Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

North Spore Shop: Bulk Substrate

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | | Last >
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: feldman114]
    #26493887 -

feldman114 said:
“A lawyer for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has said that a former US congressman offered him a pardon on behalf of US President Donald Trump, in exchange for denying Russian involvement in the Democratic National Committee email leak.“

So it’s a lie, right?



Based on what we know it is perfectly correct - Assange's lawyer has indeed made this claim

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Metoo]
    #26493892 -

Is he lying?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: feldman114]
    #26493897 -

feldman114 said:
Is he lying?



Who?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Metoo]
    #26493899 -

The lawyer

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Metoo]
    #26493901 -

Sounds to me like Rohrabacher thought he would be able to get Assange a pardon from Trump, but White House Chief of Staff John Kelly blocked Rohrabacher from doing so out of fear that 1) it might make Trump look sympathetic towards Russia  2) It would ruin the "Russia did it" story.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: feldman114]
    #26493909 -

feldman114 said:
The lawyer



99.9% certain he is telling the truth - Assange most probably did ask him to make this statement on his behalf. I have no idea if Assnage is lying but a guy who smears the walls of the room he is living in with faeces has limited credibility in my eyes. Trump is a snake so possible he had some understanding with the H guy but zero proof of that has been reported or implied.

Edited by Metoo (02/19/20 06:45 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26493912 -

Who fucking knows?  Trump is already pulling out the 'I barely know him' line.


Quote:
At Westminster Magistrates' Court, Assange's barrister, Edward Fitzgerald, referred to a witness statement by former Republican U.S. Representative Dana Rohrabacher who visited Assange in 2017, saying he had been sent by the president to offer a pardon.



That line is all over the media.

If there is a written statement, it shouldn't be too hard to see if Dana R said that or not.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: JohnRainyII]
    #26493919 -

JohnRainyII said:
Who fucking knows?  Trump is already pulling out the 'I barely know him' line.




If this is what he is saying the probability of Trump having sent the H guy there has just increased... Trump is such a BS artist

Edited by Metoo (02/19/20 06:51 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: JohnRainyII]
    #26493923 -

JohnRainyII said:
Who fucking knows?

If there is a written statement, it shouldn't be too hard to see if Dana R said that or not.



Exactly.

And if there's not a written statement, do we rely on Rohrabacher's word, who said he "would then call on President Trump to pardon him", or on Assange's lawyer's word, who said "he had been sent by the president to offer a pardon"?


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: feldman114] * 1
    #26493949 -

feldman114 said:
This would be huge in normal politics, but it’s just a Wednesday of Trump’s presidency.



When you think about it the story as presented has very little connection with Trump. Assange did what he did to get in trouble - nothing to do with T. Then the US went after him - still nothing to do with Trump. The extradition process was started under Obama. The H guy visited him a while ago but there is zero proof at this stage he was sent by Trump. So they ask Trump if he sent the H guy and he says no. This is the only direct, confirmed role he has played in the story - making a statement to deny any involvement. Most of it is just the media reporting on a desperate legal defence manoeuver made by a desperate guy in a desperate situation.

Edited by Metoo (02/19/20 07:10 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Metoo] * 1
    #26493969 -

From the current debate:

"I'd like to talk about who we're running against. A billionaire who calls women fat broads and horse faced lesbians. And no I'm not talking about Donald Trump, I'm talking about Mayor Bloomberg," Warren said.

haha - she is more right than wrong

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Metoo]
    #26493991 -

He's an easy target running as a dem - 80%+ of republicans and 40% of dems love da 'rich'


--------------------
¿Check out some art m8?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: twighead]
    #26494011 -

And now he refused to give access to his tax records - what is going on here??

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Metoo]
    #26494485 -

Metoo said:
Enlil said:
Are you impressed when a man doesn't rape a woman, too?



These days I am impressed when progressives do not ask idiotic questions. I know, it is a low bar...



