Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

North Spore Shop: Bulk Substrate

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | | Last >
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: drege]
    #26201853 -

drege said:
dude, you can INTERPRET THE BIBLE to admonish killing people.


Don't bring the bible into this, it totally changes my focus when I'm masturbating. What's clear is, the 2nd amendment provides unalienable rights to blasting on the faces of any tyrannical leaders. It says so in the constitution.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: relic]
    #26202038 -

My bad, after something like 20 years of using that word in 50% improper contexts I've looked up the definition.
My use in this manner comes from white zombie thunderkiss 65 album knuckle duster 2B

But in spite I think you know what I mean...


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. (moved) [Re: drege]
    #26202119 -

:thumbup:  right on

I was trying not to be a dickhead about it.

I remember when that record came out.  Living at the beach, had enough dough to not have to work, having a zombie good time every day.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: relic] * 1
    #26203911 -

Seriously -- why do you need the government, or even a piece of paper, to tell you what your rights are?
Who cares about the Democratic party? Or the Republican party?

Take your freedom for yourself.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: feralliberation]
    #26204093 -

feralliberation said:
Seriously -- why do you need the government, or even a piece of paper, to tell you what your rights are?
Who cares about the Democratic party? Or the Republican party?

Take your freedom for yourself.


That's about where I am at.

I am escaping it all except for taxes and vehicle regulations.

But I fully intend to purchase a riding horse next spring.

Fuck the state and gov.


--------------------
TRUMP 2020

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: XUL]
    #26204096 -

Yep, that sounds like prison bitch talk right there.  Not a good sound idea.


--------------------
"in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur"

In filth it will be found in dung it will be found

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: XUL]
    #26204110 -

XUL said:
feralliberation said:
Seriously -- why do you need the government, or even a piece of paper, to tell you what your rights are?
Who cares about the Democratic party? Or the Republican party?

Take your freedom for yourself.


That's about where I am at.

I am escaping it all except for taxes and vehicle regulations.

But I fully intend to purchase a riding horse next spring.

Fuck the state and gov.


Can I hang out with y’all? That’s where I’m at too except I’m not getting a horse


--------------------


Rate me here

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: Citizen X]
    #26204149 -

Of course. If you live up in there. Any time.


--------------------
TRUMP 2020

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: XUL] * 2
    #26204173 -

I just ordered 1000 9mm off the internet to my front door, no shipping price, and 16 cents a bullet.


I can not imagine having to go get a background check to buy ammo, retarded.  It's just one more tax on people.


Should last me 3+ range days, I have been trying to go more often since RMR'ing my pistol to train with it.  It was weird at first but cool not having to align 2 iron sites anymore, there's a learning curve though because you have to draw the pistol the same way each time or else you won't see your dot but after a few times at the range I know I am faster and my effective range is further out.  Was thinking of putting suppressor height sights on next to co-witness with the dot, I think it's the best of both worlds.


--------------------
My cultivation guide.  How anyone can grow mushrooms. 

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: PreparationH]
    #26204182 -

Since when were felons barred from guns?

Wouldn't it make more sense to have registered guns than unregistered?  Seems the media and hysteria they protray as common sense makes things worse.  Making something illegal is only a boost to the black market.  Drugs weren't a huge problem before being illegal.


--------------------
"in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur"

In filth it will be found in dung it will be found

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: Morel Guy]
    #26204185 -

1934
The National Firearms Act of 1934, regulating the manufacture, sale and possession of fully automatic firearms like sub-machine guns is approved by Congress.

1938
The Federal Firearms Act of 1938 places the first limitations on selling ordinary firearms. Persons selling guns are required to obtain a Federal Firearms License, at an annual cost of $1, and to maintain records of the name and address of persons to whom firearms are sold. Gun sales to persons convicted of violent felonies were prohibited.


--------------------
"in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur"

In filth it will be found in dung it will be found

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: Morel Guy]
    #26204250 -

Someone told me felons can still hunt with muzzle loader.

Don't know if it's true, but it sounds nice

And they get first dibs on game.


--------------------
TRUMP 2020

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: XUL] * 3
    #26204265 -

Drugs and alcohol were certainly a problem, in fact you can thank your hated government and dirty regulations for what became the FDA which has made it inconsequential to buy some vodka at the store and never having to worry about it making you go blind.

The Opium wars were fought because china hated the massive amounts of opium being brought into their country by the British.

If history tells us anything it’s that people will eventually get fed up with poorly regulated or unregulated products killing and injuring people and will call for bans or mass regulations, and those regulations often work if they are done for the purpose of safety and not with an ulterior motive.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: StygianKnight]
    #26204358 -



--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: XUL]
    #26204460 -

XUL said:
Someone told me felons can still hunt with muzzle loader.

