|
Masked
The Nutter


Registered: 11/26/12
Posts: 8,979
Loc: Canada
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936453 - 12/17/16 08:32 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
i'll tell you when something is Bullshit
As will I. You mooching off mom and dad and not even working, as you potentially near 30, is Bullshit. Plain Bullshit.
Furthermore, you claiming Bullshit to my opinion you need x, y and z to have your life together, while simultaneously whining about how subjective this all is, is beyond hypocritical and absurd...or rather...BULLSHIT
P.s. Quote:
perhaps through government assistance
Glad to know I have my life together enough to contribute to you. 
P.s.s you mentioned your adhd more than once. You mentioned it enough to make it clear it was just more defensive ammo for why you don't have your life together and like it that way.
You don't have your life together.
Now, you can counter me with the same statement. You may feel I don't meet your criteria for what it means to have my life together. Or perhaps the whole idea of the question offends your hippy bum status and you won't try to make criteria. Either one is fine.
But at this time I think it's best to agree to disagree as you already said.
-------------------- .
Edited by Masked (12/17/16 08:39 PM)
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936463 - 12/17/16 08:36 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
have you all not caught glimpse of my giant cheesehead?

behold.
see, that's me, super cheese maître d'.
since most of this discussion has been cheesed, i'll admit, that it's given a lot to sink into my subconscious.
|
Crystal G



Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 8 months, 6 days
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936490 - 12/17/16 08:45 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said: no it is not a literal one, it's a bullshit one. "having your life together" is a nonsense statement, one that only carries connotations of "having your life fulfilled" "having your life full" "having your life complete" "having your life good" "having your life productive" ect ect ect
I have to admit though, if I had a child who was in their 30's and still living with me and had no intention or hopes of ever leaving, I would be very unhappy and think their life was not together at all. I would think that I failed them as a parent somehow.
I mean it's one thing if your child has a disability and isn't able to work. That's a perfectly valid excuse then, to stay with your parents and remain unemployed.
Or if they're only temporarily out of work, that's fine too. I'd have no problem hosting them and letting them stay in the house for a while. But if 6 months to 1 year passes and they are still not looking for a job or even trying, I'd legitimately wonder what is wrong with them and if they're simply lazy.
I had a friend who moved back in with his parents at age 35, but the reason is because he just went through a divorce and was very crushed and lonely. That's a legitimate reason to stay with your parents. But he only stayed there for 2 years, and eventually moved back out.
If you ended up having a baby and you're a single parent, then okay you can stay for several years. That's a valid excuse. But even then, I would still push my kids to start looking for work once the kid reaches around the age of 2. Part-time work is fine in this instance.
If you're trying to start a business and you're saving up for a mortgage and therefore can't move out, then okay that's also a valid excuse. Etc. etc.
You have to have a valid reason for not working and living with your parents. Simply saying "I hate working, I don't like it," that wouldn't be a good enough reason to stay in my home and live off me. That's the sort of thing that would really bother me. I would request that you spend time volunteering for a noble cause at least, until you are able to find paid work.
Edited by Crystal G (12/17/16 08:54 PM)
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936494 - 12/17/16 08:46 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
As will I. You mooching off mom and dad and not even working, as you potentially near 30, is Bullshit. Plain Bullshit.
i'm not mooching. mooching is when you overstay your welcome, rifle through fridges and overeat what isn't yours, and/or, for the most part, when you ask for something for free.
this is my home. you don't seem to comprehend that my parents are fine with me here. this isn't America. i knew a guy who worked at where his dad worked his whole life, elevators, and he still lived with his parents when i met, and then years later, till i moved, still, and then he did something different...he helped his mom buy a new home. sure he could afford to pay rent. but that's besides the point i'm making now.
living with your parents isn't mooching, if they don't consider you a moocher- i never asked for anything.
Quote:
P.s. you mentioned your adhd more than once. You mentioned it enough to make it clear it was just more defensive ammo for why you don't have your life together and like it that way.
actually this is where you're just being a rancid asshole. do a search 'akira_akuma' 'ADHD'. see how often it comes up. i mentioned it here because i felt it was a good explanation, and it's also been on my mind more recently.
you're just assuming things again.
Quote:
You don't have your life together.
that statement makes no sense, so i don't care what you thin it entails for me to hear it.
but i will say that i am able.
Quote:
Now, you can counter me with the same statement.
this isn't a game now.
Quote:
You may feel I don't meet your criteria for what it means to have my life together. Or perhaps the whole idea of the question offends your hippy bum status and you won't try to make criteria. Either one is fine.
having your life "together" doesn't mean anything, that's why it doesn't matter what i pick in your criteria.
whatever you're able to do is what you should do.
if you're a boring individual, well, that can't be helped.
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936522 - 12/17/16 08:56 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
have you all not caught glimpse of my giant cheesehead?

