Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
A David Lynch thread
    #26493454 - 02/19/20 01:49 PM (3 years, 11 months ago)

I am reading David Lynch’s autobiography/biography (it’s really both, as it has two authors, one of whom is Lynch himself) called Room to Dream, and it’s fascinating, and it has made me want to watch all of his movies again, so I figured I’d create a thread devoted to them. He’s truly a fascinating guy, and one of the best directors (he’s in my all-time top five) in cinema history, so it will be a pleasure watching and discussing his films. Anyone who is interested is free and welcome to comment, and I think it will be fun. I intend to go in order, so I shall start with Eraserhead.


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum] * 2
    #26493457 - 02/19/20 01:54 PM (3 years, 11 months ago)

Eraserhead  10/10


Eraserhead was Lynch’s first film, and as I mention above, it was his favorite to make, and seems to have been his favorite overall, or so I glean from his comments. Interestingly, Eraserhead is Stanley Kubrick’s favorite film ever – quite an endorsement.

This movie, at least to me, while absolutely excellent, is very difficult to watch. It is so emotionally jarring, in such a dark and sinister atmosphere, and so deeply sad, that I am at times quite uncomfortable while watching it. But I imagine that is part of the point. It is an abstract depiction of life in its most general form, for all of us, especially in the modern world. Henry, the main character, always seems to have an expression of deep anxiety on his face, as he drifts from meaningless, empty situation to meaningless, empty situation in his life. The film is in black and white and is printed very dark, and the atmosphere is one of sullen struggle and futility, as we all, ourselves, drift from scene to scene in our lives without ever really living. There is so little real meaning in Henry’s life, which is true, I think, of most people in modern civilization. And all there really seems to be is insipid distress in Henry’s life and ours.

The scenes that really get me are those of the mewling, crying baby, which is a miserable young being in itself. Of course, if you have seen it, you’ll know that the baby is some sort of reptilian freak, which disrupts the lives of Henry and his girlfriend/wife and turns these lives into even more of a Hell than they were before. The baby’s whimpers and the reactions of the protagonists make me so sad, and this is where I have the most difficulty watching this film. It’s the main symbol in the movie, which is a dark symbol of all human affairs. The pathos involved is palpable.

In the end, I think Lynch is setting up a very abstract commentary on the sheer Hell of a world we have created for ourselves. Everywhere you look is sadness, despair, anxiety, malfunction, meaninglessness, and utter futility. And Eraserhead is a kind of moving painting which evokes all the precise emotions we have stuffed down in our subconscious. Artistically and technically, it is essentially a perfect film.






--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleTheStallionMang
Do U know who yur fuckin with?
Male

Registered: 10/18/17
Posts: 4,528
Loc: Flag
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum] * 1
    #26493752 - 02/19/20 05:18 PM (3 years, 11 months ago)

Excellent idea for a thread!

I was 16 when by chance, I caught the first episode of Twin Peaks and I was hooked.  I never missed an episode and have been a Lynch fan ever since. 

It's been too long since I've seen it to say much about Eraserhead and I've probably only seen it once but I do remember it was disturbing AF but very interesting and unusual.

I also love how he uses the same actors throughout the years.  I remember seeing Eraserhead and going "Hey, it's Pete Martel!" 

He's damn good at making his audience uncomfortable and for some reason I like that feeling...maybe it has something to do with why I like tripping and don't mind the discomfort of the "come up"...hmmmm never thought of that before.  Maybe David Lynch in a weird way lead me into psyches

Anyhow, here's a clip with a song from Eraserhead and a cover version of the same song by The Pixies that I always liked





I have a feeling this will be an awesome thread...thanks DividedQuantum!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum] * 2
    #26501861 - 02/24/20 04:24 PM (3 years, 10 months ago)

The Elephant Man  10/10


This was David Lynch's second film, after Eraserhead, and at this time he was a complete unknown. Mel Brooks had just started Brooksfilms, and was looking to get a feature going. Someone recommended the story of John Merrick, and some materials were found and a script was written. By pure chance, Lynch's name was mentioned, and Mel Brooks was intrigued. He decided to see Eraserhead, and he immediately hired Lynch. In the book I read, it was pointed out that Mel Brooks is much more of an intellectual and philosopher than anyone could possibly realize, so he warmed to the Merrick story and he warmed to Lynch right away.

