Psilynut2 said:

You can’t promote conspiracy theories for years and then suddenly expect to be considered a reputable source of news .

---

qman said:

Psilynut2 said:

You can’t promote conspiracy theories for years and then suddenly expect to be considered a reputable source of news .

---

Is questioning a government or MSM narrative the same thing as promoting a conspiracy theory?  NO, so why are you trying to equate the two?

---

Psilynut2 said:

Ok so then the 911 truth movement isn’t a conspiracy nutter movement it’s a question asking movement . Gotcha .

---

I can't speak for 'the 911 truth movement', but you'd be correct in that in general, Jimmy is asking questions.

And again, if 911 is all you got on Jimmy, he's doing pretty good.

Quote:

questioning something because there is no evidence.

---

koods said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

questioning something because there is no evidence.

---

This is not something a logical person should do

---

Quote:

Burden of proof ALWAYS falls on the person making a claim.  If

---

Psilynut2 said:

Does it have to be 911 stuff ?

Quote:

g to the 2017 Las Vegas shooting:
Dore: I saw one picture of his room, I didn't see any shell casings. There should be a fucking pile of shell casings about four feet high. He shot sixty bullets a second for fucking ten minutes, are you kidding me?[135]
Walsh: There's a cab driver in the Mandalay Bay turnaround and you hear gunfire far away then you hear it right near the nightclub. And it's like that sounds like two different places.
Dore: Two totally different guns! Two totally different placements! I've heard that.
Walsh: But you're fucking psycho if—
Dore: If you say that you're mental. See, here's what's happening lately. You can have an open murder investigation, which is what this is, and you ask questions about it, you're immediately shouted down. That's not supposed to happen during an investigation. They haven't even concluded what the fucking real investigation was supposed to say. So that's suspicious, exactly what you say, super suspicious. Why are they taking down YouTube videos that question the official narrative? If those YouTube videos are wrong, who gives a fuck?[136]

---

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

koods said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

questioning something because there is no evidence.

---

This is not something a logical person should do

---

My friend Bertrand Russell says there's a teapot orbiting the sun somewhere between earth and mars, but he has no evidence of this.

If you question this, then you're not a logical person (using your own logic).

---

“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”

relic said:

Psilynut2 said:

Does it have to be 911 stuff ?

Quote:

g to the 2017 Las Vegas shooting:
Dore: I saw one picture of his room, I didn't see any shell casings. There should be a fucking pile of shell casings about four feet high. He shot sixty bullets a second for fucking ten minutes, are you kidding me?[135]
Walsh: There's a cab driver in the Mandalay Bay turnaround and you hear gunfire far away then you hear it right near the nightclub. And it's like that sounds like two different places.
Dore: Two totally different guns! Two totally different placements! I've heard that.
Walsh: But you're fucking psycho if—
Dore: If you say that you're mental. See, here's what's happening lately. You can have an open murder investigation, which is what this is, and you ask questions about it, you're immediately shouted down. That's not supposed to happen during an investigation. They haven't even concluded what the fucking real investigation was supposed to say. So that's suspicious, exactly what you say, super suspicious. Why are they taking down YouTube videos that question the official narrative? If those YouTube videos are wrong, who gives a fuck?[136]

---

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

That's classic Jimmy dore asking why alternative theories always get shot down before the investigation is complete.  He makes a good point.  He's not insisting the alternative stories are true.

"Why are they taking down YouTube videos that question the official narrative? If those YouTube videos are wrong, who gives a fuck?"

---

To set up his questions, he made assertions, guesses, pulled shit out of his ass, and that is one reason some people don't think of him as serious, IMO.


--i saw one picture of his room and saw no shell casings.
--the re should be a pile four feet high
--he shot sixty bullets a second (no. No he didn't. Not even close)
--two totally different guns!  Two totally different placements!!

Then he asked some queztions or something?  If he wants to be taken seriously--and I have no idea if he even does--the he should drop the hyperbolic assertions before asking questions...IMHO

---

Quote:

Did I forget this?

Your logical fallacy is:  Burden of Proof

---