No he did not, although he tried inappropriately to assert it. Although it is different to say it alters consciousness vs. it is a functioning neurotransmitter.
check out this exert from a reply to the Nichols paper you refer to:
Barker, S. A. (2018). *N,N-dimethyltryptamine facts and myths. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 32(7), 820–821.*doi:10.1177/0269881118767648
Here is some exerts from the reply to Nichols assertion:
I write concerning the review article “N,N-dimethyltryptamine and the pineal gland: Separating fact from myth”, authored by David E. Nichols and recently published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology (Nichols, 2018). It appears the peer review process has failed you. In his effort to “separate fact from myth”, the reviewers and Journal failed to note that the author is actually attempting to create a myth about N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) all his own. The author states at the opening: “This review will essentially focus on whether or not DMT is produced in the human body. More specifically, is DMT produced in the human body, and especially by the pineal gland in physiologically relevant amounts? It seems clear that DMT can be produced in the body, as well as by the pineal gland, in extremely tiny amounts (Barker et al., 2012, 2013), but the more important issue is whether those amounts are sufficient to affect human physiology”. However, neither of the two references cited provide any data as to the concentration of DMT in the brain in general or the pineal gland specifically. Nonetheless, he is correct that more than adequate data have been produced in the scientific literature proving that DMT, a potent hallucinogen, is produced in vivo. However, the myth the author wishes to create is that DMT is produced in the pineal gland “in extremely tiny amounts,” a scientifically meaningless description. His myth is then extrapolated to the conclusion that the role of endogenous DMT is, therefore, insignificant. The facts are that there has yet to be any study quantitating DMT in this gland or surrounding brain structures. Knowing the actual concentration of DMT is a sine qua non for Nichols’ review and the topics he discussed.
.....
Thus, neither Nichols nor anyone else knows the concentrations of DMT in rat pineal gland, much less that of humans. Accordingly, it was inappropriate and scientifically unfounded for Nichols to base his review, dismissing an abundance of previously published peer-reviewed research in the process, solely on his pretense that DMT is only produced “in extremely tiny amounts”. The only existing published data regarding DMT’s presence in pineal gland does not, as described, lend itself to such a determination. Indeed, Nichols stated in his presentation that he is basing his opinion solely on the fact that a very sensitive technique (LC/MS/MS) was used and is either ignoring or unaware of the factors affecting such measurements or estimations as outlined in the points outlined above.
It is unfortunate that the Journal of Psychopharmacology published what constitutes a far-from-rigorous critique, motivated, it would appear, by opposition to ideas and opinions expressed in a documentary movie, a popular book, and various blogs and websites. It is certainly not based on actual published science. In so doing, Nichols appears determined to discourage legitimate, rigorous scientific research into the biosynthesis and function of DMT, an endogenous psychedelic substance. No one yet knows what DMT is doing in the brain or what physiological role it may or may not perform. We remain curious as to why a known hallucinogen is present in the brain. Only hypothesis-driven, objective, open-minded research will determine what is fact and what is myth, something Nichols’ opinionpiece does not accomplish.
Nichols reply back (small bit):
Contrary to Dr Barker’s assertion, I am not “determined to discourage legitimate, rigorous scientific research into the biosynthesis and function of DMT…” To the contrary, I would love to see a study that actually quantifies the absolute amounts of DMT produced by the pineal, or present in the blood, over a 24 h period. I am willing to be proved wrong, but please, do the experiment!
Looks like he was proved wrong!
Edited by cbeveridge3 (06/28/19 12:03 PM)
|