|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
|
It's all about natural language. What is most naturally good, and not contrary to good, in nature, is language, the word, God. But....
LOL!
they nigged me so they can't see how objectively wrong they are in their assessments about me.
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/26398532#26398532 it's funny, cause here is all the things they say, already...but it's covered...already...so why do they bother to waste their precious time, which i thought was so extremely important? they don't need to preach here, i've already got them covered, as we're all pretty well saying the same thing...
ain't that a hoot?
here's some more:
Principally, chaos is merely the singular thing of language, verily, in our order of comprehension[s], being that we use language to not only imagine but conceive and thus understand of anything: explicit in this notion, there is the fact of an encapsulation of life, from a single given perspective, but only following logic and ratiocination can this be realized; and barring that, one who can understand the logic inherent inside the encapsulation so well put [if so done] will, in time, give way to an empirical reality that is suitable for another position, when it is an order of a comprehension beyond oneself, and yet is still perceived within a consciousness that is yours and at the same time the consciousness from the words that allow the reasoning to persist as a reposit of the conscious mind of another being, which, may only persist if it's logic was complicit in an informal modal which is simply sussed: chaos is language, and not nature, itself, as nature itself is that of cosmos, which is in contradiction to kosmos, which is born in cosmos, that which is beyond it but yet defines it, as that which produced the like object-subject [and distinction] within the consciousness of being that is the self qua consciousness, and language [chaos] is the inflection of the utterance of the consciousness, in any respect- apart from that we are merely nothing but nature inherent with a quality of chaotic inflection thru language qua language.
Addendum: Chaos is always an inflection of the selfsame mark of the outside that is obnubilation, perceived ostentatious dehiscence from the crowd & parochialism: ignominious gaffs willingly extruded from a mere approach to a mere expression in 'an engendered state while looking different'.
Scholium: Of course, it should be said that "nature" is in it's own predication: but that is it's own consideration for which one can only 'say to have experience of and to be only of experience qua experience itself'.
why, surely the best rationalist explanation of the chaos of human interaction.
i wrote it. not you two. you two, just keep wafting in the wind. you're following my trail.
§ Nothing infantilizes the public mind-set like capitalist-socialist ideology. Every single effect of the world we see today is funded by the super rich, at all sides [and flows into capital markets, "progressivism" invariably included]; in WW1, 2, & now. So, to ignore this fact, seems to be "infantile", indeed.
§ Nationality really isn't the issue. Geography is the issue. And when it comes to history...it seems to be a wholly separate issue from "nationality" as well. The "propaganda" seems to have something to do with bankers who funded pretty much everyone, at one point, in WW1 & 2.
§ (Nationalities [clearly by way of group behavior] are not separate from their homelands. This fact leads to the notion of whether [nations] should approach economies as an autarky, or as more "international".)
§ Is the notion that America is "missing something" [the sole responsibility of their need to 'be like the other good countries']? They already have contributed in this regard- don't act as if they don't still have this responsibility to attend to.
§ "Conservatives" [proletarianized/fascisized] are obsessed with filiative capital & alliances with said affiliates, in their consistent efforts—whence, the concern of the possible ablation of Israeli territory, and of ties to the banking families that have inculcated them.
§ (You would need a militant effort to instill those morals, too. This is the conundrum that no one wants to face. In fact, it's so "unfaceable" as to be nearly hysterical. At any length—I can state this clearly and vehemently, and nothing will be concluded from it.)
§ (Oh these progressive leftists are dupes, for sure. They are being persuaded by monetary gain, in the long run, and are simply allowing themselves to be completely evinced as hypocrites [that they are].)
§ "I think big-wigs who control all our lives for the sake of their growing wallets, are shitty people! But to do anything about them is tantamount to immorality!"
§ Economic forces are becoming smaller, and how consolidation is proceeding into further smaller subsets of growth is by way of said growth-dematerialization this puts power into smaller hands, which are co-opted by larger companies- mostly within the software industry [obviously].
§ [P]opulation growth as well, which includes pop. density in civic centers, and cities; resources [food & water, predominantly] being the prime necessity here- which there is no "infinite growth" therein. We have finite fungible resources to use, at once.
§ ([T]he 'positive-incentive of hunger' results in a 'feeling good' to collect food, and store it, as much as it does to eat. Thing is humans don't have a good indicator of hunger, which is why they can eat so little, if they so choose. The only indicator is pain, which is resolved with so little food. This is the real indicator for survival and desire; actions that people will take. Coercion need not be at the end of a gun.)