behold.
see, that's me, super cheese maître d'.
since most of this discussion has been cheesed, i'll admit, that it's given a lot to sink into my subconscious.
Quote:
I have to admit though, if I had a child who was in their 30's and still living with me and had no intention or hopes of ever leaving, I would be very unhappy and think their life was not together at all. I would think that I failed them as a parent somehow
that's on you.
Quote:
I mean it's one thing if your child has a disability and isn't able to work. That's a perfectly valid excuse then, to stay with your parents and remain unemployed.
here's where i'd you know, but only mentioning that cause schmendrick over there trying to call me out on something he finds derogatory, my admitting to what disability i have that i've never really mentioned before, ever, and then saying i'm using it as an excuse or some shit, even though it was just used in an explanation (j/k bout the dick part, but really, it sucks that i have to explain this too, i wish i never mentioned it. i don't use any disability as a crutch, in fact, i think of it more like a positive thing, more than anything).
Quote:
Or if they're only temporarily out of work, that's fine too. I'd have no problem hosting them and letting them stay in the house for a while. But if 6 months to 1 year passes and they are still not looking for a job or even trying, I'd legitimately wonder what is wrong with them and if they're simply lazy.
so this whole world view is constructed around your fears/hang-ups about laziness.
well, you seem to think about it way too much, if i'm gonna be honest. same with Masked.
Quote:
I had a friend who moved back in with his parents at age 35, but the reason is because he just went through a divorce and was very crushed and lonely. That's a legitimate reason to stay with your parents. But he only stayed there for 2 years, and eventually moved back out.
35 and divorced. yikes.
thankfully i'm not him. but that does suck though, don't get me wrong. it's legitimate that if he was once married, he should be able to limit his stay at his parents. catch my drift?
Quote:
If you ended up having a baby and you're a single parent, then okay you can stay for several years. That's a valid excuse. But even then, I would still push my kids to start looking for work once the kid reaches around the age of 2. Part-time work is fine in this instance.
meh, maybe you think about this stuff too much, if that's the case though, you did come up with some good ideas. i just so happen to agree with you here. save the reasoning. i would push for my kids to look for work...i'd probably be alot more concerned with their education than my parents were, that's for sure too. but i wouldn't insist that they limit themselves to a shitty part-time job (or even a decent one) just to satisfy my whim that they "must work at a job". they can do chores, and/or commit to more work. either or is fine.
the education is fucked, and it fucked you up along with everyone else here (can't you see that, it's prevalently obvious in this thread); all your friends from highschool are dead.
..... metaphorically speaking of course, not literally.
Quote:
You have to have a valid reason for not working and living with your parents. Simply saying "I hate working, I don't like it," that wouldn't be a good enough reason to stay in my home and live off me. That's the sort of thing that would really bother me. I would request that you spend time volunteering for a noble cause at least, until you are able to find paid work.
i've thought of volunteering...i still might get involved with some church missionary services. but i've also considered the military. though i'm not really into war as a matter of destruction- and there's nothing doin' in the cause of creation in the military as of right now.
but i have my own noble cause. so really, i still think you're mistaken.
you're trying to live through your kids; not provide for them (though admittedly there's a trade-off. tit-for-tat is a certainly applicable 'rule of thumb'. children naturally want to please their parents anyway.) but society made you think this way. it's ok. don't worry about it. it's not a big deal; that is to say, you'll still provide for them, is what i'm saying.
Edited by akira_akuma (12/17/16 09:04 PM)
|
Masked
The Nutter


Registered: 11/26/12
Posts: 8,979
Loc: Canada
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936589 - 12/17/16 09:24 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
No...you aren't even using the simplest of words properly now.

