Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >  [ show all ]
Offlinebloodsheen
ChemChaplin
Male User Gallery


Registered: 09/24/08
Posts: 7,659
Last seen: 4 years, 14 days
Re: MATH question [Re: trees]
    #23946871 - 12/21/16 06:05 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

It was fucking years ago that I put akira on ignore and on a practically monthly basis I'm glad. There are so many angry posts that are "re:akira_akuma"

Fuckin shitty poster


--------------------


A cautious young fellow named Lodge / Had seat belts installed in his Dodge. / When his date was strapped in / He committed a sin / Without even leaving the garage. That's clever, isn't it?-A boy and his dog


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleliloldmeFacebook
( ͝° ͜ʖ͡°)つ=D
Other User Gallery


Registered: 05/15/04
Posts: 5,087
Loc: Zone 8
Re: MATH question [Re: trees]
    #23946873 - 12/21/16 06:05 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

I find indirect fire much more satisfying that direct fire :awesanta:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: MATH question [Re: trees]
    #23946875 - 12/21/16 06:06 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

LOL and did you publish any in any journal? cause otherwise, that retarded shit doesn't count...some teacher, or student, claiming it's worthy of publication =/= not necessarily something that's worthy publication. worthy is a relative term but, the fact is, if you haven't published one, how would you know? you wouldn't. ta-da!

Quote:

bloodsheen said:
It was fucking years ago that I put akira on ignore and on a practically monthly basis I'm glad. There are so many angry posts that are "re:akira_akuma"

Fuckin shitty poster



good for you. oh man, great job, you've really made a good point. (PS: that's also funny as fuck that you felt the need to justify your nigging me. LOL)

blow-hards are hilarious to me.

trying to understand a language without knowing the words, as Wittgenstein might say, is like a trying to teach a dog cat. but you can't live with that standard. you need people to literally think like you (and take the same classes, remember things like you, find order of importance like you) in order to be respected. LOL


Edited by akira_akuma (12/21/16 06:31 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinebloodsheen
ChemChaplin
Male User Gallery


Registered: 09/24/08
Posts: 7,659
Last seen: 4 years, 14 days
Re: MATH question [Re: liloldme]
    #23946882 - 12/21/16 06:09 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

liloldme said:
I find indirect fire much more satisfying that direct fire :awesanta:




Fuck this graph, they went to all the effort of labeling shit and adding arrows but they didn't bother to create decent lines of fit. That green line looks like it was drawn by a 7 year old

However, I don't know what the fuck "angle of sight" is in relation to this graph. Is it firing at a target uphill?


--------------------


A cautious young fellow named Lodge / Had seat belts installed in his Dodge. / When his date was strapped in / He committed a sin / Without even leaving the garage. That's clever, isn't it?-A boy and his dog


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: MATH question [Re: bloodsheen]
    #23946887 - 12/21/16 06:10 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

you don't know? you must be a retard, i guess.

(i mean, how could you not know something you don't know?)


Edited by akira_akuma (12/21/16 06:30 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibletrees
 User Gallery

Registered: 02/08/09
Posts: 9,194
Re: MATH question [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23946889 - 12/21/16 06:11 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

akira_akuma said:
LOL and did you publish any in any journal? cause otherwise, that retarded shit doesn't count...some teacher, or student, claiming it's worthy of publication =/= not necessarily something that's worthy publication. worthy is a relative term but, the fact is, if you haven't published one, how would you know? you wouldn't. ta-da!




Actually my research was published for use by the next generation of students. Obviosuly you have created a fantasy for yourself where everyone is wrong except you no matter what, which you love so dearly


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: MATH question [Re: trees]
    #23946899 - 12/21/16 06:13 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

trees said:
Quote:

akira_akuma said:
LOL and did you publish any in any journal? cause otherwise, that retarded shit doesn't count...some teacher, or student, claiming it's worthy of publication =/= not necessarily something that's worthy publication. worthy is a relative term but, the fact is, if you haven't published one, how would you know? you wouldn't. ta-da!