§ The whole race thing is a giant foist. Don't you see how effective it is? everyone is in on it, now. Consolidation of powers via the dynamics of coordinating trends and flows of financial support, in order to cement the "mixed culture" of globalism.
§ Race is "becoming" [always] a thing because people refuse to acknowledge that it isn't color or race screwing them over- so hence, they default to race and color. Everyone does—which just engenders a more "vileness" to "whiteness" with which to critique, even though "the people" themselves [at this time] didn't invent these notions—and so they are hence duped into "playing the game". It's a scam, and the psychosis runs on thru it.
§ Without the meter stick of history, left-wing and right-wing advocates have less and less arbitrary factors in their motivations, in contrast to another, and more and more similarities [even if they are still distinct].
§ [L]eft-wing and right-wing ideals are melding. But, however, there is an expurgation going on regarding what of the most "far left" and "far right" values need to be gotten rid of, idealistically.
§ Capitalist-socialist Fabian Society types would love to have world federalization under their synarchic lines of control. But people will never listen, never perk their ears, never follow clews, never do their research. Notice the intergenerational scheme: politicians put out things that have good intentions therein, but they use them as masks for their memetic advantage. Simple as that. They engender every bit of vitriol and sympathy, for people, that they can muster from the public and from their connections. They aren't communists. They are capitalist-socialists. They don't want to highlight class struggle, they want to host hideaway parties for pedos and control the money supply, and trammel people into closer and closer quarters, as the population ravishes the landscape.
§ The funny thing is—and it truly is hysterical—is that the only reason this is happening, is because America was the only nation to break away from [even if temporarily] from banksters and their whims. All other nations are already beholden to them. America, now, as well.
§ Crisis management will occur no matter what the case may be, because this is a natural occurrence, it matters not what one has learned in the meantime that is excusable. No one goes out of their way to survive more than they have to. Everything else is just aesthetics.
§ Never conflate "history" with concurrent reality; it's a surefire way to strike confusion into the mind.
§ All this [talk of "leftists" versus "the right" is hyperbolic. The fin de siècle era was the worst in Europe, because Europe has a history that spans the edges of time itself. America, doesn't. American misapprehends things, openly [especially after the great depression]. Right-left, both will kill, at ends.
§ (To clarify: I'm not saying it's wrong, per se. Just hyperbolic. "Right-wing troops don't kill people?" fucking utterly absurd.)
§ People just imagine they couldn't "kill someone", until they do, but by then it's already too late and it's already been justified in their minds. This is why things are so bad...people people cannot control their instincts. At all levels this creates conflagration.
§ History is past blood guilt, and people should be able to handle what is in a museum- lest there are gatherings happening there & that statuary is literally being used for something nefarious, then it's literally just a piece of bronze someone fetched out of an arc of history. Stop trying to materialize it, to quantify it, in order to buy it or war for it.
§ In the business sense, liberalization = privatization = globalization = World Bank = deregulation [in lieu of business prospects].
§ Class struggle isn't the issue, as of right now, though [if it ever can be again, or ever was]—it seems racial-groups have more of an on-going struggle, than anything else. The metropolis makes the rural dysfunctional, not the other way around. The Megalomania of the neoliberals—they say things like "we prop up red states monetarily", not realizing their culpability.
§ Privatization is a liberalist ideal, q.e.d.
here is an encapsulation and polemic of modern day political gripes, because there is so much division.
ME. i am attempting to do this....
Through the death of the name as 'being' comes the name as 'sign'; the integument of the narod splits from the ethnos.
yep.
but if you want to have these two "rationalists" agree with you, you must never contend with them, lest they put you on ignore..."rationalists". 
§ People are stupid, despotic, have selective memory & are paranoid about so much, they lose their heads.
§ Always, they try to foist—by conceits & confusions, never making any headway, socially—their problems into the public spectacle & daily docket; in the everlasting student riot.
quite clear to see: but these two, they aren't the students, no, there are the "new academics" of the future, the REAL academics, right guys, hehe, right?

§1: Be aware that the world is not run by the hoi polloi, and it would be no different in any goddamn economy. Just look at the population rate of this planet. There is no perfect world where a small group of well connected people will not "leer" over them (the hoi polloi).
