|
Viveka
refutation bias
Registered: 10/21/02
Posts: 4,061
Last seen: 7 years, 5 months
|
Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks.
#2530106 - 04/06/04 12:32 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
http://www.ultimatemetal.com/~bumble/Nickelback%20-%20How%20You%20Remind%20Me%20Of%20Someday.mp3
Check it out. It's two Nickelback songs played together, one in the left channel, one in the right.
Funniest Shit Ever!
|
TheDude
is waiting forthe peak
Registered: 04/15/03
Posts: 2,876
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Viveka]
#2530331 - 04/06/04 01:11 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! That is so awesome....and so pathetic at the same time. It's like they have a Nickelback machine that spits out songs in the exact same key/time signature. Oh man oh man, thanks for the laugh.
|
Dankman
Headphone Wizard
Registered: 06/24/02
Posts: 2,660
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: TheDude]
#2530437 - 04/06/04 02:18 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
They suck so bad that ie explorer crashes whenever I try to play it.
-------------------- "There was a dirty rainbow coming out of the fucking toilet" - 40 Oz.
|
Muppet
Nomadic Jester
Registered: 08/14/02
Posts: 28,785
Loc: (523) 327-2836
Last seen: 13 years, 2 months
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: TheDude]
#2530484 - 04/06/04 02:55 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
That is so awesome....and so pathetic at the same time. It's like they have a Nickelback machine that spits out songs in the exact same key/time signature.
I couldn't have said it better myself
-------------------- Ravings of a Madman
|
Scolecite
enthusiast
Registered: 12/27/03
Posts: 348
Last seen: 11 years, 2 months
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Muppet]
#2530583 - 04/06/04 04:15 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Um whats wrong with having 2 songs on the same album with the same time signature?
Why dont you guys show me your album that you release so I can compare???
Didnt think so....
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Scolecite]
#2530720 - 04/06/04 06:48 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
bwahahahahahaha
|
Snape
Eternal Chaos
Registered: 08/04/03
Posts: 2,285
Loc: Montreal, Quebec
Last seen: 9 years, 4 months
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Viveka]
#2530790 - 04/06/04 07:39 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
AHHAAHAHHA
I already realized that Nickelback was $$$-rock, but this is just too much. The choruses start at the exact same time!!!
--------------------
I'm floating in the sea of stars, I'm drifting away from the shore I will be lost in the dream when the dark days come But I will make the time run backwards and I'll make the stars shine again
|
lukeboots
fresh futuristic
Registered: 02/04/04
Posts: 19,728
Loc: Grand Ole Operating Syste...
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Viveka]
#2530836 - 04/06/04 08:11 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
haha.. i actually liked that better than any one nickelback song i've heard at a time..
no wonder i can never tell what nickelback song i'm listening to.
-------------------- funky ass music: Planet of Dinosaurs // Rich Whiskey
|
Annom
※※※※※※
Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6,367
Loc: Europe
Last seen: 10 months, 6 days
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Viveka]
#2530857 - 04/06/04 08:27 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
HAHAHAHAHA
|
filthysock
puresoul
Registered: 01/12/04
Posts: 2,080
Loc: Bergen, Norway
Last seen: 17 years, 9 months
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Viveka]
#2530942 - 04/06/04 09:13 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
All I can say is there songs are so alike... I cant check out that link right now, but I can imagine....!
-------------------- Magic mushrooms are not addictive, the shroomery is!
|
oneducktwoducks
Registered: 12/13/02
Posts: 2,321
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Viveka]
#2531085 - 04/06/04 10:25 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
That is awesome man.
|
TimeTraveler
Another
Registered: 11/12/03
Posts: 46
Loc: I'm right here.
Last seen: 19 years, 3 months
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: oneducktwoducks]
#2531131 - 04/06/04 10:51 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
The fact that the choruses/verses start/end at the same time is rediculous...Its like they planned it that way. And using the "well you don't have an album so you can't dislike them" argument is kinda weak, because pop culture is nothing to be proud to be a part of, in my opinion anyway. They really aren't that talented at all, nor original, nor stimulating in any way other than to keep a mind off from things that actually matter.