Number 1 sums you up nicely. Does this make you an unfulfilled or lesser person? Not necessarily. It seems you are content doing what you do.
Doesn't change the fact you are a mooch. I don't care if you do the dishes (not when mom asks you but when you feel like it of course) or whatever. Your perceived "help" isn't money.
I'm not trying to put a negative connotation on mooch necessarily.
But as far as my subjective opinion goes...a grown man who lives at home and mooches off his parents, doesn't have a job, and plans to live off government assistance should something go wrong(again, glad me and the other tax payers can contribute to your bummery)...a man like that does not have his life together.
Thats my opinion. Think it shit all you like. I share the same sentiments about your opinion.
So...agree to disagree?
Oh so now adhd is a disability? First you claim you weren't using it as an excuse but now it almost seems like you are pulling the disability card in a passive way. Am I perceiving this wrong?
Adhd hasn't stopped me
-------------------- .
Edited by Masked (12/17/16 09:29 PM)
|
Crystal G



Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 19,584
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 8 months, 6 days
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma] 1
#23936608 - 12/17/16 09:33 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
akira_akuma said: here's where i'd you know, but only mentioning that cause schmendrick over there trying to call me out on something he finds derogatory, my admitting to what disability i have that i've never really mentioned before, ever, and then saying i'm using it as an excuse or some shit, even though it was just used in an explanation (j/k bout the dick part, but really, it sucks that i have to explain this too, i wish i never mentioned it. i don't use any disability as a crutch, in fact, i think of it more like a positive thing, more than anything).
Sorry but I don't consider ADHD a real disability. Plenty of people who have been diagnosed with ADHD are perfectly fine functioning adults.
When I say a disability that would prevent them from working, I'm talking about the type of epilepsy that causes them to have 11 seizures a day. I'm talking about severe autism or mental retardation, those kinds of disabilities.
Quote:
so this whole world view is constructed around your fears/hang-ups about laziness.
well, you seem to think about it way too much, if i'm gonna be honest. same with Masked.
It's not our "whole world view," it's about raising kids that are self-sufficient and have a good work ethic.
Quote:
meh, maybe you think about this stuff too much, if that's the case though, you did come up with some good ideas. i just so happen to agree with you here. save the reasoning. i would push for my kids to look for work...i'd probably be alot more concerned with their education than my parents were, that's for sure too. but i wouldn't insist that they limit themselves to a shitty part-time job (or even a decent one) just to satisfy my whim that they "must work at a job". they can do chores, and/or commit to more work. either or is fine.
I would frankly assume that they are already doing chores if they are living with their parents. If you're living in the house and not working AND not doing any chores, then you're the absolute worst and you are a bum.
A part-time job is a good start, because in a couple of years their child will soon be going to school. School is typically from 9am to 3pm, that's basically 6 whole hours that you're going to be free.
Really, you think a part-time job is too much to ask from a single parent? Who do you think is paying for that kid, for all its clothes and food and everything? It's fine to get help for a while, maybe even for a couple years, but eventually you have to start being financially responsible for your kid. Because until then, it's the grandparents that are going to be paying for everything. So you're basically going to be burdening somebody else, because that financial duty has to fall on somebody else's shoulders, simply because you don't feel like working?
I find it alarming and extremely self-entitled, your worldviews.
Quote:
i've thought of volunteering...i still might get involved with some church missionary services. but i've also considered the military. though i'm not really into war as a matter of destruction- and there's nothing doin' in the cause of creation in the military as of right now.
Do it. Don't just talk about it. Do it. There's literally nothing stopping you.
And guess what, if you get involved with the missionary, they will pay for your room and board and food and everything. Same with the military.
Quote:
but i have my own noble cause. so really, i still think you're mistaken.
By noble cause, you mean you're just living, just like everybody else. Unless you're out there helping the homeless or giving your time tutoring underprivileged children or something, I wouldn't say anything you do is particularly noble.
Quote:
you're trying to live through your kids; not provide for them (though admittedly there's a trade-off. tit-for-tat is a certainly applicable 'rule of thumb'. children naturally want to please their parents anyway.) but society made you think this way. it's ok. don't worry about it. it's not a big deal; that is to say, you'll still provide for them, is what i'm saying.
Yeah, because clearly we're just not enlightened or conscientious enough to think your way, right?
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: Masked]
#23936611 - 12/17/16 09:33 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
i didn't figure it was a more "North American" phrase. yeah, i guess that makes sense they'd make some so arbitrary so relevant. hey, what's this on the ground. oops i'm a moocher.
yeah i guess giving a fuck about family unless you're ready to launch them like missiles is a more American type thing- this is why we should just combine our two countries already.
Quote:
Does this make you an unfulfilled or lesser person? Not necessarily. It seems you are content doing what you do
there's those ethics i was talkin' about. yeah you're full of shit. i'm doing just fine, and am fulfilled most of the time. 
Quote:
I'm not trying to put a negative connotation on mooch necessarily.
oh but you are. but that's ok, since we're clear on that. i think i've already proven how mooch is a dumb fuckin' word anyway.
Quote:
But as far as my subjective opinion goes...a grown man who lives at home and mooches off his parents, doesn't have a job, and plans to live off government assistance should something go wrong(again, glad me and the other tax payers can contribute to your bummery)...a man like that does not have his life together.
you don't contribute to me at all, sycophant (and i call you sycophant not cause you're talking to me); you've never given me anything, and i don't mean that in any sort of emotional way (this is where i posit the emotional draw, because like fuck it, it's just cool), just a purely tenable, erm, i use your roads...to walk on the sidewalk. i don't even use public transportation, i prefer walking. i used to say fuck cars, but then i guess we have too many people driving everywhere (lazy tch tch tch) and then there's only so much time, you wouldn't like that 9-5 with no car.
and i'm not on government assistance, but if i was starting out at McDonalds i'd probably have to sign up for their godddamn welfare program until i could manage to find a second job.
Quote:
Thats my opinion. Think it shit all you like. I share the same sentiments about your opinion
keep telling yourself that if it helps you dream at night. 
Quote:
So...agree to disagree?
we can agree at least one thing; it's fun.
|
moonrockmushy
High on Spite