Actually my research was published for use by the next generation of students. Obviosuly you have created a fantasy for yourself where everyone is wrong except you nonmatter what.



actually you missed the point

the point was (the point to be inferred, r-tard) that if you don't know something you can't know it. it wasn't that your life was to be invalidated by words. i never meant that.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBill_Oreilly
ANIMALS (the RAINBOW SERPENT)


Registered: 11/12/11
Posts: 26,370
Loc: Boston
Re: MATH question [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23946915 - 12/21/16 06:18 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

akira_akuma said:
would you all stfu and just help the guy. :bored:

why aren't you all in school for anthropology? or biology? or chemistry or physics? how about you all go and learn all those things you don't know, 'cause like DUHHH you don't know them!

(or do you only do so much for math? the most useless subject in logic, in existence. "hi guys, i need to answer an arbitrary question that any computer can compute, so let's just solve some arbitrary math questions...whoa fun!" applied math = useless. informal logic is literally the only effective use of math for a layman. blowwwww hhharrrrds)

it'll be more useful than math, considering computers can rip a math a teacher a new one, these days...not to mention any mathematician.

don't be such blow-hards.





I agree 100%


--------------------
Something there is mysteriously formed,
Existing before Heaven and Earth,
Silent, still, standing alone, unchanging,
All-pervading, unfailing,
I do not know its name; I call it tao.
If forced to give it a name, I call it
Great (ta). Being great, it flows out;
Flowing out means far-reaching;
Being far-reaching, it is said to return.


It's just a shot away..


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: MATH question [Re: Bill_Oreilly]
    #23946923 - 12/21/16 06:20 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

what do you think of this statement, Bill?

Quote:

LOL and did you publish any in any journal? cause otherwise(dot dot dot), that retarded shit doesn't count...some teacher, or student, claiming it's worthy of publication =/= not necessarily something that's worthy publication. worthy is a relative term but, the fact is, if you haven't published one, how would you know? you wouldn't. ta-da!




what is the point here?

PS: i'm gonna smoke a bowl and get a little dumber & a little smarter.


Edited by akira_akuma (12/21/16 06:26 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleliloldmeFacebook
( ͝° ͜ʖ͡°)つ=D
Other User Gallery


Registered: 05/15/04
Posts: 5,087
Loc: Zone 8
Re: MATH question [Re: bloodsheen]
    #23946945 - 12/21/16 06:26 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

bloodsheen said:
... I don't know what the fuck "angle of sight" is in relation to this graph. Is it firing at a target uphill?



In this case yes, the target's elevation is hiring that that of the firing position and is not visible. Once the variables such as you and your target's Azimuth/elevation, projectile of choice, weather conditions/temperature, angle of sight, obstructions and elevation requirements, you can then determine your angle of fire and propellant charge required to hit your target. Usually 3 rounds are then fired to "adjust for fire". We could usually hit a truck with a 96lb rocket assisted 155mm round around 18.5 miles away in under 3 shots


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: MATH question [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23946952 - 12/21/16 06:27 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

i never learned exponents in school, i quit school, like Bill Gates (WOOOO YA!), but when i learned the meaning of 'exponents' and how to infer from the symbols of computation that are given with exponents, i was like "well, i'll be...that's fuckin' easy.".

but i had to learn it first.

let's all go back to school and learn EVERYTHING. cause we need to, right?

right blow-hards? or no? you don't need to learn everything? then what does one NEED to learn, and for what occasions? oh of course no one will want to discuss this...it'll betray the blow-hardedness of the notion of having to know anything.  :japsmile:
Quote:

liloldme said:
Quote:

bloodsheen said:
... I don't know what the fuck "angle of sight" is in relation to this graph. Is it firing at a target uphill?



In this case yes, the target's elevation is hiring that that of the firing position and is not visible. Once the variables such as you and your target's Azimuth/elevation, projectile of choice, weather conditions/temperature, angle of sight, obstructions and elevation requirements, you can then determine your angle of fire and propellant charge required to hit your target. Usually 3 rounds are then fired to "adjust for fire". We could usually hit a truck with a 96lb rocket assisted 155mm round around 18.5 miles away in under 3 shots



dude you had to explain it to him...that's sad for bloodsheen. so sad.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: MATH question [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23946993 - 12/21/16 06:40 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

oh of course no one will want to discuss this...



of course not. wouldn't want to be proven wrong, right trees?

can't even infer a direct reference point from a statement of fact...boy, what an r-tard, go back to school and learn logic! :cookiemonster:


Quote:

LOL and did you publish any in any journal? cause otherwise(dot dot dot), that retarded shit doesn't count...some teacher, or student, claiming it's worthy of publication =/= not necessarily something that's worthy publication. worthy is a relative term but, the fact is, if you haven't published one, how would you know? you wouldn't. ta-da!




