|
doctorghosty
is the name of me



Registered: 09/02/10
Posts: 11,420
Loc: North GA, God's fav
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: Colours] 8
#26586332 - 04/08/20 01:07 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Somebody ban this fucking clown, none of this shit has anything to do with coronavirus
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 47 minutes
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: imachavel]
#26586333 - 04/08/20 01:07 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
imachavel said:
Quote:
koods said: The Bronx has officially passed having 1% of the population infected.
Only 79% more to go for the herd immunity strategy to kick in
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-52177586
Uh oh. To further your end of world statistical analysis. If that tiger has it you know for sure everyone is dead.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bronx
Also if 10,000 people in the Bronx have tested positive for Corona virus then its still not 1% of the population if the Bronx has a population of 1.4 million. You are still 4000 short. A minor technical error but an error none the less.
Those minor technical errors like Trump saying "maybe 2.2 million people would die from this or maybe it would only be 1.6 and not 2.2" is a kind if a bigger difference technical error. More so the error is that we are nowhere close to 1.6 million deaths not even the world has gotten to 10% of those many deaths total. Perhaps these days being specific about such things is kind of important.
Ok. 1.013%. Is that specific enough for you? 
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Colours
Registered: 01/20/13
Posts: 859
Last seen: 1 year, 28 days
|
|
Quote:
doctorghosty said: Somebody ban this fucking clown
Freedom of speech buddy. I didn't post anything racist, offensive, call anyone a nasty name etc.
Just facts of current news.
Why are you so upset???

edit -- because you edited your post, IT DOES have to do with corona. this stimulus they want to pass is because of Corona. yet homeless population gets NOTHING once again. such a shit show in california.
Edited by Colours (04/08/20 01:12 PM)
|
doctorghosty
is the name of me



Registered: 09/02/10
Posts: 11,420
Loc: North GA, God's fav
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: Colours] 5
#26586343 - 04/08/20 01:13 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
I’m annoyed because I am having to read a bunch of shit irrelevant to stated purpose of this thread.
|
tyrannicalrex
Strange R



Registered: 04/24/03
Posts: 38,323
Loc: subtropics
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: Colours]
#26586347 - 04/08/20 01:14 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
LOL, I'm as cool as I can be bro ham. Just being a little cocky.
|
Colours
Registered: 01/20/13
Posts: 859
Last seen: 1 year, 28 days
|
|
Quote:
doctorghosty said: I’m annoyed because I am having to read a bunch of shit irrelevant to stated purpose of this thread.
Well you should have started complaining a loooong time ago. You're only complaining now because I triggered you with some real shit. Truth hurts apparently...
Carry on lads. Let the circle jerk of speculation, nonsense and doom and gloom continue...
|
imachavel
I loved and lost but I loved-ftw



Registered: 06/06/07
Posts: 31,372
Loc: You get banned for saying that
Last seen: 1 day, 1 hour
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: Niffla] 2
#26586358 - 04/08/20 01:18 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Niffla said: Recoveries worldwide: 315,000
We will be well north of 325K by tomorrow morning

I love the positive news. It is so rarely heard. It shows that a very healthy person has a good chance of getting this and recovering and going on with life.
--------------------
I did not say to edit my signature soulidarity! Now forever I will never remember what I said about understanding the secrets of the universe by paying attention to subtleties!
I'm never giving you the password again. Jerk
|
The Blind Ass
Bodhi



Registered: 08/16/16
Posts: 26,657
Loc: The Primordial Mind
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: Colours]
#26586361 - 04/08/20 01:19 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Colors or whatever your name is... It’s because your transparent and the comments you’ve posted recently in this thread are irrelevant and inflammatory.
Your this guy...essentially. And that guy hates himself due to his own ignorance
On another note.
Last night there were ambulance sirens all night, from what I can best discern were people being taken to the hospital, a % being covid19 incidents.
Thank god our species is at a point where we can handle this pandemic with some degree of confidence.
-------------------- Give me Liberty caps -or- give me Death caps
Edited by The Blind Ass (04/08/20 01:21 PM)
|
feevers


Registered: 12/28/10
Posts: 8,546
Loc:
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: Colours] 2
#26586365 - 04/08/20 01:19 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Colours said:
Let the circle jerk of speculation, nonsense and doom and gloom continue...
It's almost like there's a pandemic and economic collapse going on or something
|
imachavel
I loved and lost but I loved-ftw



Registered: 06/06/07
Posts: 31,372
Loc: You get banned for saying that
Last seen: 1 day, 1 hour
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: koods]
#26586373 - 04/08/20 01:24 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
imachavel said:
Quote:
koods said: The Bronx has officially passed having 1% of the population infected.
Only 79% more to go for the herd immunity strategy to kick in
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-52177586
Uh oh. To further your end of world statistical analysis. If that tiger has it you know for sure everyone is dead.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bronx
Also if 10,000 people in the Bronx have tested positive for Corona virus then its still not 1% of the population if the Bronx has a population of 1.4 million. You are still 4000 short. A minor technical error but an error none the less.
Those minor technical errors like Trump saying "maybe 2.2 million people would die from this or maybe it would only be 1.6 and not 2.2" is a kind if a bigger difference technical error. More so the error is that we are nowhere close to 1.6 million deaths not even the world has gotten to 10% of those many deaths total. Perhaps these days being specific about such things is kind of important.
Ok. 1.013%. Is that specific enough for you? 