Registered: 07/01/05
Posts: 19,067
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936624 - 12/17/16 09:41 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
omg so many tldr posts in a row. I judge people based on how many shrooms they have on the shroomery rating system. I only like people who have 5 shrooms. Four is not enough in my opinion.
Stop trying to be my friend akira 
jk love ya bro
|
Masked
The Nutter


Registered: 11/26/12
Posts: 8,979
Loc: Canada
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936634 - 12/17/16 09:46 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
1. Notice the "should" in the sentence "should something go wrong" (you exclaimed to crystal that you would get some government assistance if your parents got ill or such). So your entire response to my "should", was based on the erroneous idea I said you "are". Hence, more Bullshit from akira
2.i don't really feel that mooching off your parents is "caring" for them
3. "Oh but you are" (putting a negative connotation on the word mooch). Wrong again. What was that emoticon you used? Seems fitting here. :jimmiesrustled:
4. Being told by a grown man who doesnt work and lives and mooches off mom and dad, that my opinion(that having a job and supporting kids and others, buying my own food, utilities, etc, is what constitutes having your life together), is Bullshit...is fun? Sure. If you say so
-------------------- .
|
moonrockmushy
High on Spite



Registered: 07/01/05
Posts: 19,067
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: Masked]
#23936642 - 12/17/16 09:48 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
I like akira better than you but you're the least tldr poster here so I'm going to have to side with you I guess.
|
Masked
The Nutter