point =/= not that you published an article

point = that if you didn't publish one and have it received as worthy, you couldn't know if it was worthy, save by your own standards- which isn't the standard of the journal in which it would have been received.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDoctor Sponge
He's off on a tangent
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/03/12
Posts: 11,795
Loc: the desert
Re: MATH question [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23947019 - 12/21/16 06:45 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

thanks guys for the answer

i think thats neat to know a .357 is travelling @ 1000 mph

and most rifle bullets are twice as fast or faster

a 5.56 NATO round clocks in around 2900-3100 fps

im decent at realtively simple math in my head but i never made it far in real school or very far in algebra for that matter

i havent been in school for literally almost 20 years


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: MATH question [Re: Doctor Sponge]
    #23947029 - 12/21/16 06:48 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

it's ok. those people wasted a lot of their life going to school, and they feel really good about it. which is funny. i wonder what work they do that's going to be used 50 years down the line.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibletrees
 User Gallery

Registered: 02/08/09
Posts: 9,194
Re: MATH question [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23947047 - 12/21/16 06:55 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Meanwhile Akira-Kuma will be wasting away on the shroomery trying to justify his lack of knowledge and his dropping out of school. If it's all meaningless, why don't you die? What are you waiting for?


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: MATH question [Re: trees]
    #23947051 - 12/21/16 06:55 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

justify it? nah. explaining how you're blow-hards for jumping down the guys throat? infinitely hilarious and worthwhile.

still haven't addressed how i've proven you wrong about your (failure to) infer from logical statements.



Quote:

f it's all meaningless, why don't you die? What are you waiting for?




you equate going to school as life. LOL


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibletrees
 User Gallery

Registered: 02/08/09
Posts: 9,194
Re: MATH question [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23947062 - 12/21/16 06:58 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Hilarious to you only though. Ever notice how you're always alone in your pseudo justifications?


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: MATH question [Re: trees]
    #23947067 - 12/21/16 06:59 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

nope.

you gonna establish an inference from this or what?


Quote:

LOL and did you publish any in any journal? cause otherwise(dot dot dot), that retarded shit doesn't count...some teacher, or student, claiming it's worthy of publication =/= not necessarily something that's worthy publication. worthy is a relative term but, the fact is, if you haven't published one, how would you know? you wouldn't. ta-da!




still no response? no retort that actually addresses what i'm saying here^?

no? probably not. because you'd have to explain how you could be so illogical.

and i've never felt the need to justify myself in anything. i already stated that i suck at math, and that it's reasonable to do so, and how that is so- i never said it's justified to not know math. that's your derped assumption. in fact, i only stated how interesting it is as a subject.

but i can still call you some who is full of himself...aka, the term Blow-Hard seems to suffice.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibletrees
 User Gallery

Registered: 02/08/09
Posts: 9,194
Re: MATH question [Re: akira_akuma]
    #23947073 - 12/21/16 07:00 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

Yea, no response to that. Lmao. You remind me of a cranky and tired child.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineakira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: MATH question [Re: trees]
    #23947078 - 12/21/16 07:01 PM (7 years, 1 month ago)

you're the one that keeps making assumptions about people. :shrug: i'm just being the adult here and throwing that back in your face. LOL


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* algebra question Grav 1,251 12 11/12/03 03:56 AM
by Annom
* Fun with maths! Krishna 715 5 04/25/04 10:11 AM
by phi1618
* Very OT: Strange question about fire damage and photos... GernBlanston 1,124 4 01/05/04 03:04 PM
by GernBlanston
* -A rather pressing question-
( 1 2 all )
igore 3,906 21 07/31/03 09:19 PM
by Fungushungry
* a few questions about the family :) Vulture 2,112 10 09/01/03 09:47 PM
by Vulture
* Plz help with a .SHN/.WAV related question.. Lightningfractal 1,083 6 01/02/04 09:32 PM
by Lightningfractal
* piercing question ImYourSpedFriend 773 3 12/22/03 02:33 AM
by blackroselove
* question...
( 1 2 all )
ZenBhikku 4,359 22 08/22/03 12:16 AM
by ThEGrEaTBeLoW

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
897 topic views. 6 members, 84 guests and 86 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.028 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 15 queries.