Home | Community | Message Board

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
Military spending * 4
    #24025328 - 01/20/17 11:09 AM (7 years, 10 days ago)

Like Rome -- just like Rome -- the U.S. allocates most of its resources, and spends more than it can afford, on the military. It tore Rome apart.

Our current military budget of roughly $600 billion is essentially half of all discretionary spending. What if we took 25% and spread it around to the other discretionary recipients? As far as I can tell, this is workable. They spend that much on policy wonks whose only job is to justify their jobs. Getting rid of the dross would be surprisingly easy. And we wouldn't necessarily lose one iota of military capability -- at that number.

That's all well and good, but the defense industry has very rich and very powerful lobbyists in Washington, whose main job it is to prevent something like this from ever happening.

So, I'm wondering, does anyone think it is likely that this will change in the next thirty years? Will we ever reallocate the bloated defense budget? I mean, we are really broke. Or will we go down like the Romans did, finally running out of money for the military and slowly losing control and fading away?


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 4 months, 22 days
Re: Military spending [Re: DividedQuantum] * 3
    #24025353 - 01/20/17 11:22 AM (7 years, 10 days ago)

Quote:

DividedQuantum said:
What if we took 25% and spread it around to the other discretionary recipients?  ...we wouldn't necessarily lose one iota of military capability.



Haven't you heard about Russian aggression?  :wink:



--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
Re: Military spending [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #24025359 - 01/20/17 11:25 AM (7 years, 10 days ago)

:lol:


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisible404
error
 User Gallery

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 14,539
Re: Military spending [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #24025751 - 01/20/17 02:08 PM (7 years, 10 days ago)

how did clinton gain a surplus? were we spending shit tons on the military back then as well? jc.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
Re: Military spending [Re: 404] * 2
    #24025797 - 01/20/17 02:30 PM (7 years, 10 days ago)

By spending very little on everything other than defense. Bill Clinton was basically an honorary Republican. And the budget was only balanced from '98 to '01. Big fucking deal. Meanwhile we have a 20 trillion dollar debt. Military spending is only adding to it.


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineqman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 9 hours, 20 minutes
Re: Military spending [Re: 404]
    #24026466 - 01/20/17 06:33 PM (7 years, 10 days ago)

Quote:

404 said:
how did clinton gain a surplus? were we spending shit tons on the military back then as well? jc.




The surplus was the result of being in the right place at the right time, a massive asset bubble in stocks created strong tax receipts for those years, once the 2000 bubble burst, it was back to economic reality.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinehostileuniverse
Stranger
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 8,602
Loc: 'Merica Flag
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
Re: Military spending [Re: qman]
    #24026619 - 01/20/17 07:36 PM (7 years, 10 days ago)

Debt is created by spending more than you bring in, this concept is lost on most of the American populace


--------------------
http://www.countdowntotrump.com





Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineSkellies


Registered: 06/02/15
Posts: 822
Loc: The Dream
Last seen: 1 day, 1 hour
Re: Military spending [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #24028601 - 01/21/17 04:24 PM (7 years, 9 days ago)

Around 16% of the total federal budget was defense spending (in 2015) so I wouldn't call it a majority by any means. However, there is a lot of wasteful spending when it comes to private military contractors charging exorbitant rates. We could maintain our military power while reducing costs at the same time by actually negotiating prices with those we contract.


--------------------
Nosleep mode: Activated


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBrian Jones
Club 27
Male User Gallery


Registered: 12/18/12
Posts: 12,342
Loc: attending Snake Church
Last seen: 14 hours, 53 minutes
Re: Military spending [Re: qman]
    #24029046 - 01/21/17 08:04 PM (7 years, 9 days ago)

Quote:

qman said:
Quote:

404 said:
how did clinton gain a surplus? were we spending shit tons on the military back then as well? jc.




The surplus was the result of being in the right place at the right time, a massive asset bubble in stocks created strong tax receipts for those years, once the 2000 bubble burst, it was back to economic reality.




--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

The worst thing about corruption is that it works so well,


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDividedQuantumM
Outer Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/13
Posts: 9,819
Re: Military spending [Re: Skellies] * 3
    #24029296 - 01/21/17 10:23 PM (7 years, 9 days ago)

Quote:

austothehun said:
Around 16% of the total federal budget was defense spending (in 2015) so I wouldn't call it a majority by any means. However, there is a lot of wasteful spending when it comes to private military contractors charging exorbitant rates. We could maintain our military power while reducing costs at the same time by actually negotiating prices with those we contract.




Your 16% number is correct, but misleading. In reality, defense accounts for 60% of discretionary spending. Mandatory spending doesn't really count because it's mandatory -- Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Discretionary spending is what all of our senators and representatives are fighting about when it comes to the budget. Now, the Republicans would like to make sweeping changes to nondiscretionary spending, but that will be tough.

So, sixty percent of everything we pay into the treasury for the operating budget is a lot. My proposal is to take a small percentage of that and spread it around. It would solve a lot of currently intractable problems and not reduce military capability very much if at all, conceivably.