§2: Even the Guardians of Plato's Republic (as noted in the work itself) are a purely speculative and impossible fiction, as even they would become as the "leerer" of the top-dogs of the public body. You want answers, it's not "defeating capitalism", because it's been here since the Sun was cooking oil in the bowels of the Earth.
§3: An order where everything is in it's set place is still one in which oil permeates the underwork, and movements needs be made to retrieve it's resource (among other resources, just the same). As an institution, it needs work, undoubtedly [without indecision].
§4: Something people tend to do, especially if they see political underpinnings in motion, is they get tunnel vision. All of these "ideologies" have suffered from it. Neoliberalism. Conservatism. Socialism (Che, Maduro, ect). Communism (Iron Curtain, Mao, ect).
§5: None of these ideologies are without faults. They all fall for the same human plights. Greed and feigned superiority. Whether rich, middle-class, or poor, it's been shown that each of these classes can permit themselves to do comitance to the same things.
the entirety of it is constructed and well,...there are proportions of people [the hoi polloi] which I fear are being pushed to the brink [something they can't help]. People will have to make a choice, somewhere along the line- it may end up between choosing a pro-capitalism but anti-modernity stance [symbol], or a post-capitalist but pro-modernity stance, which means that the symbol will be replaced with the ideal replacement for the symbol, which is the icon. Capitalism will be crowned [again] and communism [thru foist] will continue to belay the trends and invoke the discordant valves of movement for the anchor to settle for it's waves in existence as being-drug qua being in crisis, all whilst they [the factory-laborer, the prole, the farmer, the rural, the folk] poise themselves as figurants for the theater-machine of oscillation [see, nuclear energy], cracks, and steam. This trembling beneath the earth will not satisfy, and surely the multiplicity of the foist unto the society of "centralization" [the modicum of "normality" we invoke for our sanity, in a void], the oversocialization, which Kaczynski called this piffling mass peoples who wish only for pelf and think of nothing but satiety for their whim in desire [the so-called bourgeoisie], or for the uncontrollable factions that they [bourgeois] deplore, succumb to, at their behest [in envy of] the niceties provided them [like an extra ration given soldiers in a raid].
People nag about Hegel & Leibniz's influence on "politics", when they value "logic systems" & such invented by them; which was ultimately developed into the type of mathematics valued so highly today [even the "Hegalian" dialectic was expounded actually by Frege]. The notion of the "Hegelian dialectic' as it is widely know is due to the mimesis of the praxis given by Heinrich Moritz Chalybäus, which actually stemmed from the more "spiritual" [and not "logical"] notion derived from the mathematical notion from Frege [and Fichte and Kant].
^ that's these two...they'll complain about "the academics" 'til the cows come home.
let's dive into some Evolian thought and tie to modern science:
>I read The Metaphysics of War [by Evola] and I was pretty confused by the use of the word action. How does it work?
That was during the Fascist uprising, when he was writing for a magazine, predominantly [for those writings]. He was talking about action has it's own fruit- not the fruits of action, and the fruit in and of itself of action. However, the instance of War is the most tragic of things- and hence Evola was not a posing a determinate to war, and war-goings, but instead was offering a true platform for their existential predicament. This also would also, given the frightful scenario, the warrior to potentially find a transcendent moment in the most dire straights, which could, all things considered, save his life. However, it wouldn't be "him" doing the reacting, you see. It would be "his Being" doing that. That's the point. And also the point would be to find that "place" where the self is "transcendent" into Being. There is active science on this development- although it used in dark ops, mostly, but then again, the most intuitive notions are still being processed and thus are not really in active use, although, they couldn't be, anyway- so most such study is done by would-be ideologues which are funded one way or another to study transcendental meditation in subjects. What is found it that "Gamma" frequencies are found within subjects. Hyper-gamma frequencies can be detected, and are also found in certain cosmic environs. Theta frequencies are closest [found in humans] to the Shumann frequency of the earth. Etc. Look up. Lo, a light, within, turn, meditate.
Edited by akira_akuma (12/24/19 04:09 AM)
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
I would like to report abuse of language, excessive block copy, and writing without reading (doesn't everybody), which is a denial of the essence of language - in its guise of communication.
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
|
they don't. you don't.
whatever...i'm just gonna say: uhhh der, clearly they and i sound....soooorta similar...i'm gonna point it out, even if it's obvious...because you gotta...one just has to do what people will about the quandaries and consequences of silence...from you...from whomever.
