Enlil said:

By definition, a fact-checking website is there to rate the accuracy of a factual statement.  Is there some ambiguity in that which makes it hard to predict how they would rate a "scientifically correct statement?"

---

Enlil said:

I like ruffles

---

koods said:

Someone would have to ask XUL if Trump still had his vote

---

ballsalsa said:

Enlil said:

I like ruffles

---

I like turtles

---

Metoo said:

A Friday Quiz:
Please describe in one sentence what you think about the linked piece

"Your dangerous narcissism was not widely noted when I interviewed you, but it seemed, to me, to be the hallmark of your personality. I consulted experts and learned that this grandiosity was likely a defense mechanism against a fear of shame and rejection. I came to believe this fear was installed by your father, who, when you were a child, demanded you be a "killer" and a "king." When you failed to meet his expectations and became a troublemaker, he exiled you to military school, at age 13. Talk about a scarring experience.
The title of my book, "Never Enough," pointed to your endless drive to prove your superiority, which, ironically, led to bankruptcies, divorces and legal defeats. It's likely these failures provoked the same sense of shame and humiliation that you must have felt as a rejected child. "

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/19/opinions/trump-presidential-legacy-dantonio/index.html

---

Metoo said:

Was anyone here aware that we can scan entities which in many ways are "alive" at an atomic level?

---

For over 70 years now

But you still believed this dumb shit
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/12/jon-rappoport/the-sars-cov-2-virus-was-never-proved-to-exist/

Which has it's origins in quacks saying aids doesn't exist.