|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 20 days
|
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Enlil]
#27029145 - 11/08/20 07:22 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Who's "he"?
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
falcon



Registered: 04/01/02
Posts: 8,005
Last seen: 2 hours, 8 minutes
|
|
And it's not favorable, it makes perjury written by Trump more likely.
|
masspan
l'eclair


Registered: 07/26/08
Posts: 5,268
Loc:
Last seen: 13 hours, 3 minutes
|
|
if you want to start another thread about the Mueller Report, the redacted one that the whole world has access to, you could
i think the original question about the Mueller report was 'did Trump employ/capitalize/scheme to 'accept help from foreign governments' in the 2016 election?' or 'interference' and 'collusion'
yes, he did
--------------------
my mother said, to get things done, you'd better not mess with Major Tom...whose status is the baddest, everytime 'they' bless the apparatus
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 20 days
|
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: falcon]
#27029332 - 11/08/20 10:29 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
falcon said: He said he'd release the whole thing, he could have just done it. I meant what I said.
Unfortunately, "the judge ruled that the government was right to redact much of the Mueller report under separate exemptions that are designed to protect the integrity of ongoing investigations, law enforcement techniques and procedures, and individuals’ privacy."
Quote:
falcon said: And it's not favorable, it makes perjury written by Trump more likely.
How so. Can you explain?
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
falcon



Registered: 04/01/02
Posts: 8,005
Last seen: 2 hours, 8 minutes
|
|
Read the links you posted.
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 20 days
|
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: falcon]
#27029379 - 11/08/20 11:14 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I did. I'd like to ensure we're talking about the same thing before a sumbit a reply.
I'll even help you. Was it this tweet mentioned in the AlterNet report?
https://twitter.com/jason_kint/status/1295907657589628929
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Seriously_trippin
Cosmic Guru Ganesh



Registered: 07/12/13
Posts: 14,470
Last seen: 5 hours, 2 minutes
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:
Seriously_trippin said:
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: Russia? Wasn't that debunked by the release of his returns?
I guess one can always hope they weren't tricked for four straight years. 
No it wasn't links to opinion pieces don't count as debunking.
The New York Times got a hold of Trump's tax returns and didn't find anything shady with Russia.
Quote:
Seriously_trippin said: Mueller did however specifically state he could charge the president after he left office for blackmailing Ukraine with taxpayer dollars
That's the first time I've heard that. Source?
No links in his tax returns doesn't mean he didnt hold up aid to Ukraine under the conditions of influencing the US electoral system. I remember this conversation when we discussed the Mueller report but you were too busy denying it across the board. Robert Muller came to the conclusion BEFORE his investigation started that he couldn't indict a sitting president but he did find sufficient evidence for obstruction of justice or witness tampering and a total of 8 felonies involving g the 2016 election. When Mueller made a rare statement saying his report did not exonerate the president he also mentioned that he could not indict a sitting president but after he leaves office they could.
Here's one of many sources (won't do all your research for you) https://www.justsecurity.org/65772/yes-trump-could-be-indicted-if-he-leaves-office-in-2021-but-is-that-likely/ Like I said it's unlikely he will be charged because frankly it's a stain on our democracy but I knew this before I pulled this article up because I remember when it happened. So yes, he could be charged technically this article says in part If there is one lesson to draw from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report and congressional testimony, it is not that the president has been exonerated. Mueller compiled compelling evidence that the president engaged in conduct that likely could have been charged as obstruction of justice or witness tampering. However, the special counsel did not consider whether Trump should be indicted for obstructing the Russia investigation because he was bound by Department of Justice policy stating that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Similar calculations reportedly factored into the decision by federal prosecutors in New York to close an investigation into potential campaign finance crimes and related offenses that directly implicated the president. In that case, the publicly available evidence also does not exonerate the president. Instead, there is compelling evidence that the president personally committed up to eight federal criminal offenses while participating in and covering up a scheme to suppress negative stories about him from impacting the 2016 election.
Here's more links that echo a similar sentiment
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/07/trump-vulnerable-he-faces-lawsuits-without-presidential-immunity/6056288002/
https://en.as.com/en/2020/11/07/latest_news/1604785919_783450.html
https://theintercept.com/2020/10/18/trump-election-crimes-prosecution/
-------------------- R.I.P Zombi3, Blue Helix Modest Mouse Zappa Slothie That Kid With The face ShLong Le Canard split_by_nine & Big Worm Forever Etched in the sands of time in the shroomery and ever so beloved and deeply missed by many
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 20 days
|
|
So nothing about Russia collusion?
I realize Trump was accused of withholding aid to Ukraine to get them to announce an investigation into Joe Biden.
The part I was asking about was "blackmailing Ukraine with taxpayer dollars". How many taxpayer dollars did it cost for Trump to withhold aid?
Maybe you just worded it poorly?
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,045
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 44 minutes, 24 seconds
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:
Brian Jones said: Do you seriously think the NY investigations are not going to gain traction now that everything has changed?
Quote:
koods said: How are you not aware that NY investigators supoenaed trumps financial records as part of a criminal investigation?
Which investigations? The ones that started 10 years ago?
The one that supoenaed trump’s financials.
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:
falcon said:
Quote:
koods said: It’s a shame trump lied when he said he would declassify everything related to the Russia investigation. The unredacted mueller report would be interesting to see. It’s funny how Falcon doesn’t seem to care about those lies trump tells. It’s even funnier Falcon believed him.
Yeah that was something he could have done without commentary, on the bright side there's a glut of suckers.
Do you mean the one that finally got released right before the election, that the mainstream media didn't want to cover?
New: Mueller Investigated Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, And Roger Stone For DNC Hacks
'Mind-blowing' passages released from unsealed Mueller report on eve of Election Day
No. He said “I have fully authorized the total Declassification of any & all documents pertaining to the single greatest political CRIME in American History, the Russia Hoax. Likewise, the Hillary Clinton Email Scandal. No redactions”
That has not happened. He said they would be declassified without redactions. What we got was fewer redactions. Trump flat out lied. Why do you make excuses for it? Why did you believe him in the first place?
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
Edited by koods (11/09/20 03:45 AM)
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,045
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 44 minutes, 24 seconds
|
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Enlil]
#27029511 - 11/09/20 03:42 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Enlil said: That's because he chooses which parts come out.
Same thing he wants to do with last weeks voting. He wants his votes counted.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Seriously_trippin
Cosmic Guru Ganesh