So, Lynch was on board, and worked also on refining the script. He originally wanted to do the make up for the "elephant man," but failed miserably, so they hired an English professional. He was severely depressed for several days because of this, and he was not confident that he could live up to the standard of making this film as a big-time, professional director -- directing the likes of Anthony Hopkins, John Hurt and Anne Bancroft. It did not help that Anthony Hopkins was a total dick to him, but over time his confidence grew, Hopkins later apologized, and the rest is history. Mel Brooks is of the opinion that it was the best film Brooksfilms ever produced.

It follows part of the life of the elephant man, John Merrick (whose real name was Joseph), who was bounced around between various freak shows for most of his young life. A Dr. Treves of the London hospital becomes interested in Merrick for scientific reasons, as he wants to study him for a medical lecture. Merrick goes back to his freak show "owner," falls ill, and Treves intervenes to treat Merrick at his hospital. One thing leads to another, and Merrick is invited to remain at the hospital under special care indefinitely. He and Treves befriend one another, as well as several other people, including London socialites, and it really warms your heart. There is a later incident that is rectified, and Merrick, Treves and several others continue to have a close and warm relationship.

John Hurt is spectacular as Merrick, and this is a very touching movie. Without any sentimentality, deep emotions are evoked throughout the narrative. It is at times disturbing, but is an extremely sweet and uplifting film.

In reality, Merrick was a very smart and quite gifted person, which went against the original belief that he was an imbecile. He always ended his letters to people with this brief poem by Isaac Watts:


Quote:

'Tis true my form is something odd,
But blaming me is blaming God;
Could I create myself anew
I would not fail in pleasing you.

If I could reach from pole to pole
Or grasp the ocean with a span,
I would be measured by the soul;
The mind's the standard of the man.








--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBrian Jones
Club 27
Male User Gallery


Registered: 12/18/12
Posts: 12,340
Loc: attending Snake Church
Last seen: 3 hours, 46 minutes
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum] * 1
    #26503033 - 02/25/20 11:58 AM (3 years, 10 months ago)

I can't wait for Blue Velvet. I'll let you do it and then add some comments. I think Blue Velvet is very influential on what he did later with Twin Peaks.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

The worst thing about corruption is that it works so well,


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #26503064 - 02/25/20 12:14 PM (3 years, 10 months ago)

Dune  7.5/10


Many of us know that Dune was David Lynch's disaster, but he is on the record as saying that every filmmaker needs at least one disaster so that he can find himself as a director. Of course, what came after Dune was Blue Velvet, and the rest -- films with distinctly his vision -- is history.

The Frank Herbert book is, in my opinion, unfilmable. It is so complex and grand, with so many philosophical undercurrents that really require the exegesis of a book, that any film is bound to be a shadow of it. Denis Villeneuve is currently in post-production of his version of Dune, and we'll see how that goes. I'm sure he learned a lot of lessons from Lynch's experience.

In the end, this was not Lynch's movie -- it was producer Dino DeLaurentiis' movie, and he had final cut. Lynch seems to have bitten off way more than he could chew here, but it led to good things in his career. Remember, this was only this third movie. Dino fully financed Blue Velvet, which didn't make much money, but Dino believed in Lynch, and of course it is a masterpiece, which I shall review next.

The movie is not SO bad, but I give it three stars. It does seem to fall pretty flat, and I suspect that all those moviegoers who had not read the book would probably get very little out of it. Anyway, it's worth at least one watch possibly, as it IS a Lynch movie, and the directing is extremely interesting.





--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum] * 1
    #26503544 - 02/25/20 04:42 PM (3 years, 10 months ago)

Blue Velvet  10/10


This is the first "official" David Lynch film, in which he had total creative control. He wrote and directed, and his producer friend Dino DeLaurentiis fronted all the money for production and distribution, knowing full well the film wouldn't be a blockbuster. This would, I suppose, still be considered "early" Lynch, at a time before his films became totally distinctive and completely surreal like they did in the nineties and later. But as I said, this is Lynch's first that really had his stamp on it.

