Quote:

---

XUL said:
The movement isn't extreme.

She is hosted on PraguerU, which is very popular.

Don't take it from me. There are other people who believe what she does.

---

Quote:

---

XUL said:
The movement isn't extreme.

She is hosted on PraguerU, which is very popular.

Don't take it from me. There are other people who believe what she does.

---

Quote:

---

XUL said:
The question being: why he failed to attain money to fulfill his promise you of a wall.

The dems

---

Quote:

---

twighead said:

Quote:

---

qman said:

Quote:

---

twighead said:
There are always extremist elements to any mass movement - to focusing on that fuels and discredits it - that's how mass media discredits and aggrandizes every single popular movement in the country. They don't even need to really exist - they can just hire some actors to go dress up in 'whatever movements regalia' and then go break some windows, take a video and post it on social media. Internal provocateuring is an age-old method used by the government to discredit and shatter any and all social movements before they take grip.

Honestly, I find the way black people are regularly treated by cops and the justice system in this country to be vastly more fucked up than anything BLM has ever done so yeah imma side with them.

---

Almost every demographic is treated poorly by the police and justice system in the US today, the only way to escape it is wealth.

Policing is now a money generating enterprise, they don't care about your race or sex anymore. They're going to go after you, they have quotas to meet.

That's why the NFL protests couldn't get any traction, most of the fans were thinking to themselves that over the top policing isn't exclusive to non-whites, they had the experiences to back it up.

Too bad the movement had a 'no whites allowed' clause to it, it may of had a legitimate chance if it didn't. But that was never the goal, it was always about conflict and division, isn't that right?

---

Don't even go there with that #ALL LIVES MATTER bullshit - changing the subject and pretending that a white soccer mom is going to be treated remotely the same as a black guy with wearing a hoodie... that's so fucking untrue and you know it

Yeah - the corruption & money thing is a thing - but so is the racism thing... these sort of whataboutisms are meaningless distractions. Stick to the topic.

---

Yes, the topic is law enforcement treats every demographic differently just like society does, it's called basic commonsense.

Do females get much more favorable treatment relative to males at multiples more than whites relative to non-whites?  Yes, where is your outrage? 

Quote:

---

YangSupporter said:

Quote:

---

XUL said:
The question being: why he failed to attain money to fulfill his promise you of a wall.

The dems

---

I thought Trump was a deal maker? Guess hes just really bad at making deals sad

---

Quote:

---

twighead said:
Females have a biological premise to be less aggressive than males, can you prove the same for different ethnicities?

---

Quote:

---

twighead said:
Females have a biological premise to be less aggressive than males, can you prove the same for different ethnicities?

---

Many would suggest that's a sexist proposition you just made, you remember everyone is equal, right? 

The proof is that non-white police officers treat non-whites exactly the same way as whites, there's no difference.  The same applies to every other demographic, there is no bias, racism or conspiracy at play here.

If everyone perceives the world in the same fashion, it's because that's the way the world exists. You might not like the way the world exists and instead like to blame everyone for their unified perceptions of the world.

So you're right and everyone else is blinded by their prejudice, how's that been working out lately?

Quote:

---

YangSupporter said:

Quote:

---

twighead said:
Females have a biological premise to be less aggressive than males, can you prove the same for different ethnicities?

---

Crime is related to economic circumstances and a lack of options.

---

Quote:

---

qman said:

Quote:

---

YangSupporter said:

Quote:

---

twighead said:
Females have a biological premise to be less aggressive than males, can you prove the same for different ethnicities?

---

Crime is related to economic circumstances and a lack of options.

---

Just in the US, right?  You do realize even the poorest US citizens are richer than 95% of the global population?  So this is just a relative economic issue, correct? 

What about poor females?  Still less than males with better economic outcomes.

---

Quote:

---

qman said:

Quote:

---

YangSupporter said:

Quote:

---

twighead said:
Females have a biological premise to be less aggressive than males, can you prove the same for different ethnicities?

---

Crime is related to economic circumstances and a lack of options.

---

Just in the US, right?  You do realize even the poorest US citizens are richer than 95% of the global population?  So this is just a relative economic issue, correct? 

What about poor females?  Still less than males with better economic outcomes.

---

Quote:

---

The Ecstatic said:

Quote:

---

qman said:

Quote:

---

YangSupporter said:

Quote:

---

twighead said:
Females have a biological premise to be less aggressive than males, can you prove the same for different ethnicities?

---

Crime is related to economic circumstances and a lack of options.

---

Just in the US, right?  You do realize even the poorest US citizens are richer than 95% of the global population?  So this is just a relative economic issue, correct? 

What about poor females?  Still less than males with better economic outcomes.

---

Damn so maybe stop pissing your pants about the demise of western civilization then.

---

Quote:

---

qman said:

No, I'm not going to stop pointing out the obvious decline in the standard of living in the West despite the fact it's still multiples higher than the vast majority of the world.

My point is, if the US is so hard socially and economically on certain demographics, they're free to leave. How come instead of leaving, people of that same demographic are risking their lives to experience the same "hostile environment"?

---