Home | Community | Message Board

World Seed Supply
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | < Back | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | Next > | Last >
Offlinelifeiswhatyoumake
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/30/11
Posts: 17,363
Last seen: 4 hours, 38 minutes
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: LogicaL Chaos] * 2
    #26334331 - 11/20/19 07:30 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

LogicaL Chaos said:


Too fuckin classic! :awebig:






That is an amazing picture! 
I was unsure of Sondland at first during the hearings today, but after hours of watching I like him.  I think he is just trying to do the right thing and say the truth. Good man. :thumbup:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 107,128
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 56 minutes, 35 seconds
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: Patlal]
    #26334336 - 11/20/19 07:32 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Patlal said:
I love how you guys talk as if you know all the details of everything and how everyone involved in this thinks.

You guys are materializing a storyline that fits your narrative.

None of you guys were there.
None of you guys know what happened behind closed doors
None of you guys knows what was said behind closed doors.

And yet.  You post in this thread as if you know what you're talking about.

It's very entertaining. Keep going.




Wtf are you taking about. We know what happened behind closed doors because people behind those doors have been telling us. There’s really no doubt what happened. The question is whether he should be impeached for it.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 107,128
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 56 minutes, 35 seconds
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: lifeiswhatyoumake]
    #26334344 - 11/20/19 07:37 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

lifeiswhatyoumake said:
Quote:

LogicaL Chaos said:


Too fuckin classic! :awebig:






That is an amazing picture! 
I was unsure of Sondland at first during the hearings today, but after hours of watching I like him.  I think he is just trying to do the right thing and say the truth. Good man. :thumbup:




The timing of the Stone trial and conviction was perfect. I think he had to decide whether it was worth lying for trump and stone demonstrates what happens to people who choose to cover for the president.

Sondland is rich and doesn’t need Trump for relevance. He’s not a sycophant.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 107,128
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 56 minutes, 35 seconds
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: koods] * 1
    #26334347 - 11/20/19 07:39 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

This seems like a significant development. Nunes should be on the other side of the dais.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/lev-parnas-helped-rep-devin-nunes-investigations

Quote:

Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani, helped arrange meetings and calls in Europe for Rep. Devin Nunes in 2018, Parnas’  lawyer Ed MacMahon told The Daily Beast.

Nunes aide Derek Harvey participated in the meetings, the lawyer said, which were arranged to help Nunes’ investigative work. MacMahon didn’t specify what those investigations entailed.




--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinePatlal
You ask too many questions
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/09/10
Posts: 44,849
Loc: Ottawa Flag
Last seen: 44 minutes, 26 seconds
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: koods]
    #26334430 - 11/20/19 08:39 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

koods said:
Quote:

Patlal said:
I love how you guys talk as if you know all the details of everything and how everyone involved in this thinks.

You guys are materializing a storyline that fits your narrative.

None of you guys were there.
None of you guys know what happened behind closed doors
None of you guys knows what was said behind closed doors.

And yet.  You post in this thread as if you know what you're talking about.

It's very entertaining. Keep going.




Wtf are you taking about. We know what happened behind closed doors because people behind those doors have been telling us. There’s really no doubt what happened. The question is whether he should be impeached for it.




The only thing people behind closed doors have been telling us is what they can tell us so they can keep their jobs and titles.  People are selfish.  They will say what they can to defend themselves and those who can help them.

It's human nature.

Stop pretending to know better...


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineLogicaL ChaosM
Ascension Energy & Alien UFOs
Male User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 05/12/07
Posts: 70,093
Loc: The Inexpressible... Flag
Last seen: 2 days, 20 hours
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: Patlal] * 1
    #26334520 - 11/20/19 09:37 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

And your narrative is people will lie to keep their jobs. What about people telling the Truth for the love of their country? Or people telling the Truth as part of their job to the government they work for? Is not "human nature" as well?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 107,128
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 56 minutes, 35 seconds
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: Patlal]
    #26334543 - 11/20/19 09:56 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Patlal said:
Quote:

koods said:
Quote:

Patlal said:
I love how you guys talk as if you know all the details of everything and how everyone involved in this thinks.

You guys are materializing a storyline that fits your narrative.

None of you guys were there.
None of you guys know what happened behind closed doors
None of you guys knows what was said behind closed doors.

And yet.  You post in this thread as if you know what you're talking about.

It's very entertaining. Keep going.




Wtf are you taking about. We know what happened behind closed doors because people behind those doors have been telling us. There’s really no doubt what happened. The question is whether he should be impeached for it.




The only thing people behind closed doors have been telling us is what they can tell us so they can keep their jobs and titles. .




Explain how this works in this situation. How does testifying that there was a quid pro quo help them keep their jobs? Seriously. You need to justify this baseless opinion.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 8 months, 8 days
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: koods]
    #26334583 - 11/20/19 10:26 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

Says the guy who denies the existence of an establishment.  :lol:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblecannabinated
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 01/03/13
Posts: 14,743
Loc: Outside Flag
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26334592 - 11/20/19 10:31 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

the rights goin down this time :mad:


were gunna rub ur nose in it

good luck :wink:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 8 months, 8 days
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: cannabinated]
    #26334607 - 11/20/19 10:43 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

cannabinated said:
the rights goin down this time :mad:


were gunna rub ur nose in it

good luck :wink:



I'm not rooting for Trump.  You might recall I just said this:

Quote:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
I personally think Trump and Biden are both corrupt.