I got 0.9867%
That is 138,146 divided by 1.4 million right?
just saying though. It starts with a few points off the decimal. Starts there. Soon Fox News takes a few more points and a few more and a few more you know what is a few points difference?
Then by tomorrow morning you wake up and Fox News is saying 100,000,000 people died. Like WTF
At some point beyond the sensationalism we have to try and get as close to the truth as possible.
--------------------
I did not say to edit my signature soulidarity! Now forever I will never remember what I said about understanding the secrets of the universe by paying attention to subtleties!
I'm never giving you the password again. Jerk
|
lowbrow
Paddy Time!!!!


Registered: 09/12/08
Posts: 9,662
Last seen: 1 day, 4 hours
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: koods]
#26586378 - 04/08/20 01:26 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
I live in a travel hub. It could of happened. Because I’m a miser, nobody would of caught it from me.
-------------------- Amanita86 said: Sui is trying to mod right now. Kinda like a newborn calf tryin ta stand fer the first time ain’t it..
|
Niffla



Registered: 06/09/08
Posts: 46,482
Loc: Texas
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: imachavel]
#26586381 - 04/08/20 01:27 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
imachavel said:
Quote:
Niffla said: Recoveries worldwide: 315,000
We will be well north of 325K by tomorrow morning

I love the positive news. It is so rarely heard. It shows that a very healthy person has a good chance of getting this and recovering and going on with life.
--------------------
HAIL OUR NEW OTD KING
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 47 minutes
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: imachavel] 2
#26586383 - 04/08/20 01:27 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
imachavel said:
Quote:
Niffla said: Recoveries worldwide: 315,000
We will be well north of 325K by tomorrow morning

I love the positive news. It is so rarely heard. It shows that a very healthy person has a good chance of getting this and recovering and going on with life.
*and a $100k hospital bill fornthe seven days you spent in the ICU.
25% of cases require hospitalization in total. 10% of people under 18 require hospitalization. The doom and gloom is quite necessary to get people to take this seriously.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
imachavel
I loved and lost but I loved-ftw



Registered: 06/06/07
Posts: 31,372
Loc: You get banned for saying that
Last seen: 1 day, 1 hour
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: feevers]
#26586384 - 04/08/20 01:27 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
feevers said:
Quote:
Colours said:
Let the circle jerk of speculation, nonsense and doom and gloom continue...
It's almost like there's a pandemic and economic collapse going on or something
Somewhere close to that
Close
Something like that.
Somewhere around there.
We are not sure yet. Lets turn on CNN and get the totally specific facts straight from the lions mouth. Because maybe no pandemic or economic collapse? I mean who knows. The news tries to keep up with it as close as possible. But as far as they know who the fuck knows? Just who knows? Being accurate is hard when you are the head of a major news syndicate. Apparently. The facts just jump up and down!
Information.....
...... so hard
--------------------
I did not say to edit my signature soulidarity! Now forever I will never remember what I said about understanding the secrets of the universe by paying attention to subtleties!
I'm never giving you the password again. Jerk
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,049
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 3 hours, 47 minutes
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: imachavel]
#26586389 - 04/08/20 01:29 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
imachavel said:
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
imachavel said:
Quote:
koods said: The Bronx has officially passed having 1% of the population infected.
Only 79% more to go for the herd immunity strategy to kick in
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-52177586
Uh oh. To further your end of world statistical analysis. If that tiger has it you know for sure everyone is dead.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bronx
Also if 10,000 people in the Bronx have tested positive for Corona virus then its still not 1% of the population if the Bronx has a population of 1.4 million. You are still 4000 short. A minor technical error but an error none the less.
Those minor technical errors like Trump saying "maybe 2.2 million people would die from this or maybe it would only be 1.6 and not 2.2" is a kind if a bigger difference technical error. More so the error is that we are nowhere close to 1.6 million deaths not even the world has gotten to 10% of those many deaths total. Perhaps these days being specific about such things is kind of important.
Ok. 1.013%. Is that specific enough for you? 