Registered: 07/12/13
Posts: 14,470
Last seen: 5 hours, 2 minutes
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: So nothing about Russia collusion?
I realize Trump was accused of withholding aid to Ukraine to get them to announce an investigation into Joe Biden.
The part I was asking about was "blackmailing Ukraine with taxpayer dollars". How many taxpayer dollars did it cost for Trump to withhold aid?
Maybe you just worded it poorly?
Where exactly does the money he was holding up aid come from then? And even if it's not taxpayer money it's still ridiculously stupid for any president.
Anyways good riddance and we won't be talking about Trump in less then a year so get it out little buddy
-------------------- R.I.P Zombi3, Blue Helix Modest Mouse Zappa Slothie That Kid With The face ShLong Le Canard split_by_nine & Big Worm Forever Etched in the sands of time in the shroomery and ever so beloved and deeply missed by many
|
Asante
Mage


Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 86,792
|
|
-------------------- Omnicyclion.org higher knowledge starts here
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 20 days
|
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: koods] 1
#27029936 - 11/09/20 10:19 AM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: Which investigations? The ones that started 10 years ago?
The one that supoenaed trump’s financials.
Ya, the one that started 10 years ago.
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: Do you mean the one that finally got released right before the election, that the mainstream media didn't want to cover?
New: Mueller Investigated Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, And Roger Stone For DNC Hacks
'Mind-blowing' passages released from unsealed Mueller report on eve of Election Day
No. He said “I have fully authorized the total Declassification of any & all documents pertaining to the single greatest political CRIME in American History, the Russia Hoax. Likewise, the Hillary Clinton Email Scandal. No redactions”
That has not happened.
The more that comes out, the more of a hoax we realize this whole thing was. You may have missed this ruling by a judge, who "ruled that the government was right to redact much of the Mueller report under separate exemptions that are designed to protect the integrity of ongoing investigations, law enforcement techniques and procedures, and individuals’ privacy."
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 65,470
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
That court didn't and can't stop Trump from releasing the whole report. Why can't trump keep his promises? Why did you vote for a man who lies so fucking much?
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
falcon



Registered: 04/01/02
Posts: 8,005
Last seen: 2 hours, 8 minutes
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: I did. I'd like to ensure we're talking about the same thing before a sumbit a reply.
I'll even help you. Was it this tweet mentioned in the AlterNet report?
https://twitter.com/jason_kint/status/1295907657589628929
It's that he didn't release the whole thing when he said he would. Till then I'm going with he's guilty of anything he's accused of, he said it would exonerate him and he would release it and he didn't.
|
breeg89
i'll tell ya hwhat

Registered: 05/04/11
Posts: 3,120
Loc: mass
|
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: falcon]
#27030812 - 11/09/20 09:25 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Gotta love trump taking credit for the promising new covid vaccine data released by pfizer. Pfizer has not received funding from the government thus far for developing this. US government will be helping with mass production though.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-celebrates-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-but-government-didnt-fund-2020-11
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 20 days
|
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: breeg89]
#27030832 - 11/09/20 09:44 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,045
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 44 minutes, 24 seconds
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: Who's "he"?
He is the person who said he would declassify with no redactions, but we only seem to get no redactions where he looks good.
Where is the mueller report with no redactions? I guess trumps tweet was make believe.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,045
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 44 minutes, 24 seconds
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: Which investigations? The ones that started 10 years ago?
The one that supoenaed trump’s financials.
Ya, the one that started 10 years ago
What the fuck are you even talking about?
New York State investigators supoenaed trumps tax and financial documents as part of an investigation. We don’t know exactly what they are investigating but it’s not from ten years ago. Trump claimed he was immune from being investigated. The Supreme Court said no he’s not. The prosecutors tried again to get the documents and again trump has taken it to the Supreme Court. Now you are up to date.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Falcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger



Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US
Last seen: 4 months, 20 days
|
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: koods] 1
#27031861 - 11/10/20 03:45 PM (3 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: The more of the report that comes out, the more favorable it is towards Trump. Read the links I just posted.
Quote:
Enlil said: That's because he chooses which parts come out.
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said: Who's "he"?
He is the person who said he would declassify with no redactions, but we only seem to get no redactions where he looks good.
Source, or make believe? My source said the redactions were determined by a judge.
-------------------- I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them. I also attack my side if I think they're wrong. People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.
|
|