And if you want evidence Biden and the Democrats are corrupt, here's some:

Ukrainian MP Claims $7.4 Billion Obama-Linked Laundering, Puts Biden Group Take At $16.5 Million
Joe Biden’s Family Has Been Cashing in on His Career for Decades. Democrats Need to Acknowledge That.

And this makes it all the better:

Democrats Reject GOP Subpoena Requests
Quote:

House Intelligence Committee Democrats voted down Republican efforts to subpoena the unidentified whistle-blower and Joe Biden’s son Hunter to appear for closed-door depositions.

Also rejected along party lines were GOP subpoena requests for records on Democratic National Committee communications with Ukrainian government officials and for records from a company related to Hunter Biden’s position on the Burisma Holdings board of directors.

Republicans say they’ve been barred from calling witnesses they contend could show that Trump had reason to seek investigations of the Bidens and Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election. They also want to question the whistle-blower about factual issues and the person’s motives for acting.



You may be right.  Trump is going up against the establishment, so he'll probably lose.


I mean, without knowing who the players are, what's worse?

1.  Being corrupt
2.  Going after someone who is corrupt because you might soon run against them.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 107,128
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 56 minutes, 35 seconds
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26334617 - 11/20/19 10:51 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

You don’t actually have a problem with corruption when you think it’s being used to bring down the establishment. That’s why you defend trumps blatantly corrupt behavior: “Trump is going up against the establishment,”


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 8 months, 8 days
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: koods]
    #26334629 - 11/20/19 11:02 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

I'm not sure how stating a fact is supporting Trump.  :shrug:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 107,128
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 56 minutes, 35 seconds
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26334649 - 11/20/19 11:21 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

You haven’t stated a fact


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekoods
Ribbit
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 107,128
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 56 minutes, 35 seconds
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: koods]
    #26334667 - 11/20/19 11:34 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

Why was it necessary for Zelensky to publicly announce an investigation into Biden on American TV to get a meeting at the White House? What does a public announcement have to do with a proper investigation? That’s not how an investigation works. You do the investigation, then if you found wrong doing, then you make a public announcement.

The sad part is that it’s simply impossible for an actual investigation of Biden to happen now since trump has completely politicized it.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 8 months, 8 days
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: koods]
    #26334680 - 11/20/19 11:40 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

koods said:
Why was it necessary for Zelensky to publicly announce an investigation into Biden on American TV to get a meeting at the White House? What does a public announcement have to do with a proper investigation? That’s not how an investigation works. You do the investigation, then if you found wrong doing, then you make a public announcement.

The sad part is that it’s simply impossible for an actual investigation of Biden to happen now since trump has completely politicized it.



I agree.  :shrug:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblecannabinated
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 01/03/13
Posts: 14,743
Loc: Outside Flag
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: koods] * 1
    #26334681 - 11/20/19 11:41 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

i mean no one is taking biden seriously right?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblecannabinated
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 01/03/13
Posts: 14,743
Loc: Outside Flag
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: koods]
    #26334685 - 11/20/19 11:42 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

....as a presidential candidate

he was talking about beating up me too'ers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 8 months, 8 days
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: koods] * 2
    #26334688 - 11/20/19 11:44 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

koods said:
Quote:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:

koods said:
You defend trumps blatantly corrupt behavior: “Trump is going up against the establishment,”



I'm not sure how stating a fact is supporting Trump.  :shrug:



You haven’t stated a fact



It's pretty obvious that there's an establishment of rich people who work with politicians and the media to keep themselves wealthy at our expense.  You not believing this doesn't make it not true, it just makes you appear ignorant.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblecannabinated
I'm a teapot User Gallery


Registered: 01/03/13
Posts: 14,743
Loc: Outside Flag
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26334692 - 11/20/19 11:45 PM (4 years, 5 months ago)

the government is being brokered to rich ppl by epstein


full circle

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMorel Guy
Stranger
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/23/13
Posts: 15,577
Last seen: 4 years, 4 months
Re: Impeachment Hearings Chat [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26335101 - 11/21/19 06:31 AM (4 years, 5 months ago)

Trump going against the establishment?

I don't think so.  Which establishment?  Because he did align himself with the Christian right which is very much establishment.  The good ol boy Republican club.


--------------------
"in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur"

In filth it will be found in dung it will be found

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | < Back | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | Next > | Last >

Shop: PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* The Impeachment of Bush.
( 1 2 3 4 ... 9 10 all )
THE KRAT BARON 12,394 185 08/06/05 09:39 AM
by Los_Pepes
* Impeach Blair Xlea321 1,213 13 08/28/04 07:52 AM
by Xlea321
* European Parliament Endorses EU Constitution heidegger 583 1 01/14/05 05:19 PM
by Alan Stone
* Canadian supreme court to hear pot laws challenge
( 1 2 all )
carbonhoots 1,910 23 04/08/03 02:29 PM
by friartuck
* impeachment
( 1 2 3 all )
brainlessjon 2,638 45 10/19/06 12:22 PM
by Seuss
* Impeaching Bush
( 1 2 all )
Economist 2,008 20 11/13/06 01:31 AM
by The_Red_Crayon
* Is lying about the reason for a war an impeachable offense?
( 1 2 all )
LearyfanS 3,464 38 06/20/03 05:08 PM
by Anonymous
* Have Ariel Sharon Impeached!
( 1 2 all )
nugsarenice 3,183 34 06/04/02 06:03 PM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
20,732 topic views. 3 members, 3 guests and 12 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.032 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 15 queries.