Swizzer said:

Yes you don't want the entire bed to cake as you would want aeration & moisture regulation. Because if you were to go for a flush that perlite you decided not to add is not going to help you soak that moisture up further down if it all cakes up.

---

Alchemycologist said:

Even if this does work, why would you do all that when people pull a half pound dry from a single tub with nothing but grain, coir and water?

---

Swizzer said:

Have you used sugar water to help bring things together before?

There is no grain to this recipe. Only flour of grain. Everything else comes from Base & Enrichment. Ok I'll change the need to add more sugar water for a further flush. Cubes do consume Nitrogen bro.

I didn't mean breaking the mycelium up in a violent way other than creating space for the moisture to be absorbed jeez. It would propagate the moisture absorption better than just weeting the surface or dunking it anyway.

---

mushboy said:

adding additives to cubes is like ... having a slice of cake for dessert when dinner was the entire cake.

---

Alchemycologist said:

Our goal here is to have as much yield as possible with the best potency in a cost and time efficient manner.

---

StrohngBahd said:

Probably.  Post it in the artistic thread, we don't need new growers looking for info getting over excessive and bringing in more chances of failure.

---

lol it’s a little late for that!

And why don’t you need that? For most people fucking up is the best way to learn.

If someone really wants to get it right the first time they will put in the effort to research and get it mostly right the first time.

I guess I am just the type of person to encourage people instead of telling them how dumb they are

san pedro guy said:

Alchemycologist said:

Our goal here is to have as much yield as possible with the best potency in a cost and time efficient manner.

---

I must have missed that sticky. I thought we could all do what we liked.

I am going to be building a ridiculous fruiting chamber because I like to be creative. Am I going to be hounded if I post it here because it’s not what yall do?

---

Quote:

Expect Healthy Aggressive Growth, Satisfying Yields & Consistent Potency

---

Apc123 said:

bc I get canopies with only one ingredient instead of 10.

---

truth

and that one ingredient doesnt need to be pasteurized or sterilized. win win

san pedro guy said:

StrohngBahd said:

Probably.  Post it in the artistic thread, we don't need new growers looking for info getting over excessive and bringing in more chances of failure.

---

lol it’s a little late for that!

And why don’t you need that? For most people fucking up is the best way to learn.

If someone really wants to get it right the first time they will put in the effort to research and get it mostly right the first time.

I guess I am just the type of person to encourage people instead of telling them how dumb they are

---

bodhisatta said:

Quote:

Expect Healthy Aggressive Growth, Satisfying Yields & Consistent Potency

---

Consistency means the same. You wouldn't want consistently mediocre potency right? That's how i know you meant great potency.
Especially when your other adjectives are satisfying and aggressive

---

bodhisatta said:

Come on nate lol

Unmodified lids(pasty)
Unmodified tubs(me but it's been done but is against current dogma)
Non filtered lids for agar/media bottle use
Fae vs RH
Micropore dialed monos
Bottle teks
Over clocking a pressure cooker to make it quiet and lose less water
Shoebox technology improvement
Josex's needle biopsy methods for LC and tissue culture
Violets grain petri(which no one talked shit about)
Look at all the blender LC LI stuff we have. 4 years ago LC and LI were very frowned on any way they were done

Etc.. thats just what i thought of in a minute

---

Damn near everything you listed is old shit.

Unmodded tubs were around way before you wrote a tek about it.
Terrence mckenna wrote the book on bottle grows 30 yrs ago.
putting weights on your pc is something people were doing 10yrs go.
Shoeboxes are old news peeps been doing them in GHs forever.
Fruiting at spawning was the norm 15 years ago as I understand it.
The fact you even brought up Violet just shows your intellectual dishonesty
concerning this topic She doesnt come around anymore cause of constant flaming.

The only true innovations you listed are violets dishes, josexs poke and
pastys work.

I know you and I never quite see eye to eye, bod, but you know as well as I
do that this place is a parrot exhibit a lot of the time

bodhisatta said:

Does it not teach thousands of people a year exactly what they want to know and very quickly and efficiently? I get dozens of messages a week from people saying thanks. Sometimes it's things like helping a lady get her husband doses of cubes for cluster headaches to people from the military treating their ptsd or their family members doing it. Maybe there's a little dogma but we're not trying to be mycotopia or similar and pat people on the back for trying shit methods or compiling contraptions that wont work. People do have a goal if they come here and post in cultivation. I have a dozen employees and some temps. It's hard to teach people who know everything. Sometimes a lesson in humility is what people need to get on the right track. Maybe it's not our jobs but im usually hell bent on making people successful.

---

natedawgnow said:

I agree dude I honestly do. A buddy I gave some PE to last week told me that
they basically cured his social anxiety and depression caused by previous trauma.
I also had a small business in tejas selling gourmets as well as extracts
to small businesses and private buyers. I owe all I know to this community.

I'm just sayin, this is a forum for people to practice and learn about a hobby.
If you make it so people are scared to post what they are doing for fear
of being flamed by the peanut gallery, then how is this a fun hobby and welcoming community?
When noobs do post those crazy contraptions the  common reaction
I see on here is to call it stupid and them a dunce. Happens all the time.

OP should have posted pics to go along with the recipe, definitely agree there.
I'm actually interested in seeing how they use that recipe cause it
is way over the top and needs to be sterilized so ya.

---

bodhisatta said:

natedawgnow said:

I agree dude I honestly do. A buddy I gave some PE to last week told me that
they basically cured his social anxiety and depression caused by previous trauma.
I also had a small business in tejas selling gourmets as well as extracts
to small businesses and private buyers. I owe all I know to this community.

I'm just sayin, this is a forum for people to practice and learn about a hobby.
If you make it so people are scared to post what they are doing for fear
of being flamed by the peanut gallery, then how is this a fun hobby and welcoming community?
When noobs do post those crazy contraptions the  common reaction
I see on here is to call it stupid and them a dunce. Happens all the time.

OP should have posted pics to go along with the recipe, definitely agree there.
I'm actually interested in seeing how they use that recipe cause it
is way over the top and needs to be sterilized so ya.

---

I do try to cut down a lot on the people calling names here. But that also doesn't make you popular haha.

People think I have my "puppets" but I've banned people like mushboy a couple times or more.

---

Swizzer said:

See I mean if you're not sterilizing your tools & surfaces by default then you're not growing mushrooms right anyway.

---

Swizzer said:

Ok I'll change the need to add more sugar water for a further flush.

---

your original post actually described pouring sugar water onto a sub after first flush?

this is such a master recipe derived from your extensive research on the matter, then why would you change your master recipe when someone calls you on it?

best wishes.

bodhisatta said:

I get posts like this every day

https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/25983422#25983422

---