Near Dylan said:

I looked it up and firefighters are not at all trained in building demolition. Let alone "years of training". Dont know where he got that and dont kno why he's so upset about it lol.

---

christopera said:

waves said:

Make sure you watch this video, it really does do a good job of demonstrating how easily a steel structure would be compromised by heat.

The steel doesn't need to melt or even begin to melt to be totally fucked. It just needs to be hot

The other reason I doubt the alternative theories is the thousands of people involved in the investigation and clean up. Were all those people in on it? Something would've leaked by now

---

I said that back on like page two. I even went to semi-detail on how steel is compromised with heat, giving specific figures that are backed up sources.

Yet here are at page five.

---

Citizen X said:

Near Dylan said:

I looked it up and firefighters are not at all trained in building demolition. Let alone "years of training". Dont know where he got that and dont kno why he's so upset about it lol.

---

Years of training in fighting fires.

---

That's our point.  How is that supposed to teach them what a building demolition sounds like?

Citizen X said:

I mean if you’re going to go full retard expect people to treat you like like a retarded person

If you want to have a conversation and be an honest debater we can have an honest debate but if you’re gonna act stupid and be a shitbird troll, I’m going to call a shitbird troll. I’m not being mean

Think of it like this

If you act like a child you get treated like a child. You come here and act like a man I’ll treat like like a man

I don’t care either way is fine for me

---

So no answer on how they are experienced at recognizing building demolition?  Just more ad hominem attacks instead?

Par for the course for you. 

Near Dylan said:

How bout this dude, huh? Lol. Seems like a nice, mentally stable chap

---

Citizen X said:

I can get onboard that planes hit the WTC buildings and blew off enough of the fire proofing to melt steel and cause the A36 steel to weaken and fall. The fashion in which they fell will always blow my mind because it doesn’t seem natural.

As no plane hit building 7 there’s no natural explanation here as to why this fireproofing failed.

Edit: in before someone says but the steel in the concrete cores. That’s made with rebar not the same steel used in the construction

---

Citizen X said:

I can get onboard that planes hit the WTC buildings and blew off enough of the fire proofing to melt steel and cause the A36 steel to weaken and fall. The fashion in which they fell will always blow my mind because it doesn’t seem natural.

As no plane hit building 7 there’s no natural explanation here as to why this fireproofing failed.

Edit: in before someone says but the steel in the concrete cores. That’s made with rebar not the same steel used in the construction

---

Citizen X said:

I can get onboard that planes hit the WTC buildings and blew off enough of the fire proofing to melt steel and cause the A36 steel to weaken and fall. The fashion in which they fell will always blow my mind because it doesn’t seem natural.

As no plane hit building 7 there’s no natural explanation here as to why this fireproofing failed.

Edit: in before someone says but the steel in the concrete cores. That’s made with rebar not the same steel used in the construction

---

Citizen X said:

Nobody here is going to argue a firefighter is trained in demolition. I am saying that with years of training and experience would help them identify the difference between an explosion and something else

---