|
XUL
OTD Janitor



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 28,261
Loc: America
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: Morel Guy]
#26189747 - 09/15/19 12:39 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Yo, do you shoot?
--------------------
TRUMP 2020
|
PreparationH
apply daily

Registered: 03/28/05
Posts: 18,359
Loc: Amsterdam
Last seen: 1 day, 22 hours
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: XUL] 1
#26189770 - 09/15/19 12:46 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
The founders were ok with you owning a warship and cannons, to think they believed firearms technology would not advance much is very untrue.
I bought a $700 S&W M&P Sport 2 as my frist rifle then dumped a ton of money into it, changed out everything so far but the lower, upper, and barrel.
I plan to swap those parts too and reassemble the stock Sport 2 and the other will be totally custom at that point. I am thinking BCM/aero/geissele parts
|
christopera
Stranger


Registered: 10/13/17
Posts: 14,471
Last seen: 8 minutes, 22 seconds
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: PreparationH] 1
#26189773 - 09/15/19 12:51 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
PreparationH said: The founders were ok with you owning a warship and cannons, to think they believed firearms technology would not advance much is very untrue.
Proof?
-------------------- Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result. A Dorito is pizza, change my mind. Bank and Union with The Shroomery at the Zuul on The internet - now with %'s and things I’m sorry it had to be me.
|
XUL
OTD Janitor



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 28,261
Loc: America
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: PreparationH]
#26189775 - 09/15/19 12:52 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Nice man.
How did you know this about the founders?
--------------------
TRUMP 2020
|
PreparationH
apply daily

Registered: 03/28/05
Posts: 18,359
Loc: Amsterdam
Last seen: 1 day, 22 hours
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: XUL]
#26189818 - 09/15/19 01:24 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Why wouldn't the second amendment cover the right to own a cannon, it's just understood. You can own a cannon even today, granted you jump the NFA hoops. In my opinion, I need proof that one could not own a warship and cannon back then, which I have never seen.
|
XUL
OTD Janitor



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 28,261
Loc: America
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: PreparationH]
#26189871 - 09/15/19 01:50 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
PreparationH said: Why wouldn't the second amendment cover the right to own a cannon, it's just understood. You can own a cannon even today, granted you jump the NFA hoops. In my opinion, I need proof that one could not own a warship and cannon back then, which I have never seen.
Well said
--------------------
TRUMP 2020
|
Mycolorado
Hobbyist


Registered: 07/23/16
Posts: 8,567
Loc: Interdimensional Bootcamp
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: XUL]
#26189884 - 09/15/19 01:56 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
XUL said:
Quote:
Loaded Shaman said:
Quote:
Morel Guy said: The 2nd was intended for muskets. They didn't have the hardware available today. Life was incomparable then to today.
And we no longer use printing presses, but computers and smart phones. It's amazing that technology evolves, huh?
Morel guy is unaware that there were semiautos available at the times. As well as repeaters.
Lewis and Clark used one of the first semiautos on their expedition.
I guess that just doesn't fit his narrative.
Indeed, the 2A is not compatible with leftist culture.
But they love making movies about heroes who use guns to save the day.
Hypocrisy.
That’s a pretty loose interpretation of semi-auto considering the shooter has to perform the action of pointing the rifle straight up in order to feed another round into the chamber. With that interpretation, a single action revolver could be considered a “semi-auto”.
|
Morel Guy
Stranger


Registered: 01/23/13
Posts: 15,577
Last seen: 4 years, 4 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: PreparationH]
#26189890 - 09/15/19 01:59 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
PreparationH said: Why wouldn't the second amendment cover the right to own a cannon, it's just understood. You can own a cannon even today, granted you jump the NFA hoops. In my opinion, I need proof that one could not own a warship and cannon back then, which I have never seen.
Actually you could. It is called privateer aka state sanctioned pirate and the foundation of the US Marines.
-------------------- "in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur" In filth it will be found in dung it will be found
|
XUL
OTD Janitor



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 28,261
Loc: America
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: XUL]
#26189906 - 09/15/19 02:07 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
XUL said: Yo, do you shoot?
--------------------
TRUMP 2020
|
Morel Guy
Stranger


Registered: 01/23/13
Posts: 15,577
Last seen: 4 years, 4 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: XUL]
#26189920 - 09/15/19 02:11 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
I have shot several types of fire arms. I no longer shoot because I have a record. I do not miss it. At best it is an expensive hobby. My father owned a variety of fire arms. I was also a boy scout.
-------------------- "in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur" In filth it will be found in dung it will be found
|
XUL
OTD Janitor



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 28,261
Loc: America
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: Morel Guy]
#26189981 - 09/15/19 02:43 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Cool.
Boy scouts rock.
--------------------
TRUMP 2020
|
Morel Guy
Stranger


Registered: 01/23/13
Posts: 15,577
Last seen: 4 years, 4 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: XUL]
#26190005 - 09/15/19 02:54 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
No they don't. It's ok but it's the American version of Hitler Youth. It favors kids that have parents (dad's specifically) and parents that have money.
I've seen poor kids in scouts and they don't get any attention nor great equipment. The kids that parents have money get a lot of attention, badges, dry gear, a lot more opportunities.
-------------------- "in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur" In filth it will be found in dung it will be found
|
Mycolorado
Hobbyist


Registered: 07/23/16
Posts: 8,567
Loc: Interdimensional Bootcamp
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: Morel Guy] 2
#26190007 - 09/15/19 02:56 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Boy Scouts is a great organization...for peds.
|
XUL
OTD Janitor



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 28,261
Loc: America
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: Morel Guy]
#26190074 - 09/15/19 03:31 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
I joined the cub scouts to start, but I left because it was circus shot to me. Prior, I was already building shelters with my father and learning how to hunt and build good fires.
I exited the scouts after 2 days on my own volition and my Father's blessings.
--------------------
TRUMP 2020
|
Morel Guy
Stranger


Registered: 01/23/13
Posts: 15,577
Last seen: 4 years, 4 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: XUL]
#26190083 - 09/15/19 03:33 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
So why do you say scouts were good when you were not a scout?
Building fires are easy.
-------------------- "in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur" In filth it will be found in dung it will be found
|
XUL
OTD Janitor



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 28,261
Loc: America
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: Morel Guy]
#26190086 - 09/15/19 03:34 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
My friend who is camping/living with me was a boy scout and he has fond memories. Further, I didn't quit because of SJW issues.
--------------------
TRUMP 2020
|
Morel Guy
Stranger


Registered: 01/23/13
Posts: 15,577
Last seen: 4 years, 4 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: XUL]
#26190093 - 09/15/19 03:35 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Sjw?
Your friend probably material and personel support.
I liked scouts too but I know the politics of what is what. It is not a charity.
-------------------- "in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur" In filth it will be found in dung it will be found
|
XUL
OTD Janitor



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 28,261
Loc: America
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: Morel Guy]
#26190107 - 09/15/19 03:43 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Others would disagree.
As I am homeless now, our skills come to play in the woods.
--------------------
TRUMP 2020
|
Morel Guy
Stranger


Registered: 01/23/13
Posts: 15,577
Last seen: 4 years, 4 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: XUL]
#26190114 - 09/15/19 03:45 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Why are you homeless?
-------------------- "in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur" In filth it will be found in dung it will be found
|
XUL
OTD Janitor



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 28,261
Loc: America
Last seen: 4 years, 6 months
|
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: Morel Guy]
#26190119 - 09/15/19 03:47 PM (4 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Check OTD Sunday fuck ye morning
Pics I cluded
--------------------
TRUMP 2020
|
|