relic said:

meltdowner said:

Trump baby is phinna win big in 2020.

---

What does that mean?

Looked it up and found its a brand of cosmetics.  Trump baby is cosmetics win big?  Makes no sense.

---

The Ecstatic said:

What am I lying about?

---

XUL said:

Biden

---

I think everyone on this forum can agree Biden is awful

YangSupporter said:

The Ecstatic said:

What am I lying about?

---

You claimed Yangs a right wing libertarian he isn't. You attribute malice to Yangs intentions again a disgusting tactic. You claim his record is problematic it isn't. You also tried to claim his immigration plan was somehow bad when even Sanders is not to different. I think its fair to say I have the moral high ground in this argument since I am not spreading lies about your candidate and I am fine with you not supporting mine.

---

The Ecstatic said:

He isn’t necessarily corrupt. Just a standard venture capital opportunist.

---

The Ecstatic said:

you make it sound like Andrew yang opened his own deli or something.

Both his parents are wealthy. He went to law school and then became a corporate lawyer. Then he joined an education nonprofit before selling out to Kaplan (a notoriously shitty for profit school corp).


Honestly VFA isn’t even that bad.

---

I'm fine with all that. Hes better than Warren hes not pretending to be a native american

The Ecstatic said:

It’s not fine to me.

You don’t get to play the game, win the game, and then run for office on the premise that you hate the game and want to change it. Running for office is simply the next stage of the game for people like Yang and Warren.

---

YangSupporter said:

The Ecstatic said:

It’s not fine to me.

You don’t get to play the game, win the game, and then run for office on the premise that you hate the game and want to change it. Running for office is simply the next stage of the game for people like Yang and Warren.

---

Sanders isn't a communist though... Hes a multi millionaire he also won the game.

---

The Ecstatic said:

YangSupporter said:

The Ecstatic said:

It’s not fine to me.

You don’t get to play the game, win the game, and then run for office on the premise that you hate the game and want to change it. Running for office is simply the next stage of the game for people like Yang and Warren.

---

Sanders isn't a communist though... Hes a multi millionaire he also won the game.

---

Sanders is a millionaire because he’s got a congressional salary, wrote a NYt best seller, and is 124 years old.

Are you really questioning the motivation of Sanders’ political agenda?

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

I'm a millionaire, and I don't make nearly as much as a congressman does.  $2.5 million isn't that much for someone in Congress.

---

The Ecstatic said:

YangSupporter said:

The Ecstatic said:

What am I lying about?

---

You claimed Yangs a right wing libertarian he isn't. You attribute malice to Yangs intentions again a disgusting tactic. You claim his record is problematic it isn't. You also tried to claim his immigration plan was somehow bad when even Sanders is not to different. I think its fair to say I have the moral high ground in this argument since I am not spreading lies about your candidate and I am fine with you not supporting mine.

---

Really grasping at straws here bud.

1. I didn’t say he was right wing. I said he was a libertarian. A left winger coined the term libertarian. I make this statement because of his desire to create a welfare state while largely leaving private industry untouched. Not to mention UBI being an absolute gift to that industry.

2. I didn’t attribute malice either. Malice would be John Delaney deliberately lying on stage about M4A in order to muddy the waters.  Yang doesn’t have to be malicious to be wrong, or disingenuous. If making half truths and disingenuous rhetoric is malicious then every candidate is doing so, Sanders included.

3. His record is absolutely problematic.

4. His immigration plan is bad. It’s considerably worse than Sanders’ plan, which I can admit is not so great itself. Yang’s own website starts off his immigration plan by claiming we need southern border security strengthened because of all the illegals and drugs flowing into our country. This is boilerplate right wing rhetoric, which isn’t surprising because he does the same in a lot of other areas (circumcision, “family cohesion,” anti pornography). He very clearly panders to the right.

---

The Ecstatic said:

. Yang’s life trajectory is closer to Trump’s than it is Sanders’.

---

Ok dude its clear you have a massive chip on your shoulder. I'm not going to take you seriously anymore. I'm glad most Americans aren't like you.

The Ecstatic said:

1. I didn’t say he was right wing. I said he was a libertarian. A left winger coined the term libertarian. I make this statement because of his desire to create a welfare state while largely leaving private industry untouched. Not to mention UBI being an absolute gift to that industry.

---

The Ecstatic said:

2. I didn’t attribute malice either. Malice would be John Delaney deliberately lying on stage about M4A in order to muddy the waters.  Yang doesn’t have to be malicious to be wrong, or disingenuous. If making half truths and disingenuous rhetoric is malicious then every candidate is doing so, Sanders included.

---

The Ecstatic said:

3. His record is absolutely problematic.

---

The Ecstatic said:

4. His immigration plan is bad. It’s considerably worse than Sanders’ plan, which I can admit is not so great itself. Yang’s own website starts off his immigration plan by claiming we need southern border security strengthened because of all the illegals and drugs flowing into our country. This is boilerplate right wing rhetoric, which isn’t surprising because he does the same in a lot of other areas (circumcision, “family cohesion,” anti pornography). He very clearly panders to the right.

---