It is a mystery that is both conventional and very unconventional. Jeffrey Beaumont, played by Kyle MacLachlan -- who was very young at the time -- finds a severed ear in a field near his house. This leads him on a saga of rape, abduction, murder, abuse and mayhem that plays out over the course of the film. Laura Dern plays his girlfriend-to-be in the small town of Lumberton, and they conspire to investigate Dorothy Valens, played by Isabella Rosellini in her first major acting role, who is someone the police have been investigating. This investigation takes Jeffrey into Dorothy's world, as they have a brief but violent love affair, only to be discovered by Dorothy's abusive acquaintance Frank Booth.

Now, Dennis Hopper's portrayal of Frank Booth may be one of the great villain roles in cinema history. He is a totally vile, violent, utterly objectionable presence, who beats Dorothy in acts of brutal and twisted love plays, and no one could have played him but Hopper. David Lynch was warned before shooting even started to ditch Hopper and find someone else, because he was totally unreliable and flaky, as, at the time, he was a recovering alcoholic and drug addict. Everyone in the industry said, "Stay away," but Lynch felt he had no choice as Hopper was born to play the role, and Hopper was on his best behavior and turned in a classic performance.

The scene where Dean Stockwell lip-synched the Roy Orbison song is also a highlight, as it is just pure Lynch -- a somewhat surreal scene involving perfect acting, wonderful lighting and cinematography, and the right music. Frank Booth's gang, which also included Brad Dourif and Jack Nance, has that air of the silly and the sinister rolled into one.

Ultimately, the movie can be about many things. We have innocence meeting the real world, in which wholesome small towns play host to Satanic forces. It's like Lynch to explore dualities, and he did so throughout all his movies. He also mixes love and violence, which of course is a salient theme in history and in people's lives, with rituals based in dominance and submission -- power over others. Lynch also likes the whole small-town vibe, which he explored again with Twin Peaks. Light and darkness existing together in varying degrees is a very important motif for him. In the end, it's about how the experience feels, and for sure, Blue Velvet is unique in that department.

I must add that Sparky the Jack Russell Terrier makes an appearance at the beginning of the film, memorably interacting with a garden hose. This was David Lynch's dog at the time, whom he has described as, "The love of my life."






--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum] * 1
    #26505102 - 02/26/20 04:07 PM (3 years, 10 months ago)

Wild At Heart  9/10


Another truly unique movie, as one comes to expect from anything by David Lynch, I find nothing wrong with the movie technically, but I give it a nine because of two things: I am not fond of love stories, and I do not like The Wizard of Oz. So, it's a purely subjective thing, but the movie is not precisely my cup of tea. However, as I said, technically it is flawless, he did things with it that had never been done before, and after all, it won the Palme d'Or at Cannes in 1990. It is well appreciated.

The story follows young lovers Sailor and Lula from South Carolina, to New Orleans and then all the way to Texas, as they are simply adventuring and in a deep, pure state of blissful love. Amid spectacular directing, the characters of Sailor and Lula, played by Nicolas Cage and Laura Dern, really burn up the screen in vivid portrayals. These really are unforgettable characters. Sailor has broken bail, and they're just throwing caution to the wind as they try to find their way to California. Of course, around about Big Tuna, TX, they run out of money.

Now, Lula's mother, played by the magnificent Diane Ladd (who is Dern's real-life mother), intends to have Sailor killed. She hires hitman Santos, with whom she has become unfortunately acquainted, to do the deed. Lynch's use of Eisenhower silver dollars is fantastic and spooky (and anticipates John Wick by twenty-five years). She hates Sailor, A. Because he has refused her advances; and B. Because he has knowledge of a crime that implicates her. But that is neither here nor there. The hit is out on Sailor, and he's in big trouble.

In comes Johnny Peru in a perfect acting performance by Willem Dafoe. I can't decide which role is better: Johnny Peru or Frank Booth. They're both historically great characters. Anyway, Dafoe has it down: The facial expressions, slick speech, eye movements, the works -- and Lynch had him wear some disgusting dentures that really bring his character full-circle. He's not on screen for long, but he's priceless.

In the end, after a slew of overt references to the Wizard of Oz, Glinda the good witch saves the day, and we have a happy ending. Lynch originally wanted to make the ending brutal, with deaths of principal characters, but was convinced that this would have been totally out of step with the rest of the film. He agreed, and we have, at the end, an Elvis serenade.