Don't know if it's true, but it sounds nice

And they get first dibs on game.



No.  Powder is controlled as are firearms and receivers.  You can be one easily.  Guy I knew had a old hand musket.  .50 cal.

It'd only take one close shot with that.


--------------------
"in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur"

In filth it will be found in dung it will be found

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: Morel Guy]
    #26204860 -

Federal law does not prohibit felons from owning muzzle loading firearms but they cannot possess more than 50 lbs of powder.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: mycosis]
    #26205020 -

I have my doubts that is true.  50 pounds could blow a might large hole.

I used to get powder from model rocket engines.  But I have no interest to blowing myself up.

Dude I knew got all suicidal with his hand musket.  I wasn't there but I think he was freaked about paying a resturaunt money to drill a hole in my apartment floor for a microphone.  His main motivation was a girl.  Isn't it always?


--------------------
"in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur"

In filth it will be found in dung it will be found

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: Morel Guy]
    #26205048 -

doubt on brother! :cookiemonster:

https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/docs/0501-firearms-top-10-qaspdf/download

Quote:
Thus, a muzzle loading weapon that meets the definition of an “antique firearm” is not a firearm and
may lawfully be received and possessed by a prohibited person under the GCA.
In addition, the GCA defines the term “ammunition” to mean “ammunition or cartridge cases,
primers, bullets, or propellant powder designed for use in any firearm.” Because an “antique firearm”
is not a “firearm,” it would is lawful for a prohibited person to receive or possess black powder
designed for use in an “antique firearm.” Also, the Federal explosives laws do not make it unlawful
for a prohibited person to acquire and possess black powder in quantities not exceeding fifty pounds
if it is intended to be used solely for sporting, recreational, or cultural purposes in “antique firearms.”
See 18 U.S.C. § 845(a)(5)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: mycosis]
    #26205098 -

I wonder what Ohio law is.

Back in the day guys could speed load muzzle loaders.  Not that I want to hunt.  Rather someone else butcher my meat.

I guess a muzzle loader isn't that powerful.  I mean you wouldn't want hit by one but the speed is so slow you'd be fucked if you missed or more than one home intruder.

Probably still a weapon under disability.


--------------------
"in sterquiliniis invenitur in stercore invenitur"

In filth it will be found in dung it will be found

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The second amendment is not compatible with the Democratic party. [Re: mycosis]
    #26205834 -

mycosis said:
doubt on brother! :cookiemonster:

https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/docs/0501-firearms-top-10-qaspdf/download

Quote:
Thus, a muzzle loading weapon that meets the definition of an “antique firearm” is not a firearm and
may lawfully be received and possessed by a prohibited person under the GCA.
In addition, the GCA defines the term “ammunition” to mean “ammunition or cartridge cases,
primers, bullets, or propellant powder designed for use in any firearm.” Because an “antique firearm”
is not a “firearm,” it would is lawful for a prohibited person to receive or possess black powder
designed for use in an “antique firearm.” Also, the Federal explosives laws do not make it unlawful
for a prohibited person to acquire and possess black powder in quantities not exceeding fifty pounds
if it is intended to be used solely for sporting, recreational, or cultural purposes in “antique firearms.”
See 18 U.S.C. § 845(a)(5)



Very nice.

At least they can still hunt.

Non-violent felons get a bum deal, imo.

Serve your time, can't get jobs, lose your guns.

But damn, I bet some would be happy to hear they can hunt.


--------------------
TRUMP 2020

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | | Last >

North Spore Shop: Bulk Substrate

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Advice for the Democratic party Phred 2,349 15 11/08/04 06:00 AM
by Mushmonkey
* Just an email about the Democratic party Dont Read! Anonymous 631 2 04/22/03 02:35 PM
by hongomon
* Sen John Kerry statement=Fall of the democratic party
( 1 2 3 all )		 Anonymous 3,818 47 04/06/03 06:46 PM
by Anonymous
* Is the Democrat party dead?
( 1 2 all )		 thieverycorp 2,606 39 11/07/06 11:45 PM
by Ravus
* An experiment for the Democratic party
( 1 2 all )		 rommstein2001 2,421 30 11/08/03 01:57 PM
by Evolving
* A List of the Many Political Parties lonestar2004 1,236 0 08/25/05 01:57 PM
by lonestar2004
* How can anyone vote for a Democrat? luvdemshrooms 2,152 9 07/16/02 02:49 PM
by I_Fart_Blue
* Why Democrats are tagged as the party without values
( 1 2 all )		 Great_Satan 2,341 23 12/18/04 10:41 PM
by Annapurna1

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
20,145 topic views. 2 members, 51 guests and 8 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.036 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 15 queries.