I'm wondering if the mountain of irony here about not asking idiotic questions is intentional or accidental.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Brian Jones]
    #26494518 -

Trump just named one of his pals who has no national security experience as the Director of National Security. The position was created after 9/11 to coordinate activities and intelligence between various organs of national security, and it was specifically mandated that the director have extensive national security experience. But he's only going to do it for a short time, maybe three months, and he will keep his current job as Ambassador to Germany, so how important can this job be? I guess Trump made it a temp job.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Brian Jones]
    #26494538 -

Hope he enjoys watching me jerk it as much as all the others before him.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Brian Jones]
    #26494637 -

Brian Jones said:
Trump just named one of his pals who has no national security experience as the Director of National Security. The position was created after 9/11 to coordinate activities and intelligence between various organs of national security, and it was specifically mandated that the director have extensive national security experience. But he's only going to do it for a short time, maybe three months, and he will keep his current job as Ambassador to Germany, so how important can this job be? I guess Trump made it a temp job.



It's not very important at all. It's called being a figurehead.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Metoo]
    #26495020 -

So Bloomberg got mauled by a pack of chiwawas last night. If Mini Mike takes a hit in the polls the debate last night will only have one winner - Donald Trump. Looks more and more likely in November he will be facing his preferred contender so things are great for those practicing reason in the land of the free.

I am more and more thinking about the successsion in 2024 - GOP have to make sure Nikky Haley is ready for limelight in a few years.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Metoo] * 2
    #26495036 -

I wonder why Bloomy didn’t deny the NDA’s. I mean, most NDA’s prohibit signers from admitting they signed, so no one could have proven otherwise, right? Did he just get caught off guard?

@Metoo, you know Trump said he was afraid Hilary would pick Bernie as a running mate in 2016, right? Pretty sure it’s not his preferred opponent.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: feldman114]
    #26495111 -

feldman114 said:
@Metoo, you know Trump said he was afraid Hilary would pick Bernie as a running mate in 2016, right? Pretty sure it’s not his preferred opponent.



This is completely irrelevant because this time round Trump is an incumbent, not candidate and and Bernie hopes to be president, not running mate

What I am saying is that, in the current situation, Trump would love to run against Bernie. We know it because he is actively propping Bernie by suggesting he is being fucked by the Dems establishment. Bernie was an ok emergency spare but by putting him behind the wheel I see a car driving off the cliff.

I imagine one reason Trump wants to have a crack at Bernie is that he will be able to unleash without offending the PC sensitivities of the electorate. Bullying women on stage is problematic and Pete is gay. In contrast, when Trump has a go at Bernie the perception will be of two old bucks locking horns - one entertaining, successful, relaxed and witty and the other even older, with no track record of achievements in real life, lightweight and ideologically possessed. Bernie will be fair game on stage in ways other candidates are not.

Edited by Metoo (02/20/20 01:04 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | | Last >

North Spore Shop: Bulk Substrate


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Trump
( 1 2 3 4 ... 131 132 )
DividedQuantumM 79,726 2,635 01/19/21 07:19 AM
by STPLSD25
* Trump Will Beat Hillary In New York If He Is The Republican Nominee.....
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
starfire_xes 7,826 106 05/08/16 06:39 PM
by zappaisgod
* Donald Trump - The Embodiment of American Fascism
( 1 2 3 4 ... 11 12 all )
Bigbadwooof 14,148 228 08/04/18 08:26 PM
by Enlil
* The Reason Behind Trump's Support and Poll Numbers
( 1 2 3 all )
Astral Pain 4,730 59 12/12/15 07:57 AM
by hostileuniverse
* The Trump Phenomenon
( 1 2 3 4 ... 50 51 )
Count of Sabugosa 41,872 1,006 01/27/16 02:53 PM
by zappaisgod
* So Trump started off badly but he's making more sense every day...
( 1 2 3 4 ... 82 83 )
Patlal 66,882 1,658 06/26/24 02:53 PM
by rxb
* Is America Becoming Fascist?
( 1 2 all )
Psilocybeingzz 4,827 31 08/17/03 10:01 PM
by wingnutx
* Who Is Voting For Trump?
( 1 2 3 4 ... 10 11 all )
thewanderer25 13,428 201 08/11/15 03:28 PM
by KauaiOrca

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
488,788 topic views. 0 members, 103 guests and 55 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.033 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 17 queries.