This movie is sort of like Pulp Fiction, in that when it came out no one had ever seen anything like it before. It is not one of my favorite David Lynch movies for the reasons given and maybe a couple of others, but obviously, they're all good. And if you like love stories, there is none better.





--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePrimal Glitch
literally just vibing
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/06/07
Posts: 4,854
Loc: 🌎 Flag
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #26505817 - 02/27/20 02:36 AM (3 years, 10 months ago)

oooh nice thread! :popcorn:
love lynch and there's a couple of these I haven't seen yet



--------------------

                                  make the changa you wish to see in the world
                                                                gnome sayin'?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBrian Jones
Club 27
Male User Gallery


Registered: 12/18/12
Posts: 12,340
Loc: attending Snake Church
Last seen: 3 hours, 46 minutes
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum] * 1
    #26506074 - 02/27/20 08:10 AM (3 years, 10 months ago)

The Good Witch scenes in Wild at Heart seem a distraction. I don't think Johnny Peru is as good a villian as Frank Booth (the best) but Defoe is very good. And those teeth. J.E. Freeman as Marcellus Santos was effective. He's an even better gangster in the Coen's Millers Crossing. There is so much typecasting in the gangster drama, I'm surprised we didn't see more of this guy. Harry Dean Stanton is very good, as he nearly always is.

I think Wild at Heart was a response to the critical reception Lynch got from Blue Velvet. He had brought strangeness to a wider stage than with Eraserhead, so he decided to give us a real freak show.

The transformation of Laura Dern from the good girl in Blue Velvet to this was something to see, and I would rate this as a top five for Nic Cage.

David Lynch had to cut several scenes of violence and sex to avoid an X rating. Wild at Heart is a good and interesting movie, but not a great one.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

The worst thing about corruption is that it works so well,


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: Brian Jones] * 1
    #26506231 - 02/27/20 09:58 AM (3 years, 10 months ago)

I agree with everything you've said. Actually, the Good Witch scene was an ad hoc addition at the very end of the shoot. As I pointed out, Lynch originally wanted -- and what was in the script from the beginning -- was a devastating, brutally violent ending in which the main characters were killed. One of the producers told him, you've gotta do something else, this is completely out of step with the first 1:45. So with only a couple of weeks left to go of shooting, someone (it wasn't Lynch's idea) came up with the Glinda the Good Witch intercession there at the end. So, it stands to reason that you and I and others might see that as a flimsy resolution, because in reality that's just what it was.

Yeah, Freeman was fantastic, and he was sublime in Miller's Crossing. And yes, Harry Dean. Great actor, apparently a wonderful and very funny guy, too.

The Dern transformation is indeed shocking. She goes from all-American small town girl-next-door to, well, Lula. As I said, despite the movie's flaws, Sailor and Lula are quite well done characters, and Nicolas Cage is amazing. And he's amazing in lots of stuff.

As I said, I agree with your final assessment. Wild at Heart is not near the top of my list of favorite Lynch films, and it is not a great film, but it is very good and, as you say, cinematically interesting. I gave it perhaps a higher score than I would have subjectively for this reason -- I recognize its merits. But I would say that the formula of love story+Wizard of Oz theme cannot help but turn me off a bit. But Lynch is Lynch.


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBrian Jones
Club 27
Male User Gallery


Registered: 12/18/12
Posts: 12,340
Loc: attending Snake Church
Last seen: 3 hours, 46 minutes
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #26506353 - 02/27/20 11:23 AM (3 years, 10 months ago)

It was Nicholas Cage's idea to use the snakeskin jacket. It was Laura Dern's idea for her and Nic to spend a weekend together before shooting to get the mood right. I wonder how that went?


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

The worst thing about corruption is that it works so well,


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: Brian Jones]
    #26506576 - 02/27/20 02:03 PM (3 years, 10 months ago)

Ha, yeah.


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #26506622 - 02/27/20 02:25 PM (3 years, 10 months ago)

Twin Peaks Pilot  8.5/10


I am covering the one hour and 35 minute pilot, but not the whole series, for a couple of reasons. The main one is that Lynch considers the only really good parts of the earlier installments of Twin Peaks to be the pilot and the movie Fire Walk With Me, which I shall also comment upon. The other is the glaring fact that Lynch didn't direct the majority of the episodes, nor even write very many of them. He and Mark Frost (the co-creator, co-writer and co-producer) were only really relatively happy with the pilot and the first season, and for reasons having to do with network television, they both basically lost control and lost touch as the second season got going. The network ordered them to reveal the killer earlier than they wanted -- mid-season of season two -- and this bothered both of them a great deal. And of course after this revelation of who the killer/Bob is, most people stopped watching, the rest was pretty irrelevant (with the exception of the final episode), and the show was canceled.