PS: Quote:
which is a denial of the essence of language
the implication here being quite the reverse of the other notions of me being "enraptured" by language.
oh boy...or it could just be that my exaggerative implementations are in an inverse proportionality to their short-form exaggerations, because i like irony, and i also like posting everything that they'll ever talk about in their new found "genius".
but whatever...i'm being pompous. i know the fact that i have already covered their ground doesn't mean anything, and won't change anything. and neither will they.
Edited by akira_akuma (12/24/19 11:43 AM)
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
I think you relish the trails of fading language moments in your mind, not just the sounds, but the mere awareness that meaning is contained in language, and that language is contained in a block of text, and that a block of text is contained in a blog post under your cursor, and that you could, if you cared, read that post, and even caring is proof of your intoxicated genius.
mad laughter fills the halls
'tis the season to be jolly
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
|
no, i value the conclusions made from such things. because if there was no purpose such as a conclusive meaning or appropriate action, for what people are, essentially, talking about these days, on a daily motivation to keep discussing topics with people, they talk to, mostly, online. i know you don't like that, but it's called "common interests". but the point of the above posts, indubitably, is to to show that what rootcomplex and Loaded Shaman post about, in regards to their "super rationalism", i've readily covered in my findings, already...so...they lambasting me, is stupid. because we mostly agree. oh and that their posts are just "long-winded" as me, and they use just as much "big words" *facepalm* as i do...so their complaints about me aren't even well-founded. if you will, that's *why* the diatribe above...because they insist that they've found some new evaluation of things, which, alas, is not so new, and not so revelatory, because i've already covered alot the same ground, and it doesn't a: jive well with most people, and b: is incomplete, and c: involves the use of language to describe things...and not..."actions" or "codes" or "motivations", not any, at least, that doesn't involve the brain...which uses language to think thoughts, either that, or pure emotion.
Quote:
so, you are accusing the other apes of throwing bags of philosophy at you to justify extra poundage of miscellaneous verbiage hewn back at them, primarily, so to speak.
you fight verbal fires with verbal fires. extinguishing with a bucket of water isn't going to stop the verbal conclusion of conflagration, because they don't quit. you know that. and what about "justification"? don't give me that...you are justified in using your language to describer your ideas, freely, right? you don't need justification for that, do you?
the main take away from the actual theory, if it was to be sussed, instead of fought against with misapprehension: is that involuntary interoceptive subconscious action is a form of langauge [or communication, but i contend that these concepts conflate and fuse together, at this point, as in manticism, the direct perception of things, objects in the world.
Edited by akira_akuma (12/24/19 02:16 PM)
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
so, you are accusing the other apes of throwing bags of philosophy at you to justify extra poundage of miscellaneous verbiage hewn back at them, primarily, so to speak.
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
|
"Modal systems of world-building made from predilections, as opposed to necessary explanatory systems: the world-at-large."
another thing that's pertinent, on-topic, and sorta like what rootcomplex and Loaded Shaman are getting at, in a succinct section of text.
"Ratiocination is the ne plus ultra of any and all examination and theory, sequence, and even trivial notion. All replies on it's abstruse but non-abstract [abstructive] being."
another.
people just don't like my phaneroscopic ponderings. but i do. and it fits in with pretty much all the philosophy of both postmodernism, modernism, classical, ancient and of Tradition, and scientifically [rationalist]. hunger, orientation, time, action, being, etc.
but of course, it is a rhizomatic function, an abstract line, which you all want from me, when, of course, only you can be that line.
look, point being, they put me on ignore for "not being rational", but i am right and they are wrong: the proof is in the simple abduction of reasoning, of ratiocination, rationality: you have conceptual use of ideas thru language: all developed societies and peoples have language [at least rudimentary communication], and this is what helps "install" [if you will] the elements of conceptual ideas which are then built on. so even if the super rationalist wanted the "ground" [being] of his to be entirely without language, he would not have any ability to reach for the stars [again, so to speak] or do anything great. point here is that: hypothetical language [descriptive language of theoretical and hypothetical topology/configuration of subjects, in a field/subfield/interdisciplinary field, of study- which goes beyond merely "topical" forms of "conversation" [prattling] [which rootcomplex said i endorse ["talking for fun", which i never said i "talked for fun", i said "i do these topics for fun", but they utterly confused themselves, apparently] [excuse the nested circumstantial speech, but it's part of my point].
everyone makes the most outlandish assumptions, it's enough to make you want to puke, seriously. then i'm said to be abject [even though putting someone on ignore is abject, because they don't even know you can't read their fucking posts when you take the time to respond to them, even though it's not really the issue, the issue is that it's cowardly, and you can't face opposition to your arguments, which is what they are claiming is their bread-and-butter here].
hopefully people can see thru this...tomfoolery.