--------------------
Vi Veri Universum Vivus Vici


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePrem. Kissoff
Tourist with a typewriter
Male
Registered: 11/09/16
Posts: 259
Re: Military spending [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #24030674 - 01/22/17 02:11 PM (7 years, 8 days ago)

well have to get off the bloated empire thing, salvaging/restoring earth isnt an optional endeavor, the bugs and worms dont care if we cut our own throats.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePrem. Kissoff
Tourist with a typewriter
Male
Registered: 11/09/16
Posts: 259
Re: Military spending [Re: Prem. Kissoff]
    #24030689 - 01/22/17 02:17 PM (7 years, 8 days ago)

not to mention our military is one of if not the single worst polluter on earth.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 4 months, 22 days
Re: Military spending [Re: DividedQuantum]
    #24030974 - 01/22/17 03:58 PM (7 years, 8 days ago)

Quote:

DividedQuantum said:
Quote:

austothehun said:
Around 16% of the total federal budget was defense spending (in 2015) so I wouldn't call it a majority by any means. However, there is a lot of wasteful spending when it comes to private military contractors charging exorbitant rates. We could maintain our military power while reducing costs at the same time by actually negotiating prices with those we contract.




Your 16% number is correct, but misleading. In reality, defense accounts for 60% of discretionary spending.

So, sixty percent of everything we pay into the treasury for the operating budget is a lot. My proposal is to take a small percentage of that and spread it around. It would solve a lot of currently intractable problems and not reduce military capability very much if at all, conceivably.



Exactly.

Plus we no longer have the kind of "wasteful spending when it comes to private military contractors charging exorbitant rates" that we used to have back in the 80's.  $500 hammers are a thing of the past that ended after Reagan/Bush.  I know because I used to buy things for the US Government, and costs went down SIGNIFICANTLY after the Acquisition Reform Act of 1995.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisible404
error
 User Gallery

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 14,539
Re: Military spending [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #24031053 - 01/22/17 04:27 PM (7 years, 8 days ago)

You know, the situation with congress and their pensions come to mind, where they keep ordering more abrams tanks when the army keeps telling them not to but they do it anyway because they get money from the MIC to do so. is stuff like that still happening?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLuddite
I watch Fox News
 User Gallery

Registered: 03/23/06
Posts: 2,946
Re: Military spending [Re: 404]
    #24031088 - 01/22/17 04:38 PM (7 years, 8 days ago)

I bought Raytheon stock a couple months ago.  Its up a lot now that Trump won the election.  I'm rich! I'm rich!



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 32,557
Loc: California, US Flag
Last seen: 4 months, 22 days
Re: Military spending [Re: 404]
    #24031090 - 01/22/17 04:38 PM (7 years, 8 days ago)

Unfortunately, yes.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLuddite
I watch Fox News
 User Gallery

Registered: 03/23/06
Posts: 2,946
Re: Military spending [Re: Luddite]
    #24031092 - 01/22/17 04:40 PM (7 years, 8 days ago)

I'm so proud to be an American!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleballsalsaMDiscord
Universally Loathed and Reviled
Male User Gallery


Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,876
Loc: Foreign Lands
Re: Military spending [Re: 404] * 2
    #24031106 - 01/22/17 04:44 PM (7 years, 8 days ago)

check out the F-35


--------------------


Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleballsalsaMDiscord
Universally Loathed and Reviled
Male User Gallery


Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,876
Loc: Foreign Lands
Re: Military spending [Re: ballsalsa] * 2
    #24031112 - 01/22/17 04:46 PM (7 years, 8 days ago)

I hope Enlil finishes up his trial soon.  This sub-forum could use an active mod


--------------------


Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLuddite
I watch Fox News
 User Gallery

Registered: 03/23/06
Posts: 2,946
Re: Military spending [Re: ballsalsa]
    #24031126 - 01/22/17 04:51 PM (7 years, 8 days ago)



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* the Military is a Special Interest Group
( 1 2 all )
DoctorJ 1,547 30 07/25/03 03:55 PM
by Azmodeus
* Question about Left and Right view on military... Cracka_X 899 18 10/10/03 08:37 AM
by automan
* Senior Democrat Renews Call for Military Draft
( 1 2 all )
Darkcloud 2,586 25 12/01/06 06:01 PM
by Catalysis
* Military Reform! nugsarenice 1,400 16 04/24/02 02:31 AM
by nugsarenice
* Is there good reason to spend $ on defense?
( 1 2 3 all )
enotake2 2,209 41 03/01/04 06:26 PM
by zappaisgod
* Bush to call for near Freeze in Spending.
( 1 2 all )
lonestar2004 1,129 23 02/03/05 09:47 PM
by FrankieJustTrypt
* We must re-purpose the military
( 1 2 all )
DoctorJ 1,228 21 05/23/06 01:09 PM
by Redstorm
* say hello to mil. spending and goodbye to free speach AhronZombi 750 15 06/24/04 10:32 PM
by AhronZombi

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
538 topic views. 2 members, 11 guests and 4 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.022 seconds spending 0.004 seconds on 14 queries.