Most of what Twin Peaks is about is contained within the pilot. I have previously seen both seasons of the show, and many of the developments, especially in season one, are interesting and important to the story. But as I said, Lynch sort of lost interest in the whole thing fairly early on (but thought the later movie was a fine bit of work). Now, this show was pretty avant-garde for network television at the time, but it was a TV show, subject to all sorts of limitations, which Lynch quickly soured on. This is another reason I'm not going to watch and review the whole series; it's not really relevant to this thread.

Many of you will have seen it, so no detailed synopsis of the plot is really required. Laura Palmer, the beacon of goodness and innocence, is found murdered, and everyone in the town of Twin Peaks is shocked and horrified. The show unfolds, MacLachlan enters as FBI Agent Dale Cooper (and he was spectacular in this role), and as we get more familiar with Twin Peaks and its citizens, we come to find out that Laura was involved with a lot of very dark and unsavory forces, and her friends didn't really know her at all. I'll go more into this in my post about the movie. The developing series does bring all this out and much more quite cleverly, and I recommend it for anyone who would like a good TV series to watch on video.

Of course, in the pilot we are not yet introduced to "Bob," but that's okay as he is everywhere in the follow ups, including "The Return" which imo is one of the best things Lynch ever did, but first things first. More will be said in my review of the movie, which is coming up next.





--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum] * 1
    #26509788 - 02/29/20 01:33 PM (3 years, 10 months ago)

Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me  10/10


Despite its lukewarm reception, and its status as sort of a forgotten David Lynch movie, this one is one of my favorite movies of his, and Lynch himself feels it was one of his best. This one is kinda halfway between Blue Velvet and Twin Peaks: The Return in terms of his use of highly creative imagery -- some would call it weirdness. But what a lot of people see as weirdness in Lynch films, I see as very good artistic filmmaking.

It gives the backstory to Twin Peaks the TV series, and a lot of the actors involved were not eager to participate. They thought what already existed was enough, and that some sort of prequel would not in any way add to the story and the mystique. Kyle MacLachlan was one of them, and could only be convinced to play a very limited role. Also, Lara Flynn Boyle wouldn't do it, and we have another actress in her place. But Sheryl Lee is the star as Laura Palmer and man, was her acting good. She had to cry and act extremely emotionally, in highly complex ways, in seemingly over half of the scenes she's in, so it was a very demanding part, but she was great. Many of the other regulars from the show were there also, and all were very good.

The movie starts off right off the bat with some very strange and wonderful scenes, involving visions, bizarre symbolism, and essentially a supernatural motif. Chris Isaak was very good early on in the film. There is, indeed, a supernatural motif throughout the film, which became more and more characteristic of Lynch as his career progressed. Of course we have Bob, some sort of displaced evil spirit who infests people's souls and commits heinous crimes, and he is indeed scary. He was played by Frank Silva, who in reality was a prop master and set decorator on several of Lynch's films. One day while filming a scene for the TV series, Silva accidentally appeared in a shot in a mirror in Laura's bedroom, and Bob was born. He's perfect for the role. In any case, Lynch's use of the supernatural is what really draws me to his films, this one in particular. Of course, I'll get to some other examples of this as the thread progresses.

I think the whole Twin Peaks universe is a kind of exploration of the fact that small-town America, which symbolizes all of America, really, exists with a thin surface veneer of seeming tranquility and a sense that life is good and everything is really pretty much okay. Of course, as anyone knows, right beneath that surface is a roiling chaos of suffering and dysfunction, in which people are involved with all sorts of unsavory things and there's darkness spread over everything. Laura is seen as this innocent who could do no wrong, and Twin Peaks is perceived by its citizens to be a peaceful, perfect hamlet. But of course, Laura uses cocaine, prostitutes herself, gets in with drug dealers and pimps, etc., and this is more in line with the reality of life, albeit it's an extreme for the purposes of drama. This whole notion that we'll not worry about a thing, and have as many children as we want, and act like everything is fine to one another is at cross-purposes with the amount of suffering and destruction, on numerous levels, rampant in the world. I think Twin Peaks encapsulates that.