Registered: 11/26/12
Posts: 8,979
Loc: Canada
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: moonrockmushy]
#23936647 - 12/17/16 09:50 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
-------------------- .
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936652 - 12/17/16 09:51 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sorry but I don't consider ADHD a real disability. Plenty of people who have been diagnosed with ADHD are perfectly fine functioning adults.
great, so i have to type more bullshit to explain how you're full of shit?
it is a real disability. but like i said i don't use it as a crutch or anything. do you fathom what these words mean, or do i have to explain some more? you see, thing is i am a perfectly function adult. but that doesn't mean ADHD isn't real; i mean...look, you're reality is real. so how good that worked? it's cause it didn't work at all. so would you look at that...there is omre of those ethics we were discussing.
Quote:
It's not our "whole world view," it's about raising kids that are self-sufficient and have a good work ethic.
and i would do the same. you seem to presume a lot.
Quote:
I would frankly assume that they are already doing chores if they are living with their parents. If they're living in the house and not working AND not doing any chores, then you're the absolute worst and you are a bum.
nice ethics lecture. can i go now?
you'er frankly assuming a lot of shit, and i mean, i thought you were paying attention earlier about this stuff.
Quote:
A part-time job is a good start, because in a couple of years their child will soon be going to school. School is typically from 9am to 3pm, that's basically 6 whole hours that you're going to be free.
finally, yes, that's right. indeed, you gotta sort grade yourself on a curve for awhile, but then you pick up on the top of the bell.
i can agree with you when you aren't just making massive presumptions in text about my life (even things we've covered already like chores...i mean, shit, you're basically treating me like i'm a child, right over the internet. lies are fun, but this is fun too, i'm ready to just light up and enjoy some excellent music...it's funny, i have a lot of time on my hands -- you're right, it'd be nice to get that job to fill the time- too bad there ain't no good jobs. but thanks for your concerns anyway, i really just thought i'd expand on this quote a little bit though, just cause there wasn't much really to say about it, and contrast is important in making an argument. i guess this is what i'm doing now, since my ethics are being called into question.
Quote:
Really, you think a part-time job is too much to ask from a single parent? Who do you think is paying for that kid, for all its clothes and food and everything? It's fine to get help for a while, maybe even for a couple years, but eventually you have to start being financially responsible for your kid. Because until then, it's the grandparents that are going to be paying for everything.
I find it alarming and even self-entitled, your worldviews.
this one is nice and simple; um, you obviously didn't read what i said.
not enough motivation for tendency, and too much attendance to motivation, is not the best method to teach. you seem to be presuming so much about me. it's hilarious.
Quote:
Do it. Don't just talk about it. Do it. There's literally nothing stopping you.
And guess what, if you get involved with the missionary, they will pay for your room and board and food and everything. Same with the military.
meh, i might. just do it is an apt analogy to what i might do. the military is out of the option right now though, unless of course there is a call to war, then i'd go.
Quote:
By noble cause, you mean you're just living, just like everybody else. Unless you're out there helping the homeless or giving your time tutoring underprivileged children or something, I wouldn't say anything you do is particularly noble.
no, my noble cause is to create a life, not just live. but my motivations are probably very different than yours, at least, they probably were, and thus, even if they are more in-line with my own now, then before, i'm obviously still not there yet. but i've been thinking about changing the scenario a bit, thing is, i'm working on it now. i don't know, still kind of presumptive. you keep mentioning like helping people. i help people who need help. oh but it needs to be random people? i've helped random people before, of given them money. in fact, my step-dad is really kindly, so my friends actually was given money for school, at one point.
altruism works, clearly, but it's not always rational, that's for sure, or sensible.

didn't i say this was all about ethics?
Quote:
Yeah, because clearly we're just not enlightened or conscientious enough to think your way, right? 
*should i randomly laugh or just say no*
no. you see things in a different perspective than myself.
we all do, but i'm pretty sure that when you have kids, if you don't already, then you'll put yourself before them, always, until you learn not to.
unless you are enlightened. there are some enlightened moms, i don't mean to presume on you, but since we are making presumptions...you're be overly conscientious in the worst ways, given your track record.
Edited by akira_akuma (12/17/16 10:13 PM)
|
Konyap