Edited by akira_akuma (12/25/19 12:43 AM)
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
|
language is how we cogitate. sorry guys, you need language for everything. oops. sorry, so sorry. go do your great things...or nothing...meditate...just remember to transcend language. [and don't forget compassion.]
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
|
i hope this thread is dead, because what would be the point of me being here [selfish right], especially considering [particularly considering]
a: i'm right b: they aren't saying anything right in reference to me c: they will talk amongst themselves but won't take any contention with a grain of salt, and take it personally, even though they're still wrong and they confuse what is ratiocination and what isn't, because they deny that they are using the tools that were laid out before their eyes by men before them, and by men before even them, still, and that those tools are forever needed to progress further, whether by experiential or other means, by "knowledge", "intelligence", "recognition", or "apprehension", or what have you.
Edited by akira_akuma (12/25/19 12:55 AM)
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said: language is how we cogitate. sorry guys, you need language for everything. oops. sorry, so sorry. go do your great things...or nothing...meditate...just remember to transcend language. [and don't forget compassion.]
still no clue
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
|
that's pretty sad.
anyways, before rootcomplex or LoadedShaman even arrived on these shores, i was postulating the same ratiocination over empiricism arguments they are trying to claim is the idea that "i don't get", which is foolish, considering the explanans to the explanadum, presented in this thread, in all it's largess. i have postulated everything that they are claiming to represent above me, and my "ability" [according to LoadedShaman] to apprehend rationalism [i have, in propositional form, in a sense, "air-tight"].
i don't care if you "can't comprehend" something, you're just...not trying to. you're not even trying to. none of you are. you're all just full of yourselves. 
the only thing there is to evince here is how much like me you all really are...both "in theory", and in your need/wont to prove yourself correct, like right now, coming back with this weak retort, as if it will vindicate you and make me look silly. see? you do the same things.
i'm in the right here. you all can't say you're doing something any "better", more "reserved", "less difficult", "more respectful", et al. none of these ideals can apply. you're all like me...you don't care if you are difficult, to push people to their limits or to prove yourself right and them wrong, this is what you are all doing. you can't deny it. i win. this time. i win. because none of you have outdone me, or yourselves.
|
kitten6
hiker

Registered: 05/13/19
Posts: 96
Loc: UK 0161
Last seen: 17 hours, 56 minutes
|
|
i think a good way of thinking about it is, like in a computer.
A computer has a cpu, that cpu has all kinds of logic circuits which can be referred to by a standard instruction set.
think of language as an instruction set. The larger the instruction set, the more complex the design of the cpu, however it allows instructions to be done in less cycles, using more advanced instructions making it more time efficient. But due to complex design less power efficient.
However, you can use a smaller instruction set. This makes your CPU design much more simple, and energy efficient. However due to the lack of instructions, the more basic instructions have to be combined to complete the same task as more complex instructions, this uses more cycles though taking more time.
Theoretically, every instruction set boils down to a few major instructions that serve as a basis for every other instruction made possible in larger instruction sets. These instructions are things like times, divide, add, subtract, allocate, wipe, point, these kinds of things.
The same can be done for language,
more instructions means (more time efficiency, less power efficiency) less instructions means (less time efficiency, more power efficiency)
lets say power is equivalent to literacy rate (how many people who can use every instruction in the language) because i guess having more speakers will make your language more powerful (amplitude) and more instructions to learn makes a language more difficult to learn for example arabic or chinese (before education became mainstream).
and time is equivalent to well... time.
all languages boil down to a common set of instructions, common denominator, but i guess its hard to pinpoint what the common denominator when we're still debating over what language actually is.
But still I'm not convinced that language can portray everything. Like some things when I'm tripping they transcend our dimensional philosophies. Its like we're discussing in 4D philosophy now im trippin on some 8D shit. Ever tried nutmeg?