--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #26513267 - 03/02/20 05:20 PM (3 years, 10 months ago)

Lost Highway  10/10


This is a cool movie. When I first saw it, I was blown away, yes, but I felt stunned, not knowing what the hell just happened. But the secret of David Lynch movies is that, just as with excellent artwork, there is no wrong interpretation. I'm not sure Lynch even has a concrete explanation for it, and it's just as well, because with a movie like this, one's interpretation of it is likely to evolve over time. In any case, this is one of my favorite Lynch movies.

In a way similar to Kubrick, I think, Lynch gets performances out of actors that are truly unique, and different from anything else they have ever done. Bill Pullman is particularly good in this, and gives a somewhat taut, mysterious vibe to his performance, making one wonder what depths lurk behind this person. The acting is simply artful, and very memorable. But the acting is only part of this movie. Once again, Lynch employs a supernatural element in his narrative, and mysterious, otherworldly things transpire in the plot that seemingly have no explanation -- certainly none is given in the film -- and this is a huge part of the fun with Lynch.

The film begins with a cryptic message for Bill Pullman's character over his house's intercom: "Dick Laurent is dead." Neither he nor the audience has any idea what this means now or later. This actually happened to David Lynch -- someone came up to his house, whispered a similar message into his intercom, and vanished. That, and the idea of mysterious packages with anonymous videotapes, were the seed for the whole movie.

Anyway, some strange things start happening. Mysterious, unmarked videotapes start arriving at the protagonists' house, of some spooky videos taken from inside the house, even of the couple sleeping. We begin to meet some chilling characters. Robert Blake plays the mysterious evil guy, and I think he steals the show. He meets Bill Pullman's character Frank at a party, invites him to call his own house, where the weird videos have been shot, and Frank is talking on the phone to... Blake's character, standing right next to him. He is somehow in both places at once. A few minutes later into the film, a new videotape is left, and it depicts Frank brutally killing his beautiful wife -- played memorably by Patricia Arquette. (In these scenes she is a brunette). The audience knows he is innocent, and has been framed by the evil guy, but that doesn't help Frank.

So, Pullman's character winds up in prison, on death row. He begins having severe headaches, and at some point supernaturally morphs into... Pete Dayton, played by Balthazar Getty. Now, is this the same character, with the same soul? Or are they two different characters being manipulated by diabolical forces? We don't know. But Pete has total memory loss, goes home to his parents', and has no idea what is going on.

He works at an auto garage, and frequently works on the cars of... Dick Laurent. Laurent is known as "Mr. Eddie," and drives by one day with Frank's wife Alice, a blonde played by Patricia Arquette. They become quite romantically involved, which draws the ire of Mr. Eddie. Eventually, Alice and Pete are in Laurent's crosshairs -- literally -- and so they hatch a plan for a robbery. This is successful, and Alice and Pete drive out to a place "in the desert" where they can convert their loot into cash. At which time, Pete morphs back into Frank (Getty into Pullman), who kills Dick Laurent with the help of the evil guy Robert Blake. Then Frank goes back to his house to whisper into the intercom: "Dick Laurent is dead."

He then runs from the cops, after having weeks before mysteriously disappeared from his prison cell, and the movie ends with him on the run, morphing into... who?

That's just a very brief synopsis which does no justice to the actual experience of watching the film, obviously. But the nonlinear, supernatural narrative has become a trademark of David Lynch, and I love it. It seems to me that, given Robert Blake's character, some seriously malevolent forces are playing around with Frank and Pete, weaving a web only they understand, and to say this is easy, but the raw feel of the film conveys that evil more viscerally. There is in a sense a form of reincarnation going on, as Frank morphs into Pete, and later again back to Frank, and no explanation is ever given. Clearly, some very powerful entities are manipulating reality to achieve their ends. This is something that is fleshed out much more in the Twin Peaks Showtime sequel, which I will get to. But this is a dark movie of murder (of which Frank was framed), lust, organized crime, demons, infidelity, various forms of violence, pornography, etc. It is obvious that some sinister reality is lurking beneath the surface. Just what its nature is seems to be for the viewer to determine.





