Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

vault123 said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Can you explain why the most successful cities in America are usually the most diverse?

---

Most successful cities...

---

I didn't say the most successful cities have no problems, I said the most successful cities are the most diverse.

---

vault123 said:

Then why isn't that shit happening in Tokyo?

---

MagicMush123 said:

Do you think that they'll annex Belarus?

---

MagicMush123 said:

It will be interesting as i was reading that belarusians overwhelmingly want to stay

---

vault123 said:

So top Democrat officials don’t want illegal immigrants in their cities...interesting.

Really makes you think. Perhaps they haven’t spoken with Falcon who thinks they’re going to raise his wages, and Koods thinks they’re going to make his community safer.

---

Quote:

...a very insignificant part of the problem (you yourself have been unable to demonstrate otherwise).

More like (what's more significant is) allowing tax cuts for the super rich, real minimum wages to slide, elimination of Wall Street regulations, removal of union protections, unaffordable healthcare, lowering of estate taxes, social security cuts, etc...

You know, thing that ACTUALLY matter for the average American.

---

vault123 said:

These anecdotal examples would make you believe that illegal immigrants are an asset that should be fiercely competed over,  but the democratic leadership that is pushing for these open border policies want nothing to do with them...

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

If you show me where I said I think they're going to raise wages, I'll give you five shrooms.

---

I would just like to say that this was one of the best conversations I've ever had on the topic and I learned a great deal doing it.

I need more room for images I keep having to delete them. "immigration actually help wages" appeared to be the position you would hypothetically be able to take based on the study.

Now, this was fantastic guarding language when you said "one could argue" which means you are correct in your challenge and that you did not directly say you thought they would raise wages, but it is relevant and I'll tell you why at the end.



So in this one as I understood it you were referring to the net affects of migration when you said "better median income" because in  this article it says which sounds like the better median income is coming from the increased wages.



This last part here I claimed immigration would suppress wages and it appeared that you were contesting it, I assumed for the above reasons.


All this to say no where in there did you "say" that you thought they would raise wages, and like I said earlier that was great use of guarding language, but I never claimed you "said" immigration would raise wages I claimed you "thought" immigration was going to raise wages, and due to the above reasons here I did so I was not wrong either.

koods said:

Zerohedge 😆

---