Home | Community | Message Board

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Kraken Kratom Shop: Red Vein Kratom

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Invisiblefunkymonk
Get's down, withthe get-down.
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/29/02
Posts: 8,160
Loc: saskatchewan
SuperScan
    #2610364 - 04/28/04 02:29 AM (19 years, 11 months ago)

So I'm up late, I'm bored, and I started scanning my IP range, scanning 20 at a time..
This program reports back that xx many host's are live, then it starts tcp/udp scans
then i lose my network connection..

what's up with this? is there a ip in the range that's causing this? is it the program? is it my homemade cable? I know it may be alot of thing's, but what are your guy's idea's?




****all the above is pure fiction, no ports where harmed, scanned, fingered, or violated in anyway*********

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinenife
I'm Dead
Male
Registered: 12/26/03
Posts: 225
Last seen: 1 year, 3 months
Re: SuperScan [Re: funkymonk]
    #2610382 - 04/28/04 02:37 AM (19 years, 11 months ago)

I bet you are flooding your connection, try using fewer threads on your scan. Also it may be that your cpu can't handle all of the new connections its trying to make at once. we're talking thousands of ports to try on each and every host. You do the math thats kinda a lot. Though on a good connection its easily do-able.


--------------------
Protect Your Rights
Freedom Card

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblefunkymonk
Get's down, withthe get-down.
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/29/02
Posts: 8,160
Loc: saskatchewan
Re: SuperScan [Re: nife]
    #2610974 - 04/28/04 10:32 AM (19 years, 11 months ago)

i've got a good connection, good computer, so that's not the case..
I shall scan a smaller range of ip's..with a smaller range of ports to scan...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offline3DSHROOM
loon
Male

Registered: 04/19/99
Posts: 2,878
Last seen: 11 years, 2 months
Re: SuperScan [Re: funkymonk]
    #2612972 - 04/28/04 07:20 PM (19 years, 11 months ago)

Most ISP's don't like you mass scanning IPs/ports.


--------------------
Your friendly neighborhood loon

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblefunkymonk
Get's down, withthe get-down.
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/29/02
Posts: 8,160
Loc: saskatchewan
Re: SuperScan [Re: funkymonk]
    #2613438 - 04/28/04 09:16 PM (19 years, 11 months ago)

fair enough,

but do you think that is what disconnected me?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offline3DSHROOM
loon
Male

Registered: 04/19/99
Posts: 2,878
Last seen: 11 years, 2 months
Re: SuperScan [Re: funkymonk]
    #2613828 - 04/28/04 10:47 PM (19 years, 11 months ago)

Hard to say really..


--------------------
Your friendly neighborhood loon

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblezeta
Stranger

Registered: 05/24/02
Posts: 3,972
Re: SuperScan [Re: funkymonk]
    #2613866 - 04/28/04 10:57 PM (19 years, 11 months ago)

I'd say your ISP probably disconnected you

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinenife
I'm Dead
Male
Registered: 12/26/03
Posts: 225
Last seen: 1 year, 3 months
Re: SuperScan [Re: zeta]
    #2614417 - 04/29/04 01:11 AM (19 years, 11 months ago)

I SERIOUSLY doubt your isp disconnected you. Take it from someone who used to scan from a 10mbit. Its really not that hard to flood a connection with a scan. I could do it with 50 hosts doing a full portscan on each. so assuming you have like a 2.5 mbit connection(a good comcast cable) then 12 or so hosts doing full portscan would just about fill your conection. Not with data, just the connections in and out are time consuming and windows TCP/IP stack isn't the greatest.

ISP's don't just pull the plug and then put it back on. Basically if they are going to shut you down for scanning, you aren't going to get it back without a phone call and a good reason for scanning.


--------------------
Protect Your Rights
Freedom Card

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblefunkymonk
Get's down, withthe get-down.
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/29/02
Posts: 8,160
Loc: saskatchewan
Re: SuperScan [Re: nife]
    #2615649 - 04/29/04 11:04 AM (19 years, 11 months ago)

"but ISP customer service guy, it must be a virus"

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleTinMan
Stranger

Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 2,956
Loc: Russia
Re: SuperScan [Re: nife]
    #2618507 - 04/29/04 08:18 PM (19 years, 11 months ago)

Consider it a warning. There are automated scripts that look for this type of scanning. No human interaction is needed to disconnect a customer. ISPs don't care if its legit scanning or not, portscanning is portscanning.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Kraken Kratom Shop: Red Vein Kratom


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Airport scans for illegal downloads white_noise 1,319 14 07/14/08 07:19 AM
by Lana
* Brain Scan Reveals Intentions DiploidM 744 2 02/12/07 02:14 PM
by RuNE
* Surprise! Scans Suggest Hackers Put IMSI-Catchers All Over Defcon tdubz 189 0 08/14/16 04:45 AM
by tdubz
* Win10 wireless disconnect issue RogerRabbitM 789 4 03/31/17 08:20 AM
by BtC
* Clamwin scan results: permision denied Epilson Lyrae 4,177 6 01/21/10 07:00 AM
by abetterlie
* invalid scan freq. CosmicJokeM 751 2 05/18/06 02:02 PM
by CosmicJoke
* Edit scanned text robbyberto 626 6 01/21/09 08:09 PM
by SheerTerror
* Is it possible to code a program that will scan facebook profiles & collect data? bongoboy2000 1,051 5 10/11/10 05:33 PM
by BadAcid

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: trendal, automan, Northerner
699 topic views. 0 members, 0 guests and 1 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 14 queries.