My 2c!
-------------------- The air is cut with cyanide.
|
Muppet
Nomadic Jester
Registered: 08/14/02
Posts: 28,785
Loc: (523) 327-2836
Last seen: 13 years, 2 months
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Scolecite]
#2531196 - 04/06/04 11:25 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
yeah that is a really weak argument
besides - I can bang on an old coffee can for an hour or so and come up with several completely different beats that sound nothing like eachother (it really doesn't take much skill to create a basic 'layout' for a song...so there's no damn reason a so called professional group should be re-using the same basic design like that)
-------------------- Ravings of a Madman
|
greenhaze
one toke overthe line
Registered: 06/03/02
Posts: 514
Loc: the severed garden
Last seen: 18 years, 4 months
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Viveka]
#2531214 - 04/06/04 11:31 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
that's good shit man....i never have liked that band
|
Annom
※※※※※※
Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6,367
Loc: Europe
Last seen: 10 months, 6 days
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Viveka]
#2531245 - 04/06/04 11:39 AM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
When is the release of the Dolby Digital 5.1 version?
|
MOTH
Wild Woman
Registered: 06/06/03
Posts: 23,431
Loc: In the jungle
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Viveka]
#2531305 - 04/06/04 12:00 PM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
I must confess that while this is indeed strange and pathetic, I tend to like Nickelback's songs The lead singer-guy has such a gravely voice that appeals to me. But now I'm convinced that something fishy is going on with their music. So no wonder I like two or three of their songs...they're all alike!!!!!
|
Cubieman420
Sharing in thegroove
Registered: 03/20/02
Posts: 2,693
Loc: Midwest
Last seen: 10 years, 3 months
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: MOTH]
#2531398 - 04/06/04 12:21 PM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
They do suck balls, that dudes voice is just so shitty, just like that guy from creeds, I hate that shit. Muhaaaaa, yeaaaaa, yeaaaa, muhaaaaaa <==thats what he sounds like!
-------------------- "...now waters run free, no more fish in the sea..." 1983-2004
|
ImYourSpedFriend
Fear and Loathing
Registered: 11/13/03
Posts: 870
Loc: NH
Last seen: 9 years, 6 months
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Viveka]
#2531634 - 04/06/04 01:22 PM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
looks like somebody found their next single
-Speddy
|
manna_man
High onlife.....andcrack
Registered: 06/10/03
Posts: 481
Loc: Vancouver
Last seen: 18 years, 5 months
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: Viveka]
#2531654 - 04/06/04 01:29 PM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
yea ive always known that they use the exact same song structure in almost every one of their songs.
Usually starts off with just singing and guitar, the usual 4 power chords, then the whole band comes in after maybe 8 measures, it has to be in 4/4 time of course, then after a bit of that they transition into the chorus with the banging of the low tom of the drums and try to get that "build-up" effect, stop, then boom, right into a chorus that we've heard 132 times on the radio already. Fuck, nickleback fuckin blows.
-------------------- This post is protected under copyrite law.All above content is strictly the property of ?manna_man.Any infringement of copyright property is strictly prohibited.Any violators will be stretched, shot, and then vaporized into a state of anti-matter, where they will cease to exist.
|
Viveka
refutation bias
Registered: 10/21/02
Posts: 4,061
Last seen: 7 years, 5 months
|
Re: Scientific evidence that Nickelback sucks. [Re: manna_man]
#2532304 - 04/06/04 04:17 PM (19 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Usually starts off with just singing and guitar, the usual 4 power chords, then the whole band comes in after maybe 8 measures, it has to be in 4/4 time of course, then after a bit of that they transition into the chorus with the banging of the low tom of the drums and try to get that "build-up" effect, stop, then boom, right into a chorus that we've heard 132 times on the radio already.
Yeah, exactly. Glad you're all getting a kick out of this.
Another fun thing to do is move the balance all the way to the left for two bars, then all the way to the right for two, etc... Pure comedy!
|
|