Home | Community | Message Board

MRCA Tyroler Gluckspilze
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Amazon Shop: Scales

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Fred's son

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 3 years, 4 months
"Get rid of it!"
    #2482450 - 03/30/04 02:05 AM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Damn. I've said it before and I'll say it again -- Thomas Sowell is one very sharp cookie. I just love reading his stuff.

My platform
Thomas Sowell

March 30, 2004

From time to time some kind readers suggest that I run for public office, including President of the United States. No need for those on the left to panic. It is not going to happen.

Such suggestions, however, cause me to imagine what my platform would be if I were in politics. Once you see what that platform would be, you can understand why it will never happen.

Since politicians like to have campaign slogans, instead of "Bring it On!" my slogan might be "Get rid of it!" to describe all the laws, policies, and government agencies that I would abolish.

A more positive slogan would be "Conservative Radicalism." That is, my policies would be based on traditional values but would make radical changes in order to restore or enhance those values.

Cabinet-level departments, for example, would be reduced to just two -- the Defense Department and the State Department, with the latter purged of the weak-kneed internationalist crowd who have dominated it for so long. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Labor, etc., would all be abolished as just money-wasting bureaucracies serving outside special interests, instead of the people whose taxes support them.

Government subsidies would be drastically reduced, starting at the top. That is, there would be a prohibition against giving a dime of government money to anyone whose annual income or total assets exceed one billion dollars. Why should agricultural subsidies be going to Ted Turner and David Rockefeller, or "universal health care" pay for their medicine?

Who could object to cutting off subsidies to billionaires? Once that was done, however, the next step would be to cut off millionaires. Then we could proceed on down the income scale until people making a hundred grand a year could no longer expect to be subsidized with the taxpayer's money.

The great advantage of this way of proceeding is that it would rob the media of opportunities to run sob stories about how some poor person was hurt by cutbacks in some government program -- even when the vast majority of those who were hurt were the bureaucrats who run these programs and slick special interests who hide behind the poor.

By the time we got down to cutting off all government subsidies to people making $100,000 a year or more, the federal budget would probably not only be balanced but have a surplus. Of course, there would be hordes of unemployed bureaucrats being interviewed on TV, complaining that the world was going to end, without their vital contributions. But that could be brushed aside.

With all the money saved by ending vast numbers of subsidies, the government could afford to pay the kinds of salaries that would attract highly qualified people from the private sector. For example, if every member of Congress were paid a million dollars a year, that would cost less than one percent of what it costs to run the Department of Agriculture.

As things stand today, a successful doctor, lawyer, executive, engineer or economist would lose money by becoming a member of Congress. This means that Congress is largely filled with people who either already have great wealth or people who don't have what it takes to earn a high income in the private sector -- or people hungry for power, who are the worst of all.

These are not the kinds of people who should dominate the making of laws in Congress or enforcing them in the courts. Short-sighted critics might object that the kinds of people we have in politics and the courts don't deserve to get a million dollars a year. But that is the very reason for trying to get better people.

If a million dollars a year won't do it, you could raise the pay to ten million and it would still be chump change compared to what is wasted by cheap politicians, who turn out to be very expensive politicians when wasting the taxpayers' money.

Then there should be term limits. In fact, elected officials should be limited to just one term. Otherwise, they and their staffs would be spending most of their time doing things to get re-elected in all but the last term.

These are just some of the things I would do in the name of "conservative radicalism." But it may be enough to show why there is no clear and present danger of my being nominated, much less elected.




Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/06/02
Posts: 23,099
Loc: To the limit!
Last seen: 7 hours, 49 minutes
Re: "Get rid of it!" [Re: Phred]
    #2482722 - 03/30/04 04:47 AM (14 years, 1 month ago)

I wonder how long it would take him to get around to firing all the teachers.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Two inch dick..but it spins!?

Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,239
Loc: Lost In Space
Re: "Get rid of it!" [Re: Phred]
    #2482756 - 03/30/04 06:06 AM (14 years, 1 month ago)

He's a truly wise man.

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Registered: 06/24/02
Posts: 1,583
Last seen: 4 years, 5 months
Re: "Get rid of it!" [Re: Baby_Hitler]
    #2484206 - 03/30/04 05:44 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)


Baby_Hitler said:
I wonder how long it would take him to get around to firing all the teachers.

hopefully thatd be close to the top of the list

"You cannot trust in law, unless you can trust in people. If you can trust in people, you don't need law." -J. Mumma

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
Re: "Get rid of it!" [Re: BleaK]
    #2485056 - 03/30/04 09:48 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

interesting web of links there, BleaK.

All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

Amazon Shop: Scales

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* They all suck - President at 33% Approval, Congress at 29%
( 1 2 all )
dedjam 3,164 23 05/18/07 08:44 AM
by dedjam
* Do Republican Politicians Deserve To Be Held To a Higher Standard?
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
Madtowntripper 6,787 114 04/25/08 12:10 AM
by Daishi
* Allawi delivers ?thank you? to Congress Great_Satan 297 0 09/23/04 12:04 PM
by Great_Satan
* Congress 'made Wikipedia changes' HagbardCeline 707 9 02/11/06 01:19 PM
by zappaisgod
* On electing rocks to congress johnm214 651 8 06/22/08 09:14 PM
by zappaisgod
* Transcript of Allawi's speech to Congress Phred 592 4 09/24/04 03:50 PM
by Zahid
* Congress to repeal presidential term limits to allow Bush to seek third term..
( 1 2 3 all )
Smallworlds 3,047 52 08/02/05 12:23 AM
by LeftyBurnz
* Urge Congress to Stop Racial Profiling
( 1 2 3 all )
silversoul7 3,569 50 11/03/03 12:04 AM
by monoamine

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
530 topic views. 3 members, 0 guests and 2 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
SoulSpeciosa Kratom
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2018 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 19 queries.