Registered: 06/30/07
Posts: 33,945
Loc: Planet Piss
Last seen: 4 years, 2 months
|
Re: How would you define someone who [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936684 - 12/17/16 10:03 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
i had a full time job and all of my money went towards useless shit, which is why I quit I'd rather be at home then watching my daylight hours go by a part time job is such a non thing it's like showing up to work and then going home with no money, you can't even buy useless shit with a part time job
Edited by Konyap (12/17/16 10:04 PM)
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936688 - 12/17/16 10:04 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
1. Notice the "should" in the sentence "should something go wrong" (you exclaimed to crystal that you would get some government assistance if your parents got ill or such). So your entire response to my "should", was based on the erroneous idea I said you "are". Hence, more Bullshit from akira
lol, i recognize that, i was making a point. logic chopping isn't to going to help make a case that you have a valid point.
Quote:
2.i don't really feel that mooching off your parents is "caring" for them
i care about myself. i worry about them, and care that they happy of course, but that's different. they seem happy. you don't know how ridiculous they are, and i mean that in the best way possible. my mom is a bit of a B, though; but she like had God put in to her, so yeah, and she's a mercurial mother and shit, so it makes sense, taskmaster but helpful and automatically willing to be obliging. a strange combination. (obviously, i've just proffering a narrative here) oh yeah but whatever dude, i don't know you you're not my real dad.
Quote:
3. "Oh but you are" (putting a negative connotation on the word mooch). Wrong again. What was that emoticon you used? Seems fitting here. :jimmiesrustled:
"Does this make you an unfulfilled or lesser person? Not necessarily...It seems you are content doing what you do"-- "I'm not trying to put a negative connotation on mooch necessarily."

don't tell me that wasn't intentional...alright, but it seems like you're putting a negative connection every which way about how i conduct myself in every other post...so...am i to take it that you were being nice here? just condescendingly nice.
Quote:
4. Being told by a grown man who doesnt work and lives and mooches off mom and dad, that my opinion(that having a job and supporting kids and others, buying my own food, utilities, etc, is what constitutes having your life together), is Bullshit...is fun? Sure. If you say so 
it's fun for me. i'm able to expose you for being truly full of poop, internally. i never said what you do is bullshit. i said the statement "How would you define someone who 'has their life together'?" is nonsense and bullshit and doesn't make any goddamn sense.
Quote:
Konyap said: i had a full time job and all of my money went towards useless shit, which is why I quit I'd rather be at home then watching my daylight hours go by a part time job is such a non thing it's like showing up to work and then going home with no money, you can't even buy useless shit with a part time job
i can get by rather easily without buying useless shit.
|
Masked
The Nutter


Registered: 11/26/12
Posts: 8,979
Loc: Canada
|
Re: How would you define someone who [Re: Konyap]
#23936691 - 12/17/16 10:05 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
How do you afford the Internet you are using right now and the light to see? How do you afford your necessities and luxuries?
-------------------- .
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
Re: How would you define someone who [Re: Masked]
#23936697 - 12/17/16 10:07 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Masked said: How do you afford the Internet you are using right now and the light to see? How do you afford your necessities and luxuries?
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/23936381/gonew/1#UNREAD
|
Masked
The Nutter


Registered: 11/26/12
Posts: 8,979
Loc: Canada
|
Re: How would you define someone who "has their life together"? [Re: akira_akuma]
#23936715 - 12/17/16 10:12 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
So...
1. You admit to being full of shit...again. great! 
2. You care about yourself. That much is obvious
3. Necessarily...meaning, I figured your ruffled feathers probably perceive it as negative. I don't intend it to be.
4. The only thing you have "exposed" is that A. You are grown man...jobless and live at home and contribute limited household help on your own time...and B. You feel emotionally, spiritually and/or intellectual superior for being said mooch. And C. You are defensive about your ADHD...
In essence...all you have exposed is just how full of shit you are in fact.
Get your life together.
-------------------- .
|
Masked
The Nutter


Registered: 11/26/12
Posts: 8,979
Loc: Canada
|
Re: How would you define someone who [Re: Repertoire89]
#23936721 - 12/17/16 10:12 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Lol!
-------------------- .
|
Repertoire89
Cat



Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 21,773
|
Re: How would you define someone who [Re: Masked]
#23936740 - 12/17/16 10:19 PM (7 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Chef Konyap works on call
|
|