/13/21 09:39 AM (3 years, 15 days ago) |
|
|
Looks like they are willing to ban people, at the detriment of their profits. See the value of Twitter after doing such, to the president?
-------------------- “I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”
|
Ran-D



Registered: 12/19/10
Posts: 16,311
|
|
Your commas, don't make sense. They just make, your post confusing.
Also, "detriment of profits", give me a break.
|
SirTripAlot
Semper Fidelis



Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 7,459
Loc: Harmless (Mostly)
Last seen: 18 minutes, 1 second
|
Re: Coronavirus Chat [Re: Ran-D]
#27145524 - 01/13/21 10:09 AM (3 years, 15 days ago) |
|
|
-------------------- “I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”
|
Ran-D



Registered: 12/19/10
Posts: 16,311
|
|
No. Trump was a liability and the repercussions of not banning him would have been much worse than some temporary stock drop.
So you are saying you DO actually believe they did it because it's the right thing to do? LOL. How amazingly cute and naive.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 30 minutes
|
Re: Coronavirus Chat [Re: Ran-D]
#27146565 - 01/13/21 08:22 PM (3 years, 15 days ago) |
|
|
How is banning Trump because he’s a liability not the right thing to do?
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 21 days
|
|
I just started another thread so we don't hijack the coronavirus thread.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
OutsideOfMyMind
LSD Self Administrative Director



Registered: 10/05/20
Posts: 5,384
Last seen: 1 hour, 3 minutes
|
|
Quote:
SirTripAlot said: Looks like they are willing to ban people, at the detriment of their profits. See the value of Twitter after doing such, to the president?
Your commas are not grammatically correct. You don't need to put commas.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 30 minutes
|
|
In the past week, 24,000 people died of a disease that disappeared in April
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
ballsalsa
Universally Loathed and Reviled



Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,837
Loc: Foreign Lands
|
Re: Coronavirus Chat [Re: koods]
#27146958 - 01/14/21 01:29 AM (3 years, 14 days ago) |
|
|
Like magic
--------------------
Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here
|
SirTripAlot
Semper Fidelis



Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 7,459
Loc: Harmless (Mostly)
Last seen: 18 minutes, 1 second
|
Re: Coronavirus Chat [Re: Ran-D]
#27147120 - 01/14/21 05:47 AM (3 years, 14 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Ran-D said: No. Trump was a liability and the repercussions of not banning him would have been much worse than some temporary stock drop.
So you are saying you DO actually believe they did it because it's the right thing to do? LOL. How amazingly cute and naive.
I get it, your pissed you cant read Trumps tweets anymore! I provided an example of a company making a decision that was at a detriment to their profits. What evidence have you proposed other than butthurt dribble?
Lol, companies make decisuons all the time, based on the right thing to do. Do you need examples?
You stated that Twitter only cared about their profits. It didnt take a rocket scientist to speculate that banning Trump would hurt their profits....and it did. Now you are changing the goal posts, because somewhere deep inside of you, you cant admit you are wrong.
You are intellectually dishonest as noted by our mod here.
Edited by SirTripAlot (01/14/21 06:11 AM)
|
SirTripAlot
Semper Fidelis



Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 7,459
Loc: Harmless (Mostly)
Last seen: 18 minutes, 1 second
|
|
Quote:
OutsideOfMyMind said:
Quote:
SirTripAlot said: Looks like they are willing to ban people, at the detriment of their profits. See the value of Twitter after doing such, to the president?
Your commas are not grammatically correct. You don't need to put commas.
Welcome to the shroomery poli forum, and ,thank you, for the ,grammer, lesson.
-------------------- “I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”
|
Mach z 800
Stranger


Registered: 12/04/15
Posts: 1,580
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
|
Re: Coronavirus Chat [Re: koods]
#27147303 - 01/14/21 08:46 AM (3 years, 14 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: But they don’t allow all viral particles to pass. The ones in water drops, for example. It’s not all or nothing. If they block 25% of viruses that means you’re 25% less likely to get infected and a 25% reduction in transmission is a massive advantage when you’re taking about an infectious disease and can easily make the difference between a disease that is growing exponentially and one that is declining.
Very small changes in a virus’ ability to spread has huge public health implications
they dont stop viruses your talking about something microscopic. Your mask are not ratted for the kind of filtration , they leak out of the sides allowing contamination in an out like i said before. If these cloth masks worked so good there would be 0 need for an 95 or higher rating. But that is not the case. There designed for sanitary purposes only not to stop viruses.
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,499
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
Just because something isn't 100% effective doesn't mean it shouldn't be used. Very few things are 100% effective.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
christopera
Stranger


Registered: 10/13/17
Posts: 14,201
Last seen: 2 hours, 25 minutes
|
|
Quote:
Mach z 800 said:
Quote:
koods said: But they don’t allow all viral particles to pass. The ones in water drops, for example. It’s not all or nothing. If they block 25% of viruses that means you’re 25% less likely to get infected and a 25% reduction in transmission is a massive advantage when you’re taking about an infectious disease and can easily make the difference between a disease that is growing exponentially and one that is declining.
Very small changes in a virus’ ability to spread has huge public health implications
they dont stop viruses your talking about something microscopic. Your mask are not ratted for the kind of filtration , they leak out of the sides allowing contamination in an out like i said before. If these cloth masks worked so good there would be 0 need for an 95 or higher rating. But that is not the case. There designed for sanitary purposes only not to stop viruses.
Masks that are rated at 95 are only 95% effective.
-------------------- Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result. A Dorito is pizza, change my mind. Bank and Union with The Shroomery at the Zuul on The internet - now with %'s and things I’m sorry it had to be me.
|
bodhisatta 
Smurf real estate agent


Registered: 04/30/13
Posts: 61,889
Loc: Milky way
|
Re: Coronavirus Chat [Re: Enlil] 1
#27147336 - 01/14/21 09:00 AM (3 years, 14 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Enlil said: Just because something isn't 100% effective doesn't mean it shouldn't be used. Very few things are 100% effective.
Seatbelts and airbags are nowhere near 95% effective.
|
Kryptos
Stranger

Registered: 11/01/14
Posts: 12,263
Last seen: 1 hour, 12 minutes
|
|
Come to think of it, neither are cars themselves.
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,499
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: Coronavirus Chat [Re: Kryptos] 1
#27147367 - 01/14/21 09:25 AM (3 years, 14 days ago) |
|
|
My rhetoric is nowhere near 95% effective either.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
TheStallionMang
Do U know who yur fuckin with?


Registered: 10/18/17
Posts: 4,531
Loc:
|
Re: Coronavirus Chat [Re: Enlil] 1
#27147373 - 01/14/21 09:29 AM (3 years, 14 days ago) |
|
|
Condoms are also only about 95% effective but I'm damn sure glad I used em many times because it was effective enough to not fuck up my life
|
mndfreeze 
Shroomery Secret Service




Registered: 04/22/02
Posts: 20,529
Loc: PuppetMasterFlash
Last seen: 4 hours, 2 minutes
|
Re: Coronavirus Chat [Re: Enlil]
#27147772 - 01/14/21 01:28 PM (3 years, 14 days ago) |
|
|
Why the fuck are we still arguing about the efficacy of masks a year later.
-------------------- Nothing says love like grannies prolapsed anus! quote]Urb said: I know... Its fucked up... Ill fix it minyana..[/quote]
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,499
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
Why the fuck are you still rocking a folding squiggly when you haven't dropped a fucking work unit in years?
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
|