I get that when on shrooms and acid and whatnot, for me the words just come bubbling up out of god damn nowhere. But each word is only about 78% accurate which is still pretty good, but I think to get 100% accuracy your gonna need an infinite amount of time, and might aswell take an infinite amount of words while I'm at it to bring the time down, even though I just discussed that it can still be achieved with limited words.
its like the line trying to hit the asymptote, you get almost infinitely close but never there never there. unless you let the line graph itself infinitely long,
time is a mountain range, you hiking along it forever and ever
but who knows, google about to do this quantum computing shite. Who knows where we'll end up after that. Maybe we're all gonna be walking around with 5D quantum translators in the afterlife. Who knows. god knows.
|
kitten6
hiker

Registered: 05/13/19
Posts: 96
Loc: UK 0161
Last seen: 17 hours, 56 minutes
|
|
look man if you wanna prove that your right go start a seperate thread, is akira_akuma rational? I think that would be a good one in the philosophy section.
But don't go making others play your game in someone else's thread.
|
RJ Tubs 202


Registered: 09/20/08
Posts: 6,016
Loc: USA
Last seen: 1 hour, 21 minutes
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said:
you're all just full of yourselves.
Well, we should all be able to agree on that fact!
I can't decide if I should read this whole thread in it's entirety, so I can better understand what is being discussed, or if I should go take a hot bath. For the moment, I've done a couple of searches to try to understand the meaning of "phaneroscopic" ponderings.
|
redgreenvines
irregular verb


Registered: 04/08/04
Posts: 37,532
|
|
bath, totally rocks!
--------------------
_ 🧠 _
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
Re: Language [Re: kitten6] 1
#26401361 - 12/26/19 09:15 AM (4 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
RJ Tubs 202 said:
Quote:
akira_akuma said:
you're all just full of yourselves.
Well, we should all be able to agree on that fact!
I can't decide if I should read this whole thread in it's entirety, so I can better understand what is being discussed, or if I should go take a hot bath. For the moment, I've done a couple of searches to try to understand the meaning of "phaneroscopic" ponderings.
⚔ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phaneron
"The phaneron (Greek φανερός [phaneros] "visible, manifest") is the subject matter of phenomenology, or of what Charles Sanders Peirce later called phaneroscopy. The term, which was introduced in 1905, is similar to the concept of the "phenomenon" in the way it meant "whatever is present at any time to the mind in any way".
Quote:
kitten6 said: look man if you wanna prove that your right go start a seperate thread, is akira_akuma rational? I think that would be a good one in the philosophy section.
But don't go making others play your game in someone else's thread.
thread starter doesn't have a problem with it. you all have a problem with someone being invasive instead of pandering arguments to you all, when you all won't even argue back, you just insult. since none of you are being genuine in your opposition against my statements, i opt for for full force invasion of ideas. sorry for the fangs, but without fangs, you'd just run roughshod over me. you agree with me, and you made a big big post...so? aren't you doing what i've done? what else am i doing, that is different than what you are doing? tell me.
Edited by akira_akuma (12/26/19 11:44 AM)
|
kitten6
hiker

Registered: 05/13/19
Posts: 96
Loc: UK 0161
Last seen: 17 hours, 56 minutes
|
|
i think from the looks of things, obviously I haven't been around on shroomery for that long, I don't know what kinda guy you are, I'm not trying to direct any insults at you, because I haven't insulted you and neither has anyone on this thread.
I think you misunderstand, we're not trying to argue with you, we're trying to have a debate/discussion about the limits of language with you.
What are your thoughts on the limits of language? If you have something to contribute we wanna hear it because that's what this thread is all about.
|
r00tcmplx
Stranger

Registered: 02/19/18
Posts: 419
Last seen: 3 years, 11 months
|
|
Quote:
kitten6 said: i think a good way of thinking about it is, like in a computer...
 Indeed. Convo boils down to : https://www.microcontrollertips.com/risc-vs-cisc-architectures-one-better/
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
|
Quote:
What are your thoughts on the limits of language? If you have something to contribute we wanna hear it because that's what this thread is all about.
i already made my contributions here, they were mostly insulted. but not too harshly, i guess; i don't mean to complain. but alas, i haven't even seen you in this thread, 'til now. i don't think i was trying to come off as harsh to you, if i was, sorry.
PS:
here, this video i made is on my theoretical take about language. rootcomplex put me on ignore simply because he i thought i didn't share his views...i made the video encompassing those views...before he came to them. which is ironic.
|
DividedQuantum
Outer Head


Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,818
|
|
Clearly, ultimately, the infinite totality of nature cannot be encompassed by anything, including language. Or it wouldn't be infinite, and it wouldn't be one.
-------------------- Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici
|
|