|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
Phobos
Registered: 10/14/00
Posts: 435
|
SF / Bay Area ID — Found Today
#23959118 - 12/26/16 07:46 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
--
Edited by Phobos (12/28/16 02:52 PM)
|
Phobos
Registered: 10/14/00
Posts: 435
|
Re: SF / Bay Area ID [Re: Phobos]
#23959122 - 12/26/16 07:48 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Also: I think they're all the same, but does anyone see anything that's different hiding out anywhere? Are there any lookalikes to what I think it is?
|
MollyLucyMaryJane

Registered: 09/10/11
Posts: 1,302
|
Re: SF / Bay Area ID [Re: Phobos]
#23959148 - 12/26/16 07:59 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Its possible the red one is A.Muscaria but it is impossible to ID it reliably. The rest look like Psilocybe Allenii to me.
There are no blue staining lookalikes for Ps.Allenii. If they all stain blue they are good. Toss the A.Muscaria outside.
|
totallylike
Stranger

Registered: 12/26/16
Posts: 26
Last seen: 3 years, 10 months
|
|
The red definitely looks like muscaria
|
WhyDidiDoThis
Bay Area Mushroom Collector


Registered: 11/26/14
Posts: 3,338
Last seen: 6 years, 2 months
|
|
Definitely not Fly Agaric. Try Leatiromyceres.
|
shroomer1234567



Registered: 04/26/15
Posts: 329
|
Re: SF / Bay Area ID — Found Today [Re: Phobos]
#23959173 - 12/26/16 08:16 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Red ones definitely not amanita muscaria. If the rest bruise blue there active
|
shroomer1234567



Registered: 04/26/15
Posts: 329
|
Re: SF / Bay Area ID — Found Today [Re: Phobos]
#23959178 - 12/26/16 08:18 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Its crazy how close in tho photo P. Aleeni looks to a sun damaged NZ P. sub
|
NothingsChanged
Striving for Excellence


Registered: 05/28/11
Posts: 10,207
Loc: North/Western WA
|
|
Amanita? WTF? Whats up with the off the wall ID's lately? Trusted identifiers should be the only ones making identifications. I mean it's cool to learn but come on. Identifications need to be trusted! Strictly my opinion.
--------------------

|
WhyDidiDoThis
Bay Area Mushroom Collector


Registered: 11/26/14
Posts: 3,338
Last seen: 6 years, 2 months
|
|
Quote:
NothingsChanged said: Amanita? WTF? Whats up with the off the wall ID's lately? Trusted identifiers should be the only ones making identifications. I mean it's cool to learn but come on. Identifications need to be trusted! Strictly my opinion.
Quoted for truth
|
Byrain

Registered: 01/07/10
Posts: 9,664
|
|
Quote:
NothingsChanged said: Trusted identifiers should be the only ones making identifications.
No. There would be no TIs then.
|
MollyLucyMaryJane

Registered: 09/10/11
Posts: 1,302
|
|
Quote:
NothingsChanged said: Trusted identifiers should be the only ones making identifications. I mean it's cool to learn but come on.
Quote:
MollyLucyMaryJane said: Its possible the red one is A.Muscaria but it is impossible to ID it reliably.
Quote:
totallylike said: The red definitely looks like muscaria
Noone said it was Amanita. If someone said "that might be Muscaria but idk" would you eat it?
Besides I told him to toss it outside. If I dont know what something is or at least have a good feeling I dont even try to ID. Even when I do attempt to ID something I always say "I think" or "It might be"
Byrain is right. If noone ever came here and tried to ID mushrooms, there would be no MH&I forum. Stop letting the trusted identifier tag get to your head Nothingschanged. We are all only human and we are all capable of mistakes.
|
Byrain

Registered: 01/07/10
Posts: 9,664
|
Re: SF / Bay Area ID — Found Today [Re: Phobos]
#23959757 - 12/27/16 03:36 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Concerning the red mushroom, it looks weird and I'm not quite sure what it is. I'm not sure its Leratiomyces ceres with those white gills though.
|
MollyLucyMaryJane

Registered: 09/10/11
Posts: 1,302
|
Re: SF / Bay Area ID — Found Today [Re: Byrain]
#23959760 - 12/27/16 03:39 AM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Is it possible its Russula?
|
Byrain

Registered: 01/07/10
Posts: 9,664
|
|
Might be, its hard to tell if the texture / consistency is chalky or not.
|
Hammer92
THC

Registered: 09/27/13
Posts: 338
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
|
Re: SF / Bay Area ID — Found Today [Re: Byrain]
#23960790 - 12/27/16 03:18 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
NothingsChanged said: Trusted identifiers should be the only ones making identifications.
No. There would be no TIs then.
 Agreed
|
Phobos
Registered: 10/14/00
Posts: 435
|
Re: SF / Bay Area ID — Found Today [Re: Hammer92]
#23960984 - 12/27/16 05:04 PM (7 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Yeah, I mean, half the reason I even threw that in there is to see what responses would be to it so that I could more safely trust any identifiers according to their opinion. I certainly wanted to know what it was, but alas.
Edited by Phobos (12/27/16 05:44 PM)
|
|