I got 0.9867%
That is 138,146 divided by 1.4 million right?
just saying though. It starts with a few points off the decimal. Starts there. Soon Fox News takes a few more points and a few more and a few more you know what is a few points difference?
Then by tomorrow morning you wake up and Fox News is saying 100,000,000 people died. Like WTF
At some point beyond the sensationalism we have to try and get as close to the truth as possible.
That’s the official data dude. Look at the web address.
You don’t have to admit you were wrong. But you are.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Niffla



Registered: 06/09/08
Posts: 46,482
Loc: Texas
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: koods] 3
#26586390 - 04/08/20 01:30 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
imachavel said:
Quote:
Niffla said: Recoveries worldwide: 315,000
We will be well north of 325K by tomorrow morning

I love the positive news. It is so rarely heard. It shows that a very healthy person has a good chance of getting this and recovering and going on with life.
*and a $100k hospital bill fornthe seven days you spent in the ICU.
Of course

Drops by to make sure we can't enjoy a little bit of actual good news

--------------------
HAIL OUR NEW OTD KING
|
Simisu
taken by gravity


Registered: 08/08/03
Posts: 5,435
Loc: Israeli in
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: feevers]
#26586393 - 04/08/20 01:30 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
feevers said:
Quote:
Colours said:
Let the circle jerk of speculation, nonsense and doom and gloom continue...
It's almost like there's a pandemic and economic collapse going on or something
free premium porn tho
--------------------
   Shr mery    Visit & Support Free Spore Ring Earth Please help spread live Salvia Divinorum
|
imachavel
I loved and lost but I loved-ftw



Registered: 06/06/07
Posts: 31,372
Loc: You get banned for saying that
Last seen: 1 day, 1 hour
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: koods]
#26586396 - 04/08/20 01:32 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
imachavel said:
Quote:
Niffla said: Recoveries worldwide: 315,000
We will be well north of 325K by tomorrow morning

I love the positive news. It is so rarely heard. It shows that a very healthy person has a good chance of getting this and recovering and going on with life.
*and a $100k hospital bill fornthe seven days you spent in the ICU.
25% of cases require hospitalization in total. 10% of people under 18 require hospitalization. The doom and gloom is quite necessary to get people to take this seriously.
People will take seriously what they want to take seriously regardless of what it is. The diversion of true facts from sensationalism is disgusting. There are people who spend 6 weeks in the ICU for lung cancer or alcoholics with failing livers and they get out and light up a cigarette or pop open a beer.
It is ultimately up to the person. The raving news lunacy does not help. I highly question that 25% ICU rate because 2 weeks ago it was a 5% ICU rate. These numbers jump drastically. But be it as it is. Whatever it is.
Everyone take care of themself. Be safe. Be distant. Take care of your immune system. Keep an eye on China because they already lifted their quarantine. Maybe they had a good model for quarantine. Or maybe they are making a huge mistake.
But keep your eyes on the facts and lets hope this is all over soon and we don't all starve to death.
--------------------
I did not say to edit my signature soulidarity! Now forever I will never remember what I said about understanding the secrets of the universe by paying attention to subtleties!
I'm never giving you the password again. Jerk
|
imachavel
I loved and lost but I loved-ftw



Registered: 06/06/07
Posts: 31,372
Loc: You get banned for saying that
Last seen: 1 day, 1 hour
|
Re: Viral outbreak in China [Re: koods]
#26586400 - 04/08/20 01:34 PM (3 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
imachavel said:
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
imachavel said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-52177586
Uh oh. To further your end of world statistical analysis. If that tiger has it you know for sure everyone is dead.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bronx
Also if 10,000 people in the Bronx have tested positive for Corona virus then its still not 1% of the population if the Bronx has a population of 1.4 million. You are still 4000 short. A minor technical error but an error none the less.
Those minor technical errors like Trump saying "maybe 2.2 million people would die from this or maybe it would only be 1.6 and not 2.2" is a kind if a bigger difference technical error. More so the error is that we are nowhere close to 1.6 million deaths not even the world has gotten to 10% of those many deaths total. Perhaps these days being specific about such things is kind of important.
Ok. 1.013%. Is that specific enough for you? 

I got 0.9867%
That is 138,146 divided by 1.4 million right?
just saying though. It starts with a few points off the decimal. Starts there. Soon Fox News takes a few more points and a few more and a few more you know what is a few points difference?
Then by tomorrow morning you wake up and Fox News is saying 100,000,000 people died. Like WTF
At some point beyond the sensationalism we have to try and get as close to the truth as possible.
That’s the official data dude. Look at the web address.
You don’t have to admit you were wrong. But you are.
Shit my post did not post. It came out blank. Weird error.
I was saying 138,000 out of 1.4 million is not 1%. Perhaps the liberal agenda is wrong. Making incorrect math correct.
--------------------
I did not say to edit my signature soulidarity! Now forever I will never remember what I said about understanding the secrets of the universe by paying attention to subtleties!
I'm never giving you the password again. Jerk
|
lowbrow
Paddy Time!!!!


Registered: 09/12/08
Posts: 9,662
Last seen: 1 day, 4 hours
|
|
Quote:
doctorghosty said: I’m annoyed because I am having to read a bunch of shit irrelevant to stated purpose of this thread.
He didn’t post anything that the other side of the political spectrum doesn’t post on a regular basis.
But we’re all in this together, we should all stay at home and wear our masks while putting out good vibes. We can’t let those blue meanies get us.
-------------------- Amanita86 said: Sui is trying to mod right now. Kinda like a newborn calf tryin ta stand fer the first time ain’t it..
|
|