--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRyzo
Male


Registered: 12/25/18
Posts: 203
Loc: United States Flag
Last seen: 9 months, 27 days
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #26517831 - 03/05/20 01:52 AM (3 years, 10 months ago)

Huge Lynch fan.

Who do you all think are the top 5 closest descendants of Lynch today? /directors


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: Ryzo]
    #26518258 - 03/05/20 09:32 AM (3 years, 10 months ago)

Gosh, I don't know. I don't think anyone, that I've seen, is a whole lot like David Lynch. My favorite director of the somewhat younger generation is P.T. Anderson, and I would say he's more like Kubrick than Lynch. What directors would you name?


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #26518934 - 03/05/20 03:36 PM (3 years, 10 months ago)

The Straight Story  8.5/10


This is easily the most un-Lynchian movie of any David Lynch ever made, even including The Elephant Man which contained a few flourishes. This movie has no flourishes. Lynch plays it absolutely straight here -- coincidentally (no pun intended). That said, the directing is as good as any you'll see, far higher than the level of most directors who usually make a movie like this.

It depicts the real-life story of Alvin Straight, who drove from Laurens, IA to a small town in Wisconsin (which is almost 300 miles) on his John Deere riding-mower at a top speed of 5 miles per hour. He went to see his estranged brother, played memorably by Harry Dean Stanton, who had recently had a stroke. He was very old and his vision was too poor for a driver's license, and he didn't want to be driven but to go himself, hence the lawn mower. This all really happened in 1996, and Straight was quite upset by the publicity it generated, turning down offers to appear on Jay Leno and David Letterman. Although this is not depicted in the movie.

Sissy Spacek sort of steals the show as Straight's autistic daughter, but Richard Farnsworth was great too and got an Oscar nomination for his role in this film. It's clearly well outside of the primary Lynch canon, but as I indicated, they wanted a good director and he wanted to do it, so they got one. He did not write or produce. His now ex-wife Mary Sweeney, however, co-wrote the script, and she was the editor of the film and several other of his films. She didn't even show the script to him until well after it was completed, for logical reasons, but he read it and said, "I want to do this."

For fans of David Lynch, this is somewhat of a curiosity, and many have probably not seen it. Like I said, there is not one Lynch-esque flourish in the whole film -- it's totally straight filmmaking. But I have to say, and as one might expect, it is very good and quite touching, without cheap sentiment of any kind. If anyone is interested in the story, I say see it.





--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRyzo
Male


Registered: 12/25/18
Posts: 203
Loc: United States Flag
Last seen: 9 months, 27 days
Re: A David Lynch thread [Re: DividedQuantum] * 1
    #26521626 - 03/07/20 04:05 AM (3 years, 10 months ago)

Quote:

DividedQuantum said:
Gosh, I don't know. I don't think anyone, that I've seen, is a whole lot like David Lynch. My favorite director of the somewhat younger generation is P.T. Anderson, and I would say he's more like Kubrick than Lynch. What directors would you name?




I didn't think anyone either, but was hoping there was someone out there I missed. 

Well that's depressing. :facepalm:

Inland Empire is my favorite.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* David Lynch Movies
( 1 2 all )
dillavou_fran_ce 4,712 26 09/12/02 02:19 PM
by apatheticgoddess
* David Lynch!! and movies in general yelimS 2,080 15 04/30/03 05:11 PM
by ihavefingers
* david lynch BrAiN 771 4 01/13/05 02:00 AM
by BrAiN
* David Lynch.... =) .......? badjessejames 1,145 6 07/12/02 03:42 AM
by frogsheath
* david lachapelle can get a little TOO weird BrAiN 1,726 17 04/26/05 09:10 PM
by BrAiN
* David Lynch... BrAiN 805 4 08/08/05 01:42 AM
by TheCow
* Shroomism's Metal Guide (obsolete - see new thread)
( 1 2 3 4 all )
ShroomismM 12,123 71 01/15/05 12:58 AM
by ryou
* The Official Pink Floyd fanatic thread
( 1 2 3 all )
acoostick 5,366 42 02/12/05 05:39 PM
by acoostick

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, automan, DividedQuantum
1,304 topic views. 0 members, 4 guests and 2 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.032 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 16 queries.